Characterizing the Access of Cholinergic Antagonists to Efferent Synapses in the Inner Ear.

Stimulation of cholinergic efferent neurons innervating the inner ear has profound, well-characterized effects on vestibular and auditory physiology, after activating distinct ACh receptors (AChRs) on afferents and hair cells in peripheral endorgans. Efferent-mediated fast and slow excitation of vestibular afferents are mediated by α4ß2*-containing nicotinic AChRs (nAChRs) and muscarinic AChRs (mAChRs), respectively. On the auditory side, efferent-mediated suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) is mediated by α9α10nAChRs. Previous characterization of these synaptic mechanisms utilized cholinergic drugs, that when systemically administered, also reach the CNS, which may limit their utility in probing efferent function without also considering central effects. Use of peripherally-acting cholinergic drugs with local application strategies may be useful, but this approach has remained relatively unexplored. Using multiple administration routes, we performed a combination of vestibular afferent and DPOAE recordings during efferent stimulation in mouse and turtle to determine whether charged mAChR or α9α10nAChR antagonists, with little CNS entry, can still engage efferent synaptic targets in the inner ear. The charged mAChR antagonists glycopyrrolate and methscopolamine blocked efferent-mediated slow excitation of mouse vestibular afferents following intraperitoneal, middle ear, or direct perilymphatic administration. Both mAChR antagonists were effective when delivered to the middle ear, contralateral to the side of afferent recordings, suggesting they gain vascular access after first entering the perilymphatic compartment. In contrast, charged α9α10nAChR antagonists blocked efferent-mediated suppression of DPOAEs only upon direct perilymphatic application, but failed to reach efferent synapses when systemically administered. These data show that efferent mechanisms are viable targets for further characterizing drug access in the inner ear.

Pinprick hypo- and hyperalgesia in diabetic rats: Can diet content affect experimental outcome?

Existing literature concerning the effect of experimentally-induced diabetes on pain thresholds in rodent models remains controversial. In this work, we describe a phenotypical switch from streptozotocin-induced pinprick hypoalgesia to hyperalgesia observed in the same laboratory, in the same strain of rats, obtained from the same vendor, and measured by the same technique carried out by the investigators. This switch was observed around January 2015, at the time when there was a change in the diet of rats at the Radley North Carolina Charles River facility. These data support the contention that diet may significantly modify disease progression, including progression of signs of diabetic neuropathy.

Preclinical assessment of utility of M6S for multimodal acute and chronic pain treatment in diabetic neuropathy.

AIMS: Previous reports from our laboratory have established that morphine-6-O-sulfate (M6S) is a mixed µ/δ opioid receptor (OR) agonist and a potential improved alternative to morphine for treatment of chronic multimodal pain in non-diabetic rats. This study extends the antinociceptive effects of M6S and morphine in STZ-induced diabetic rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects of morphine and M6S were studied across a range of pain modalities, using hot plate threshold (HPT), pinprick sensitivity threshold (PST) and paw pressure threshold (PPT) tests. KEY FINDINGS: Acutely, M6S was 3- to 5-fold more potent and 2- to 3-fold more efficacious than morphine in HPT and PST tests. No differences in analgesic drug potency/efficacy were detected in the PPT test. After 7-9days of chronic treatment, tolerance developed to the antinociceptive effects of morphine, but not to M6S, in all three pain tests. Furthermore, morphine-tolerant rats were not cross-tolerant to M6S. The selective δ-OR antagonist, naltrindole, blocked M6S-induced antinociception by 62±3% in the HPT test, 93±5% in the PST test, and 30±17% in the PPT test when examined acutely. SIGNIFICANCE: These studies provide additional confirmation for the mixed µ/δ activity of M6S and demonstrate potential improved clinical utility for dual µ/δ agonists relative to morphine in treatment of diabetic neuropathy across multiple pain domains.

Evaluation of Analgesia, Tolerance, and the Mechanism of Action of Morphine-6-O-Sulfate Across Multiple Pain Modalities in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

BACKGROUND: Morphine-6-O-sulfate (M6S) is a mixed µ/δ-opioid receptor (OR) agonist and potential alternative to morphine for treatment of chronic multimodal pain. METHODS: To provide more support for this hypothesis, the antinociceptive effects of M6S and morphine were compared in tests that access a range of pain modalities, including hot plate threshold (HPT), pinprick sensitivity threshold (PST) and paw pressure threshold tests. RESULTS: Acutely, M6S was 2- to 3-fold more potent than morphine in HPT and PST tests, specifically, derived from best-fit analysis of dose-response relationships of morphine/M6S half-effective dose (ED50) ratios (lower, upper 95% confidence interval [CI]) were 2.8 (2.0-5.8) in HPT and 2.2 (2.1, 2.4) in PST tests. No differences in analgesic drug potencies were detected in the PPT test (morphine/M6S ED50 ratio 1.2 (95% CI, 0.8-1.4). After 7 to 9 days of chronic treatment, tolerance developed to the antinociceptive effects of morphine, but not to M6S, in all 3 pain tests. Morphine-tolerant rats were not crosstolerant to M6S. The antinociceptive effects of M6S were not sensitive to κ-OR antagonists. However, the δ-OR antagonist, naltrindole, blocked M6S-induced antinociception by 55% ± 4% (95% CI, 39-75) in the HPT test, 94% ± 4% (95% CI, 84-105) in the PST test, and 5% ± 17% (95% CI, -47 to 59) or 51% ± 14% (95% CI, 14-84; 6 rats per each group) in the paw pressure threshold test when examined acutely or after 7 days of chronic treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Activity via δ-ORs thus appears to be an important determinant of M6S action. M6S also exhibited favorable antinociceptive and tolerance profiles compared with morphine in 3 different antinociceptive assays, indicating that M6S may serve as a useful alternative for rotation in morphine-tolerant subjects.