Metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of [14C]mirogabalin, a novel α2δ ligand, in healthy volunteers following oral administration.

The metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of mirogabalin were investigated following a single oral administration of [14C]mirogabalin at 30 mg/5.55 MBq to six healthy male subjects.The mean recovery values of radioactivity in urine and faeces were 96.85 and 1.21%, respectively. The main component of radioactivity in the plasma, urine, and faeces was mirogabalin. A204-4455 (lactam form), mirogabalin N-glucuronide, and glucuronide of oxidized A204-4455 were detected as minor components in the specimens. Renal clearance of mirogabalin was higher than the glomerular filtration rate of the human kidneys, indicating renal secretion is involved in the clearance.In vitro studies revealed that UDP-glucuronosyltransferase produced two metabolites: A204-4455, formed via mirogabalin acylglucuronide, and a ring-opened form of mirogabalin N-glucuronide.Mirogabalin was absorbed almost completely, and was eliminated via urine. A part of the orally administered dose of mirogabalin was metabolized through glucuronidation at the amine and carboxylic acid moiety, which represents the primary metabolic pathway.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of DS-1040 Drug-Drug Interactions With Aspirin, Clopidogrel, and Enoxaparin.

DS-1040, a novel low-molecular-weight inhibitor of activated thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, is under development for the treatment of thromboembolic diseases including venous thromboembolism and acute ischemic stroke. Here we describe the results of 3 studies that evaluated the safety and tolerability of DS-1040 along with the effect on DS-1040 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, when dosed alone or when coadministered with aspirin (NCT02071004), clopidogrel (NCT02560688), or enoxaparin in healthy subjects. Concomitant administration of single-dose DS-1040 with multiple-dose aspirin, multiple-dose clopidogrel, or single-dose enoxaparin, consistent with clinically relevant dose regimens, was safe and well tolerated with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, bleeding-related TEAEs, and no significant changes in coagulation parameters. DS-1040 did not prolong bleeding time when administered concomitantly with aspirin or clopidogrel. In the aspirin study, DS-1040 PK was evaluated following the concomitant administration with multiple-dose aspirin, where the plasma DS-1040 exposure (peak plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUCinf ]) was to be similar to the data previously published in the first-in-human study of DS-1040 in healthy subjects. The PK parameters of DS-1040 coadministered with clopidogrel were similar to those of DS-1040 alone, with small increases in geometric means for Cmax (7%) and AUClast (9%). When coadministered with enoxaparin, the PK parameters of DS-1040 were not affected (1.1% and 1.5% decreases in geometric means for Cmax and AUClast , respectively). Therefore, concomitant administration of DS-1040 and clopidogrel or enoxaparin did not demonstrate PK drug-drug interactions.

Effect of DS-8500a, a Novel G Protein-Coupled Receptor 119 Agonist, on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Non-clinical study data suggest that DS-8500a, a G protein-coupled receptor 119 agonist, exhibits antidiabetic activity, inhibition of some transporters and induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Statins are substrates for some transporters and CYP3A that may be coadministered with DS-8500a in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential effects of DS-8500a on the pharmacokinetics of statins, we evaluated the effects of repeated oral administration of DS-8500a 75 mg on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in healthy adults. METHODS: We performed two single-center, open-label, single-sequence studies. In Study I, subjects received single-dose rosuvastatin 10 mg (Period A) and DS-8500a 75 mg once daily + single-dose rosuvastatin 10 mg (Period B). In Study II, subjects received single-dose atorvastatin 10 mg (Period A) and DS-8500a 75 mg once daily + single-dose atorvastatin 10 mg (Period B). Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: In Study I, the Cmax and AUC of rosuvastatin increased by 66% and 33%, respectively, when coadministered with DS-8500a, versus rosuvastatin alone. In Study II, the Cmax of atorvastatin increased by 28%, but AUC remained unchanged following coadministration with DS-8500a, versus atorvastatin alone. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate and mostly unrelated to the study drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple doses of DS-8500a increased exposure to rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. This short-term study suggests that the impact of DS-8500a coadministration on atorvastatin exposure is limited and may not be clinically relevant. Nevertheless, caution may be necessary when patients are coadministered rosuvastatin with DS-8500a. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03699774. JAPAN PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION CENTER IDENTIFIER: JapicCTI-152878.

First-in-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of an Oral Formulation of DS-1040, an Inhibitor of the Activated Form of Thrombin-Activatable Fibrinolysis Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.

DS-1040, a low-molecular-weight imidazole derivative, inhibits the enzymatic activity of thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFIa), enhancing endogenous tissue plasminogen activator-triggered fibrinolysis. This first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of an oral formulation of DS-1040. Healthy adults (aged 20-45 years; N = 56) were randomized 3:1 to receive DS-1040 orally administered as single ascending doses (50, 100, 200, or 400 mg) or placebo, or DS-1040 multiple ascending doses (100 mg once daily, 200 mg once daily, or 150 mg twice daily) or placebo for 14 days. Safety, PK, and PD parameters were assessed. All doses of DS-1040 were well tolerated; no serious/severe adverse events (AEs) or discontinuations due to AEs occurred. DS-1040 had no effect on coagulation parameters, and no treatment-related trends in the bleeding time were observed. DS-1040 exposure (peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve) increased in a dose-proportional manner across the single-dose range. With multiple doses, steady state was achieved by day 7 with minimal accumulation (mean accumulation ratio 1.15-1.25), and the PK was time-independent. After 72 hours, approximately 10% of the DS-1040 400-mg single dose was recovered in urine as intact parent drug. The mean terminal half-life ranged from 17.2 to 24.9 hours, which was similar to previous intravenous administration data. Dose-dependent inhibition of total TAFIa activity was observed following single and multiple doses of oral DS-1040. The safety and PK/PD profiles of oral DS-1040 in healthy subjects support further clinical development.

Abuse potential of mirogabalin in recreational polydrug users.

Mirogabalin is a selective calcium channel α2δ subunit ligand being developed to treat neuropathic pain. In accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, the human abuse potential of mirogabalin (15-105 mg) was examined, relative to placebo, diazepam (15 or 30 mg), and pregabalin (200 or 450 mg), in two single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover studies in recreational polydrug users who could discern between positive comparator and placebo. The primary endpoint was maximum observed effect (E max) for Drug Liking Visual Analog Scale. At therapeutic doses, mirogabalin Drug Liking E max did not differ significantly from placebo and was significantly lower than diazepam and pregabalin. This indicates therapeutic doses mirogabalin may have less abuse potential versus diazepam or pregabalin. At supratherapeutic doses (⩾4× therapeutic dose), mirogabalin had significantly higher Drug Liking E max than placebo, but lower E max than pregabalin. In both studies, therapeutic doses of mirogabalin demonstrated limited evidence of abuse potential.

Open-Label Single-Dose Study to Assess the Effect of Mild and Moderate Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Mirogabalin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mirogabalin is an α2δ ligand being developed to treat neuropathic pain. A small fraction of mirogabalin is metabolized by the liver, where hepatic impairment may affect exposure. The objective of this phase I, open-label single-dose study was to determine if mild or moderate hepatic impairment alters the pharmacokinetics of mirogabalin. METHODS: Serial blood samples were collected for determination of maximum observed concentration, time to maximum concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable concentration of the active free form (A200-700) and inactive lactam metabolite (A204-4455) of mirogabalin. RESULTS: The A200-700 maximum observed concentration was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment but lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control subjects. The A204-4455 maximum observed concentration was lower in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. control groups. The A200-700 area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable concentration was slightly lower in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and slightly higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control subjects. Peak A204-4455 levels were approximately 22% and 31% lower for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. control individuals, respectively. Exposure to A204-4455 was approximately 37% lower in subjects with mild hepatic impairment but unaffected in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment vs. control groups. Two subjects in the mild hepatic impairment group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event of mild somnolence. No serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events, discontinuations as a result of treatment-emergent adverse events, or deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Mild hepatic impairment resulted in lower A200-700 and A204-4455 exposure, while moderate hepatic impairment did not affect A200-700 exposure. Overall, mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment did not have a significant effect on mirogabalin exposure. A single 15-mg dose of mirogabalin was well tolerated by subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of mirogabalin in healthy subjects: Results from phase 1 studies.

Three phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) studies were conducted in healthy men and women to further characterize the safety, tolerability, and PK/PD of mirogabalin administration with or without food and to guide the dose selection and regimen for phase 2 and 3 clinical development. The 3 studies included 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending-dose studies, and 1 open-label, crossover study to evaluate the PK of mirogabalin administered under fasting and fed (high-fat meal) conditions. Forty-eight and 47 healthy volunteers completed the single- and multiple-dose studies, respectively. Thirty subjects were enrolled and completed the food effect study. Mirogabalin was well tolerated in the fed and fasted states. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)-dizziness and somnolence-were expected based on mirogabalin's mechanism of action. Subjects receiving the highest mirogabalin doses (50 and 75 mg single dose) showed greater dizziness and sedation and higher rates of TEAEs than subjects receiving 3-30 mg. After oral administration, mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum concentration, ∼1 hour) and eliminated through urine unchanged (61%-72% urinary excretion). Exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after single or multiple mirogabalin doses. No significant accumulation occurred with multiple doses over 14 days. After single doses of mirogabalin (15 mg), the bioavailability was considered equivalent in the fed and fasted states, indicating that mirogabalin can be taken without food restrictions. Based on these data, mirogabalin 15 mg twice daily was selected as the highest target dose for further clinical development.

Coadministration of probenecid and cimetidine with mirogabalin in healthy subjects: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, drug-drug interaction study.

AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to assess the individual effects of probenecid and cimetidine on mirogabalin exposure. METHODS: This phase 1, open-label, crossover study randomized healthy adults to receive three treatment regimens, each separated by ≥5-day washout: a single oral dose of mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2, mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus probenecid 500 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4, and mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus cimetidine 400 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4. RESULTS: Coadministration of mirogabalin with probenecid or cimetidine increased the maximum and total mirogabalin exposure. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of probenecid were 128.7% (121.9-135.7%) and 176.1% (171.9-180.3%), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of cimetidine were 117.1% (111.0-123.6%) and 143.7% (140.3-147.2%), respectively. Mean (standard deviation) renal clearance of mirogabalin (l h-1 ) was substantially slower after probenecid [6.67 (1.53)] or cimetidine [7.17 (1.68)] coadministration, compared with mirogabalin alone [11.3 (2.39)]. Coadministration of probenecid or cimetidine decreased mirogabalin mean (standard deviation) apparent total body clearance [10.5 (2.33) and 12.8 (2.67) l h-1 , respectively, vs. 18.4 (3.93) for mirogabalin alone]. CONCLUSIONS: A greater magnitude of change in mirogabalin exposure was observed when coadministered with a drug that inhibits both renal and metabolic clearance (probenecid) vs. a drug that only affects renal clearance (cimetidine). However, as the increase in exposure is not clinically significant (>2-fold), no a priori dose adjustment is recommended.

A Phase 1 Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Single Oral Doses of DS-3801b, a Motilin Receptor Agonist, in Healthy Subjects.

DS-3801b is an orally active, nonmacrolide, selective motilin receptor agonist. The aim of this 2-part first-in-human study was to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects on proximal and distal gastrointestinal (GI) motility of single oral doses of DS-3801b in healthy subjects. The 13 C-octanoate breath test was used to assess gastric emptying (GE), a measure of proximal GI motility. The time to first bowel movement (TTFBM) and the consistency of the first bowel movement according to the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) were recorded to assess distal GI motility. In part A, 48 subjects received single oral doses of DS-3801b from 1 to 100 mg or placebo (6 DS-3801b, 2 placebo per cohort). In part B, 12 subjects received 50 mg of DS-3801b or placebo to assess GE. DS-3801b is safe and generally well tolerated after doses up to 50 mg, resulting in mild, predominantly GI adverse events. DS-3801a plasma concentrations increase with increasing doses; however, Cmax increases greater than dose-proportionally, whereas AUC increases less than dose-proportionally. The double peaks observed are consistent with multiple absorption sites. Results of the 13 C-octanoate breath test indicate that DS-3801b accelerates GE. Fifty milligrams of DS-3801b resulted in a 20.8% median reduction in GE T1/2 and a 20.6% median reduction in GE Tlag compared with placebo. However, this increase in proximal GI motility was not accompanied by an effect on distal GI motility, as indicated by no significant differences in TTFBM and BSS values across DS-3801b dose levels or compared with placebo.

A study of the pharmacokinetic interactions of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren with metformin, pioglitazone and fenofibrate in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension and type 2 diabetes are common comorbidities, thus many patients receiving antihypertensive medication require concomitant therapy with hypoglycemic or lipid-lowering drugs. The aim of these three studies was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertension, co-administered with the glucose-lowering agents metformin or pioglitazone or the lipid-lowering agent fenofibrate in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In three open-label, multiple-dose studies, healthy volunteers (ages 18 to 45 years) received once-daily treatment with either metformin 1000 mg (n = 22), pioglitazone 45 mg (n = 30) or fenofibrate 200 mg (n = 21) and aliskiren 300 mg, administered alone or co-administered in a two-period study design. Blood samples were taken frequently on the last day of each treatment period to determine plasma drug concentrations. RESULTS: Co-administration of aliskiren with metformin decreased aliskiren area under the plasma concentration- time curve during the dose interval (AUC(tau)) by 27% (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 0.73; 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.64, 0.84) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) by 29% (GMR 0.71; 90% CI 0.56, 0.89) but these changes were not considered clinically relevant. Co-administration of aliskiren with fenofibrate had no effect on aliskiren AUC (GMR 1.05; 90% CI 0.96, 1.16) or C(max) (GMR 1.05; 90% CI 0.80, 1.38); similarly, co-administration of aliskiren with pioglitazone had no effect on aliskiren AUC(tau) (GMR 1.05; 90% CI 0.98, 1.13) or C(max) (GMR 1.01; 90% CI 0.84, 1.20). All other AUC and C(max) GMRs for aliskiren, metformin, pioglitazone, ketopioglitazone, hydroxypioglita-zone and fenofibrate were close to unity and the 90% CI were contained within the bioequivalence range of 0.80 to 1.25. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of aliskiren with metformin, pioglitazone or fenofibrate had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in healthy volunteers. These findings indicate that aliskiren can be co-administered with metformin, pioglitazone or fenofibrate without the need for dose adjustment.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the oral Renin inhibitor aliskiren in patients with hepatic impairment.

Aliskiren is the first in a new class of orally active, direct renin inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension. This open-label, nonrandomized, single-center, parallel-group study compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 300-mg oral dose of aliskiren in patients with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment to that in healthy subjects. When pooled across subgroups, there were no significant differences between patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects in aliskiren AUC(0-infinity) (ratio of geometric means, 1.12; 90% confidence interval, 0.85, 1.48) or Cmax (mean ratio, 1.19; 90% confidence interval, 0.84, 1.68), and there was no correlation between severity of hepatic impairment and either AUC(0-infinity) or Cmax. Aliskiren was well tolerated by healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment. In conclusion, hepatic impairment has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of aliskiren following single-dose administration, and dosage adjustment is unlikely to be needed in patients with liver disease.