5-year retrospective analysis of patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) and hyperphenylalaninemia treated at two specialized clinics.

BACKGROUND: Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the PAH gene, resulting in deficiency of phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH), an enzyme that converts phenylalanine (Phe) to tyrosine (Tyr). The purpose of this study was to capture real-world data associated with managing PKU under current standard of care and to characterize a representative population for a planned gene therapy trial. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at two U.S. clinics for individuals 10-40 years old diagnosed with PKU-related hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA). Demographics, medical history, treatments and blood Phe data were collected from electronic medical records spanning a five-year period ending in November 2017. RESULTS: 152 patients were enrolled (65.8% had classical PKU). Although >95% of patients were prescribed a Phe-restricted diet, blood Phe concentrations remained substantially elevated, particularly in patients diagnosed with classical PKU. As the Phe threshold was lowered (Phe < 600, 360, 120 or 30 µmol/L), the number of patients with consecutive lab values below the threshold decreased, suggesting that many patients' Phe levels are inadequately controlled. 62.5% of patients were reported as having a history of at least one neuropsychiatric comorbidity, and adults were more likely than adolescents (69.5% vs. 54.3%). 92 of 98 PAH genotypes collected were distinct mutations; the 6 null-null genotypes were associated with classical PKU. Overall the demographics and clinical data were consistent across both sites. CONCLUSION: Despite dietary restrictions, mean Phe concentrations were > 360 µmol/L (a level considered well-controlled based on current U.S. treatment guidelines) for mild, moderate, and classical PKU patients. There remains an unmet need for therapies to control Phe concentrations.

From bench to bedside: review of gene and cell-based therapies and the slow advancement into phase 3 clinical trials, with a focus on Aastrom's Ixmyelocel-T.

There is a large body of preclinical research demonstrating the efficacy of gene and cellular therapy for the potential treatment of severe (limb-threatening) peripheral arterial disease (PAD), including evidence for growth and transcription factors, monocytes, and mesenchymal stem cells. While preclinical research has advanced into early phase clinical trials in patients, few late-phase clinical trials have been conducted. The reasons for the slow progression of these therapies from bench to bedside are as complicated as the fields of gene and cellular therapies. The variety of tissue sources of stem cells (embryonic, adult bone marrow, umbilical cord, placenta, adipose tissue, etc.); autologous versus allogeneic donation; types of cells (hematopoietic, mesenchymal stromal, progenitor, and mixed populations); confusion and stigmatism by the public and patients regarding gene, protein, and stem cell therapy; scaling of manufacturing; and the changing regulatory environment all contribute to the small number of late phase (Phase 3) clinical trials and the lack of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals. This review article provides an overview of the progression of research from gene therapy to the cellular therapy field as it applies to peripheral arterial disease, as well as the position of Aastrom's cellular therapy, ixmyelocel-T, within this field.

The Aastrom experience.

Aastrom Biosciences has developed a proprietary cell-processing technology that enables the manufacture of ixmyelocel-T, a patient-specific multicellular therapy expanded from a small sample of a patient's own bone marrow. Ixmyelocel-T is produced under current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) in a fully closed, automated system that expands mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and macrophages. While the cell types in ixmyelocel-T are the same as those found in the bone marrow, the numbers of MSCs and alternative macrophages are greater in ixmyelocel-T. We propose that the mixture of expanded MSCs and alternatively activated macrophages promote long-term tissue repair of ischemic tissue. The multiple cell types in ixmyelocel-T have a range of biological activities that are likely to contribute to a complex mechanism of action. Clinical trial data collected to date support the potential for ixmyelocel-T as an efficacious and safe treatment for ischemic cardiovascular indications, including critical limb ischemia (CLI) and a severe form of heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The CLI clinical program has completed phase 2 and has reached concurrence with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on a phase 3 study (REVIVE) through the Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) process. The phase 3 study began screening patients in February 2012. The DCM clinical program will initiate phase 2b in 2012.

Cellular therapy with Ixmyelocel-T to treat critical limb ischemia: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled RESTORE-CLI trial.

Ixmyelocel-T is a patient-specific, expanded, multicellular therapy evaluated in patients with lower extremity critical limb ischemia (CLI) with no options for revascularization. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial (RESTORE-CLI) compared the efficacy and safety of intramuscular injections of ixmyelocel-T with placebo. Patients received one-time injections over 20 locations in a single leg and were followed for 12 months. Safety assessments included occurrence of adverse events. Efficacy assessments included time to first occurrence of treatment failure (TTF; major amputation of injected leg; all-cause mortality; doubling of total wound surface area from baseline; de novo gangrene) and amputation-free survival (AFS; major amputation of injected leg; all-cause mortality). A total of 77 patients underwent bone marrow or sham aspiration; 72 patients received ixmyelocel-T (48 patients) or placebo (24 patients). Adverse event rates were similar. Ixmyelocel-T treatment led to a significantly prolonged TTF (P = 0.0032, logrank test). AFS had a clinically meaningful 32% reduction in event rate that was not statistically significant (P = 0.3880, logrank test). Treatment effect in post hoc analyses of patients with baseline wounds was more pronounced (TTF: P < 0.0001, AFS: P = 0.0802, logrank test). Ixmyelocel-T treatment was well tolerated and may offer a potential new treatment option.

Interim analysis results from the RESTORE-CLI, a randomized, double-blind multicenter phase II trial comparing expanded autologous bone marrow-derived tissue repair cells and placebo in patients with critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: Cell therapy is a novel experimental treatment modality for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) of the lower extremities and no other established treatment options. This study was conducted to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of intramuscular injection of autologous tissue repair cells (TRCs). METHODS: A prospective, randomized double-blinded, placebo controlled, multicenter study (RESTORE-CLI) was conducted at 18 centers in the United States in patients with CLI and no option for revascularization. Enrollment of 86 patients began in April 2007 and ended in February 2010. For the prospectively planned interim analysis, conducted in February 2010, 33 patients had the opportunity to complete the trial (12 months of follow-up), and 46 patients had completed at least 6 months of follow-up. The interim analysis included analysis of both patient populations. An independent physician performed the bone marrow or sham control aspiration. The aspirate was processed in a closed, automated cell manufacturing system for approximately 12 days to generate the TRC population of stem and progenitor cells. An average of 136 ± 41 × 10(6) total viable cells or electrolyte (control) solution were injected into 20 sites in the ischemic lower extremity. The primary end point was safety as evaluated by adverse events, and serious adverse events as assessed at multiple follow-up time points. Clinical efficacy end points included major amputation-free survival and time to first occurrence of treatment failure (defined as any of the following: major amputation, death, de novo gangrene, or doubling of wound size), as well as major amputation rate and measures of wound healing. RESULTS: There was no difference in adverse or serious adverse events between the two groups. Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in time to treatment failure (log-rank test, P = .0053) and amputation-free survival in patients receiving TRC treatment, (log-rank test, P = .038). Major amputation occurred in 19% of TRC-treated patients compared to 43% of controls (P = .14, Fisher exact test). There was evidence of improved wound healing in the TRC-treated patients when compared with controls at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular injection of autologous bone marrow-derived TRCs is safe and decreases the occurrence of clinical events associated with disease progression when compared to placebo in patients with lower extremity CLI and no revascularization options.

Value of repeated measures of nerve conduction and quantitative sensory testing in a diabetic neuropathy trial.

Conduct of a large, multicenter trial of the aldose reductase inhibitor zenarestat provided data on the reproducibility of multiple electrophysiologic (nerve conduction studies, NCS) and quantitative sensory (QST) tests. Baseline and 12-month electrophysiologic data from approximately 1100 patients at multiple centers were available for analysis. Intersite variability contributed minimally to overall test variance. All NCS tests were highly reproducible. Cool thermal and vibration QST thresholds, as measured by CASE IV instrumentation, were also highly reproducible. Intersubject variance accounted for the majority of variance for all parameters measured. Repeating NCS and QST measures decreased sample sizes needed to show statistical significance. Consideration of these observations, particularly with regard to QST, should aid in the design of future clinical trials investigating neuropathy.

Natural progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the Zenarestat study population.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the baseline and natural progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy over 12 months in a large mild-to-moderate neuropathy population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients from a multicentered trial of zenarestat, an aldose reductase inhibitor, had serial measures of neurologic function, including nerve conduction studies (NCSs), quantitative sensory testing (QST), and clinical neuropathy rating scores at baseline and at 12 months. Baseline population descriptors and changes in neurologic function in placebo-treated patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Sural sensory velocity (P = 0.0008 [95% CI -1.04 to -0.27]), median sensory amplitude (P = 0.0021 [-1.3 to -0.29]), median distal motor latency (P = 0.002 [0.09-0.28]), cool thermal QST (P = 0.0005 [0.27-0.94]), and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument results (P = 0.0087 [0.04-0.30]) declined significantly from baseline in the placebo population. NCS changes from baseline were independent of baseline HbA1c stratification. CONCLUSIONS: The neurologic decline over 12 months is evident when measured by NCS and cool thermal QST. Other measures (vibration QST, neuropathy rating scores, monofilament examination) are insensitive to changes over 12 months in a mild-to-moderate affected population of this size.