RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Verification of the performance of analytical platforms is indicated prior to adoption of new Technology for patient sample analysis. Acceptance criteria for the performance of coagulation analytical platforms are not always readily available and is complicated by the multiple assays and test principles in this section of the clinical laboratory. Coagulation samples are also prone to pre-analytical, post-sample collection variables potentially interfering with accuracy analysis. METHODS: This verification study assessed the accuracy of the automated STAGO STA-R Max® coagulation analyzers by means of a comparison study of results obtained on the previously validated STAGO STA-R Evolution® analyzer for 22 coagulation parameters on 40 individual patient samples for each parameter. Within- and between- run reproducibility on commercial control material, carry-over from abnormal to normal samples and the interference of bilirubin, hemoglobin and lipids on the chromogenic analytical channel were also assessed. Ongoing evaluation of the analyzer performance was assessed by External Quality Assurance (EQA) scheme participation. RESULTS: The reproducibility (precision) on 2 levels (Normal and Pathological) commercial control material was acceptable with co-efficient of variance (CV) results below the manufacturer target % CVs. The correlation study demonstrated accuracy of results obtained on the analyzers for all parameters except for D-dimers and coagulation Factor VII. Subsequent EQA performance for these two parameters were however satisfactory. Interference from bilirubin, hemoglobin and lipids did occur in the chromogenic channel. No clinically significant carry over from abnormal to normal samples were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the STAGO STA-R Max® analyzer is acceptable across the full coagulation test repertoire with the exception of the von Willebrand activity assay. Participation in EQA scheme assessments will be an integral part of ongoing monitoring of the performance of this automated analyzer.
Assuntos
Automação Laboratorial/instrumentação , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/instrumentação , Coagulação Sanguínea , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/instrumentação , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Automação Laboratorial/métodos , Automação Laboratorial/normas , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/métodos , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/normas , Serviços de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Humanos , Laboratórios/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , África do SulRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease requires laboratory confirmation with quantitative and qualitative measurements of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Qualitative VWF-activity (VWF-Ac) tests have poor inter- and intra-laboratory reproducibility with coefficients of variation (CVs) as high as 64%, often lacking accuracy at low VWF-Ac levels. METHODS: This study evaluated the recently launched immunoturbidometric STAGO® STA-VWF:RCo® reagent for VWF-Ac. Accuracy was evaluated on 32 samples by comparing results using the Siemens® Innovance® reagent. An intra-run reproducibility study was performed on controls. Linearity and lower limit of detection was studied on external-quality-assurance (EQA) material with a known VWF-Ac level. RESULTS: STA-VWF:RCo® reagent results were within clinical interpretation agreement with Siemens® Innovance®. The reproducibility study yielded % CVs of 8.41 for normal and 11.46 for abnormal controls and the assay was linear between 73 and 14.6% and remained linear to 2% with extrapolation. CONCLUSIONS: The STAGO® STA-VWF:RCo® reagent showed clinically meaningful accuracy and acceptable precision.
Assuntos
Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Imunoturbidimetria/métodos , Doenças de von Willebrand/diagnóstico , Fator de von Willebrand/análise , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoturbidimetria/normas , Limite de Detecção , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Doenças de von Willebrand/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The validity of laboratory results depends on pre-analytical variables not detected by conventional quality control. Recommendations are for post-centrifugation coagulation samples to remain capped with cappiercing primary tube analysis. Total laboratory automation integrates analytical platforms with potential incompatibilities necessitating changes including pre-analytical uncapping of samples. METHODS: Samples analyzed for Prothrombin Time (PT), activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), D-dimers, Antithrombin and Fibrinogen at baseline, and after 60 and 120 minutes were left at ambient temperature, either re-capped or uncapped, in order to simulate changes from baseline that could occur in uncapped samples on an automation track prior to analysis. Changes were compared to the maximal permissible bias. RESULTS: Sample uncapping for up to 120 minutes at ambient temperature post-centrifugation did not result in clinically significant changes in routine coagulation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Routine coagulation parameters will not change significantly if the primary citrate tubes are uncapped after centrifugation prior to analysis.