Regional White Matter Hyperintensities Relate to Specific Cognitive Abilities in Older Adults Without Dementia.

INTRODUCTION: White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are magnetic resonance imaging markers of small vessel cerebrovascular disease that are associated with cognitive decline and clinical Alzheimer disease. Previous studies have often focused on global or total WMH; less is known about associations of regional WMHs and cognitive abilities among older adults without dementia. METHODS: A total of 610 older adults with normal cognition (n=302) or mild cognitive impairment (n=308) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent neuropsychological testing and magnetic resonance imaging. Linear regression models examined associations between regional WMH volumes and cognition, adjusting for age, sex, education, apolipoprotein E ε4 allele frequency, and pulse pressure. RESULTS: Among all participants, greater regional WMH volume in all lobes was associated with poorer performance on memory and speed/executive functioning. Among participants with normal cognition, greater temporal and occipital WMH volumes were associated with poorer memory, whereas no regional WMH volumes were associated with speed/executive function. DISCUSSION: Results show that greater regional WMH volume relates to poorer cognitive functioning-even among those with normal cognition. Together with results from previous studies, our findings raise the possibility that WMH may be a useful therapeutic target and/or important effect modifier in treatment or prevention dementia trials.

White Matter Hyperintensity Volume and Amyloid-PET Synergistically Impact Memory Independent of Tau-PET in Older Adults Without Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cerebrovascular disease are common, co-existing pathologies in older adults. Whether the effects of cerebrovascular disease and AD biomarkers on cognition are additive or synergistic remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume moderates the independent association between each AD biomarker and cognition. METHODS: In 586 older adults without dementia, linear regressions tested the interaction between amyloid-ß (Aß) positron emission tomography (PET) and WMH volume on cognition, independent of tau-PET. We also tested the interaction between tau-PET and WMH volume on cognition, independent of Aß-PET. RESULTS: Adjusting for tau-PET, the quadratic effect of WMH interacted with Aß-PET to impact memory. There was no interaction between either the linear or quadratic effect of WMH and Aß-PET on executive function. There was no interaction between WMH volume and tau-PET on either cognitive measure. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that cerebrovascular lesions act synergistically with Aß to affect memory, independent of tau, highlighting the importance of incorporating vascular pathology into biomarker assessment of AD.

APOE differentially moderates cerebrospinal fluid and plasma phosphorylated tau181 associations with multi-domain cognition.

Biofluid markers of phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181) are increasingly popular for the detection of early Alzheimer's pathologic changes. However, the differential dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma p-tau181 remain under investigation. We studied 727 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with plasma and CSF p-tau181 data, apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 carrier status, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, and neuropsychological data. Higher levels of plasma and CSF p-tau181 were observed among APOE ε4 carriers. CSF and plasma p-tau181 were significantly associated with memory, and this effect was greater in APOE ε4 carriers. However, whereas CSF p-tau181 was not significantly associated with language or attention/executive function among ε4 carriers or non-carriers, APOE ε4 status moderated the association of plasma p-tau181 with both language and attention/executive function. These findings lend support to the notion that p-tau181 biofluid markers are useful in measuring AD pathologic changes but also suggest that CSF and plasma p-tau181 have unique properties and dynamics that should be considered when using these markers in research and clinical practice.

Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of cognitive and pathological heterogeneity in early-stage Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Data-driven approaches have demonstrated cognitive heterogeneity in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but few studies have examined this heterogeneity and its association with progression to MCI/dementia in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. OBJECTIVE: We identified cluster-derived subgroups of CU participants based on comprehensive neuropsychological data and compared baseline characteristics and rates of progression to MCI/dementia or a Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) of ≤129 across subgroups. METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on individual baseline neuropsychological test scores from 365 CU participants in the UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center longitudinal cohort. Cox regressions examined the risk of progression to consensus diagnosis of MCI or dementia, or to DRS score ≤129, by cluster group. RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified 5 groups: All-Average (n = 139), Low-Visuospatial (n = 46), Low-Executive (n = 51), Low-Memory/Language (n = 83), and Low-All Domains (n = 46). Subgroups had unique demographic and clinical characteristics. Rates of progression to MCI/dementia or to DRS ≤129 were faster for all subgroups (Low-All Domains progressed the fastest > Low Memory/Language≥Low-Visuospatial and Low-Executive) relative to the All-Average subgroup. CONCLUSION: Faster progression in the Low-Visuospatial, Low-Executive, and Low-Memory/Language groups compared to the All-Average group suggests that there are multiple pathways and/or unique subtle cognitive decline profiles that ultimately lead to a diagnosis of MCI/dementia. Use of comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries that assess several domains may be a key first step toward an individualized approach to early detection and fewer missed opportunities for early intervention.

Tau levels are higher in objective subtle cognitive decline but not subjective memory complaint.

BACKGROUND: The 2018 NIA-AA Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Research Framework states that subtle cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals can be measured by subjective reports or evidence of objective decline on neuropsychological measures. Both subjective memory complaint (SMC) and objective subtle cognitive decline (Obj-SCD) have been shown to be associated with future cognitive decline and AD biomarkers. We examined whether there are differences in tau PET levels between (a) SMC- vs. SMC+ participants, (b) Obj-SCD- vs. Obj-SCD+ participants, and (c) participants with overlapping vs. discrepant SMC and Obj-SCD classifications. METHODS: Cognitively unimpaired participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; n = 236) were classified at baseline as positive or negative for SMC (SMC- n = 77; SMC+ n = 159) based on the first 12 items of the Cognitive Change Index and/or classified as positive or negative for Obj-SCD (Obj-SCD- n = 173; Obj-SCD+ n = 63) based on previously defined neuropsychological criteria. Analyses of covariance, adjusting for age, sex, APOE ε4 carrier status, and pulse pressure, examined the group differences in tau PET (AV-1451) using a composite standardized uptake variable ratio (SUVR) for regions consistent with Braak stage III/IV. The chi-squared tests examined the tau positivity rates across the groups. RESULTS: Obj-SCD+ participants had higher tau continuous SUVR levels (p = .035, ηp2 = .019) and higher rates of tau positivity (15.8% Obj-SCD- vs. 30.2% Obj-SCD+) than Obj-SCD- participants. Neither tau levels (p = .381, ηp2 = .003) nor rates of tau positivity (18.2% SMC- and 20.1% SMC+) differed between the SMC groups. There was very little agreement between SMC and Obj-SCD classifications (42%; κ = 0.008, p = .862). Participants who were Obj-SCD+ without SMC had the highest tau PET levels and differed from participants who were SMC+ without Obj-SCD (p = .022). Tau levels in participants with both SMC and Obj-SCD did not differ from those with only Obj-SCD (p = .216). Tau positivity rates across the SMC-/Obj-SCD-, SMC+/Obj-SCD-, SMC-/Obj-SCD+, and SMC+/Obj-SCD+ groups were 10.5%, 18.1%, 40.0%, and 25.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Participants with Obj-SCD had a greater tau PET burden than those without Obj-SCD, but SMC was not associated with higher tau levels. The combination of SMC and Obj-SCD did not have higher tau levels than Obj-SCD alone. Findings add to the evidence that the Obj-SCD classification is associated with AD biomarkers and faster cognitive decline in ADNI participants, but further work is needed to validate this approach in more representative/diverse cohorts.

Interactive Effects of Pulse Pressure and Tau Imaging on Longitudinal Cognition.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that both tau and cardiovascular risk are associated with cognitive decline, but the possible synergistic effects of these pathologic markers remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the interaction of AD biomarkers with a specific vascular risk marker (pulse pressure) on longitudinal cognition. METHODS: Participants included 139 older adults from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Biomarkers of tau, amyloid-ß (Aß), and vascular risk (pulse pressure) were assessed. Neuropsychological assessment provided memory, language, and executive function domain composite scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Multiple linear regression examined interactive effects of pulse pressure with tau PET independent of Aß PET and Aß PET independent of tau PET on baseline and 1-year cognitive outcomes. RESULTS: The interaction between pulse pressure and tau PET significantly predicted 1-year memory performance such that the combined effect of high pulse pressure and high tau PET levels was associated with lower memory at follow-up but not at baseline. In contrast, Aß PET did not significantly interact with pulse pressure to predict baseline or 1-year outcomes in any cognitive domain. Main effects revealed a significant effect of tau PET on memory, and no significant effects of Aß PET or pulse pressure on any cognitive domain. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that tau and an indirect marker of arterial stiffening (pulse pressure) may synergistically contribute to memory decline, whereas Aß may have a lesser role in predicting cognitive progression. Tau and vascular pathology (particularly in combination) may represent valuable targets for interventions intended to slow cognitive decline.

Objective subtle cognitive decline and plasma phosphorylated tau181: Early markers of Alzheimer's disease-related declines.

INTRODUCTION: Objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline (Obj-SCD) and plasma phosphorylated-tau181 (p-tau181) are promising early Alzheimer's disease (AD) markers. However, associations between Obj-SCD and p-tau181, and their combined prognostic potential, are unknown. METHODS: Baseline and 4-year longitudinal p-tau181 changes were compared across cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 402), Obj-SCD (n = 199), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 346) groups. CU and Obj-SCD participants were further classified as p-tau181-positive or negative. RESULTS: CU and Obj-SCD has lower baseline p-tau181 than MCI and did not differ from one another. Longitudinally, Obj-SCD had the steepest p-tau181 increase. Obj-SCD/p-tau181-positive participants had the fastest rates of amyloid accumulation, cognitive decline, and functional decline. CONCLUSIONS: Despite assumptions that cognitive changes invariably follow biomarker changes, early neuropsychological difficulties may emerge before/concurrently with plasma p-tau181 changes. Combining Obj-SCD and p-tau181, two potentially accessible early markers, was associated with the faster declines in AD-related outcomes.