Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 121
Filtrar
3.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(9): 1467-1476, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35470457

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis (PSO) present major challenges in health care. Thus, biomarkers to identify disease trajectories and response to treatments to improve the lives of affected individuals warrant great research consideration. The requirements that these biomarkers must fulfil for use as practical clinical tools have not yet been adequately investigated. AIM: To identify the core elements of high-quality AD and PSO biomarkers to prepare recommendations for current biomarker research. METHOD: A cross-sectional two-round Delphi survey was conducted from August to October 2019 and October to November 2020. All participants were members of the BIOMAP project, an EU-funded consortium of clinicians, researchers, patient organizations and pharmaceutical industry partners. The first round consisted of three open-ended questions. Responses were qualitatively analysed, and 26 closed statements were developed. For the second round, 'agreement' was assumed when the responses of ≥70% of the participants were ≥5 points on a 7-point Likert scale for each statement. Priority classification was based on mean scores (<20th percentile = low, 20th to 60th percentile = medium, >60th percentile = high). RESULTS: Twenty-one and twenty-six individuals participated in rounds one and two, respectively. From 26 statements that were included in round 2, 18 achieved agreement (8 concerning the performance, 8 for the purpose and 2 on current obstacles). Seven statements were classified as high priority, e.g. those concerning reliability, clinical validity, a high positive predictive value, prediction of the therapeutic response and disease progression. Another seven statements were assigned medium priority, e.g. those about analytical validity, prediction of comorbidities and therapeutic algorithm. Low priority included four statements, like those concerning cost effectiveness and prediction of disease flares. CONCLUSION: The core requirements that experts agreed on being essential for high-quality AD and PSO biomarkers require rapid validation. Biomarkers can therefore be assessed based on these prioritized requirements.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Psoríase , Biomarcadores , Consenso , Estudos Transversais , Técnica Delphi , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Motivação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Br J Dermatol ; 186(3): 440-452, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698371

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) not controlled with topical therapy have limited treatment options. Ciclosporin A (CSA) is a commonly used, broad immunosuppressant in AD, but treatment with CSA requires monitoring for potentially serious adverse effects. In a previous phase III trial, tralokinumab plus topical corticosteroids (TCS) as needed provided early and sustained improvements in AD signs and symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab plus TCS in adult patients with severe AD whose disease was not adequately controlled with CSA or who had contraindications to oral CSA. METHODS: In this 26-week, multicentre, parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial, European adults with severe AD were randomized 1 : 1 to subcutaneous tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks plus TCS as needed. The primary endpoint was a 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16. RESULTS: In total, 277 patients were randomized. At week 16, more patients treated with tralokinumab plus TCS vs. placebo plus TCS achieved EASI 75 [64·2% vs. 50·5%; difference 14·1% (95% confidence interval 2·5-25·7); P = 0·018], which increased further up to week 26. Improvements in AD severity were accompanied by early improvements in patient-reported outcomes, including Dermatology Life Quality Index, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, pruritus and sleep interference. Tralokinumab plus TCS also showed a higher EASI75 response at week 16 among patients who had previously failed CSA therapy vs. placebo plus TCS (57% vs. 41%). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab 300 mg plus TCS as needed was effective and well tolerated in patients with severe AD whose disease was not adequately controlled with CSA or who had contraindications to oral CSA.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Eczema , Corticosteroides , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 47(2): 303-311, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34382243

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by unrelenting pruritus and recurrent eczematous lesions. It affects up to 15% of children and adolescents and up to 5% of adults, and confers a high and multifactorial burden to patients, families and society. With increasing awareness of this substantial burden, AD has become a priority for healthcare systems. AIM: The Atopic Dermatitis Quality of Care (ADQoC) initiative set out to describe good practices for addressing the challenges that impede the management of AD. METHODS: The initiative carried out a literature review and surveyed 32 expert care centres, catalogued findings, and analysed and elucidated global challenges to AD care along with good practice implementations that can address them. RESULTS: The four challenges to quality care for AD are: (i) misconceptions about AD; (ii) delayed referral and access to AD specialists; (iii) poor patient access to AD treatments and poor adherence to medications; and (iv) managing the complexity of AD and its comorbidities. The initiative highlighted 5 of 10 good practice implementations as high priority for any AD care centre to focus on: (i) clinical assessment and diagnosis; (ii) a structured multidisciplinary care team; (iii) monitoring and evaluating care quality; (iv) patient education and communication; and (v) collaboration and exchange with patient groups. CONCLUSION: These implementations can provide benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the healthcare system. They directly contribute to the efficacy of treatment, improved healthcare provider efficiency, improved education for patients and healthcare providers, and improved costs to healthcare systems. The initiative was launched on https://atopicdermatitiscare.kpmg.co.uk/ to provide an easy-to-use educational platform.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Encaminhamento e Consulta
7.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(4): 547-556, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34779040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common inflammatory skin disorder in both adolescence and adulthood. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the lifetime prevalence of hand eczema and associated exogenous and endogenous risk factors among adolescents in Germany. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study embedded into a prospective population-based birth cohort in four regions of Germany, which recruited healthy neonates born between November 1997 and January 1999. We included 1736 participants who had completed the 15-year follow-up from birth cohort and 84.6% (1468/1736) had clearly reported whether they have ever had hand eczema. All the data were based on questionnaires and blood tests (immunoglobulin E). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine endogenous and exogenous factors in relation to the lifetime prevalence of hand eczema among adolescents. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and sixty-eight adolescents (715 girls, 48.7%) were included in the final analysis. The lifetime prevalence of hand eczema among adolescents at the age of 15 was 10.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9%-12.1%), with a significantly higher lifetime prevalence among girls than boys (12.7% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.005). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated statistically significant associations between the lifetime prevalence of hand eczema and having ever been diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.8) or having ever had dry skin (aOR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.1), respectively. No statistically significant independent associations were found between asthma, hay fever, allergy-related clinical symptoms, immunoglobulin E positivity and other exogenous factors in relation to hand eczema. CONCLUSION: Our study fills a research gap on the epidemiological burden of hand eczema among adolescents. One out of ten ever suffered from hand eczema until age 15 years indicating that hand eczema constitutes a significant burden in paediatric populations. The role of atopic dermatitis in hand eczema reinforces previous findings. Exogenous risk factors warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Eczema , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Eczema/epidemiologia , Eczema/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
9.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(3): 413-421, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743344

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a multifactorial genesis including genetic predispositions and environmental risk and trigger factors. One of the latter possibly is smoking, indicated by an increased prevalence of AD in adults and children that are actively or passively exposed to cigarette smoke. OBJECTIVES: In this study, AD characteristics and its atopic comorbidities are compared in smoking and non-smoking AD patients. METHODS: TREATgermany is a non-interventional clinical registry which includes patients with moderate to severe AD in Germany. Baseline data of patients included in TREATgermany from inception in June 2016 to April 2020 in 39 sites across Germany was analysed comparing AD disease characteristics and comorbidities in smokers vs. non-smokers. RESULTS: Of 921 patients, 908 (male: 58.7%) with a mean age of 41.9 ± 14.4 reported their smoking status. The objective Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (oSCORAD) did not differ between smokers (n = 352; 38.8%) and non-smokers, however, lesions' intensity of oozing/crusts and excoriations as well as patient global assessment scores (PGA) of AD severity were higher in smoking as opposed to non-smoking patients. Smokers reported a lower number of weeks with well-controlled AD and more severe pruritus than non-smokers. Total IgE levels were more elevated in smokers and they displayed a younger age at the initial diagnosis of bronchial asthma. After adjustment for potential confounders, the increased intensity of oozing/crusts, the reduced number of weeks with well-controlled AD and the greater pruritus remained different in smokers compared to non-smokers. In addition, smoking patients with adult-onset AD showed a 2.5 times higher chance of involvement of the feet. CONCLUSIONS: German registry data indicate that AD patients who smoke have a higher disease burden with a different distribution pattern of lesions in adult-onset AD.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Eczema , Adulto , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prurido , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
10.
Hautarzt ; 72(12): 1079-1089, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34542647

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With AtopicHealth1, the first national care study on atopic dermatitis (AD) was conducted in 2010. At that time, about one third of the patients undergoing treatment by dermatologists showed severe limitations in quality of life, which indicated an insufficient quality of care. The aim of the present study was to characterise the current care of patients with AD undergoing dermatological treatment in comparison between different severity grades, as well as in comparison to 2010 and to psoriasis. METHODS: The Germany-wide multicentre cross-sectional study "AtopicHealth2" recorded clinical data, quality of life (DLQI), therapies, preventive behaviour and patient-defined treatment benefit (PBI). Patients with an indication for systemic therapy were considered moderately to severely affected for subgroup analyses, the others mildly affected. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2019, 1291 patients (median age 41 years, 56.5% female) were enrolled by 111 centres. Compared with 2010, there were no improvements in quality of life (DLQI 8.5 in both studies), severity (SCORAD 45.4 vs. 42.3 in 2010) or treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.4 in 2010). Moderately to severely affected patients were more likely to show impaired quality of life (45.4% vs. 23.6%) and less likely to have relevant treatment benefits (PBI < 1: 21.3% vs. 13.2%) than mildly affected patients. In contrast to psoriasis, patients with AD revealed higher quality of life limitations (DLQI 8.5 vs. 6.1) and lower treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.8). DISCUSSION: Compared to 2010, there is no improvement in the quality of care for AD in Germany. Compared to psoriasis, patients with AD show higher burden and lower treatment benefit, which underlines the need for therapeutic innovations.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
13.
Br J Dermatol ; 185(3): 573-584, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33733457

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The human skin offers diverse ecosystems for microbial symbionts. However, the factors shaping skin-microbiome interactions are still insufficiently characterized. This contrasts with the broader knowledge about factors influencing gut microbiota. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate major patterns of association of host traits, lifestyle and environmental factors with skin bacteria in two German populations. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study with 647 participants from two population-based German cohorts, PopGen (n = 294) and KORA FF4 (n = 353), totalling 1794 skin samples. The V1-V2 regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene were sequenced. Associations were tested with two bacterial levels, community (beta diversity) and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). RESULTS: We validated known associations of the skin microbiota with skin microenvironment, age, body mass index and sex. These factors were associated with beta diversity and abundance of ASVs in PopGen, which was largely replicated in KORA FF4. Most intriguingly, dietary macronutrients and total dietary energy were associated with several ASVs. ASVs were also associated with smoking, alcohol consumption, skin pH, skin type, transepidermal water loss, education and several environmental exposures, including hours spent outdoors. Associated ASVs included members of the genera Propionibacterium, Corynebacterium and Staphylococcus. CONCLUSIONS: We expand the current understanding of factors associated with the skin bacterial community. We show the association of diet with skin bacteria. Finally, we hypothesize that the skin microenvironment and host physiology would shape the skin bacterial community to a greater extent compared with a single skin physiological feature, lifestyle and environmental exposure.


Assuntos
Bactérias , Microbiota , Bactérias/genética , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Microbiota/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética
15.
Br J Dermatol ; 184(3): 450-463, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33000503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a key driver of atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were candidates for systemic therapy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo plus TCS controlled phase III trial. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to subcutaneous tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) with TCS as needed over 16 weeks. Patients who achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 and/or 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16 with tralokinumab were rerandomized 1 : 1 to tralokinumab Q2W or every 4 weeks (Q4W), with TCS as needed, for another 16 weeks. RESULTS: At week 16, more patients treated with tralokinumab than with placebo achieved IGA 0/1: 38·9% vs. 26·2% [difference (95% confidence interval): 12·4% (2·9-21·9); P = 0·015] and EASI 75: 56·0% vs. 35·7% [20·2% (9·8-30·6); P < 0·001]. Of the patients who were tralokinumab responders at week 16, 89·6% and 92·5% of those treated with tralokinumab Q2W and 77·6% and 90·8% treated with tralokinumab Q4W maintained an IGA 0/1 and EASI 75 response at week 32, respectively. Among patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 and EASI 75 with tralokinumab Q2W at 16 weeks, 30·5% and 55·8% achieved these endpoints, respectively, at week 32. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab 300 mg in combination with TCS as needed was effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Eczema , Corticosteroides , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(12): 2717-2744, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33205485

RESUMO

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease. The diagnosis is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Disease activity and burden are best measured with a composite score, assessing both objective and subjective symptoms, such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD). AD management must take into account clinical and pathogenic variabilities, the patient's age and also target flare prevention. Basic therapy includes hydrating and barrier-stabilizing topical treatment universally applied, as well as avoiding specific and unspecific provocation factors. Visible skin lesions are treated with anti-inflammatory topical agents such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus), which are preferred in sensitive locations. Topical tacrolimus and some mid-potency corticosteroids are proven agents for proactive therapy, which is defined as the long-term intermittent anti-inflammatory therapy of frequently relapsing skin areas. Systemic anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive treatment is a rapidly changing field requiring monitoring. Oral corticosteroids have a largely unfavourable benefit-risk ratio. The IL-4R-blocker dupilumab is a safe, effective and licensed, but expensive, treatment option with potential ocular side-effects. Other biologicals targeting key pathways in the atopic immune response, as well as different Janus kinase inhibitors, are among emerging treatment options. Dysbalanced microbial colonization and infection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Systemic antihistamines (H1R-blockers) only have limited effects on AD-related itch and eczema lesions. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation, preferably narrowband UVB or UVA1. Coal tar may be useful for atopic hand and foot eczema. Dietary recommendations should be patient-specific, and elimination diets should only be advised in case of proven food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Psychosomatic counselling is recommended to address stress-induced exacerbations. Efficacy-proven 'Eczema school' educational programmes and therapeutic patient education are recommended for both children and adults.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Eczema , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Calcineurina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Prurido , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA