RESUMO
BACKGROUND: /Purpose: The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Pedi-EAT-10) is a caregiver-administrated subjective questionnaire for evaluating swallowing and feeding disorders among children. This study translated the Pedi-EAT-10 into Traditional Chinese and tested the translated version's reliability and validity. METHODS: Pedi-EAT-10 was translated into Traditional Chinese by experts and finalized after discussion and testing. A total of 168 participants, consisting of 32 children with dysphagia from a tertiary medical center and 136 healthy controls from its Children Care Center for Employees, were recruited. All participants were assessed by an otolaryngologist and speech-language pathologist. The reliability, validity, and efficacy of the translated Pedi-EAT-10 were analyzed to ensure it could be used to identify pediatric dysphagia and feeding problems. RESULTS: The Traditional Chinese version of the Pedi-EAT-10 had significant clinical discriminative validity between the dysphagia group and the control group (total score = 9.6 vs. 2.6, P < 0.001), acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.63), and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91 for the entire cohort). The overall performance of the test for distinguishing children with dysphagia from normal controls was acceptable, and the area under the curve was 74.8% (sensitivity = 71.9%; specificity = 69.9%). The optimal cutoff score was ≥3 on the Youdex index. CONCLUSIONS: The Traditional Chinese version of the Pedi-EAT-10 has fair reliability and validity and can be quickly and easily completed by caregivers. The translated Ped-EAT-10 can be used as a first-line tool for assessing the need for further referral and instrumental examination.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Adenotonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed on children. Caregivers are often concerned about voice change after the procedure, and such concerns remain unsettled. This meta-analysis analyzed voice change in children after adenotonsillectomy. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. REVIEW METHODS: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Two authors independently searched for articles using keywords "adenoidectomy," "tonsillectomy, "voice," "nasalance,"and "speech." English articles specifying voice changes after adenotonsillectomy were pooled with standardized mean difference (SMD) using random-effects model. Evaluation methods were computerized acoustic voice analysis, aerodynamic analysis, nasometer, rhinomanometry, evaluations from a speech-language pathologist or otolaryngologist, and a caregiver assessment questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies with 2154 children were analyzed (mean age: 8.0 y; 58% boys; mean sample size: 94 children). Due to insufficient data for other outcome variables, this meta-analysis only summarized changes in the computerized acoustic voice analysis 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The computerized acoustic analysis revealed significant changes in jitter (SMD = -0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.60 to -0.11), shimmer (SMD = -0.34; 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.11), and soft phonation index (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.15) at 1 month after surgery. Parameters including fundamental frequency, jitter, noise-to-harmonics ratio, and shimmer were not significantly changed at 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis observed small improvements in jitter, shimmer, and soft phonation index 1 month after surgery. No significant effects were observed in voice outcomes 3 months after surgery. Laryngoscope, 2023.
