Capturing COPD heterogeneity: anomaly detection and parametric response mapping comparison for phenotyping on chest computed tomography.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a substantial global health burden, demanding advanced diagnostic tools for early detection and accurate phenotyping. In this line, this study seeks to enhance COPD characterization on chest computed tomography (CT) by comparing the spatial and quantitative relationships between traditional parametric response mapping (PRM) and a novel self-supervised anomaly detection approach, and to unveil potential additional insights into the dynamic transitional stages of COPD. Methods: Non-contrast inspiratory and expiratory CT of 1,310 never-smoker and GOLD 0 individuals and COPD patients (GOLD 1-4) from the COPDGene dataset were retrospectively evaluated. A novel self-supervised anomaly detection approach was applied to quantify lung abnormalities associated with COPD, as regional deviations. These regional anomaly scores were qualitatively and quantitatively compared, per GOLD class, to PRM volumes (emphysema: PRMEmph, functional small-airway disease: PRMfSAD) and to a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Clustering, applied on the self-supervised latent space. Its relationships to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were also evaluated. Results: Initial t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) visualization of the self-supervised latent space highlighted distinct spatial patterns, revealing clear separations between regions with and without emphysema and air trapping. Four stable clusters were identified among this latent space by the PCA and Cluster Analysis. As the GOLD stage increased, PRMEmph, PRMfSAD, anomaly score, and Cluster 3 volumes exhibited escalating trends, contrasting with a decline in Cluster 2. The patient-wise anomaly scores significantly differed across GOLD stages (p < 0.01), except for never-smokers and GOLD 0 patients. In contrast, PRMEmph, PRMfSAD, and cluster classes showed fewer significant differences. Pearson correlation coefficients revealed moderate anomaly score correlations to PFTs (0.41-0.68), except for the functional residual capacity and smoking duration. The anomaly score was correlated with PRMEmph (r = 0.66, p < 0.01) and PRMfSAD (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Anomaly scores significantly improved fitting of PRM-adjusted multivariate models for predicting clinical parameters (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots revealed that volume agreement between PRM-derived volumes and clusters was not constant across the range of measurements. Conclusion: Our study highlights the synergistic utility of the anomaly detection approach and traditional PRM in capturing the nuanced heterogeneity of COPD. The observed disparities in spatial patterns, cluster dynamics, and correlations with PFTs underscore the distinct - yet complementary - strengths of these methods. Integrating anomaly detection and PRM offers a promising avenue for understanding of COPD pathophysiology, potentially informing more tailored diagnostic and intervention approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Prediction of disease severity in COPD: a deep learning approach for anomaly-based quantitative assessment of chest CT.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify regional manifestations related to COPD as anomalies from a modeled distribution of normal-appearing lung on chest CT using a deep learning (DL) approach, and to assess its potential to predict disease severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired inspiratory/expiratory CT and clinical data from COPDGene and COSYCONET cohort studies were included. COPDGene data served as training/validation/test data sets (N = 3144/786/1310) and COSYCONET as external test set (N = 446). To differentiate low-risk (healthy/minimal disease, [GOLD 0]) from COPD patients (GOLD 1-4), the self-supervised DL model learned semantic information from 50 × 50 × 50 voxel samples from segmented intact lungs. An anomaly detection approach was trained to quantify lung abnormalities related to COPD, as regional deviations. Four supervised DL models were run for comparison. The clinical and radiological predictive power of the proposed anomaly score was assessed using linear mixed effects models (LMM). RESULTS: The proposed approach achieved an area under the curve of 84.3 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001) for COPDGene and 76.3 ± 0.6 (p < 0.001) for COSYCONET, outperforming supervised models even when including only inspiratory CT. Anomaly scores significantly improved fitting of LMM for predicting lung function, health status, and quantitative CT features (emphysema/air trapping; p < 0.001). Higher anomaly scores were significantly associated with exacerbations for both cohorts (p < 0.001) and greater dyspnea scores for COPDGene (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Quantifying heterogeneous COPD manifestations as anomaly offers advantages over supervised methods and was found to be predictive for lung function impairment and morphology deterioration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Using deep learning, lung manifestations of COPD can be identified as deviations from normal-appearing chest CT and attributed an anomaly score which is consistent with decreased pulmonary function, emphysema, and air trapping. KEY POINTS: • A self-supervised DL anomaly detection method discriminated low-risk individuals and COPD subjects, outperforming classic DL methods on two datasets (COPDGene AUC = 84.3%, COSYCONET AUC = 76.3%). • Our contrastive task exhibits robust performance even without the inclusion of expiratory images, while voxel-based methods demonstrate significant performance enhancement when incorporating expiratory images, in the COPDGene dataset. • Anomaly scores improved the fitting of linear mixed effects models in predicting clinical parameters and imaging alterations (p < 0.001) and were directly associated with clinical outcomes (p < 0.001).

Automated detection and quantification of brain metastases on clinical MRI data using artificial neural networks.

Background: Reliable detection and precise volumetric quantification of brain metastases (BM) on MRI are essential for guiding treatment decisions. Here we evaluate the potential of artificial neural networks (ANN) for automated detection and quantification of BM. Methods: A consecutive series of 308 patients with BM was used for developing an ANN (with a 4:1 split for training/testing) for automated volumetric assessment of contrast-enhancing tumors (CE) and non-enhancing FLAIR signal abnormality including edema (NEE). An independent consecutive series of 30 patients was used for external testing. Performance was assessed case-wise for CE and NEE and lesion-wise for CE using the case-wise/lesion-wise DICE-coefficient (C/L-DICE), positive predictive value (L-PPV) and sensitivity (C/L-Sensitivity). Results: The performance of detecting CE lesions on the validation dataset was not significantly affected when evaluating different volumetric thresholds (0.001-0.2 cm3; P = .2028). The median L-DICE and median C-DICE for CE lesions were 0.78 (IQR = 0.6-0.91) and 0.90 (IQR = 0.85-0.94) in the institutional as well as 0.79 (IQR = 0.67-0.82) and 0.84 (IQR = 0.76-0.89) in the external test dataset. The corresponding median L-Sensitivity and median L-PPV were 0.81 (IQR = 0.63-0.92) and 0.79 (IQR = 0.63-0.93) in the institutional test dataset, as compared to 0.85 (IQR = 0.76-0.94) and 0.76 (IQR = 0.68-0.88) in the external test dataset. The median C-DICE for NEE was 0.96 (IQR = 0.92-0.97) in the institutional test dataset as compared to 0.85 (IQR = 0.72-0.91) in the external test dataset. Conclusion: The developed ANN-based algorithm (publicly available at www.github.com/NeuroAI-HD/HD-BM) allows reliable detection and precise volumetric quantification of CE and NEE compartments in patients with BM.