Person-Centered Models for Cardiovascular Care: A Review of the Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and disability in the United States and globally. Disease burden continues to escalate despite technological advances associated with improved life expectancy and quality of life. As a result, longer life is associated with multiple chronic cardiovascular conditions. Clinical guidelines provide recommendations without considering prevalent scenarios of multimorbidity and health system complexities that affect practical adoption. The diversity of personal preferences, cultures, and lifestyles that make up one's social and environmental context is often overlooked in ongoing care planning for symptom management and health behavior support, hindering adoption and compromising patient outcomes, particularly in groups at high risk. The purpose of this scientific statement was to describe the characteristics and reported outcomes in existing person-centered care delivery models for selected cardiovascular conditions. We conducted a scoping review using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase.com, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2010 to 2022. A range of study designs with a defined aim to systematically evaluate care delivery models for selected cardiovascular conditions were included. Models were selected on the basis of their stated use of evidence-based guidelines, clinical decision support tools, systematic evaluation processes, and inclusion of the patient's perspective in defining the plan of care. Findings reflected variation in methodological approach, outcome measures, and care processes used across models. Evidence to support optimal care delivery models remains limited by inconsistencies in approach, variation in reimbursement, and inability of health systems to meet the needs of patients with chronic, complex cardiovascular conditions.

Assessment and management of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS): A clinical perspective from the National Lipid Association.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are the most common form of statin intolerance and are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events that manifest from statin underutilization and discontinuation. The reported frequencies of SAMS are divergent in the literature. The writing group estimates the prevalence of SAMS, namely all muscle symptoms temporally related to statin use but without regard to causality, to be about 10% (range 5% to 25%), and the prevalence of pharmacological SAMS, specifically muscle symptoms resulting from pharmacological properties of the statin, to be about 1-2% (range 0.5% to 4%). In clinical practice, SAMS are likely to result from a combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological effects, however this does not make the symptoms any less clinically relevant. Regardless of the etiology, SAMS need to be addressed in accordance with patients' preferences and experiences. This clinical perspective reviews the epidemiology and underlying pathophysiology of SAMS, and the cardiovascular consequences resulting from statin discontinuation. We present patient-centered clinical and communication strategies to mitigate SAMS and improve medication adherence and outcomes among statin users. Treatment strategies include 1) optimizing lifestyle interventions, 2) modulating risk factors that may contribute to muscle symptoms, 3) optimizing statin tolerability by dose reduction, decreased dosing frequency, or use of an alternate statin with more favorable pharmacokinetic properties, and 4) use of non-statins, emphasizing those with evidence for atherosclerotic risk reduction, either in combination with or in place of statin therapy depending on the patient's circumstances. The focus of this clinical perspective is sustainable lipoprotein goal achievement, which is important for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Complementary role of evinacumab in combination with lipoprotein apheresis in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have severe hypercholesterolemia from birth and if untreated may experience very early onset of coronary artery disease in childhood or young adulthood with an aggressive course resulting in early death. Early initiation of aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering is the mainstay of treatment, which requires the use of a multidrug treatment regimen, often in combination with lipoprotein apheresis, but LDL-C goal achievement is frequently unattainable due to the severity of baseline hypercholesterolemia and hyporesponsiveness to many LDL-C-lowering medications. Evinacumab, a monoclonal antibody that sequesters angiopoietin-like 3 protein and lowers LDL-C by an average of 49% in patients with homozygous FH, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in February 2021 and is a major advance in treatment of these high-risk patients. In this report, we describe the complementary role of evinacumab in combination with lipoprotein apheresis in two patients with homozygous FH.

Real-world utilization of bempedoic acid in an academic preventive cardiology practice.

BACKGROUND: Lipid management for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease remains insufficient for many with currently available therapies. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate real-world use of bempedoic acid. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients in our Center for Preventive Cardiology who were prescribed bempedoic acid between February 2020 and July 2021. Patients were managed according to clinical standards of care, with lipid assessments at months ≤3, 6, and 12 post-bempedoic acid initiation. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were prescribed bempedoic acid, with 64 initiating therapy. The majority had atherosclerosis (89%), familial hypercholesterolemia (64%), and statin intolerance (74%), with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 120 mg/dL. Prior authorization requests and appeals of denials were required in 90% and 19% of cases, respectively. Cost-mitigating strategies reduced median monthly drug costs from $432 pre-insurance approval to $80 post-insurance approval, to $10 after financial assistance intervention. Bempedoic acid reduced LDL-C by -36.7%, -31%, and -20.3% at ≤3, 6, and 12, respectively, with >20% achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL. There was substantial inter-individual heterogeneity in LDL-C lowering. We observed high rates of drug discontinuation (35.9%), mostly related to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (32.8%), primarily musculoskeletal complaints. Use of reduced dose bempedoic acid (<180 mg) was associated similar LDL-C lowering but TEAE and drug discontinuation were still common. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world use of bempedoic acid was limited by insurance and cost barriers requiring substantial post-prescription interventions. In patients at heightened risk for atherosclerotic events and statin intolerance, bempedoic acid was associated with clinically meaningful LDL-C lowering, but high rates of TEAEs and drug discontinuations.

Hepatic Sensing Loop Regulates PCSK9 Secretion in Response to Inhibitory Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9i) lower LDL-C by up to 60% and increase plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels by 10-fold. OBJECTIVES: The authors studied the reasons behind the robust increase in plasma PCSK9 levels by testing the hypothesis that mechanisms beyond clearance via the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) contribute to the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. METHODS: In clinical cohorts, animal models, and cell-based studies, we measured kinetic changes in PCSK9 production and clearance in response to PCSK9i. RESULTS: In a patient cohort receiving PCSK9i therapy, plasma PCSK9 levels rose 11-fold during the first 3 months and then plateaued for 15 months. In a cohort of healthy volunteers, a single injection of PCSK9i increased plasma PCSK9 levels within 12 hours; the rise continued for 9 days until it plateaued at 10-fold above baseline. We recapitulated the rapid rise in PCSK9 levels in a mouse model, but only in the presence of LDLR. In vivo turnover and in vitro pulse-chase studies identified 2 mechanisms contributing to the rapid increase in plasma PCSK9 levels in response to PCSK9i: 1) the expected delayed clearance of the antibody-bound PCSK9; and 2) the unexpected post-translational increase in PCSK9 secretion. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 re-entry to the liver via LDLR triggers a sensing loop regulating PCSK9 secretion. PCSK9i therapy enhances the secretion of PCSK9, an effect that contributes to the increased plasma PCSK9 levels in treated subjects.

Evinacumab for treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia.

Introduction: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by lifelong elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), early onset coronary atherosclerosis, and premature death. FH is underdiagnosed and undertreated, but requires aggressive LDL-C-lowering to prevent complications. Current treatment strategies such as lifestyle modification and numerous LDL-C-lowering medications are often insufficient to achieve lipid goals in FH.Areas covered: Angiopoietin-like 3 protein (ANGPTL3) is intricately involved in lipid metabolism. Loss-of-function mutations in ANGPTL3 are associated with panhypolipidemia and reduced coronary atherosclerosis. Evinacumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, inhibits ANGPTL3 and reduces multiple lipoprotein fractions ~50%, including LDL-C. The use of evinacumab within the FH population is described as well as its regulatory journey to an approved therapeutic.Expert opinion: Evinacumab, with its capacity to lower multiple lipoprotein fractions, particularly LDL-C, independently of LDLR function has potential to revolutionize treatment for FH patients. Current FDA-approval is only for homozygous FH (HoFH), arguably the most impactful indication, but use in other lipid disorders is under investigation. The short-term tolerability of evinacumab is very good, with infrequent, mild, and transient adverse events; however, long-term safety data are needed. The high cost and requirement for intravenous administration may limit adoption of evinacumab, but dramatic LDL-C-lowering and need for new therapeutic options for HoFH will drive interest.

Real-world utilization of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in an academic preventive cardiology practice.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the real-world use of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in an academic Preventive Cardiology Clinic. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients seen in our Center for Preventive Cardiology (CPC) and who received a new prescription, according to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications, for one of the following pharmacotherapies with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications from May 2019 to May 2020: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). Treatment endpoints were prescription patterns, medication access, patient out-of-pocket expenses, medication tolerability, and clinical cardiovascular events while on these therapies. RESULTS: Of the 2390 patients seen in our CPC clinic over the observation period, 532 (22.3%) had already started and 291 (12.2%) were newly initiated on pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications with a median treatment duration of 9.1 months. Of these, 291 patients (for a total of 320 separate drug orders) - 93 (29.1%) were prescribed PCSK9i, 131 (40.9%) EPA, 46 (14.4%) SGLT2i, and 50 (15.6%) GLP-1 RA. Nearly 80% of cases required some form of provider intervention post-prescription (authorization, appeal, financial assistance, and/or side effect management). A total of 70% of adult patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin and with an HgbA1C >7% were treated with a SGLT2i and/or GLP-1 RA - either initiated prior to or during the study period. Median monthly drug cost for the total cohort was reduced from $595.00 pre-insurance approval to $70.50 post-insurance approval, to $7.00 post-financial assistance intervention. The medications were well tolerated with any side effect occurring in 28.3%, and discontinuation due to side effects in 5.8% of cases. Clinical cardiovascular events occurred in 2.7%, of which 1.9% was due to ASCVD and 0.8% to hospitalization for heart failure. Differences in medication access, cost, tolerability and clinical cardiovascular events varied widely between the medication classes. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation and management of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in a real-world setting requires substantial provider intervention, a workflow amenable to a multi-disciplinary approach which allows for high rates of medication access and cost minimization, and low rates of medication side effects and clinical cardiovascular events.

Optimizing sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor use in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A collaborative clinical practice statement.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a debilitating disease that is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and societal costs. The past three decades have brought about significant advancements in the pharmacologic management of HFrEF, and a corresponding reduction in morbidity and mortality. However, the progress to improve clinical outcomes in real-world settings has stalled in recent years, largely due to underutilization of guideline directed medical therapies (GDMT). The discovery of significant cardio-renal protection from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has ushered in a new treatment paradigm for HFrEF management with SGLT2i therapy becoming an essential component of GDMT. Our Preventive Cardiology and Heart Failure services have established an innovative, multi-disciplinary, collaborative protocol to optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors and facilitation SGLT2i use in patients with HFrEF. The goal of this collaboration is to enhance utilization and safety of SGLT2i for HFrEF management by circumventing medication access issues, the major obstacle to therapy initiation. Within this protocol, our heart failure providers identify patients for the addition of SGLT2i to a background of heart failure GDMT. The patient is then referred to preventive cardiology where the team performs a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment, optimizes cardiovascular risk factors, and initiates SGLT2i with an emphasis on medication access, cost minimization, and mitigation of potential side effects. The heart failure team assumes responsibility for modification of heart failure-based therapies, and the preventive team manages diabetes, lipid, and metabolic-based therapies. The patient is followed by both cardiology services in a structured fashion, comparing outcome measures at regular intervals and utilizing our patient registry and bio-repository. This clinical practice statement provides a detailed evidentiary review on the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2i, outlines the rational for creation of a collaborative protocol, details a structured program that may serve as a template for enhanced heart failure management in other health systems, and addresses challenges encountered and recommendations for use.

Inclisiran: A Novel Agent for Lowering Apolipoprotein B-containing Lipoproteins.

ABSTRACT: Hypercholesterolemia is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, efforts to lower apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in plasma are the centerpiece of strategies for cardiovascular prevention and treatment in primary and secondary management. Despite the importance of this endeavor, many patients do not achieve appropriate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goals, even among those who have experienced atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The development of new LDL-C-lowering medications with alternative mechanisms of action will facilitate improved goal achievement in high-risk patients. Inclisiran is a novel small interfering RNA-based drug that is experimental in the United States and approved for clinical use in the European Union. It lowers LDL-C and other apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins by reducing production of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin Type 9 (PCSK9), a protein that normally contributes to LDL-receptor degradation, thereby increasing LDL-receptor density and recycling in hepatocytes. Although the lipid-lowering efficacy of inclisiran is comparable with results achieved with PCSK9-blocking monoclonal antibodies (alirocumab and evolocumab), there are several important differences between the 2 drug classes. First, inclisiran reduces levels of PCSK9 both intracellularly and extracellularly by blocking translation of and degrading PCSK9 messenger RNA. Second, the long biological half-life of inclisiran produces sustained LDL-C lowering with twice yearly dosing. Third, although PCSK9-blocking monoclonal antibodies drugs are proven to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events, clinical outcomes trials with inclisiran are still in progress. In this article, we review the clinical development of inclisiran, its mechanism of action, lipid-lowering efficacy, safety and tolerability, and potential clinical role of this promising new agent.

Chylomicronemia syndrome: Familial or not?

BACKGROUND: Chylomicronemia syndrome (CS) is a metabolic condition characterized by severely elevated plasma triglycerides (>880 mg/dL) and high rates of morbidity and mortality. The syndrome can be classified into two major groups: monogenic familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) and multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), the frequencies of which are ill-defined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to characterize the prevalence of the most common and rarest subsets of this syndrome, MCS and FCS, respectively, in a single-center, real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with plasma triglycerides ≥880 mg/dL. The criteria used for identification of patients with FCS were modeled after a Food and Drug Administration endorsed set of parameters. Less stringent criteria that removed the requirement for pancreatitis were used to classify MCS. Full criteria are described in detail in the article. RESULTS: Of the 2,342,136 patient records queried, 578 had triglycerides ≥880 mg/dL (0.025%), of which 86 had a documented history of pancreatitis. Five patients who met the criteria for FCS were identified (three genetically confirmed), resulting in an estimated prevalence of ~1-2 per 1,000,000. On the other hand, MCS was identified in 186 patients, corresponding to an estimated prevalence of ~1 in 12,000. There were 5181 cases of pancreatitis (0.22% of the entire cohort), 86 of which occurred in subjects with triglycerides≥880 mg/dL (1.7% of cases of pancreatitis). Rates of pancreatitis in this subset were elevated at 6.5%, 100%, and 17.8%, among patients with MCS, FCS, and secondary hypertriglyceridemia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CS is an uncommon condition, but it is associated with significant complications, regardless of etiology. Among patients with CS, MCS was 40- to 60-fold more prevalent than FCS and associated with frequent morbidity. Therefore, disease recognition and treatment should extend to all forms of CS pursuant to the clinical presentation.

Use of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients.

Standard lipid-lowering therapies in solid organ transplantations pose challenges due to interactions with immunosuppressants. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) represent a new class of lipid-lowering therapies with potential promise in this population. We describe PCSK9i as an efficacious and safe option for management of hypercholesterolemia in solid organ transplantations. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Unusual responses to PCSK9 inhibitors in a clinical cohort utilizing a structured follow-up protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize unusual responses to PCSK9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapy in a real-world setting, given their extremely low prevalence in clinical trials. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients seen in a structured academic PCSK9i clinic who had LDL-C measurements before and after initiation of PCSK9i (up to 12 months). Unusual response was defined as: (1) no response: no changes in LDL-C level at all time points; (2) delayed response: <30% LDL-C reduction by the third dose, but achieving this threshold at a later time; (3) reduced response: <30% LDL-C reduction at all time points; and (4) lost response: ≥30% LDL-C reduction by the third dose, but displaying <30% reduction at a later time. RESULTS: Of the 411 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 54 were initially classified as unusual responders. After excluding those not adherent to prescribed interventions, 31 patients (7.5%) were classified as true unusual responders. These included: 2 with no response, 12 with delayed response, 3 with reduced response, 6 with delayed or reduced response, 4 with lost response, and 4 with delayed and lost response. Response to PCSK9i therapy at all time points revealed higher on-treatment LDL-C values (94-100 vs. 47-51 â€‹mg/dL, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and lower degree of percent reduction in LDL-C (23.3-34% vs. 61.1-64.5%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) in the unusual versus usual responders. Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) values were consistently higher in the unusual responders (81-92.5 vs. 28.5-52 â€‹mg/dL, p â€‹< â€‹0.01). Fold change in post-versus pre-treatment PCSK9 plasma results was similar between the two cohorts (p â€‹> â€‹0.05), suggesting that unusual responses were not due to insufficient plasma PCSK9 blockade. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified clinical FH (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.27-7.24) and no ezetimibe therapy (OR 0.334, 95% CI 0.150-0.728) as factors related to true unusual response. CONCLUSIONS: Unusual responses to PCSK9i in a clinical cohort are more common than reported in clinical trials. Of the suspected unusual responders, nearly half were the result of adherence issues, and thus careful medication reconciliation should be the first step in diagnosing an unusual response.

The PCSK9 revolution: Current status, controversies, and future directions.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) has revolutionized our understanding of cholesterol homeostasis and added to our arsenal against atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In a span of approximately 15 years, PCSK9 has morphed from an esoteric and rare cause of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) into the most efficient cholesterol-lowering target ever known, with the completion of two large scale cardiovascular outcome trials showing positive results. Current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved modalities to inhibit PCSK9 are in the form of monoclonal antibodies which display an unparalleled degree of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering and expand upon the notion that lower LDL-C is better for ASCVD risk reduction. However, the accelerated pace of discovery and therapeutic development has left large gaps in our knowledge regarding the physiology and function of PCSK9. The aim of this review is to provide context to the discovery, history, treatment and current status of PCSK9 and its therapeutic inhibitors and highlight areas of controversy and future directions.

Mechanisms and Evidence for Heart Failure Benefits from SGLT2 Inhibitors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the clinical trial data and underlying mechanistic principles in support of the robust cardiovascular (CV) benefits, in particular, heart failure (HF) outcomes association with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. RECENT FINDINGS: Several large CV outcome trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and with either established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) or at high risk for ASCVD reveal that SGLT2 inhibitors cause reductions in CV and HF endpoints. The reduction in ASCVD appears to be confined to those with established ASCVD on the order of ≈ 14%, as does the mortality benefit-all-cause and CV-related. However, hospitalization for HF are reduced by ≈ 33% and occur regardless of baseline patient characteristics. The unprecedented HF outcomes are theorized to occur via several possible mechanisms and include optimization of conventional ASCVD risk factors, improvement in hemodynamics, prevention of cardiac and renal remodeling, inhibition of hormone dysregulation, use of more efficient metabolic substrates, ion channel inhibition, anti-inflammatory effects, and anti-oxidant effects. Recent evidence has unveiled the irrefutable data that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce CV events in patients with T2DM, with a profound effect on reductions in hospitalization for HF. Though several mechanisms conveying this benefit are suggested, most are based in limited data requiring further validation. Nonetheless, the arrival of SGLT2 inhibitors has ushered in a new era of CV risk reductions therapies.

JCL Roundtable: Lipid clinic operations.

Until 1990, lipid clinics in the United States existed only in academic medical centers, generally in close relationship with laboratory-based research programs. The advent of statin therapy, the success of major clinical trials to prevent or stabilize atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and organizational efforts highlighted by regional Lipid Disorders Training Centers and the newly formed National Lipid Association boosted the formation of lipid clinics and preventive cardiology clinics in private and academic settings. This roundtable discussion with 4 experts examines multiple aspects of lipid clinic operations: obtaining referrals, adapting to either the academic or community setting, organizing a team of providers, incorporating diet and lifestyle counseling as well as medication, establishing the pharmacist role, and gaining financial stability. Some issues are as yet unsettled, including the subspecialty home of lipidology, if any, and the diagnostic and management boundaries of practical lipid clinics. Achieving official recognition as a subspecialty has taken some steps forward but remains a challenge. Opportunities for advocacy need to be seized.

The effect of heparin infusion intensity on outcomes for bridging hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative bridging in atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with low thromboembolic rates but high bleeding rates. Recent guidance cautions the practice of bridging except in high risk patients. However, the practice of bridging varies widely and little data exist regarding appropriate anticoagulation intensity when using intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH). HYPOTHESIS: To determine if high intensity UFH infusion regimens are associated with increased bleeding rates compared to low intensity regimens for bridging patients with AF. METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective cohort study of admitted patients with non-valvular AF receiving UFH for ≥24 hours. UFH intensities were chosen at the providers' discretion. The primary endpoint was the rate of bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis during UFH infusion or within 24 hours of discontinuation. The secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular events, arterial thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarctions and death during UFH infusion. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were included in this analysis. Warfarin was used in 82.1% and direct acting oral anticoagulants in 14.1% of patients. The rate of any bleed was higher among high intensity compared to low intensity UFH regimens (10.5% vs 4.9%, odds ratio = 2.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.07-4.90). Major bleeding was significantly higher among high intensity compared to low intensity UFH regimens. There was no difference in composite thrombotic events or death. CONCLUSIONS: Low intensity UFH infusions, targeting lower anticoagulation targets, were associated with decreased bleeding rates without a signal of increased thromboembolic events in hospitalized AF patients.

The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in a Preventive Cardiology Practice.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In response, a multidisciplinary team approach, which includes clinical pharmacists, is recommended to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of the study was to describe interventions associated with integration of a clinical pharmacist, with an emphasis on pharmacist-generated patient cost avoidance. Methods: This is a prospective observational study detailing pharmacist-initiated interventions within an academic preventive cardiology service. Interventions targeting pharmacotherapy optimization, side effect management, patient education, medication adherence, and cost avoidance were implemented during shared office visits with providers and/or on provider consultation for remote follow-up. Tabulation of cost avoidance was arranged into 2 formats: clinical interventions implemented by the pharmacist and direct patient out-of-pocket expense reduction. Money saved per clinical intervention was extrapolated from data previously published. Patient out-of-pocket expense prior to and after pharmacist involvement was calculated to assess aggregate yearly patient cost savings. Results: Over 12 months the pharmacist intervened on 974 patients, totaling 3725 interventions. Cost avoidance strategies resulted in yearly savings of $830 748 in aggregate-$149 566 from clinical interventions and $681 182 from patient out-of-pocket expense reduction. Monthly patient out-of-pocket expense was reduced from a median (interquartile range) of $217 ($83.5-$347) before to $5 ($0-$18) after pharmacist intervention. Conclusions: Addition of a clinical pharmacist within an academic preventive cardiology clinic generated substantial pharmacotherapy interventions, resulting in significant cost avoidance for patients. The resulting cost avoidance may result in improved medication adherence and clinical outcomes.

Impact of PCSK9 inhibitors on plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations with or without a background of niacin therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an atherogenic lipoprotein associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Niacin and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) both lower Lp(a). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine if addition of PCSK9i to background niacin therapy further lowers Lp(a). METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients who met the following inclusion criteria: initiated PCSK9i therapy, had Lp(a) measurements before and after initiation of PCSK9i, and for the combination therapy group, PCSK9i was added on top of baseline niacin monotherapy. Of the 150 patients included in this study, 136 were on monotherapy (PCSK9i) and 14 were on combination therapy (niacin + PCSK9i). Lp(a) values were assessed in both groups before and after the addition of PCSK9i. RESULTS: Median percent and absolute Lp(a) reductions in the niacin + PCSK9i combination therapy group were -15.3% (interquartile range [IQR] -31.8, -1) and -9 mg/dL (IQR -37.2, -0.5), respectively, from a baseline Lp(a) of 95 mg/dL (IQR 20.5, 171). These reductions were statistically significant or nearly so (P = .04 and P = .05, respectively). Median percent and absolute Lp(a) reductions in the PCSK9i monotherapy group were -17.3% (IQR -34.4, 0) and -6 mg/dL (IQR -16, 0), respectively, from a baseline Lp(a) of 39.5 mg/dL (IQR 15, 117.5). There was no difference in median percent and absolute change in Lp(a) between monotherapy and combination therapy groups (P = .84 and P = .54, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the addition of PCSK9i to background of niacin therapy is associated with ∼15% reduction in Lp(a) beyond that achieved with background niacin monotherapy.

Management of dyslipidemia in adult solid organ transplant recipients.

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) has revolutionized treatment of end-stage disease. Improvements in the SOT continuum of care have unmasked a significant burden of cardiovascular disease, manifesting as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors for development of post-transplant cardiovascular disease exist, dyslipidemia remains one of the most frequent and modifiable risks. An important contributor to dyslipidemia in SOT recipients is the off-target metabolic effects of immunosuppressive medications, which may alter lipoproteins and their metabolism. Dyslipidemia management is paramount as lipid-lowering therapy with statins has demonstrated reductions in graft vasculopathy, decreased rejection rates, and improved survival. Several nonstatin medication options are available, but data supporting their benefit in the SOT population are minimal, typically extrapolated from studies in the general population. Further compounding dyslipidemia management is the complex interplay of drug interactions between lipid-lowering and immunosuppressant medications, which can result in serious toxicity and/or therapeutic failure.