First trimester "clean catch" urine and vaginal swab sample distinct microbiological niches.

IMPORTANCE: Untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including pyelonephritis, preterm labor, and low birth weight infants. Thus, routine screening by standard urine culture (SUC) and treatment of ASB are currently recommended for all pregnant women. For this purpose, some researchers claim that vaginal swabs and urine samples can be used as proxies for each other. Because SUC often misses microbes, we used two more sensitive, recently validated detection methods to compare the composition of the urinary and vaginal microbiomes of pregnant females in their first trimester. Both methods yielded similar results. Vaginal and urinary microbial compositions for the same individual were significantly correlated; however, they were not equivalent. We argue that first trimester urinary and vaginal microbiomes are distinct enough to preclude their use as proxies for each other.

Effectiveness of extended postpartum inpatient monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to reduce the risk of readmission for preeclampsia with severe features.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is an obstetrical disorder, which complicates 3% to 6% of pregnancies and contributes to 21.6% of readmissions in the postpartum period. The optimal strategy for inpatient monitoring of blood pressures to minimize readmissions for postpartum patients with hypertensive disorders is not known. We hypothesized that extended monitoring of postpartum patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for at least 36 hours after the last blood pressure that was ≥150/100 mm Hg would result in decreased readmission rates for preeclampsia with severe features compared with those who were not observed by these blood pressure goals. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether extended inpatient monitoring of postpartum patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for at least 36 hours after their last blood pressure that was ≥150/100 mm Hg would improve readmission rates for preeclampsia with severe features within 6 weeks of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study in patients with a singleton pregnancy and a diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy at their delivery admission or at any point during pregnancy who delivered 1 year before and 1 year after the implementation of extended inpatient monitoring of postpartum hypertension. The primary outcome was readmission for preeclampsia with severe features within 6 weeks of delivery. The secondary outcomes were length of stay during first admission, number of readmissions for any indication, intensive care unit admission, postpartum day at readmission, median systolic blood pressure in the 24-hour period before discharge, median diastolic blood pressure in the 24-hour period before discharge, intravenous antihypertensive medication required during first admission, and intravenous antihypertensive medication required during second admission. Univariable analysis was performed for the association between baseline maternal characteristics and the primary outcome. Multivariable analysis was performed, adjusting for baseline maternal characteristic differences between exposure groups. RESULTS: A total of 567 patients met the inclusion criteria of which 248 patients delivered before and 319 delivered after the implementation of extended monitoring. For baseline characteristics, the extended monitoring group had a significantly higher proportion of patients who were non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic, more diagnoses of hypertensive disorders and/or diabetes mellitus at the time of admission for delivery, a difference in the distribution of hypertensive diagnoses at the time of discharge from the first admission, and fewer discharged patients from their first admission on labetalol than the preintervention group. In a univariable analysis of the primary outcome, there was a significantly increased risk of readmission for preeclampsia with severe features in the extended monitoring group (62.5% vs 96.2% of total readmissions; P=.004). In multivariable analysis, patients in the extended monitoring group were more likely to be readmitted for preeclampsia with severe features than patients in the preintervention group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-11.5; P=.044). CONCLUSION: Extended monitoring with a strict blood pressure goal of <150/<100 mm Hg did not decrease readmissions for preeclampsia with severe features in patients with a previous diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.

Longitudinal changes in glucose metabolism in women with gestational diabetes, from late pregnancy to the postpartum period.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to determine, in women with gestational diabetes (GDM), the changes in insulin sensitivity (Matsuda Insulin Sensitivity Index; ISOGTT), insulin response and disposition index (DI) from late pregnancy (34-37 weeks gestation, T1), to early postpartum (1-5 days, T2) and late postpartum (6-12 weeks, T3). A secondary aim was to correlate the longitudinal changes in maternal lipids, adipokines, cytokines and weight in relation to the changes in ISOGTT, insulin response and DI. METHODS: ISOGTT, insulin response and DI were calculated at the three time points (T1, T2 and T3) using the results of a 75 g OGTT. Adipokines, cytokines and lipids were measured prior to each OGTT. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare changes across each time point. Changes in ISOGTT, insulin response and DI were correlated with changes in maternal adipokines, cytokines and lipids at each time point. RESULTS: A total of 27 women completed all assessments. Compared with T1, ISOGTT was 11.20 (95% CI 8.09, 14.31) units higher at 1-5 days postpartum (p < 0.001) and was 5.49 (95% CI 2.38, 8.60) units higher at 6-12 weeks postpartum (p < 0.001). Compared with T1, insulin response values were 699.6 (95% CI 957.5, 441.6) units lower at T2 (p < 0.001) and were 356.3 (95% CI 614.3, 98.3) units lower at T3 (p = 0.004). Compared with T1, the DI was 6434.1 (95% CI 2486.2, 10,381.0) units higher at T2 (p = 0.001) and was 4262.0 (95% CI 314.6, 8209.3) units higher at T3 (p = 0.03). There was a decrease in mean cholesterol, triacylglycerol, LDL-cholesterol and VLDL-cholesterol from T1 to T2 (all p < 0.001), and an increase in mean C-reactive protein, IL-6 and IL-8 from T1 to T2 (all p < 0.001). Mean leptin decreased from T1 to T2 (p = 0.001). There was no significant change in mean adiponectin (p = 0.99) or TNF-α (p = 0.81) from T1 to T2. The mean maternal BMI decreased from T1 to T2 (p = 0.001) and T3 (p < 0.001). There were no significant correlations between any measure of change in ISOGTT, insulin response and DI and change in maternal cytokines, adipokines, lipids or weight from T1 to T2. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In women with GDM, delivery was associated with improvement in both insulin sensitivity and insulin production within the first few days. Improvement in insulin production persisted for 6-12 weeks, but insulin sensitivity deteriorated slightly. These changes in glucose metabolism were not associated to changes in lipids, leptin, inflammation markers or body weight. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02082301.

Should women with gestational diabetes be screened at delivery hospitalization for type 2 diabetes?

BACKGROUND: Less than one-half of women with gestational diabetes mellitus are screened for type 2 diabetes postpartum. Other approaches to postpartum screening need to be evaluated, including the role of screening during the delivery hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of an oral glucose tolerance test administered during the delivery hospitalization compared with the oral glucose tolerance test administered at a 4- to 12-week postpartum visit. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a combined analysis of patient-level data from 4 centers (6 clinical sites) assessing the utility of an immediate postpartum 75-g oral glucose tolerance test during the delivery hospitalization (PP1) for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes compared with a routine 4- to 12-week postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (PP2). Eligible women underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test at both PP1 and PP2. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the PP1 test were estimated for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, or impaired glucose tolerance. RESULTS: In total, 319 women completed a PP1 screening, with 152 (47.6%) lost to follow-up for the PP2 oral glucose tolerance test. None of the women with a normal PP1 oral glucose tolerance test (n=73) later tested as having type 2 diabetes at PP2. Overall, 12.6% of subjects (n=21) had a change from normal to impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance or a change from impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes. The PP1 oral glucose tolerance test had 50% sensitivity (11.8-88.2), 95.7% specificity (91.3-98.2%) with a 98.1% (94.5-99.6%) negative predictive value and a 30% (95% confidence interval, 6.7-65.3) positive predictive value for type 2 diabetes vs normal/impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance result. The negative predictive value of having type 2 diabetes at PP2 compared with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (excluding impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance) at PP1 was 100% (95% confidence interval, 93.5-100) with a specificity of 96.5% (95% confidence interval, 87.9-99.6). CONCLUSION: A normal oral glucose tolerance test during the delivery hospitalization appears to exclude postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the results of the immediate postpartum oral glucose tolerance test were mixed when including impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance. As a majority of women do not return for postpartum diabetic screening, an oral glucose tolerance test during the delivery hospitalization may be of use in certain circumstances in which postpartum follow-up is challenging and resources could be focused on women with an abnormal screening immediately after the delivery hospitalization.

Variation in C-reactive protein at 1 month post-partum by etiology of preterm birth: selective identification of those at risk for both poor pregnancy outcome and future health complications.

Objective To assess post-partum inflammation for patients delivering prior to 34 6/7 weeks by birth etiology. Methods This was an observational study of early preterm birth (PTB) occurring between 20 0/7 and 34 6/7 weeks of gestation. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured 1 month post-partum. CRP measurements were compared by birth etiology. Results A total of 399 women were analyzed. Distribution of birth etiology was 35% (n = 138) preterm labor (PTL), 28% (n = 115) preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM), and 37% (n = 141) indicated preterm birth (IPTB). Serum CRP varied by birth etiology (P = 0.036). Women with pPROM had elevated median CRP levels compared to women with PTL (P = 0.037). IPTB demonstrated elevated CRP levels when compared to PTL (P = 0.019). Pre-eclamptic/eclamptic subjects exhibited increased median CRP levels compared to PTL (P = 0.04). Conclusion Post-partum inflammation varies by birth etiology. Such variation may serve as identification of subjects whose future pregnancies and, ultimately, overall health status may benefit from inter-pregnancy interventions aimed at reducing inflammatory-associated risk factors.

Aortic Dissection in a Pregnant Patient without Other Risk Factors.

Background. An aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition in which the intima of the artery tears causing separation of the intima and media. Pregnancy places women at a significantly increased risk of common vascular events including venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke, while also increasing the risk of rarer vascular events such as aortic dissection and aortic rupture. Case. A 30-year-old previously healthy multiparous woman presenting at 36 weeks of pregnancy with a Type A aortic dissection. She underwent a combined emergent cesarean delivery followed by repair of her aortic root. Conclusions. Aortic dissection should be high on the differential for pregnant patients presenting with the characteristic complaints and physical exam findings given the high mortality rate associated with this vascular event. Teaching Points. (1) This report reviews the characteristic presentation, risk factors, and physical exam findings in a patient with an aortic dissection. (2) The report includes treatment options for pregnant patients based on the classification of the dissection.

Microorganisms Identified in the Maternal Bladder: Discovery of the Maternal Bladder Microbiota.

Objective The objective of this study was to characterize the bladder microbiota in pregnancy. Methods A prospective observational study of 51 pregnant women, admitted to a tertiary care hospital, who underwent straight catheterization urine collection or transurethral Foley catheter placement. 16S rRNA gene sequencing and enhanced quantitative urine culture assessed the maternal bladder microbiota with comparisons made to standard urine culture results. Results Enhanced quantitative urine culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing detected bacteria in the majority of participants. Lactobacillus and Gardnerella were the most commonly detected microbes. In contrast, standard urine culture had a 100% false-negative rate and failed to detect several known or emerging urinary pathogens. Conclusion There are live bacteria in the bladders of most pregnant women. This challenges the definition of asymptomatic bacteriuria.

Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity for Women Who Would Be Added to the Diagnosis of GDM Using IADPSG Criteria: A Secondary Analysis of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of adverse outcomes for women who are diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria using data from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis from the North American HAPO study centers. Glucose measurements from a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were used to group participants into three nonoverlapping categories: GDM based on Carpenter-Coustan (CC) criteria (also GDM based on IADPSG criteria), GDM diagnosed based on IADPSG criteria but not CC criteria, and no GDM. Newborn outcomes included birth weight, cord C-peptide, and newborn percentage fat above the 90th percentile; maternal outcomes included primary cesarean delivery and preeclampsia. Outcome frequencies were compared using multiple logistic regression, adjusting for predefined covariates. RESULTS: Among 25,505 HAPO study participants, 6,159 blinded participants from North American centers were included. Of these, 81% had normal glucose testing, 4.2% had GDM based on CC criteria, and 14.3% had GDM based on IADPSG criteria but not CC criteria. Compared with women with no GDM, those diagnosed with GDM based on IADPSG criteria had adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) for birth weight, cord C-peptide, and newborn percentage fat above the 90th percentile, as well as primary cesarean delivery and preeclampsia, of 1.87 (1.50-2.34), 2.00 (1.54-2.58), 1.73 (1.35-2.23), 1.31 (1.07-1.60), and 1.73 (1.32-2.27), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Women diagnosed with GDM based on IADPSG criteria had higher adverse outcome frequencies compared with women with no GDM. These data underscore the need for research to assess the effect of treatment to improve outcomes in such women.

A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Elective induction of labor (eIOL) prior to 39 weeks' gestation is discouraged because of presumed fetal benefits. However, few data exist on the maternal risks of expectant management. To date, no study has evaluated the maternal risk of developing a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy with expectant management of a low-risk gravid at term. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the development of hypertensive disorders in term low-risk expectantly managed patients. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study from 19 US hospitals, from 2002 to 2008 (Safe Labor Consortium) including all nonanomalous, cephalic, singleton pregnancies at 37-41 weeks. Women with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, or planned cesarean delivery or from centers with incomplete hypertensive data were excluded. Women with eIOL in each week were compared with women managed expectantly until the next week of gestation or beyond. The primary outcome was the frequency of hypertensive complications. RESULTS: Of 114,651 low-risk deliveries, 12,772 (11.1%) had eIOL. The cohort was 49.2% nulliparous, 51.1% white, and obese (mean body mass index 30.2 kg/m(2)). The risk of developing any hypertension in expectantly managed women was 4.1% after 37 weeks, 3.5% after 38 weeks, 3.2% after 39 weeks, and 2.6% after 40 weeks. Compared with eIOL, women with hypertensive disorders had significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery and maternal morbidities (intensive care unit admission or death, third- or fourth-degree lacerations, maternal infections, and bleeding complications) at each week of gestation and the composite neonatal morbidity at 38 and 39 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: For women at low risk expectantly managed at term, there is a risk of developing hypertensive complications for each additional week of pregnancy, with associated increases in maternal and neonatal morbidities.

A retrospective cohort study of factors relating to the longitudinal change in birth weight.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have shown a decrease in birth weight, a change from prior steady increases. Therefore we sought to describe the demographic and anthropometric changes in singleton term fetal growth. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of term singleton deliveries (37-42 weeks) from January 1, 1995 to January 1, 2010 at a single tertiary obstetric unit. We included all 43,217 neonates from term, singleton, non-anomalous pregnancies. Data were grouped into five 3-year intervals. Mean and median birth weight (BW), birth length (BL), and Ponderal Index (PI) were estimated by year, race and gestational age. Our primary outcome was change in BW over time. The secondary outcomes were changes in BL and PI over time. RESULTS: Mean and median BW decreased by 72 and 70 g respectively (p < 0.0001) over the 15 year period while BL also significantly decreased by 1.0 cm (P < 0.001). This contributed to an increase in the neonatal PI by 0.11 kg/m(3) (P < 0.001). Mean gestational age at delivery decreased while maternal BMI at delivery, hypertension, diabetes, and African American race increased. Adjusting for gestational age, race, infant sex, maternal BMI, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and parity, year of birth contributed 0.1 % to the variance (-1.7 g/year; 26 g) of BW, 1.8% (-0.06 cm/year; 0.9 cm) of BL, and 0.7% (+0.008 kg/m(3)/year; 0.12 kg/m(3)) of PI. These findings were independent of the proportional change in race or gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a crude decrease in mean BW of 72 g and BL of 1 cm over 15 years. Furthermore, once controlling for gestational age, race, infant sex, maternal BMI, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and parity, we identified that increasing year of birth was associated with a decrease in BW of 1.7 g/year. The significant increase in PI, despite the decrease in BW emphasizes the limitation of using birth weight alone to define changes in fetal growth.

Measures of success: Prediction of successful labor induction.

Ideally, all pregnant women would enter labor spontaneously at the safest time to yield the best health outcomes for both themselves and their newborns. Unfortunately, this does not always happen and leaves obstetric providers weighing the maternal and fetal risks of continued expectant management versus labor induction. Several elements have been reported to affect the success rate of an induction, including the Bishop score, maternal parity, body mass index (BMI), age, medical comorbidities, fetal gestational age, and estimated weight, as well as the hospital site and provider practice. Recent data suggest that the decision to induce or continue expectant management in anticipation of labor is an important variable in determining whether a woman has a safe and successful delivery.

Perinatal outcomes associated with the diagnosis of gestational diabetes made by the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To assess perinatal outcomes with Carpenter-Coustan criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), those with normal glucose testing, and those who would be added to GDM by The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent screening and diagnostic testing for GDM. Patients were divided into nonoverlapping groups: GDM by Carpenter-Coustan (Carpenter-Coustan), IADPSG GDM criteria but not Carpenter-Coustan (IADPSG), and normal GDM screening or testing (control). Outcomes included newborn birth weight, birth weight z-score, Ponderal Index, and large for gestational age. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, t tests, or χ. RESULTS: There were 8,390 women who met inclusion criteria: 338 Carpenter-Coustan; 281 IADPSG; and 7,771 women in the control group. Mean birth weight (3,411 compared with 3,240 g, P<.01), birth weight z-score (0.477 compared with 0.059, P<.01), Ponderal Index (2.79 compared with 2.73 g/cm, P=.014), and large for gestational age (19.9% compared with 8.8%, relative risk 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76-2.88) were higher in IADPSG compared with women in the control group. The IADPSG group had greater birth weight (3,411 compared with 3,288 g, P<.01) than Carpenter-Coustan neonates with no difference in large for gestational age (19.9% compared with 16.0%, relative risk 1.25 95% CI 0.88-1.75), Ponderal Index (2.78 compared with 2.79 g/cm, P=1), or birth weight z-score (0.477 compared with 0.330, P=.30). CONCLUSIONS: Newborns of women who would be added to the diagnosis of GDM by IADPSG criteria have greater measures of fetal overgrowth than those in the control group and greater birth weight in comparison with Carpenter-Coustan GDM neonates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Elective induction of labor has been discouraged over concerns regarding increased complications. We evaluated the mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidities in low-risk patients whose labor was electively induced or expectantly managed at term. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study from 12 US institutions (19 hospitals), 2002 through 2008 (Safe Labor Consortium). Healthy women with viable, vertex singleton pregnancies at 37-41 weeks of gestation were included. Women electively induced in each week were compared with women managed expectantly. The primary outcome was mode of delivery. RESULTS: Of 131,243 low-risk deliveries, 13,242 (10.1%) were electively induced. The risk of cesarean delivery was lower at each week of gestation with elective induction vs expectant management regardless of parity and modified Bishop score (for unfavorable nulliparous patients at: 37 weeks = 18.6% vs 34.2%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.40; [95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.88]; 38 weeks = 28.4% vs 35.4%, 0.65 [0.49-0.85]; 39 weeks = 23.6% vs 38.5%, 0.47 [0.38-0.57]; 40 weeks = 32.3% vs 42.3%, 0.70 [0.59-0.81]). Maternal infections were significantly lower with elective inductions. Major, minor, and respiratory neonatal morbidity composites were lower with elective inductions at ≥38 weeks (for nulliparous patients at: 38 weeks = adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; [95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.72]; 39 weeks = 0.75 [0.61-0.92]; 40 weeks = 0.65 [0.54-0.80]). CONCLUSION: Elective induction of labor at term is associated with decreased risks of cesarean delivery and other maternal and neonatal morbidities compared with expectant management regardless of parity or cervical status on admission.

The risk of fetal death: current concepts of best gestational age for delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of fetal death (FD) between 34 and 41 weeks' gestational age (GA) with the neonatal mortality rate to examine the best GA for delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Linked birth and infant death data for the US from the National Center for Health Statistics analyzed nonanomalous singleton pregnancies between 2003 and 2005. Pregnancies were classified as high risk or low risk based on preexisting maternal complications. Outcomes of 8,785,132 live births and 12,777 FDs between 34 and 42 completed weeks' gestation were examined. The risk of FD was determined using the following equation: The FD risk of those remaining undelivered was compared with the neonatal death rate for each week of gestation. RESULTS: Between 34 and 40 weeks' gestation, the FD risk of those remaining undelivered for all pregnancies declined and then increased at term. For high risk pregnancies, the FD risk of those remaining undelivered is substantially higher than for low risk pregnancies. The number of FDs that can be avoided by delivery exceeds the neonatal death rate between 37 and 38 weeks' gestation in low risk pregnancies and at 36 weeks' gestation in high risk pregnancies. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that delivery at 39 weeks' gestation in both high and low risk pregnancies would result in an increased number of perinatal deaths. Decisions regarding the "optimal time for delivery" should include the risk of remaining undelivered.

Neonatal body composition according to the revised institute of medicine recommendations for maternal weight gain.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released revised pregnancy weight gain guidelines. There are limited data regarding the effect of maternal weight gain on newborn adiposity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate neonatal fat mass, lean body mass, and percentage body fat according to current Institute of Medicine (IOM) pregnancy weight gain guidelines. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study of neonates delivered at least 36 wk gestation and evaluated for fat mass, lean body mass, and percentage body fat. Women with abnormal glucose tolerance testing and other known medical disorders or pregnancies with known fetal anomalies were excluded. Pregravid body mass index (BMI) was categorized as normal weight (<25 kg/m2), overweight (25-30 kg/m2), or obese (>30 kg/m2). Maternal weight gain was quantified as less than, equal to, or greater than current IOM guidelines. Newborn body composition measurements were compared according to weight gain and BMI categories. RESULTS: A total of 439 maternal-newborn pairs were evaluated; 19.8% (n=87) of women gained less than IOM guidelines; 31.9% (n=140), equal to IOM guidelines; and 48.3% (n=212), greater than IOM guidelines. Significant differences for each component of body composition were found when evaluated by IOM weight gain categories (all ANOVA, P<0.001). When controlling for pregravid BMI, only weight gain for women who were of normal weight before pregnancy remained significant. CONCLUSION: Maternal weight gain during pregnancy is a significant contributor to newborn body composition, particularly for women who are of normal weight before pregnancy.

Maternal weight gain in women who develop gestational diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal weight gain before 24 weeks in women developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared with controls with normal glucose tolerance. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of maternal weight gain. Women developing GDM were matched to three controls by self-reported prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), maternal age, race, and parity. Women without documented pregravid or 22- to 24-week weights and multiple gestations were excluded. The primary outcome was weight gain through 24 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-two women (163 in the GDM group and 489 controls) underwent chart review. There were no significant differences in race (36% compared with 36% African American, P=.99), age (28.7 ± 6.3 years compared with 29.4 ± 6.9 years, P=.26) or prepregnancy BMI (31.7 ± 8.2 compared with 31.8 ± 8.6, P=.88). Maternal weight gain was higher in the GDM group than in the control group (14.8 compared with 11.2 lb, P<.001). When controlling for prepregnancy BMI, overweight (18.6 compared with 12.9 lb, P<.004), and obese (12.6 compared with 8.8 lb, P<.008), GDM participants gained significantly more weight by 24 weeks. Both diet-controlled (A1) and insulin-requiring (A2) GDM had higher weight gain compared with controls (control compared with A1: 11.2 compared with 15.3 lb, P=.029; control compared with A2: 11.2 compared with 14.6 lb, P=.018. No difference was found between A1 and A2 patients (P=.942). CONCLUSION: Women who develop GDM have higher gestational weight gain through 24 weeks. Gestational weight gain is a significant risk factor for GDM in the overweight or obese patient but not in patients who were underweight or had a normal BMI before pregnancy.

Women's reported weight: is there a discrepancy?

OBJECTIVE: To compare self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & delivery weight with documented pre-pregnancy & delivery weight and determine whether there are differences compared with the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) guidelines. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 234 women. Inclusion criteria included documented height, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight, self-reported delivery weight, documented pre-pregnancy weight ± 12 weeks from last menstrual period, and documented delivery weight ± 2 weeks from delivery. We determined the difference between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight vs. documented pre-pregnancy weight and self-reported delivery weight vs. documented delivery weight. Using documented pre-pregnancy weight and documented delivery weight, we calculated gestational weight gain (GWG) relative to IOM criteria. RESULTS: Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight was 2.94 kg less than documented pre-pregnancy weight (p < 0.0001). Self-reported BMI was 1.11 mg/kg(2) less than documented BMI (p < 0.0001). Self-reported GWG was 3.01 kg greater than documented GWG (p < 0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of normal weight correctly classified pregravid BMI in contrast to 86% of obese (p < 0.005) and 73% of overweight (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obese women underestimated self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & overestimated GWG, thereby mistakenly categorizing IOM guidelines.

Preterm PROM: prediction, prevention, principles.

Preterm premature rupture of the membranes remains difficult to predict accurately. The majority of those suffering preterm premature rupture of the membrane lack risk factors that might lead to preventative treatments. Its management is centered on an evaluation of the risks and benefits of attempted pregnancy prolongation compared with expeditious delivery. An understanding of the gestational age specific risks for newborn morbidity and mortality is essential to estimate the potential benefits of conservative management. Once the diagnosis of membrane rupture remote from term is made, conservative management to reduce neonatal complications is generally attempted while maintaining vigilance for complications such as infection, umbilical cord compression, or abruption. Concurrent antibiotic therapy and antenatal corticosteroid treatment are typically administered to prolong pregnancy, prevent infection, and reduce gestational age dependent morbidities. Near and at term, particularly if fetal pulmonary maturity has been confirmed, the patient is generally best served by expeditious delivery.

Longitudinal modulation of immune system cytokine profile during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize immune modulation as expressed by cytokine assays at three time-points in human pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, longitudinal study of a broad panel of cytokine expression during singleton pregnancies resulting in an uncomplicated, full-term, live births. Peripheral blood was obtained at 8-14, 18-22, and 28-32 weeks gestation. Six cytokines - IFN-γ, IL-4, TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-10 - were measured in supernatants obtained from whole blood stimulations with PHA or LPS and were compared to unstimulated controls. Samples were processed by Luminex-100 MAP®. We used Generalized Linear Models (GLM) to evaluate cytokine trajectories. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 45 uncomplicated pregnancies. Overall, peripheral blood WBC's demonstrated dampened cytokine responses. However, over the course of pregnancy, we found enhanced counter-regulatory cytokine expression (e.g., shown by increased IL-10). CONCLUSION: The overall decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines and increase in counter-regulatory cytokines as uncomplicated pregnancy progresses supports the evolving concepts of immunoregulation for the maintenance of a viable pregnancy.