Gynecomastia Surgery Patient Education: An Information Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos.

BACKGROUND: YouTube is a platform for many topics, including plastic surgery. Previous studies have shown poor educational value in YouTube videos of plastic surgery procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality and accuracy of YouTube videos concerning gynecomastia surgery (GS). METHODS: The phrases "gynecomastia surgery" (GS) and "man boobs surgery" (MB) were queried on YouTube. The first 50 videos for each search term were examined. The videos were rated using our novel Gynecomastia Surgery Specific Score to measure gynecomastia-specific information, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) to measure understandability and actionability, and the Global Quality Scale to measure general quality. RESULTS: The most common upload source was a board-certified plastic surgeon (35%), and content category was surgery techniques and consultations (51%). Average scores for the Global Quality Scale (x̄ = 2.25), Gynecomastia Surgery Specific Score (x̄ = 3.50), and PEMAT Actionability (x̄ = 44.8%) were low, whereas PEMAT Understandability (x̄ = 77.4%) was moderate to high. There was no difference in all scoring modalities between the GS and MB groups. Internationally uploaded MB videos tended to originate from Asian countries, whereas GS videos tended to originate from non-US Western countries. Patient uploaders had higher PEMAT Actionability scores than plastic surgeon uploaders. CONCLUSIONS: The quality and amount of gynecomastia-specific information in GS videos on YouTube are low and contain few practical, take-home points for patients. However, understandability is adequate. Plastic surgeons and professional societies should strive to create high-quality medical media on platforms such as YouTube.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Assess the Teratogenic Risk of Vitamin A Supplements.

Vitamin A in high doses has been found to be highly teratogenic, leading to severe fetal abnormalities if exposure occurs during pregnancy. Hence, prescription vitamin A acne medications like isotretinoin are highly regulated via programs such as iPledge, which intend to avert fetal exposure to isotretinoin and to educate healthcare providers, pharmacists, and patients about the significant risks associated with isotretinoin and its appropriate usage conditions. However, over-the-counter (OTC) vitamin A supplements are not subject to these requirements, and calculating the vitamin A content of these supplements can be difficult due to the lack of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and inconsistencies in labeling. If the necessary information is provided, ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool, can help the general public calculate the vitamin A content of supplements. Nonetheless, supplement manufacturers do not always provide the data necessary for these calculations.

Association of Cardiovascular Medications With Adverse Outcomes in a Matched Analysis of a National Cohort of Patients With COVID-19.

Background: The use of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and anticoagulants may be associated with fewer adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods: Nested within a cohort of 800,913 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between April 1, 2020 and June 24, 2021 from the Optum COVID-19 database, three case-control studies were conducted. Cases-defined as persons who: (1) were hospitalized within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis (n = 88,405); (2) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)/received mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 hospitalization (n = 22,147); and (3) died during COVID-19 hospitalization (n = 2300)-were matched 1:1 using demographic/clinical factors with controls randomly selected from a pool of patients who did not experience the case definition/event. Medication use was based on prescription ≤90 days before COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: Statin use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.69, 0.75) and ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84, 0.97). ACEI/ARB use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65, 0.70), ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86, 0.99), and death (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47, 0.78). Anticoagulant use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89, 0.99) and death (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41, 0.77). Interaction effects-in the model predicting hospitalization-were statistically significant for statins and ACEI/ARBs (P < .0001), statins and anticoagulants (P = .003), ACEI/ARBs and anticoagulants (P < .0001). An interaction effect-in the model predicting ventilator use/ICU-was statistically significant for statins and ACEI/ARBs (P = .002). Conclusions: Statins, ACEI/ARBs, and anticoagulants were associated with decreased risks of the adverse outcomes under study. These findings may provide clinically relevant information regarding potential treatment for patients with COVID-19.

Isotretinoin, Vitamin A Supplements, and Unintended Pregnancies in Post Roe v. Wade America.

Isotretinoin is a potent vitamin A derivative that is used to treat acne. However, despite its utility in dermatologic care, it is also highly teratogenic and can cause severe life-threatening fetal abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy. As a result, existing regulations are stringent in order to prevent accidental pregnancies in women taking isotretinoin. In the unlikely case of an unintended pregnancy, while taking isotretinoin, a woman could terminate her pregnancy with an abortion. However, with the recent overturning of Roe v. Wade, we explore the consequences of this landmark United States Supreme Court ruling with special attention to those taking isotretinoin and over-the-counter (OTC) vitamin A supplements.

Ignoring the elephant in the room-overregulated isotretinoin and unregulated dietary supplements in the United States.

Isotretinoin is an acne medication regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) iPledge Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program due to its potential for birth defects. This program enforces monthly pregnancy tests and comprehension quizzes, among other requirements, which results in disproportionate medication access barriers. In December 2021, the iPledge system underwent a series of changes, which resulted in systemwide malfunctions and hour-long phone support line waiting times. Due to growing challenges to isotretinoin access, patients may turn to unregulated over-the-counter vitamin A dietary supplements marketed for acne, despite evidence of similar risk of teratogenicity to isotretinoin. While the FDA has understandably focused its attention to isotretinoin regulation, it should increase oversight of the dietary supplement industry, and practitioners should remain informed of risks of vitamin A supplements.

The limits of viability of extremely preterm infants.

Shaeffer and Avery's textbook, Diseases of the Newborn (1971), estimated the limit of viability to be around 28 weeks' gestation and/or 1000 g. Contemporarily, however, attempts are being made to resuscitate infants as early as 22 weeks' gestation. Clearly the "limit of viability" is a moving target, and the acceptable risk of intervening to attempt to "save" these small infants/fetuses is a value judgment and not one that can be answered by science. Even though the dilemma is not one that can be resolved empirically, the emphasis on resolution continues to be one of demands for "further research" by critics as well as advocates for the care of these small infants. Patrick Romanell (1912-2002) was a major philosopher in the critical naturalist movement in the United States and internationally. His observations on the tragic quality of human life and the dilemmas associated between the conflicts of good vs good rather than the epic quality of good vs evil lend themselves well to understanding the conflicts involved in determining the limits of viability of extremely preterm infants.

No One Dies Alone: Addressing a Gap in Medical Education.

Medical school curriculum typically consists of didactical experiences with minimal patient interaction for junior students followed by clinical experiences with supplementary didactics for senior students. Due to the focus on understanding basic medical concepts and disease pathophysiology during the first few years of medical school, students have limited exposure to real-life clinical situations that involve complex, difficult concepts such as death and dying. This leaves students ill-prepared to contribute meaningfully to patients' end-of-life (EOL) care that they will inevitably encounter during their clerkship years. We believe that students would benefit from increased exposure to these difficult situations through structured educational environments, such as the No One Dies Alone Program. In this way, students can become more familiar with the difficult concepts of death and dying, learn how to make meaningful contributions in their patients' EOL care, and ultimately provide patients with the "good death" they deserve.