Genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in a UK university identifies dynamics of transmission.

Understanding SARS-CoV-2 transmission in higher education settings is important to limit spread between students, and into at-risk populations. In this study, we sequenced 482 SARS-CoV-2 isolates from the University of Cambridge from 5 October to 6 December 2020. We perform a detailed phylogenetic comparison with 972 isolates from the surrounding community, complemented with epidemiological and contact tracing data, to determine transmission dynamics. We observe limited viral introductions into the university; the majority of student cases were linked to a single genetic cluster, likely following social gatherings at a venue outside the university. We identify considerable onward transmission associated with student accommodation and courses; this was effectively contained using local infection control measures and following a national lockdown. Transmission clusters were largely segregated within the university or the community. Our study highlights key determinants of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and effective interventions in a higher education setting that will inform public health policy during pandemics.

Investigation of a Cluster of Sequence Type 22 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission in a Community Setting.

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has typically been used to confirm or refute hospital/ward outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identified through routine practice. However, appropriately targeted WGS strategies that identify routinely "undetectable" transmission remain the ultimate aim. METHODS: WGS of MRSA isolates sent to a regional microbiological laboratory was performed as part of a 12-month prospective observational study. Phylogenetic analyses identified a genetically related cluster of E-MRSA15 isolated from patients registered to the same general practice (GP) surgery. This led to an investigation to identify epidemiological links, find additional cases, and determine potential for ongoing transmission. RESULTS: We identified 15 MRSA-positive individuals with 27 highly related MRSA isolates who were linked to the GP surgery, 2 of whom died with MRSA bacteremia. Of the 13 cases that were further investigated, 11 had attended a leg ulcer/podiatry clinic. Cases lacked epidemiological links to hospitals, suggesting that transmission occurred elsewhere. Environmental and staff screening at the GP surgery did not identify an ongoing source of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance in the United Kingdom shows that the proportion of MRSA bacteremias apportioned to hospitals is decreasing, suggesting the need for greater focus on the detection of MRSA outbreaks and transmission in the community. This case study confirms that the typically nosocomial lineage (E-MRSA15) can transmit within community settings. Our study exemplifies the continued importance of WGS in detecting outbreaks, including those which may be missed by routine practice, and suggests that universal WGS of bacteremia isolates may help detect outbreaks in low-surveillance settings.

A population in pain: report from the Olmsted County health study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is poorly understood on a population level. This study provides updated estimates of the prevalence, location, severity, and impact of pain in a U.S. community and discusses current definitions of "chronic" pain. OUTCOME MEASURES: We mailed four-page surveys to a random sample of 5,897 adult residents of Olmsted County, MN. The survey asked about participant pain (location, duration, severity, and impact), as well as satisfaction with pain-related health care. RESULTS: Of the 3,575 responders (61%), 64.4% reported having chronic pain (>3 months' duration); 6.9% reported subacute pain (1-3 months); and 9.9% reported acute pain (<1 month). Body regions with the highest prevalence of pain were the head (31.9%), lower back (37.7%), and joints (59.5%). Chronic pain sufferers had more days per months with pain, more moderate or severe pain, and greater levels of interference with general activities and sleep than the people with acute and subacute pain. Almost two-thirds of those with chronic pain (63%) reported multiple pain locations. Several chronic pain sufferers gave fair or poor ratings for the quality of care (13.3% of those rating) or the effectiveness of treatment (28.1%) for pain. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of chronic pain is high, often in more than one location, and over 21% of chronic pain sufferers report dissatisfaction with current care.

The impact of NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor use on the initiation of antihypertensive therapy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to quantify the associations between NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors and risk for initiating antihypertensive therapy. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study in a large, integrated health system in the Midwestern United States. Cases (N = 23 562) were new users of antihypertensive therapy from 1, July 1997, through 31, January 2003. Controls (N = 23 562) were randomly selected and matched to cases on age, copay, medical care utilization, sex, and index date. The main outcome measures were exposure to NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. RESULTS: Recent prescription NSAID use was associated with an increased risk for initiation of antihypertensive therapy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95%CI 1.5, 1.7) as were selective COX-2 inhibitors (OR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.6, 2.1). After adjusting for age, sex, co-payment, race, and exposure to other NSAIDs/COX-2, each non-selective NSAID (diclofenac, ibuprofen, indomethacin, naproxen, oxaprozin) was associated with an increased risk of antihypertensive therapy initiation, with ORs ranging from 1.4 to 1.8. Recent users of COX-2 inhibitors had an increased risk of initiating antihypertensive therapy, regardless of specific drug (celecoxib adjusted OR = 1.7 (95%CI 1.3, 2.1); rofecoxib adjusted OR = 1.7 (95%CI 1.4, 1.9)). CONCLUSIONS: A consistent increased risk of initiation of antihypertensive therapy was observed among recent users of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Unlike previous studies, the results indicate that the effects of rofecoxib and celecoxib are equivalent.

Silent pain sufferers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion and characteristics of patients with chronic pain who do not seek treatment and assess whether these patients have unmet pain care needs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, from March through June 2004, with additional visit and diagnosis data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project database. Study participants were a random, population-based sample of eligible adult (>30 years) residents of Olmsted County with at least 1 visit to a local health care facility in the past 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 5897 eligible participants, 3575 people (60.6%) responded. Of the respondents who reported pain of more than 3 months' duration, 497 (22.4%) of the 2211 patients stated that they had not informed their physician about their pain. Of these silent sufferers, 70.6% (351/497) reported having moderate or severe pain, 49.2% (243/497) reported having frequent pain (>8 days per month), and 40.6% (202/497) met both criteria. Silent sufferers also reported that pain interfered with their general activity and sleep to a level only slightly less than the chronic pain sufferers who reported discussing their pain with a physician. Silent sufferers made an average of 5.2 ambulatory physician visits per year, which was less than those who sought physician help for their pain (8.6 ambulatory visits per year; P < .001). Men and younger participants were more likely to be silent about their pain (P < .001). CONCLUSION: More than 1 in 5 people with chronic pain did not seek physician care for their pain. This group is unknown to physicians and therefore represents an unreported patient group with an unmet need for pain care.