Clinical impact of selective and nonselective beta-blockers on survival in patients with ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical evidence has suggested that sustained adrenergic activation can promote ovarian cancer growth and metastasis. The authors examined the impact of beta-adrenergic blockade on the clinical outcome of women with epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers (collectively, epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]). METHODS: A multicenter review of 1425 women with histopathologically confirmed EOC was performed. Comparisons were made between patients with documented beta-blocker use during chemotherapy and those without beta-blocker use. RESULTS: The median age of patients in the current study was 63 years (range, 21-93 years). The sample included 269 patients who received beta-blockers. Of those, 193 (71.7%) were receiving beta-1-adrenergic receptor selective agents, and the remaining patients were receiving nonselective beta antagonists. The primary indication for beta-blocker use was hypertension but also included arrhythmia and postmyocardial infarction management. For patients receiving any beta-blocker, the median overall survival (OS) was 47.8 months versus 42 months for nonusers (P =.04). The median OS based on beta-blocker receptor selectivity was 94.9 months for those receiving nonselective beta-blockers versus 38 months for those receiving beta-1-adrenergic receptor selective agents (P<.001). Hypertension was associated with decreased OS compared with no hypertension across all groups. However, even among patients with hypertension, a longer median OS was observed among users of a nonselective beta-blocker compared with nonusers (38.2 months vs 90 months; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of nonselective beta-blockers in patients with EOC was associated with longer OS. These findings may have implications for new therapeutic approaches. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Evaluation of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin dose on the adverse drug event profile and outcomes in treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine factors that may increase the likelihood of adverse drug events (ADEs) in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) as well as this agent's impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The treatment records of patients with endometrial cancer who received PLD at The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, from 1996 to 2006 were reviewed. Patient demographics, PLD dose, ADEs, use of supportive care interventions, disease progression, and survival were extracted. Logistical regression analysis was used to identify factors that were associated with higher incidence of ADEs and that influenced survival. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with recurrent endometrial cancer were identified who experienced 122 ADEs. The most commonly reported ADEs were nausea (18.9%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE; 16.4%), muscle weakness (12.3%), mucositis (10.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (9.8%). Seventeen patients (28%) required a dose reduction because of ADEs. However, only 5 (8.3%) patients discontinued therapy because of toxicity. Cooling mechanisms were used in 19 patients to prevent PPE, although 9 of these patients still experienced PPE. Treatment with 6 or more cycles of PLD was associated with increased incidence of neutropenia (P = 0.045), peripheral neuropathy (P = 0.004), and PPE (P < 0.001). No differences in progression-free survival or time to progression were found between the doses of PLD; however, there was an assessable trend toward increased survival with doses of 40 mg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no association with dose level and ADEs, more cycles received increased the incidence of toxicities, including PPE and neuropathy. There was no association between different doses of PLD and progression-free survival or time to progression.

Evaluation of pharmacist-provided medication therapy management services in an oncology ambulatory setting.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of formal medication therapy management (MTM) services on pharmacist workload, as well as to describe the population receiving MTM, describe the services provided, and determine the reimbursement rate for billed MTM services. DATA SOURCES: MTM Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code claims, electronic medical records, and pharmacist MTM logs. DATA SYNTHESIS: A retrospective review of all MTM charges from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2010, was performed. Data collected included location of the MTM visit, age, gender, insurance, primary malignancy, comorbidities, home medications, time to complete and document the MTM visit, and rate of reimbursement. RESULTS: In the 3-month period, 239 MTM visits were completed. It took pharmacists a median of 20 minutes (range 15-127) of face-to-face time and 18 minutes (5-90) for documentation per visit. To date, no claims for MTM have been rejected, and reimbursement rates range from 47% to 79% depending on the insurance provider. CONCLUSIONS: MTM in the ambulatory clinic is feasible despite the increase in pharmacist workload from documenting and billing. The increased visibility of clinical pharmacy services justifies the extra time required for formal MTM.

Vinblastine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, bleomycin, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VPCBAE) in the management of three patients with small-cell carcinoma of the ovary.

► Ovarian small-cell carcinoma of the hypercalcemic type is a rare neoplasm with no standard treatment. ► The chemotherapy regimen including vinblastine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, bleomycin, doxorubicin and etoposide (VPCBAE) has limited toxicities and was effective in the 3 patients described in this case report.

Topical treatment of recurrent vaginal melanoma in situ with imiquimod: A case report.

► Vaginal melanoma in situ is a rare neoplasm with a paucity of data regarding the optimal management. ► More conservative approaches are needed to avoid the disfigurement, pain and postoperative complications associated with repeated surgical interventions. ► Imiquimod may prove to be a useful treatment modality for patients with vulvar or vaginal melanoma in situ.

Rhabdomyolysis in a Prostate Cancer Patient Taking Ketoconazole and Simvastatin: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of severe rhabdomyolysis resulting in acute renal failure caused by an interaction between ketoconazole and simvastatin in a patient with prostate cancer. CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old man who received ketoconazole for prostate cancer, along with simvastatin and fenofibrate for dyslipidemia, presented to our ambulatory clinic with complaints of blood in his urine and weakness following an increase in his ketoconazole dose. Two days after presentation, the patient was admitted with rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure, as evidenced by elevated serum creatine kinase (>32,000 IU/L), serum myoglobin (20.6 ng/mL), and serum creatinine (4.2 mg/dL) as well as abnormal bone scintigraphy findings. Ketoconazole, fenofibrate, and simvastatin were discontinued. Renal function did not normalize with hydration, and intermittent hemodialysis was initiated; 10 days of hemodialysis resulted in normalization of electrolytes and creatine kinase. Symptom improvement and normalization of laboratory parameters were observed after prolonged hospitalization (24 days). DISCUSSION: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men in the US. Androgen deprivation therapy is the standard initial treatment for biochemical recurrence or metastatic disease. Most patients experience progression to a castrate-resistant disease state, requiring the use of additional therapies. Ketoconazole is considered a secondary hormonal treatment option. We describe an interaction in a patient with prostate cancer between a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor and ketoconazole resulting in rhabdomyolysis, requiring hemodialysis. An objective causality assessment using the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale revealed that the adverse drug reaction was a possible result of the interaction. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal fashion in which the episode occurred suggests that a possible simvastatin-ketoconazole interaction precipitated rhabdomyolysis in this patient. The use of ketoconazole for castrate-resistant prostate cancer can lead to drug-drug interactions in patients taking simvastatin or other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Clinicians should be aware of this severe adverse event and take steps to minimize its occurrence.