The presence of persistent symptoms 12 months following a first lateral ankle sprain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is the most common musculoskeletal injury in the physically active population. It is uncertain what percentage of these patients develop persisting symptoms including pain, recurrent sprains and subjective instability. This systematic review was conducted to assess the presence and duration of persistent symptoms after a first LAS. METHODS: A systematic review of the Medline, Web of Sciences, Embase, CINAHL and Pedro databases was performed to identify peer-reviewed articles concerning the occurrence and duration of remaining symptoms after a first LAS. Inclusion criteria focused on selection of patients without previous ankle injuries and study quality. One of the following outcomes had to be described: subjective instability, resprains, remaining symptoms. RESULTS: In total, 15 studies were included. The occurrence of patients with subjective instability decreased from 37.9% (95%CI [6.0-69.7]) at 3 months to 16.1% (95%CI [7.8-24.3]) at 6 months and 8.1% (95%CI [3.3-13.3]) at 12 months. The occurrence of patients with a recurrent LAS was 15.8% (95%CI [6.3-25.3]) at 12 months. The occurrence of patients with residual pain decreased from 48.6% (95%CI [23.6-73.5]) at 3 months, to 21.5% (95%CI [2.8-40.2]) at 6 months and 6.7% (95%CI [3.2-10.1]) at 12 months. CONCLUSION: This study offers new insights in the presence of remaining symptoms after a first LAS and the development of chronic ankle instability. Twelve months following an initial LAS, a significant number of patients may still have symptoms. The incidence of subjective instability, and pain, continues to decrease until 12 months post-injury. This new information may suggest that a longer period of non-operative treatment may be warranted before recommending surgical intervention in patients with a first LAS.

A calcaneal tunnel for CFL reconstruction should be directed to the posterior inferior medial edge of the calcaneal tuberosity.

PURPOSE: Anatomical reconstruction of the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) is a common technique to treat chronic lateral ankle instability. A bone tunnel is used to fix the graft in the calcaneus. The purpose of this study is to provide some recommendations about tunnel entrance and tunnel direction based on anatomical landmarks. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts. The first part assessed the lateral tunnel entrance for location and safety. The second part addressed the tunnel direction and safety upon exiting the calcaneum on the medial side. In the first part, 29 specimens were used to locate the anatomical insertion of the CFL based on the intersection of two lines related to the fibular axis and specific landmarks on the lateral malleolus. In the second part, 22 specimens were dissected to determine the position of the neurovascular structures at risk during tunnel drilling. Therefore, a method based on four imaginary squares using external anatomical landmarks was developed. RESULTS: For the tunnel entrance on the lateral side, the mean distance to the centre of the CFL footprint was 2.8 ± 3.0 mm (0-10.4 mm). The mean distance between both observers was 4.2 ± 3.2 mm (0-10.3 mm). The mean distance to the sural nerve was 1.4 ± 2 mm (0-5.8 mm). The mean distance to the peroneal tendons was 7.3 ± 3.1 mm (1.2-12.4 mm). For the tunnel exit on the medial side, the two anterior squares always contained the neurovascular bundle. A safe zone without important neurovascular structures was found and corresponded to the two posterior squares. CONCLUSION: Lateral landmarks enabled to locate the CFL footprint. Precautions should be taken to protect the nearby sural nerve. A safe zone on the medial side could be determined to guide safe tunnel direction. A calcaneal tunnel should be directed to the posterior inferior medial edge of the calcaneal tuberosity.