Hybrid nanopotentiators with dual cascade amplification for glioma combined interventional therapy.

Glioma is an aggressive malignant brain tumor with a very poor prognosis for survival. The poor tumor targeting efficiency and tumor microenvironment penetration barrier also as troubles inhibited the effective glioma chemotherapy. Here, we design a core-shell structure cascade amplified hybrid catalytic nanopotentiators CFpAD with DM1 encapsulated to overcome the glioma therapeutic obstacles. NIR laser-based BBB penetrating enhances the tumor accumulation of CFpAD. When CFpAD, as the cascade amplified drug, is treated on the cancer cells, the bomb-like CFpAD releases gold nanoparticles as glucose oxidase (GOx) and ferric oxide nanoparticles (FNPs) as peroxides (POx) after blasting, producing ROS via a cascade amplification for tumor cell apoptosis. Gold nanoparticles can rest CAFs and reduce ECM secretion, achieving deep penetration of CFpAD. Moreover, CFpAD also cuts off the nutritional supply of the tumor, reduces the pH value, and releases free radicals to destroy the cancer. The glioma cell viability was significantly decreased through DNA damage and ROS aggregation due to the DM1-based chemotherapy synergistically combined with interventional photothermal therapy (IPTT) and radiotherapy (RT). This domino cascade amplified loop, combined with starvation therapy with IPTT and RT, has good tumor penetration and outstanding antitumor efficacy, and is a promising glioma treatment system.

Effects of sintilimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from the randomized phase 3 ORIENT-15 study.

Background: In ORIENT-15 study, sintilimab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvement on overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report effect of sintilimab plus chemotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced ESCC. Methods: From December 14, 2018 to August 28, 2022, HRQoL was evaluated in all randomized patients using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (QLQ-C30), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophageal Cancer Module 18 items (QLQ-OES18), and visual analogue scale (VAS) of the EuroQol five-dimensional five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Mean scores of each scale were described by treatment group through week 60. Least-squares mean (LSM) score change from baseline through week 24 were analyzed using the mixed-model repeated-measures method. Time to the first onset of deterioration (TTD) and OS for each scale were estimated. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03748134. Findings: As of August 28, 2022, 689 of 690 enrolled patients were assessed for HRQoL analysis (sintilimab group: 340, placebo group: 349). Median follow-up was 32.2 months. Differences in LSM favored sintilimab over placebo for QLQ-C30 social functioning (LSM difference: 3.06, 95% CI: 0.55 to 5.57; P = 0.0170), pain (-2.24, 95% CI: -4.30 to -0.17; P = 0.0337), fatigue (-2.24, 95% CI: -4.46 to -0.02; P = 0.0479), constipation (-3.27, 95% CI -5.49 to -1.05; P = 0.0039), QLQ-OES18 pain (-1.77, 95% CI -3.11 to -0.43; P = 0.0097), trouble swallowing saliva (-2.09, 95% CI: -3.77 to -0.42; P = 0.0146), and choked when swallowing (-3.23, 95% CI: -5.60 to -0.86; P = 0.0076). TTD favored sintilimab over placebo for QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.94, P = 0.0104), and trouble swallowing saliva (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, P < 0.0001). Improved OS were observed in patients with better performance in several functioning and symptom scales of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-QES18. Interpretation: The statistically significant differences of several HRQoL scales and improvements in delayed deterioration observed in our study further support the use of sintilimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. Funding: This study was funded by Innovent Biologics and was co-funded by Eli Lilly.

Adjuvant Osimertinib in Patients With Stage IB to IIIA EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC After Complete Tumor Resection: ADAURA China Subgroup Analysis.

Introduction: In Chinese patients with NSCLC, prevalence of EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) disease is high. In the global phase 3 ADAURA study (NCT02511106), adjuvant osimertinib was found to have a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) versus placebo in resected stage IB to IIIA EGFRm NSCLC. We present efficacy and safety data from a subgroup analysis of 159 Chinese patients enrolled in the People's Republic of China from ADAURA. Methods: In ADAURA, patients with completely resected stage IB to IIIA EGFRm (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R) NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or placebo for 3 years or until disease recurrence/discontinuation. Adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted before randomization, per physician/patient choice. Primary end point was investigator-assessed DFS in stage II to IIIA disease; secondary end points included DFS in stage IB to IIIA (overall population), overall survival, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety. Results: Of 682 patients enrolled globally, 159 patients in the People's Republic of China were included in this subgroup analysis (osimertinib n = 77; placebo n = 82). Baseline characteristics were balanced across the treatment arms. At data cutoff, stage II to IIIA DFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.42; maturity 59%); stage IB to IIIA DFS HR was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.17-0.48; maturity 42%). At 13% maturity (21 deaths), HR for overall survival in the stage IB to IIIA population was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.21-1.20). HRQoL was maintained from baseline, and safety was consistent with the global population. Conclusions: In this population of Chinese patients from ADAURA, adjuvant osimertinib was found to have a clinically meaningful improvement in DFS versus placebo, with maintained HRQoL and a safety profile consistent with the global study population.

Nimotuzumab plus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): interim analysis from a Phase 3 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospectively randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase 3 clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety profile of nimotuzumab (nimo) plus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive CCRT plus nimotuzumab or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In addition, interim analysis for short-term response rate was pre-defined. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomised into two groups. Eighty patients in the nimo group and eighty-two in the placebo group were evaluable. Three to six months after treatment, 26 (32.5%) patients achieved complete response (CR) in the nimo group, and 10 (12.2%) in the placebo group (P = 0.002). The ORR of the nimo group was significantly higher than the placebo group (93.8% vs. 72.0%, P < 0.001). The two groups' grade 3-5 adverse drug reactions were 11.1% vs. 10.9% (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nimotuzumab, in combination with chemo-radiotherapy, increased the CRR and ORR with a good safety profile. The OS is needed to be followed and finally analysed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02409186.

First-line pyrotinib in advanced HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a patient-centric phase 2 trial.

To explore targeted treatment options in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rare genetic mutations in the context of a patient-centric clinical trial, we initiated, in parallel, a phase 2 adaptive umbrella trial consisting of a criteria-fulfilled (CF) cohort and a compassionate use (CU) cohort under expanded eligibility criteria, and a prospective real-world study (RWS). Here, we present efficacy and safety data from 48 patients with treatment-naive, advanced HER2-mutant NSCLC treated with the pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor pyrotinib (CF and CU cohorts) or physician's therapy of choice (RWS cohort). In the phase 2 trial CF cohort (n = 28), the primary endpoint was reached with an objective response rate of 35.7% after pyrotinib treatment. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (89.3%), median progression-free survival (PFS) (7.3 months), median overall survival (OS) (14.3 months) and toxicity, which was acceptable, with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurring in three patients (10.7%). The phase 2 trial CU cohort (n = 12) showed an objective response rate of 16.7%, disease control rate of 83.4%, median PFS of 4.7 months and median OS of 14.2 months after pyrotinib treatment. The RWS cohort (n = 8) had no responses to physician's therapy of choice, while median PFS and OS were 3.0 and 12.2 months, respectively. Phase 2 umbrella trial, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03574402 . RWS, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03605602 .

Evaluation safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and radiotherapy combination versus ICB in non-small cell lung cancer patients with recurrence or metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and radiotherapy (RT) combination therapy is broadly applied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, meta-analysis about safety and efficacy of RT + ICB versus ICB has not yet been reported. To evaluate safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of ICB and RT in patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC and explore factors related to higher response rates, longer lifetime, and lower toxicity, meta-analysis of previous clinical data will be presented in this article. METHODS: A literature search on patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC treated with RT + ICB versus ICB was performed using the Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed up to December 10, 2022. Suitable quality assessment checklists were selected corresponding to various types of research studies. Comparative and single-arm studies were analyzed using Stata 14.0. RESULTS: 10 comparative studies and 15 arms of combination therapy were included for this meta-analysis. RT significantly improved objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ICB (I-square value (I2 ) = 0.00%, odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.49, I2 = 0.00%, OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.25, I2 = 42.1%, OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.92, I2 = 34.5%, OR 0.80, and 95% CI 0.71-0.89, respectively). Toxicity between combination therapy and ICB monotherapy did not significantly differ in any grade or in ≥3 grade of tr-AEs (I2 = 0.00%, OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.22, I2 = 0.00%, OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.90-2.37, respectively). Subgroup analyses based on single-arm studies showed that applications of SRS/SBRT, PD-1 inhibitor, and administration of ICB after RT were conducive to a better DCR, longer OS and mild adverse events (heterogeneity between groups (HBG) all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: RT can significantly improve ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS of ICB in patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC without increasing toxicity. PD-1 inhibitor following SRS/SBRT could be the best option to maximally benefit the patients.

Construction of Prognostic Nomogram in Patients with N3-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to retrospectively identify the metastatic influence factors and predict the prognosis and develop an individualized prognostic prediction model for patients with N3-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: The study collected 446 NPC patients with N3 stage from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. The patients were classified into subgroups based on the histological types and metastatic status. Multivariable logistic, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test were performed. The nomogram model was created using the prognostic factors identified from Cox regression analysis. The predictive accuracy was determined based on the concordance index (c-index) and calibration curves. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the NPC patients with N3 stage was 43.9%, and the prognosis of patients without any distant metastases was largely longer than that with metastases. No difference was observed between different pathological types in the entire cohort. However, patients with non-keratinized squamous cell carcinoma had a better OS than that of the patients with keratinized squamous cell carcinoma in a nonmetastatic subgroup. Using the Cox regression analysis results, the nomogram successfully classified these patients into low- and high-risk subgroups and presented the survival difference. The c-index of the nomogram for predicting the prognosis was satisfactory. CONCLUSION: This study identified metastatic risk factors and developed a convenient clinical tool for the prognosis of NPC patients. This tool can be used for individualized risk classification and decision-making regarding treatment of NPC patients with N3 stage.

Early Changes of Serum Interleukin 14α Levels Predicts the Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Cancer.

Background: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade has been shown to confer clinical benefit in cancer patients. Here, we assessed the level of serum interleukin 14α (IL14α) in patients receiving anti-PD-1 treatment. Methods: This prospective study recruited 30 patients with advanced solid cancer who received pembrolizumab treatment in Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital between April 2016 and June 2018. The western blot analysis was used to assess the expression level of serum IL14α in patients at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment. Interleukin 14α was performed using the unpaired 2-tailed Student test. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results: The early change of IL14α after 2 cycles of anti-PD-1 therapy was calculated as delta IL14α % change = (IL14α level after 2 cycles - IL14α level before treatment)/IL14α level before treatment × 100%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was analyzed to get a cutoff point of delta IL14α % change as 2.46% (sensitivity = 85.71%, specificity = 62.5%; area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.7277, P = .034). Using this cutoff to subgroup the patients, an improved objective response rate was observed in patients with a delta IL14α change higher than 2.46% (P = .0072). A delta IL14α change over 2.46% was associated with a superior PFS (P = .0039). Conclusions: Early changes of serum IL14α levels may be a promising biomarker to predict outcomes in patients with solid cancer following anti-PD-1 treatment.

Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Treatment-Naive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial (CHOICE-01).

PURPOSE: The CHOICE-01 study investigated the efficacy and safety of toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 465) with treatment-naive, advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive toripalimab 240 mg (n = 309) or placebo (n = 156) once every 3 weeks in combination with chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles, followed by the maintenance of toripalimab or placebo once every 3 weeks plus standard care. Stratification factors included programmed death ligand-1 expression status, histology, and smoking status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: At the final PFS analysis, PFS was significantly longer in the toripalimab arm than in the placebo arm (median PFS, 8.4 v 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.61; two-sided P < .0001). At the interim OS analysis, the toripalimab arm had a significantly longer OS than the placebo arm (median OS not reached v 17.1 months, hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92; two-sided P = .0099). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was similar between the two arms. Treatment effects were similar regardless of programmed death ligand-1 status. Genomic analysis using whole-exome sequencing from 394 available tumor samples revealed that patients with high tumor mutational burden were associated with significantly better PFS in the toripalimab arm (median PFS 13.1 v 5.5 months, interaction P = .026). Notably, patients with mutations in the focal adhesion-PI3K-Akt signaling pathway achieved significantly better PFS and OS in the toripalimab arm (interaction P values ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy significantly improves PFS and OS in patients with treatment-naive advanced NSCLC while having a manageable safety profile. Subgroup analysis showed the OS benefit was mainly driven by the nonsquamous subpopulation.

Evaluate the Prognosis of MYC/TP53 Comutation in Chinese Patients with EGFR-Positive Advanced NSCLC Using Next-Generation Sequencing: A Retrospective Study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of MYC and TP53 comutations on the clinical efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Chinese patients with advanced EGFR-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Tissue samples and information from 65 patients with advanced NSCLC in Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital were collected and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Progression-free survival (PFS) and total survival (OS) were the main endpoints, and the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were the secondary endpoints. Result: Among 65 patients, 17 had TP53 and MYC wild-type mutations (WT/WT), 36 had TP53 mutant and MYC wild-type mutations (TP53/WT), and 12 had coexisting MYC/TP53 mutations (MYC/TP53). When 12 patients with MYC/TP53 comutation were compared with the other two groups (TP53/WT, WT/WT), mPFS and mOS are significantly lower than those in the other two groups (mPFS: 4.1 months vs 6.0 months, 12.3 months, HR: 0.769, 95% CI: 4.592-7.608, P = .047. mOS: 14.6 months vs 24.1 months, 31.5 months, HR: 3.170, 95% CI: 18.786-31.214, P < .001), and the ORR, DCR of patients with MYC/TP53 comutation was lower than that of the other two groups (ORR, 25% vs 44.4%, 70.6%, P = .045. DCR, 58.3% vs 72.2%, 82.4%, P = .365). Conclusion: Patients with MYC/TP53 comutations with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC are more likely to develop drug resistance after early treatment with EGFR-TKIs and have a worse clinical outcome.

Construction of prognostic signature of breast cancer based on N7-Methylguanosine-Related LncRNAs and prediction of immune response.

Background: Long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) is a prognostic factor for malignancies, and N7-Methylguanosine (m7G) is crucial in the occurrence and progression of tumors. However, it has not been documented how well m7G-related LncRNAs predict the development of breast cancer (BC). This study aims to develop a predictive signature based on long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) associated with m7G to predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database provided us with the RNA-seq data and matching clinical information of individuals with breast cancer. To identify the signature of N7-Methylguanosine-Related LncRNAs and create a prognostic model, we employed co-expression network analysis, least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis, univariate Cox regression analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The signature was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. A nomogram and principal component analysis (PCA) were employed to confirm the predictive signature's usefulness. Then, we examined the drug sensitivity between the two risk groups and utilized single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) to investigate the association between predictive factors and the tumor immune microenvironment in high-risk and low-risk groups. Results: Nine m7G-related LncRNAs (LINC01871, AP003469.4, Z68871.1, AC245297.3, EGOT, TFAP2A-AS1, AL136531.1, SEMA3B-AS1, AL606834.2) that are independently associated with the overall survival time (OS) of BC patients make up the signature we developed. For predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates, the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.715, 0.724, and 0.726, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the prognosis of BC patients in the high-risk group was worse than that of those in the low-risk group. When compared to clinicopathological variables, multiple regression analysis demonstrated that risk score was a significant independent predictive factor for BC patients. The results of the ssGSEA study revealed a substantial correlation between the predictive traits and the BC patients' immunological status, low-risk BC patients had more active immune systems, and they responded better to PD1/L1 immunotherapy. Conclusion: The prognostic signature, which is based on m7G-related LncRNAs, can be utilized to inform patients' customized treatment plans by independently predicting their prognosis and how well they would respond to immunotherapy.

Biomarker-Driven Studies With Multi-targets and Multi-drugs by Next-Generation Sequencing for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Open-Label, Multi-center, Phase II Adaptive Umbrella Trial and a Real-World Observational Study (CTONG1702&CTONG1705).

BACKGROUND: With rare genetic variations having been increasingly recognized at a preclinical stage, a variety of early-phase clinical trials have been launched. Due to the low incidence rate of these variations, although the sample size of trials are small, it still needs a large number of patients for screening. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), multiple genetic variations can be detected simultaneously. Multiple biomarkers and agents can be evaluated using umbrella clinical trials, which rapidly and effectively screen and enroll patients for parallel sub-studies using NGS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed an open-label, multi-center, phase II clinical trial CTONG1702. This is an adaptive umbrella trial that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of several biomarker-driven agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and a PD-1 inhibitor, in stage IIIB to IV patients (eighth AJCC) with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients will be enrolled in parallel sub-studies based on the results of NGS and PD-L1 IHC analysis. Patients who are not eligible for CTONG1702 will be enrolled in the observational real-world study CTONG1705. This study aims to develop a large-scale genomic database and explore the relationship between genetic variations in NSCLC patients and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The adaptive umbrella trial will evaluate multi-targets and multi-drugs in advanced NSCLC patients (CTONG1702). In addition, the simultaneously initiated real-world study will provide additional data for clinical practice (CTONG1705).

Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy (cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) as first line treatment of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. SETTING: 66 sites in China and 13 sites outside of China between 14 December 2018 and 9 April 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 659 adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had not received systemic treatment. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive sintilimab or placebo (3 mg/kg in patients weighing <60 kg or 200 mg in patients weighing ≥60 kg) in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every three weeks. The trial was amended to allow investigators to choose the chemotherapy regimen: cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1-5). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival in all patients and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 for expression of programmed cell death ligand 1. RESULTS: 659 patients were randomly assigned to sintilimab (n=327) or placebo (n=332) with chemotherapy. 616 of 659 patients (93%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel and 43 of 659 patients (7%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. At the interim analysis, sintilimab with chemotherapy showed better overall survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (median 16.7 v 12.5 months, hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.78, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (17.2 v 13.6 months, 0.64, 0.48 to 0.85, P=0.002). Sintilimab and chemotherapy significantly improved progression free survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (7.2 v 5.7 months, 0.56, 0.46 to 0.68, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (8.3 v 6.4 months, 0.58, 0.45 to 0.75, P<0.001). Adverse events related to treatment occurred in 321 of 327 patients (98%) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy group versus 326 of 332 (98%) patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Rates of adverse events related to treatment, grade ≥3, were 60% (196/327) and 55% (181/332) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, sintilimab in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed significant benefits in overall survival and progression free survival as first line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Similar benefits of sintilimab with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil seem promising. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748134.

One Ferroptosis-Related Gene-Pair Signature Serves as an Original Prognostic Biomarker in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common histological subtype of lung cancer which causes the largest number of deaths worldwide. Exploring reliable prognostic biomarkers based on biological behaviors and molecular mechanisms is essential for predicting prognosis and individualized treatment strategies. Ferroptosis is a recently discovered type of regulated cell death. We downloaded ferroptosis-related genes from the literature and collected transcriptome profiles of lung adenocarcinoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to construct ferroptosis-related gene-pair matrixes. Then, we performed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to build our prognostic ferroptosis-related gene-pair index (FRGPI) in TCGA training matrix. Our study validated FRGPI through ROC curves, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox hazard analyses in TCGA and GEO cohorts. The optimal cut-off 0.081 stratified patients into low- and high-FRGPI groups. Also, the low-FRGPI group had a significantly better prognosis than the high-FRGPI group. For further study, we analyzed differentially expressed ferroptosis-related genes between high- and low-FRGPI groups. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) enrichment maps indicated that "cell cycle," "DNA replication," "proteasome," and "the p53 signaling pathway" were significantly enriched in the high-FRGPI group. The high-FRGPI group also presented higher infiltration of M1 macrophages. Meanwhile, there were few differences in adaptive immune responses between high- and low-FRGPI groups. In conclusion, FRGPI was an independent prognostic biomarker which might be beneficial for guiding individualized tumor therapy.

Evaluation of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Efficacy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer by Serial Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab is widely used in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, efficacy evaluation along treatment by serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using next-generation sequencing remained to be well studied. METHODS: Nine PD-L1 positive advanced NSCLC patients were prospectively enrolled and received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Pretreatment tissue and/or plasma samples were collected as baseline reference. Serial plasma samples were collected after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment as well as at disease progression. All samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.43 and 25.53 months, respectively. In total, 3 patients achieved partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) for more than 6 months and were thus classified into the durable clinical benefit (DCB) group, whereas the rest 6 were grouped as nondurable benefit (NDB) patients. Molecular profiling of baseline samples revealed that TP53 and APC were the 2 most frequently mutated genes in all patients, whereas POT1 and SETD2 mutations were enriched in DCB and NDB groups, respectively. Higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) was observed in DCB patients than NDB group. During serial ctDNA monitoring, 2 DCB patients showed a dramatic ctDNA reduction while 75% of NDB patients' ctDNA concentration increased at week 6. Several acquired mutations might contribute to the pembrolizumab resistance, including CDKN2A frameshift and MITF nonsense mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic profiling of peripheral blood samples can be applied to dynamically monitor disease progression. The reduction in ctDNA concentration during treatment implied DCBs.

Genomic signatures define three subtypes of EGFR-mutant stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer with distinct adjuvant therapy outcomes.

The ADJUVANT study reported the comparative superiority of adjuvant gefitinib over chemotherapy in disease-free survival of resected EGFR-mutant stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, not all patients experienced favorable clinical outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), raising the necessity for further biomarker assessment. In this work, by comprehensive genomic profiling of 171 tumor tissues from the ADJUVANT trial, five predictive biomarkers are identified (TP53 exon4/5 mutations, RB1 alterations, and copy number gains of NKX2-1, CDK4, and MYC). Then we integrate them into the Multiple-gene INdex to Evaluate the Relative benefit of Various Adjuvant therapies (MINERVA) score, which categorizes patients into three subgroups with relative disease-free survival and overall survival benefits from either adjuvant gefitinib or chemotherapy (Highly TKI-Preferable, TKI-Preferable, and Chemotherapy-Preferable groups). This study demonstrates that predictive genomic signatures could potentially stratify resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients and provide precise guidance towards future personalized adjuvant therapy.

The Effect of Hippocampal Avoidance Whole Brain Radiotherapy on the Preservation of Long-Term Neurocognitive Function in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastasis.

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the mainstay of therapy in treating cancer patients with brain metastases, but unfortunately, it might also lead to decline in neurocognitive function. This study aims to investigate the preservation of long-term neurocognitive function in patients after hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT). Retrospectively, 47 patients diagnosed with brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2015-01-01 and 2017-12-31 at the Department of Oncology, XXX Hospital were selected and divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 27) received HA-WBRT, whereas group B (n = 20) received WBRT. Neurocognitive function was analyzed at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months after radiotherapy, using Mine-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scales and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scales. The OS, PFS and tumor recurrence sites were also analyzed. When evaluated at 12 and 24 months after radiotherapy, the cognitive function scores of the hippocampal avoidance group were significantly higher than those of the non-hippocampal avoidance group (P < 0.001). In terms of patient survival, there was no significant difference in OS (P = 0.2) and PFS (P = 0.18) between these 2 groups. Fourteen patients in group A and 12 patients in group B had brain tumor recurrence after radiation, only one patient in group A occurred within 5 mm from the edge of the hippocampus (P > 0.05). In conclusion, HA-WBRT might have a protective effect on long-term neurocognitive function and did not affect patient survival.

Osimertinib Versus Comparator EGFR TKI as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: FLAURA China, A Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: In the global FLAURA study, first-line osimertinib, a third-generation irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus comparator EGFR TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OBJECTIVE: The FLAURA China study assessed first-line osimertinib in Chinese patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC (NCT02296125). METHODS: FLAURA China was a double-blind, randomized, phase III study. Adults from mainland China with previously untreated EGFRm (Exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC were enrolled in the global study or a China-only study under the same protocol; 136 patients were randomized to osimertinib (80 mg once daily [od]; n = 71) or comparator EGFR TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib; all sites selected gefitinib 250 mg od; n = 65). Patients were randomized and allocated to treatment groups by a central computer system. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: All 136 randomized patients were analyzed. Osimertinib extended median PFS by 8.0 months versus comparator EGFR TKI (17.8 vs. 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.85). Median OS was 33.1 months in the osimertinib group versus 25.7 months in the comparator group (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.56-1.29). At 3 years, 20% of patients on osimertinib and 8% on the comparator remained on randomized treatment. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were reported in 54 and 28% of patients in the osimertinib and comparator groups, respectively, driven by increased local reporting of laboratory- and disease-related AEs. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: First-line osimertinib treatment resulted in a clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefit versus comparator EGFR TKI in Chinese patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of osimertinib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02296125, registered 20 November 2014.

Gefitinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin as Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: Final Overall Survival Analysis of CTONG1104 Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: ADJUVANT-CTONG1104 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01405079), a randomized phase III trial, showed that adjuvant gefitinib treatment significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VP) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) results. METHODS: From September 2011 to April 2014, 222 patients from 27 sites were randomly assigned 1:1 to adjuvant gefitinib (n = 111) or VP (n = 111). Patients with resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) NSCLC and EGFR-activating mutation were enrolled, receiving gefitinib for 24 months or VP every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was DFS (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Secondary end points included OS, 3-, 5-year (y) DFS rates, and 5-year OS rate. Post hoc analysis was conducted for subsequent therapy data. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 80.0 months. Median OS (ITT) was 75.5 and 62.8 months with gefitinib and VP, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.36; P = .674); respective 5-year OS rates were 53.2% and 51.2% (P = .784). Subsequent therapy was administered upon progression in 68.4% and 73.6% of patients receiving gefitinib and VP, respectively. Subsequent targeted therapy contributed most to OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.38) compared with no subsequent therapy. Updated 3y DFS rates were 39.6% and 32. 5% with gefitinib and VP (P = .316) and 5y DFS rates were 22. 6% and 23.2% (P = .928), respectively. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant therapy with gefitinib in patients with early-stage NSCLC and EGFR mutation demonstrated improved DFS over standard of care chemotherapy. Although this DFS advantage did not translate to a significant OS difference, OS with adjuvant gefitinib was one of the longest observed in this patient group compared with historic data.