Influential upregulation of KCNE4: Propelling cancer associated fibroblasts-driven colorectal cancer progression.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignancy of remarkable heterogeneity and heightened morbidity. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are abundant in CRC tissues and are essential for CRC growth. Here, we aimed to develop a CAF-related classifier for predicting the prognosis of CRC and identify critical pro-tumorigenic genes in CAFs. METHOD: The mRNA expression and clinical information of CRC samples were sourced from two comprehensive databases, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Using a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) approach, CAF-related genes were identified and a CAF risk signature was developed through the application of univariate analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model. EdU cell proliferation assay, and transwell assay were performed to detect the oncogenic role of KCNE4 in CAFs. RESULTS: We constructed a prognostic CAF model consisting of two genes (SFRP2 and KCNE4). CRC patients were classified into low- and high-CAF-risk groups using the median CAF risk score, and patients in the high-CAF-risk group had worse prognosis. Meanwhile, a higher risk score for CAFs was associated with greater stromal and CAF infiltrations, as well as higher expression of CAF markers. Furthermore, TIDE analysis indicated that patients with a high CAF risk score are less responsive to immunotherapy. Our further experiments had confirmed the strong correlation between KCNE4 and the malignant phenotypes of CAFs. Moreover, we had shown that KCNE4 could actively promote tumor-promoting phenotypes in CAFs, indicating its critical role in cancer progression. CONCLUSION: The two-gene prognostic CAF signature was constructed and could be reliable for predicting prognosis for CRC patients. Moreover, KCNE4 may be a promising strategy for the development of novel anti-cancer therapeutics specifically directed against CAFs.

Helicobacter pylori and immunotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer.

Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers; however, its impact on immunotherapy for GI cancers remains uncertain. In this study, we included 10,122 patients who underwent 13C-urea breath tests. Among 636 patients with Epstein-Barr virus-negative microsatellite-stable gastric cancer (GC) who were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, H. pylori-positive patients exhibited significantly longer immune-related progression-free survival (irPFS) compared with H. pylori-negative patients (6.97 months versus 5.03 months, p < 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.95, p = 0.015). Moreover, the H. pylori-positive group demonstrated a trend of 4 months longer median immune-related overall survival (irOS) than the H. pylori-negative group. H. pylori-positive GC displayed higher densities of PD-L1+ cells and nonexhausted CD8+ T cells, indicative of a "hot" tumor microenvironment. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that H. pylori-positive GC shared molecular characteristics similar to those of immunotherapy-sensitive GC. However, H. pylori-positive patients with DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) had shorter irPFS compared with H. pylori-negative patients (16.13 months versus not reached, p = 0.042, HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.13-4.50, p = 0.021 and 5.57 months versus 6.97 months, p = 0.029, HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.14-2.23, p = 0.006, respectively). The difference in irOS between H. pylori-positive and -negative patients had the same trend as that between dMMR/MSI-H colorectal adenocarcinoma and ESCC patients. We also identified a trend of shorter irPFS and irOS in H. pylori-positive liver cancer and pancreatic cancer patients. In summary, our findings supported that H. pylori infection is a beneficial factor for GC immunotherapy by shaping hot tumor microenvironments. However, in dMMR/MSI-H colorectal adenocarcinoma and ESCC patients, H. pylori adversely affects the efficacy of immunotherapy.

WALL-ASSOCIATED KINASE Like 14 regulates vascular tissue development in Arabidopsis and tomato.

Initiation of plant vascular tissue is regulated by transcriptional networks during development and in response to environmental stimuli. The WALL-ASSOCIATED KINASES (WAKs) and WAK-likes (WAKLs) are cell surface receptors involved in cell expansion and defence in cells with primary walls, yet their roles in regulation of vascular tissue development that contain secondary walls remains unclear. In this study, we showed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) SlWAKL2 and the orthologous gene in Arabidopsis thaliana, AtWAKL14, were specifically expressed in vascular tissues. SlWAKL2-RNAi tomato plants displayed smaller fruit size with fewer seeds and vascular bundles compared to wild-type (WT) and over-expression (OE) lines. RNA-seq data showed that SlWAKL2-RNAi fruits down-regulated transcript levels of genes related to vascular tissue development compared to WT. Histological analysis showed T-DNA insertion mutant wakl14-1 had reduced plant stem length with fewer number of xylem vessels and interfascicular fibres compared to WT, with no significant differences in cellulose and lignin content. Mutant wakl14-1 also showed reduced number of vascular bundles in fruit. A proWAKL14::mCherry-WAKL14 fusion protein was able to complement wakl14-1 phenotypes and showed mCherry-WAKL14 associated with the plasma membrane. In vitro binding assays showed both SlWAKL2 and AtWAKL14 can interact with pectin and oligogalacturonides. Our results reveal novel roles of WAKLs in regulating vascular tissue development.

Real-world treatment and outcomes of patients with metastatic BRAF mutant colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: BRAF mutation occurs in 5%-10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). Patients with BRAF mutant mCRC exhibit a specific metastatic pattern and poor prognosis. Survival outcomes are heterogeneous in cases of mCRC with a BRAF mutation. The optimal first-line therapy is still controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC between June 2010 and December 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment and BRAF mutation testing results were collected. Patients with a BRAF mutation were included. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to analyze and compare survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to establish the predictive nomogram model. RESULTS: Of the 4475 mCRC, 261 have a BRAF mutation, including 240 V600E and 21 non-V600E mutants. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months in the BRAF V600E mutant group versus 38.0 months in the non-V600E mutant group (p = 0.022). ECOG score, tumor differentiation, liver metastasis, bone metastasis and primary tumor resection were independent prognostic factors for the OS of BRAF V600E mutant mCRC. A nomogram model was established using these factors. The median OS was 39.3 m, 18.2 m and 10.7 m for the low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups defined by this model, respectively (p < 0.0001). Patients who received first-line triplet chemotherapy ± bevacizumab had comparable progression free survival (PFS) and OS compared with those treated with doublets ± bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: BRAF V600E mutant mCRCs exhibit unfavorable and heterogeneous prognosis. The first-line intensive chemotherapy did not confer a marked impact on the PFS and OS.

PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy Versus PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor in Microsatellite Instability Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in advanced microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited patients with MSI/dMMR gastrointestinal cancer who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with or without chemotherapy and compared objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (chemo-anti-PD-1/PD-L1 group) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 group). Propensity score-based overlap weighting analysis was conducted to adjust the baseline covariable imbalance. Sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the stability of the results by propensity score matching and multivariable Cox and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were eligible, with 68 and 188 receiving chemo-anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1, respectively. The chemo-anti-PD-1/PD-L1 group showed significant improvements versus the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 group in ORR (61.8% v 38.8%; P = .001), DCR (92.6% v 74.5%; P = .002), PFS (median PFS [mPFS], not reached [NR] v 27.9 months; P = .004), and OS (median OS [mOS], NR v NR; P = .014). After overlap weighting, the improvements tended to be more significant with chemo-anti-PD-1/PD-L1 versus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in ORR (62.5% v. 38.3%; P < .001), DCR (93.8% v 74.2%; P < .001), PFS (mPFS, NR v 26.0 months; P = .004), and OS (mOS, NR v NR; P = .010). These results were solidified through sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Chemo-anti-PD-1/PD-L1 is superior to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in MSI/dMMR gastrointestinal cancers with improved efficacy.

Trastuzumab Combined with Irinotecan in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Single-Arm Study and Exploratory Biomarker Analysis.

PURPOSE: The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an established therapeutic target for various kinds of solid tumors. HER2 amplification occurs in approximately 1% to 6% of colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy in HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials and Methods: An open-label, phase II trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03185988) was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity of trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2-positive digestive cancers excluding gastric cancer in 2017. Patients from this trial with HER2-positive, KRAS/BRAF wild-type, unresectable mCRC were analyzed in this manuscript. Eligible patients were treated with trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose and then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) and irinotecan (120 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. RESULTS: Twenty-one HER2-positive mCRC patients were enrolled in this study. Seven patients (33.3%) achieved an objective res-ponse, and 11 patients (52.4%) had stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 5.9). Four of the 21 patients (19.0%) had grade 3 adverse events, including leukopenia, neutropenia, urinary tract infection, and diarrhea. No treatment-related death was reported. Exploratory analyses revealed that high tumor tissue HER2 copy number was associated with better therapeutic response and PFS. Alterations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, HER2 gene, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway, and cell cycle control genes were potential drivers of trastuzumab resistance in mCRC. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is a potentially effective and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen in mCRC with a high HER2 copy number.

Using genotype to assist clinical surveillance: a retrospective study of Chinese familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Without treatment, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients will inevitably develop colorectal cancer (CRC) during lifetime. Yet, surgical trauma is a high risk of desmoid tumor (DT), one of the main causes of death in FAP patients. So far, the timing for colectomy is primarily based on the clinician's experience and the patient's preference; most patients undergo surgery at mid-20's. In this study, we analyzed the germline mutation distribution in 35 FAP patients from different families, 16 of them diagnosed with DTs. We also investigated the association between the molecular alterations and the clinicopathological features. Capture-based targeted sequencing using a panel of 520 genes was performed on tumor tissue and paired normal mucosa or white blood cells from 18 FAP probands who were initially diagnosed with CRC. Of all 35 FAP patients, 30 (85.7%) of them harbored germline APC mutations scattered from codon 161 to 1578. The mutations in the 16 DT patients scattered from codon 457 to 1578. All three patients with the mutation at the 3' of 1444 codon were diagnosed with DT. The percentage of high-risk DT (stage III or IV) harboring mutations at the 5' of 1062 or 1062-1578 was 14.3% and 77.8%, respectively, and all three patients with 3' of 1399 codon mutation had high risk. In addition, by using public database, we compared 140 FAP patients with DT to all 1880 FAP patients on the Leiden Open Variation Database and found that the odd ratio of DT in codon 159 to 495 was 0.34, while in codon 1310 to 2011 was 2.36. Compared to sporadic CRCs, the somatic spectrum of FAP CRCs was similar to the early onset CRCs, with higher TP53 (94.1%) and lower somatic APC mutations (65.7%), but the KRAS mutation rate was the highest (58.5%). One of the 18 FAP CRCs was identified as microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), with tumor mutation burden (TMB) of 115.65 mut/Mb. Given that no TP53 mutations were detected in the low- and high-grade adenomas, ctDNA TP53 sequencing might be used for the close monitoring before FAP colectomy. In conclusion, except mutations at the 5' end of APC (5' to 495), all FAP patients need to consider the risk of DT after colectomy. The chance of life-threating DTs was higher in patients with 3' 1062 codon mutation and peaked in patients with 3' 1399 codon mutation. Scheduled monitoring of TP53 ctDNA is proposed to be a novel tool for optimizing the operation time.

The Optimal Therapy after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in MSI Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) gastrointestinal cancers, the optimum therapy after the progression of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is yet unknown. Here, we compared the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus other therapy and chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy in MSI/dMMR gastrointestinal cancer patients after progression on anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited MSI/dMMR gastrointestinal cancer patients who had progressed on anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PFS ratio (PFSr) were compared between patients who received anti-PD1/PD-L1 plus other therapy (ICI-plus group) and patients who received chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy (chemo-targeted group). RESULTS: In total, 26 and 25 patients were recruited in the ICI-plus group and chemo-targeted group, respectively. Significantly better DCR (80.8% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.007), PFS (median PFS 6.9 months vs. 3.0 months, p = 0.001), OS (median OS NR vs. 14.1 months, p = 0.043), and PFSr (2.4 vs. 0.9, p = 0.021), along with a numerically higher ORR (23.1% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.503) were observed in the ICI-plus group compared with the chemo-targeted group. Multivariate analyses identified the therapy regimen as an important prognostic factor in gastrointestinal cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy, continuing anti-PD1/PD-L1 in combination with other treatments showed better clinical outcomes in MSI/dMMR gastrointestinal cancer patients who progressed on PD1/PD-L1 blockade, which should be validated prospectively in clinical trials.

Serological biomarkers predict immune-related adverse events and clinical benefit in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically improved survival in advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients, but also resulted in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to evaluate serological biomarkers of irAEs and treatment response in GI cancer patients. Patients and methods: Metastatic GI cancer patients were enrolled between August 1, 2015, and July 31, 2017. Serum samples were collected at baseline, and a panel of 59 serum biomarkers was tested. The occurrence of irAEs was analyzed, and serological biomarker expression was correlated with irAE incidence and prognosis. Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled, of whom 47.1% (24/51) were diagnosed with irAEs, including 4 patients (7.8%) with grade 3-5 irAEs. The most common irAE was thyroiditis (9/51, 17.6%), followed by colitis (7/51, 13.7%). The expression of CD28 (P = 0.042), IL-4 (P = 0.033), IL-15 (P = 0.024) and PD-L1 (P = 0.018) was significantly elevated in patients with grade 3-5 irAEs. For organ-specific irAEs, IL-6 levels were higher in patients with thyroiditis and colitis, while IL-22 and SCF levels were higher in patients with colitis. Increased IL-1α, IL-21, LIF, and PIGF-1 levels were significantly associated with myositis incidence, while the serum levels of six cytokines (BTLA, GM-CSF, IL-4, PD-1, PD-L1 and TIM-3) were higher in patients with rash. Prognostic analysis showed that patients with irAEs had better tumor response (P = 0.029), improved PFS (median survival: undefined vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.002), and extended OS (median survival: undefined vs. 4.3 months, P = 0.003). The prognostic value of irAEs was only significant in patients who received anti-PD-1 inhibitors, but not in those who received anti-PD-L1 inhibitors. Besides, elevated BTLA (median OS: not reached vs. 7 months; P = 0.0168) and PD-1 (median OS: not reached vs. 7 months; P = 0.0223) concentrations were associated with longer OS. Conclusions: Serological proteins are promising markers for predicting immune-related toxicity and prognosis in GI cancer patients. Organ-specific irAEs have various cytokine profiles. Although further validation is needed before clinical application, this study provided a direction for identifying patients at risk for irAEs, and guiding patient selection for ICI therapy.

Molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance of BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors.

Background: Combinatorial inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and BRAF shows remarkable clinical benefits in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the tumor may inevitably develop resistance to the targeted therapy, thereby limiting the response rate and durability. This study aimed to determine the genetic alterations associated with intrinsic and acquired resistance to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Methods: Targeted sequencing of 520 cancer-related genes was performed in tumor tissues and in plasma samples collected from patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, who were treated with EGFR/BRAF ±â€„MEK inhibitors, before and after the targeted treatment. Clinical benefit was defined as an objective response or a stable disease lasting longer than the median progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In all, 25 patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC were included in this study. Those with RNF43 mutations (n = 8) were more likely to achieve clinical benefit from EGFR/BRAF inhibitors than those with wild-type RNF43 (87.5% versus 37.5%, p = 0.034). Genetic alterations in receptor tyrosine kinase genes (n = 6) were associated with worse PFS (p = 0.005). Among the 23 patients whose disease progressed after the EGFR/BRAF-targeted therapy, at least one acquired resistance-related mutation was detected in 12 patients. Acquired mutations were most frequently observed in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway-related genes (n = 9), including KRAS (G12D and Q61H/R), NRAS (Q61L/R/K and amplification), BRAF (amplification), and MEK1 (K57T). MET amplification and PIK3R1 Q579fs mutation emerged in three patients and one patient, respectively, after disease progression. Conclusion: Multiple genetic alterations are associated with clinical benefits and resistance to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Our findings provide novel insights into strategies for overcoming resistance to EGFR/BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC.

Combination of AKT1 and CDH1 mutations predicts primary resistance to immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is the second most common cancer type with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype that is expected to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, approximately half of the patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer derive no benefit from ICIs. We sought to identify the predictors of primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer. METHODS: Three independent cohorts were included: (1) the discovery cohort (65 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer) with ICI efficacy data and pre-ICIs tissue samples for genomic profile and tumor immune infiltration; (2) the validation cohort (22 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer) with ICI efficacy data and pre-ICIs plasma samples for genomic profile; and (3) the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) cohort not receiving ICIs (152 patients with MSI-H GI cancer) with genomic profile and survival data. RESULTS: AKT1 and CDH1 mutations were identified as independent predictors of poor progression-free survival (PFS) and primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer. We combined these two genes as an immuno-oncology therapy predictor (IOpred), which could recognize 52.4% (11/21) of dMMR/MSI-H patients with primary resistance to ICIs with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.7% (11/12). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated IOpred with a good performance in predicting primary resistance (area under the curve 0.751). Patients with IOpred-Mut (mutant AKT1 or CDH1) GI cancer had significantly shorter PFS (HR=8.36, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS, HR=5.17, p<0.001) than IOpred-WT (wild-type for both AKT1 and CDH1) cases upon ICI treatment. The validation cohort also confirmed the correlation between IOpred-mutation and poorer prognosis (PFS, HR=4.68, p=0.004; OS, HR=15.98, p<0.001) in dMMR/MSI-H patients after ICIs. The PPV of IOpred in identifying primary resistance to ICIs was 80% (4/5) in the validation cohort. Additionally, IOpred-WT patients could be further stratified by tumor mutational burden (TMB), wherein TMB-low patients (TMB ≤26.19 mutations per megabase (Mb)) had a significantly higher primary resistance rate to ICIs (34.8% vs 6.7%, p=0.014) and poorer PFS (HR=3.46, p=0.008) and OS (HR=4.42, p=0.047) than TMB-high patients (TMB >26.19 mutations/Mb). CONCLUSIONS: IOpred was identified as a powerful predictor of primary resistance to ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer, which might serve as a promising biomarker to help guide immunotherapy decision-making.

Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial interim results.

Despite success in hematologic malignancies, the treatment landscape of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for solid tumors remains limited. Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2)-redirected CAR T cells showed promising efficacy against gastric cancer (GC) in a preclinical study. Here we report the interim analysis results of an ongoing, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 clinical trial of CLDN18.2-targeted CAR T cells (CT041) in patients with previously treated, CLDN18.2-positive digestive system cancers ( NCT03874897 ). The primary objective was safety after CT041 infusion; secondary objectives included CT041 efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. We treated 37 patients with one of three CT041 doses: 2.5 × 108, 3.75 × 108 or 5.0 × 108 cells. All patients experienced a grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicity. Grade 1 or 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 94.6% of patients. No grade 3 or higher CRS or neurotoxicities, treatment-related deaths or dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 48.6% and 73.0%, respectively. The 6-month duration of response rate was 44.8%. In patients with GC, the ORR and DCR reached 57.1% and 75.0%, respectively, and the 6-month overall survival rate was 81.2%. These initial results suggest that CT041 has promising efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated, CLDN18.2-positive digestive system cancers, particularly in those with GC.

Mutations of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway as predictors for immune cell infiltration and immunotherapy efficacy in dMMR/MSI-H gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A significant subset of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) gastric adenocarcinomas (GAC) are resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), yet the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. We sought to investigate the genomic correlates of the density of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (DTICs) and primary resistance to ICI treatment. METHODS: Four independent cohorts of MSI-H GAC were included: (i) the surgery cohort (n = 175) with genomic and DTIC data, (ii) the 3DMed cohort (n = 32) with genomic and PD-L1 data, (iii) the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n = 73) with genomic, transcriptomic, and survival data, and (iv) the ICI treatment cohort (n = 36) with pre-treatment genomic profile and ICI efficacy data. RESULTS: In the dMMR/MSI-H GAC, the number of mutated genes in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway (NMP) was positively correlated with tumor mutational burden (P < 0.001) and sensitivity to PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitors and negatively correlated with CD3+ (P < 0.001), CD4+ (P = 0.065), CD8+ (P = 0.004), and FOXP3+ cells (P = 0.033) in the central-tumor rather than invasive-margin area, and the transcription of immune-related genes. Compared to the NMP-low (NMP = 0/1) patients, the NMP-high (NMP ≥ 2) patients exhibited a poorer objective response rate (29.4% vs. 85.7%, P < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 3.40, P = 0.019), and overall survival (HR = 3.59, P = 0.048) upon ICI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Higher NMP was identified as a potential predictor of lower DTICs and primary resistance to ICIs in the dMMR/MSI-H GAC. Our results highlight the possibility of using mutational data to estimate DTICs and administering the PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitor as an immunotherapeutic adjuvant in NMP-high subpopulation to overcome the resistance to ICIs.

Efficacy and predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (GC) (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of GC with a favorable prognosis. However, the exact effects and potential mechanisms of EBV infection on immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) efficacy in GC remain to be clarified. Additionally, EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization (ISH), the traditional method to detect EBV, could cause false-positive/false-negative results and not allow for characterizing other molecular biomarkers recommended by standard treatment guidelines for GC. Herein, we sought to investigate the efficacy and potential biomarkers of ICB in EBVaGC identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS). DESIGN: An NGS-based algorithm for detecting EBV was established and validated using two independent GC cohorts (124 in the training cohort and 76 in the validation cohort). The value of EBV infection for predicting ICB efficacy was evaluated among 95 patients with advanced or metastatic GC receiving ICB. The molecular predictive biomarkers for ICB efficacy were identified to improve the prediction accuracy of ICB efficacy in 22 patients with EBVaGC. RESULTS: Compared with orthogonal assay (EBER-ISH) results, the NGS-based algorithm achieved high performance with a sensitivity of 95.7% (22/23) and a specificity of 100% (53/53). EBV status was identified as an independent predictive factor for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with DNA mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) GC following ICB. Moreover, the patients with EBV+/pMMR and EBV-/MMR deficient (dMMR) had comparable and favorable survival following ICB. Twenty-two patients with EBV+/pMMR achieved an objective response rate of 54.5% (12/22) on immunotherapy. Patients with EBVaGC with a high cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) level were less responsive to anti-programmed death-1/ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) monotherapy, and the combination of anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1/L1 checkpoint blockade benefited patients with EBVaGC more than anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy with a trend close to significance (p=0.074). There were nearly significant differences in tumor mutational burden (TMB) level and SMARCA4 mutation frequency between the ICB response and non-response group. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an efficient NGS-based EBV detection strategy, and this strategy-identified EBV infection was as effective as dMMR in predicting ICB efficacy in GC. Additionally, we identified CTLA-4, TMB, and SMARCA4 mutation as potential predictive biomarkers of ICB efficacy in EBVaGC, which might better inform ICB treatment for EBVaGC.

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Regorafenib and Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An Observational Cohort Study in the Real World.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib and fruquintinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are recommended for refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) in China. However, to date, no head-to-head trials have been conducted to guide clinical practice. METHODS AND PATIENTS: An ambispective observational cohort study was conducted in Beijing Cancer Hospital. Patients with metastatic CRC who received regorafenib or fruquintinib were retrospectively collected between January 2018 and April 2020, and prospectively enrolled between May 2020 and February 2021. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and adverse events. An additional goal of the study was to explore the appropriate sequence of regorafenib and fruquintinib treatment. RESULTS: A total of 366 patients with metastatic CRC were enrolled to receive regorafenib (n = 260) or fruquintinib (n = 106) between January 2018 and February 2021. No difference was observed for median TTF (regorafenib 2.7 months vs. fruquintinib 3.1 months, P = .200) or median OS (regorafenib 13.8 months vs. fruquintinib 11.3 months, P = .527). The propensity score analysis showed similar results for median TTF and median OS between the 2 groups, as did the results of subgroup analysis for prospective set (n = 146). For sequence analysis, patients with regorafenib followed by fruquintinib (n = 84) showed longer OS than that with the reverse (n = 29) (28.1 months vs. 18.4 months, P = .024). Most patients tolerated regorafenib at a reduced dose (93.1%), and most patients tolerated fruquintinib at a standard dose (68.9%). The incidences of most adverse events were similar between the two groups, while any grade of hand-foot skin reaction and hyperbilirubinemia were more frequently observed in the regorafenib group and ≥grade 3 hypertension was more common in the fruquintinib group. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib and fruquintinib had similar efficacy and toxicity profiles with various frequency. Regorafenib followed by fruquintinib showed longer OS than the reverse, but the sequence needs to be further confirmed.

PTCH1 mutation promotes antitumor immunity and the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer patients.

Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy for various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), but only a subset of MSI-H patients can benefit from such therapy. Patched1 (PTCH1) is a frequently altered gene in CRCs and its mutations contribute to unregulated Hedgehog (Hh) signaling. In the study, we evaluated the association of PTCH1 mutations with CRC immunity based on our single-center cohort and multiple cancer genomic datasets. Among 21 enrolled patients, six (28.6%) harbored a PTCH1 mutation based on WES analyses. In CRC patients, the PTCH1 mutation subgroup experienced a higher durable clinical benefit rate than the PTCH1 wild-type subgroup (100% vs. 40%, P = 0.017). In addition, patients with the PTCH1 mutation experienced greater progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.037; HR, 0.208) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.045; HR, 0.185). A validation cohort from the MSKCC also confirmed the correlation between PTCH1 mutation and better prognosis (P = 0.022; HR, 0.290). Mechanically, diverse antitumor immune signatures were more highly enriched in PTCH1-mutated tumors than in PTCH1 wild-type tumors. Furthermore, PTCH1-mutated tumors had higher proportions of CD8 + T cells, activated NK cells, and M1 type macrophage infiltration, as well as elevated gene signatures of several steps in the cancer-immunity cycle. Notably, the PTCH1 mutation was correlated with tumor mutational burden (TMB), loss of heterozygosity score, and copy number variation burden. Our results show that the mutation of PTCH1 is a potential biomarker for predicting the response of CRC patients to immunotherapy.

Redefine Hyperprogressive Disease During Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Emerging evidence showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) lead to hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in a small proportion of patients. There is no well-recognized standard for the evaluation of HPD. Comprehensive exploration of HPD definition system in gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI is lacking to date. METHODS: A total of 126 patients with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI monotherapy were analyzed. Seven definitions of HPD were defined with tumor growth kinetics (TGK) or tumor growth rate (TGR) by including new lesions or not, and with different cutoffs. Incidence and performance of different criteria were compared. Clinicopathologic characteristics and baseline genomic variations associated with HPD were also explored. RESULTS: Tumor growth kinetics ratio of more than two fold that incorporated new lesions into calculation of HPD outperformed other definitions by successfully stratifying 14 patients (11.1%) with both accelerated disease progression (median PFS, 1.62 versus 1.93 months; hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.98 to 3.48; P = 0.059) and worse overall survival (median OS, 3.97 versus 10.23 months; hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.78; P = 0.021). Baseline genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA, including SMARCA2, MSH6, APC signaling pathway, and Wnt signaling pathway, might be associated with the risk of HPD. CONCLUSION: Incorporating new lesions emerging during the treatment was shown to be reliable for the assessment of TGK. TGK serves as a more convenient way to reflect tumor growth acceleration compared with TGR. Genomic alterations were suggested to be associated with the occurrence of HPD.

Germline HLA-B evolutionary divergence influences the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) genotype has been linked with differential immune responses to infectious disease and cancer. However, the clinical relevance of germline HLA-mediated immunity in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer remains elusive. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the genomic profiling data from 84 metastatic GI cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) recruited from Peking University Cancer Hospital (PUCH). A publicly available dataset from the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center (MSK GI cohort) was employed as the validation cohort. For the PUCH cohort, we performed HLA genotyping by whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis on the peripheral blood samples from all patients. Tumor tissues from 76 patients were subjected to WES analysis and immune oncology-related RNA profiling. We studied the associations of two parameters of germline HLA as heterozygosity and evolutionary divergence (HED, a quantifiable measure of HLA-I evolution) with the clinical outcomes of patients in both cohorts. RESULTS: Our data showed that neither HLA heterozygosity nor HED at the HLA-A/HLA-C locus correlated with the overall survival (OS) in the PUCH cohort. Interestingly, in both the PUCH and MSK GI cohorts, patients with high HLA-B HED showed a better OS compared with low HLA-B HED subgroup. Of note, a combinatorial biomarker of HLA-B HED and tumor mutational burden (TMB) may better stratify potential responders. Furthermore, patients with high HLA-B HED were characterized with a decreased prevalence of multiple driver gene mutations and an immune-inflamed phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our results unveil how HLA-B evolutionary divergence influences the ICB response in patients with GI cancers, supporting its potential utility as a combinatorial biomarker together with TMB for patient stratification in the future.

Alterations in DNA damage response and repair genes as potential biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade in gastrointestinal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved remarkable results in cancer treatments. However, there is no effective predictive biomarker for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: We conducted integrative analyses of the genomic and survival data of ICI-treated GI cancer patients from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cohort (MSK-GI, n = 227), the Janjigian cohort (n = 40), and the Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute cohort (PUCH, n = 80) to determine the possible associations between DNA damage response and repair (DDR) gene mutations and clinical outcomes. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were analyzed to determine the possible correlations between DDR gene mutations and the tumor microenvironment. RESULTS: In the MSK cohort, the presence of ≥ 2 DDR gene mutations was correlated with prolonged overall survival (OS). The Janjigian and PUCH cohorts further confirmed that subgroups with ≥ 2 DDR gene mutations displayed a prolonged OS and a higher durable clinical benefit. Furthermore, the DDR gene mutation load could be considered as an independent prognostic factor, and exhibited a potential predictive value for survival in GI cancer patients treated with ICIs. Mechanistically, we showed that the presence of ≥ 2 DDR gene mutations was correlated with higher levels of tumor mutation burden, neoantigen, and T cell infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: The DDR gene mutation status was correlated with favorable clinical outcomes in GI cancer patients receiving ICIs, which could serve as a potential biomarker to guide patient selection for immunotherapy.

Genetic differences between lung metastases and liver metastases from left-sided microsatellite stable colorectal cancer: next generation sequencing and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the clinical characteristics and outcomes of lung metastases (LuM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are different from those of liver metastases (LiM) from CRC. However, little is known about the genetic features of LuM. This study aimed to identify the different genetic characteristics of LuM and LiM from left-sided microsatellite stable CRC. METHODS: Tissue samples of the primary tumors and paired metastases from 18 CRC patients with isolated LuM (LuM cohort), 18 patients with isolated LiM (LiM cohort), and 10 locally advanced CRC patients without metastases (control cohort) were selected for next-generation sequencing. Patients in the LiM cohort had matched clinicopathological characteristics with the LuM cohort. The single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), copy number variations (CNVs), pathway alterations, and tumor mutation burdens (TMBs) were also calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: The CNV results showed that ZFHX4, GATA2, and FAM131B amplifications were more common in the metastatic cohorts than in the control cohort, while RECQL4 and FLCN amplifications were common in the controls. The LuM cohort had significantly higher proportions of HNF4A, BRD4, and U2AF1 amplification. The LuM, LiM, and control cohorts were successfully separated using pathway alteration analysis. The LuM cohort had more frequent alterations in the RTK/RAS pathway, HIPPO pathway, KRAS, and MET than the LiM group. The LuM cohort also had relatively higher TMBs than the LiM cohort. CONCLUSIONS: CNVs in primary tumors could identify patients with LuM. Targeting the HIPPO pathway or MET and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with other agents might be novel therapies for LuM.