RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine potential sex differences in the relationship between arterial stiffness and global cognitive function and executive functions. METHODS: Baseline data from 80 older adults were included from two randomized controlled trials (NCT02669394 and NCT02737878). Arterial stiffness was measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV). Cognitive function assessment included global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]) and executive functions (set shifting [Trail Making Test Part B minus A], inhibition [Stroop Test], and working memory [Verbal Digit Span Backwards Test]). Separate statistical models were constructed to assess the effect of cf-PWV on each cognitive outcome for females and males. Each statistical model controlled for Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score and education. RESULTS: Higher cf-PWV was associated with impaired MMSE performance in males (ß = -0.48; p = 0.018), but not females (p ≥ 0.389). For executive processes, higher cf-PWV was associated with impaired Trail Making Test Part B minus A (ß = 0.56; p = 0.005) and Stroop Test (ß = 0.59; p = 0.004) in males, but not in females (ps ≥ 0.108). cf-PWV was not significantly associated with Verbal Digit Span Forward minus Backward Test in males or females (ps ≥ 0.108). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial stiffness is more strongly associated with cognitive impairment in males than females. These results further elucidate the interplay between vascular health and cognitive function by providing support for sex-specific mechanisms.
Assuntos
Cognição , Disfunção Cognitiva , Rigidez Vascular , Idoso , Cognição/fisiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Distribuição por Sexo , Rigidez Vascular/fisiologiaRESUMO
Purpose: The Reid R. Sacco AYA Cancer Program set out to improve survivorship care for AYA-aged patients (15-39 years) of pediatric or AYA cancer. This article discusses the steps in establishing the clinic, including the creation of a database on cancer history, exposures, and attendant risks of late effects. Results from the database tell the broader story of AYAs who seek care within a dedicated survivorship clinic. Methods: The database was created with REDCap® (Research Electronic Data Capture), a secure web-based, HIPAA compliant application for research and clinical study data. Data were abstracted and analyzed by trained members of the program team. Results: A total of 144 patients were seen for their initial survivorship visit between January 2013 and September 2019. Regarding physical health, two-thirds of the patients presented with an established late effect, one third with an established medical comorbidity, and 11% (n = 16) with secondary cancer related to their oncologic treatment. In assessing mental health, a significant cohort reported a known affective disorder (32%, n = 46) with one quarter already taking a psychotropic medication. Despite the transient nature of AYAs, 85% of patients remained in care within the long-term follow-up clinical model. Conclusions: Data presented illustrate how multilayered and complex survivorship care needs can be, as patients enter the clinic with complicated pre-existing psychosocial issues, significant late effects, and comorbidities. This study reinforces the value of a clinical database to better understand AYA survivors with the ultimate goal of optimizing and coordinating care.