The Added Value of Supplemental Breast Ultrasound Screening for Women With Dense Breasts: A Single Center Canadian Experience.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the contribution to cancer detection of supplemental breast ultrasound screening in women with dense breasts based on a single center experience by comparing our results with similar programs elsewhere. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of handheld sonographer-performed screening ultrasound exams at our academic breast imaging center, from January 1st to December 31st, 2019. Breast density, breast cancer risk factors, BI-RADS assessment, and lesion pathology were reviewed and tallied, followed by derivation of the biopsy rate, breast cancer detection rate, PPV3 and average tumor size. These values were compared to published results of breast screening programs elsewhere. RESULTS: 695 screening breast ultrasounds for women with dense breasts and negative mammograms were performed in 2019. The biopsy rate was 1.3%, breast cancer detection rate was 7 in 1000, PPV3 was 42%, and the average tumor size was 9.0 ± 1.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The first-year data of the breast screening ultrasound program at our practice are promising, demonstrating comparable cancer detection rate, higher PPV3, and similar biopsy rate in those with dense breasts compared with similar programs elsewhere. Longitudinal analysis and larger sample size are required for validation. Comparison of incidence and prevalence screening data is also warranted to elucidate the true value of this program.

Fasting insulin and endogenous hormones in relation to premenopausal breast density (Canada).

PURPOSE: Mammographic breast density (BD) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. This study asks which circulating metabolic and reproductive biomarkers are associated with BD, particularly dense breast area, in premenopausal women not taking exogenous hormones. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 299 premenopausal women aged 40-49 completed questionnaires, provided a fasting blood sample, had height, weight, percentage body fat, waist and hip measurements taken, and attended a screening mammogram. Multivariate linear regression was used to calculate adjusted means for percentage BD, absolute dense and non-dense area, across categories of covariates, adjusted for day of menstrual cycle, age, parity, body mass index, percentage body fat, and ethnicity. RESULTS: Fasting insulin levels were inversely associated, and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 levels directly associated with percentage BD, but lost statistical significance after multivariate adjustment. Sex hormone-binding globulin levels were directly associated with percentage BD, still significant after multivariate adjustment (p = 0.03). A significant inverse dose-response association was observed between progesterone levels and dense area (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Breast density in premenopausal women seems unrelated or inversely related to insulin resistance, levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 and its binding proteins, and levels of sex steroids; therefore, the mechanism by which radiodensity on a mammogram is related to breast cancer risk remains unclear.

The negative predictive value of ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a validation study of 339 cases.

PURPOSE: To determine the negative predictive value of sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses, with detailed analysis of any false-negative cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 669 cases of sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsies that had benign pathologic findings. Given a benign pathology on core biopsy, true-negatives had either benign pathology on surgical excision or at least 2 years of stable imaging and/or clinical follow-up; false-negatives had malignant histology on surgical excision. RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 339 breast lesions; 117 were confirmed to be benign via surgical excision, and 220 were stable after 2 years or more of imaging or clinical follow-up (mean follow-up time 33.1 months, range 24-64 months). The negative predictive value was determined to be 99.4%. There were 2 false-negative cases, giving a false-negative rate of 0.1%. There was no delay in diagnosis in either case because the radiologist noted discordance between imaging and core biopsy pathology, and recommended surgical excision despite the benign core biopsy pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy provides a high negative predictive value in assessing breast lesions. Radiologic/pathologic correlation should be performed to avoid delay in the diagnosis of carcinoma.