Dysfunction of proprioceptive sensory synapses is a pathogenic event and therapeutic target in mice and humans with spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by a varying degree of severity that correlates with the reduction of SMN protein levels. Motor neuron degeneration and skeletal muscle atrophy are hallmarks of SMA, but it is unknown whether other mechanisms contribute to the spectrum of clinical phenotypes. Here, through a combination of physiological and morphological studies in mouse models and SMA patients, we identify dysfunction and loss of proprioceptive sensory synapses as key signatures of SMA pathology. We demonstrate that SMA patients exhibit impaired proprioception, and their proprioceptive sensory synapses are dysfunctional as measured by the neurophysiological test of the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex). We further show that loss of excitatory afferent synapses and altered potassium channel expression in SMA motor neurons are conserved pathogenic events found in both severely affected patients and mouse models. Lastly, we report that improved motor function and fatigability in ambulatory SMA patients and mouse models treated with SMN-inducing drugs correlate with increased function of sensory-motor circuits that can be accurately captured by the H-reflex assay. Thus, sensory synaptic dysfunction is a clinically relevant event in SMA, and the H-reflex is a suitable assay to monitor disease progression and treatment efficacy of motor circuit pathology. One-sentence summary: Sensory-motor circuit dysfunction involving impairment of proprioceptive synapses on motor neurons is a conserved pathogenic event and therapeutic target across animal models and humans with spinal muscular atrophy.

Randomized controlled phase II trial of glatiramer acetate in ALS.

The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the safety and immunology of glatiramer acetate in ALS. Twenty treated patients were randomly assigned to daily or biweekly injections. Ten control patients were selected from another trial and followed up concurrently. Injection reactions were the only common adverse event (p = 0.01). Treated patients showed enhanced lymphocyte proliferation (p = 0.02). The safety profile and immune effects support conducting larger trials of dose selection and efficacy.

Quantitative sensory testing: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

OBJECTIVE: This assessment evaluates the clinical utility, efficacy, and safety of quantitative sensory testing (QST). METHODS: By searching MEDLINE, Current Contents, and their personal files, the authors identified 350 articles. Selected articles utilized computer operated threshold systems, manually operated threshold systems, and electrical threshold devices. The authors evaluated the use of normal values and the degree of reproducibility between the same and different systems. Articles were rated using a standard classification of evidence scheme. RESULTS: Because of differences between systems, normal values from one system cannot be transposed to others. Reproducibility of results was also an important concern, and there is no consensus on how it should be defined. The authors identified no adequately powered class I studies demonstrating the effectiveness of QST in evaluating any particular disorder. A number of class II and III studies demonstrated that QST is probably or possibly useful in identifying small or large fiber sensory abnormalities in patients with diabetic neuropathy, small fiber neuropathies, uremic neuropathies, and demyelinating neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: QST is a potentially useful tool for measuring sensory impairment for clinical and research studies. However, QST results should not be the sole criteria used to diagnose pathology. Because malingering and other nonorganic factors can influence the test results, QST is not currently useful for the purpose of resolving medicolegal matters. Well-designed studies comparing different QST devices and methodologies are needed and should include patients with abnormalities detected solely by QST.

Electrophysiologic studies in critical illness associated weakness: myopathy or neuropathy--a reappraisal.

OBJECTIVE: Unexplained weakness in critically ill patients is recognized with increasing frequency. However, it is debated whether the condition is a peripheral neuropathy or a myopathy. Diagnostic difficulties can arise from multiple sources that are not generally a factor in other neuromuscular conditions. Conventional electrodiagnostic techniques may provide only non-specific data, clinical examination is often hampered, and muscle biopsy is not a practical screening tool. METHOD: To improve diagnostic yield, we studied 22 consecutive patients with critical illness associated weakness with additional electrodiagnostic techniques, including direct muscle stimulation, quantitative electromyography, and motor unit number estimation. RESULTS: The applied techniques supported an underlying myopathy in all the patients examined. The diagnosis was confirmed by muscle biopsy in 9 patients. Additional lesser features of neuropathy were concomitantly present in one patient who also underwent sural nerve biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that myopathy is much more common than polyneuropathy in critical illness. Suspicion of this entity should be high in this setting even without exposure to corticosteroids or non-depolarizing blocking agents.

Antisulfatide antibodies in neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiologic correlates.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of the neuropathy associated with elevated serum antisulfatide antibodies. METHODS: Clinical, electrophysiologic, morphologic, and laboratory data of 25 patients with significantly elevated (>25,600) antisulfatide antibodies were reviewed. RESULTS: Four groups were distinguished based on clinical and electrophysiologic data: Group 1, eight patients with predominantly small fiber sensory neuropathy (32%); Group 2, five patients with mixed large and small fiber sensory neuropathy (20%); Group 3, seven patients with axonal sensorimotor neuropathy (28%); and Group 4, three patients with demyelinating sensorimotor neuropathy (12%). One additional patient had mononeuritis multiplex and one had ALS. An immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy was found in 30% of the patients tested, but not in any of the Group 1 patients with small fiber sensory neuropathy. Serum IgM level was elevated in 12 patients, of whom six had a concomitant monoclonal gammopathy. Morphologic studies in five patients showed predominantly axonal degeneration, with three of the patients also exhibiting additional features of demyelination. CONCLUSIONS: Antisulfatide antibodies are associated with several subtypes of peripheral neuropathy. Predominantly sensory or sensorimotor axonal neuropathies are most common in this series, with the sensory component either small fiber or mixed fiber type. A smaller demyelinating group indistinguishable from patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy was also seen. One third of patients had a concomitant IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and approximately one half had elevated serum IgM.