Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are expressed in the mouse urinary bladder and their activation modulates afferent bladder activity.

Pharmacological studies have indirectly shown the possible presence of cannabinoid receptors in the urinary bladder and their potential role in reducing bladder inflammatory pain. However, the localization of cannabinoid receptors in the urinary bladder remains unknown and there are no published data on the effects of cannabinoids on the sensory system of the bladder. The present study was performed to evaluate the expression of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in the mouse urinary bladder and to assess their co-localization with the purinergic P2X(3) receptor, a major player in the transduction of sensory events in the bladder. Also, the effect of intravesical administration of a cannabinoid agonist on the electrical activity of bladder afferent fibers was studied. The expression of mRNA coding for CB(1) receptor was assessed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Immunofluorescence experiments were performed to study CB(1) and P2X(3) protein expression in the bladder. The electrical activity of bladder afferent fibers was recorded using an ex vivo bladder-nerve preparation. Mechanical stimulation of the bladder was performed by a controlled slow inflation with an external pump. A bolus of a cannabinoid agonist (AZ12646915) was administered intravesically prior to a second inflation. Afferent activity was measured before and after administration of the cannabinoid compound or its vehicle. The effects of CB(1) receptor antagonist (AM251) on the AZ12646915 response were also analyzed. Cannabinoid receptor CB(1) mRNA was detected in the urinary bladder of the mouse. The protein was found in the urothelium, as well as in nerve fibers. CB(1) and P2X(3) receptors were found to be co-expressed in urothelial cells and in some nerve fibers. In addition, intravesical administration of a cannabinoid receptor agonist reduced the mechanically-evoked activity of bladder afferents in the pelvic nerve. This effect was abolished by the previous administration of the CB(1) antagonist AM251. These data demonstrate the presence of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor mRNA and the protein in the mouse urinary bladder. CB(1) and P2X(3) protein co-localization supports the hypothesis of an interaction between the cannabinoid and the purinergic systems in the transduction of sensory information in the urinary bladder. Finally, the reduction of nerve activity induced by cannabinoid-receptor activation implicates CB(1) receptors in the peripheral modulation of bladder afferent information.

Antinociceptive effects of tetrodotoxin (TTX) in rodents.

BACKGROUND: Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is a powerful sodium channel blocker extracted from the puffer fish. The analgesic effects of TTX were investigated in different animal pain models. METHODS: Wistar rats were submitted to the formalin test and to partial ligation of the sciatic nerve (Seltzer's model). Swiss Webster mice were used in the writhing test. Rodents were divided into six groups receiving a s.c. injection of either 0.9% NaCl, TTX 0.3, 1, 3, or 6 microg kg(-1), or morphine (5 mg kg(-1)). Substances were injected 30 min before 2.5% formalin injection into the hind paw, acetic acid administration intraperitoneally or neuropathic pain testing consisting of mechanical allodynia (von Frey filament) and thermal hyperalgesia (Plantar test). RESULTS: TTX decreased pain behaviour in the formalin test at the highest dose and in the writhing test at 3 and 6 microg kg(-1). It also diminished mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia with an ED(50) of 1.08 (0.89) and 0.62 (0.33) microg kg(-1), respectively. Observation of the rats after TTX injection did not show any motor deficit, respiratory distress or sedation. Morphine was also effective in relieving pain in all three tests but with signs of considerable sedation. CONCLUSION: Systemic injections of TTX diminished pain behaviour in a dose-dependent manner in models of inflammatory, visceral and neuropathic pain without causing adverse events, whereas morphine analgesia was associated with heavy sedation. TTX is a very promising substance for the treatment of various types of pain but needs further evaluation.

Behavioral, pharmacological and molecular characterization of the saphenous nerve partial ligation: a new model of neuropathic pain.

The saphenous partial ligation (SPL) model is a new, easily performed, rodent model of neuropathic pain that consists of a unilateral partial injury to the saphenous nerve. The present study describes behavioral, pharmacological and molecular properties of this model. Starting between 3 and 5 days after surgery, depending on the modality tested, animals developed clear behaviors indicative of neuropathic pain such as cold and mechanical allodynia, and thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia compared with naive and sham animals. These pain behaviors were still present at 1 month. Signs of allodynia also extended to the sciatic nerve territory. No evidence of autotomy or bodyweight loss was observed. Cold and mechanical allodynia but not thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia was reversed by morphine (4 mg/kg i.p.). The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (5 mg/kg i.p.) improved signs of allodynia and hyperalgesia tested except for mechanical hyperalgesia. Gabapentin (50 mg/kg i.p.) was effective against cold and mechanical allodynia but not hyperalgesia. Finally, amitriptyline (10 mg/kg i.p.) failed to reverse allodynia and hyperalgesia and its administration even led to hyperesthesia. Neurobiological studies looking at the expression of mu opioid receptor (MOR), cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors showed a significant increase for all three receptors in ipsilateral paw skin, L3-L4 dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord of neuropathic rats compared with naive and sham animals. These changes in MOR, CB(1) and CB(2) receptor expression are compatible with what is observed in other neuropathic pain models and may explain the analgesia produced by morphine and WIN 55,212-2 administrations. In conclusion, we have shown that the SPL is an adequate model that will provide a new tool for clarifying peripheral mechanisms of neuropathic pain in an exclusive sensory nerve.