Exercise and Recovery Following Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury in the Community Setting.

Introduction The recommendations on return to exercise post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain debatable. As recent as 10 years ago, the conventional recovery modality for a mild TBI was to reduce neurostimulating activity and encourage rest until the symptoms subsided. However, emerging literature has challenged this notion, stating that returning to exercise early in the course of mild TBI recovery may be beneficial to the recovery timeline. This study surveys Hawaii's diverse population to identify trends in exercise and recovery for TBI patients to shape recommendations on return to exercise. Methods A single-center retrospective chart review of the patients with mild-to-moderate TBI was selected from a patient database at an outpatient neurology clinic between January 2020 and January 2022. The variables collected include demographics, the etiology of injury, and symptoms at diagnosis. Self-generated phone surveys were completed to evaluate exercise patterns post-TBI. Results The patients who recovered within two years displayed similar exercise patterns to the patients who took more than two years to recover. Exercise frequency, intensity, and duration did not differ significantly (p=0.75, p=0.51, and p=0.80, respectively; n=100). Hiking and walking were more common in the long recovery (LR) group (p=0.02), likely reflecting advanced age compared to the short recovery (SR) group (50 versus 39 years, p<0.01). Additionally, no correlation exists between exercise intensity and worsening symptoms (p=0.920), suggesting that the patients exhibit exercise patterns suitable for sub-symptomatic recovery. Conclusion Return to exercise does not appear to be a predictor for mild-to-moderate TBI recovery. The patients appear to self-regulate an exercise regimen that will not exacerbate their symptoms or recovery time; thus, it may be suitable to recommend return to exercise as tolerated. These, and other findings in the literature, suggest that patients should be encouraged to return to exercise shortly after a mild TBI so long as the exercise does not exacerbate their symptoms.

Update on Current Concepts of Blood Flow Restriction in the Perioperative Period of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament tears or ruptures are common orthopedic injuries. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is an orthopedic procedure allowing for earlier return to sports, improved maintenance of lifestyle demands, and restored knee stability and kinematics. A perioperative rehabilitative adjunct recently gaining interest is blood flow restriction (BFR), a method in which temporary restriction of blood flow to a chosen extremity is introduced and can be used as early as a few days postoperative. There has been increasing investigation and recent literature regarding BFR. This review synthesizes current concepts of BFR use in the ACLR perioperative period. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):e333-e340.].

Mechanisms and Severity of Exercise Intolerance Following COVID-19 and Similar Viral Infections: A Comparative Review.

Approximately 19% of the population is suffering from "Long COVID", also known as post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (PASC), which often results in exercise intolerance. As COVID infections continue to be common, studying the long-term consequences of coronavirus disease (COVID) on physical function has become increasingly important. This narrative review will aim to summarize the current literature surrounding exercise intolerance following COVID infection in terms of mechanism, current management approaches, and comparison with similar conditions and will aim to define limitations in the current literature. Multiple organ systems have been implicated in the onset of long-lasting exercise intolerance post-COVID, including cardiac impairment, endothelial dysfunction, decreased VO2 max and oxygen extraction, deconditioning due to bed rest, and fatigue. Treatment modalities for severe COVID have also been shown to cause myopathy and/or worsen deconditioning. Besides COVID-specific pathophysiology, general febrile illness as commonly experienced during infection will cause hypermetabolic muscle catabolism, impaired cooling, and dehydration, which acutely cause exercise intolerance. The mechanisms of exercise intolerance seen with PASC also appear similar to post-infectious fatigue syndrome and infectious mononucleosis. However, the severity and duration of the exercise intolerance seen with PASC is greater than that of any of the isolated mechanisms described above and thus is likely a combination of the proposed mechanisms. Physicians should consider post-infectious fatigue syndrome (PIFS), especially if fatigue persists after six months following COVID recovery. It is important for physicians, patients, and social systems to anticipate exercise intolerance lasting for weeks to months in patients with long COVID. These findings underscore the importance of long-term management of patients with COVID and the need for ongoing research to identify effective treatments for exercise intolerance in this population. By recognizing and addressing exercise intolerance in patients with long COVID, clinicians can provide proper supportive interventions, such as exercise programs, physical therapy, and mental health counseling, to improve patient outcomes.

Risk factors for water sports-related cervical spine injuries.

BACKGROUND: To examine risk factors associated with water sports-related cervical spine injuries (WSCSI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted for WSCSI from 1993 to 1997 was performed. The severity of cervical spine injury was assessed by review of medical records and imaging studies. Mechanisms of injury and activities at the time of injury were noted to determine risk factors for cervical spine injuries caused by wave forced impacts (WFI) from activities such as bodysurfing and body boarding. These risks were compared with injuries incurred by shallow water dives (SWD). RESULTS: One hundred patients were analyzed (mean age, 36 years old); 89% were male, 62% were nonresidents of Hawaii, and 75% had a large build. Patients without radiographic evidence of fractures, subluxations, and/or dislocations (n = 26) were significantly older (48 versus 32 years old, p < 0.0001) with a higher rate of pre-existing cervical spine abnormalities (65% versus 15%, p < 0.0001) compared with the remainder of patients (n = 74). Seventy-seven percent of WFI involved nonresidents. The mean age of WFI patients was significantly older than patients involved in SWD (42 versus 25 years). Ninety-six percent of wave-related accidents occurred at moderately to severely rated shorebreak beaches. CONCLUSIONS: Wave forced impacts of the head with the ocean bottom typically occurred at moderate to severe shorebreaks, and involved inexperienced, large-build males in their 40s. Spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylosis may increase the risk of cervical spine injury associated with WFI due to the increased risk of neck hyperextension and hyperflexion impacts inherent to this activity.

Optimizing the glenoid contribution to the stability of a humeral hemiarthroplasty without a prosthetic glenoid.

BACKGROUND: In a shoulder requiring arthroplasty, if the glenoid is flat or biconcave, the surgeon can restore the desired glenoid stability by using a glenoid prosthesis with a known surface geometry or by modifying the surface of the glenoid to a geometry that provides the desired glenoid stability. This study tested the hypotheses that (1) the stability provided by the glenoid is reduced by the removal of the articular cartilage; (2) the stability contributed by the glenoid is compromised by loss of its articular cartilage, and this lost stability can be restored by spherical reaming along the glenoid centerline; and (3) the stability of a reamed glenoid is comparable with that of a native glenoid and with that of a polyethylene glenoid with similar surface geometry; and (4) the glenoid stability can be predicted from the glenoid surface geometry. METHODS: The stability provided by the glenoid in a given direction can be characterized by the maximal angle that the humeral joint reaction force can make with the glenoid centerline before the humeral head dislocates; this quantity is defined as the balance stability angle in the specified direction. The balance stability angles were both calculated and measured in eight different directions for an unused polyethylene glenoid component and eleven cadaveric glenoids in four different states: (1) native without the capsule or the rotator cuff, (2) denuded of cartilage and labrum, (3) after reaming the glenoid surface around the glenoid centerline with use of a spherical reamer with a radius of 25 mm, and (4) after reaming around the glenoid centerline with use of a spherical reamer with a radius of 22.5 mm. RESULTS: The calculated and measured balance stability angles for each direction in each glenoid were strongly correlated. Denuding the glenoids of the articular cartilage reduced the glenoid contribution to stability, especially in the posterior direction. Reaming the glenoid restored the stability to values comparable with those of the normal glenoid. For example, the average calculated balance stability angle (and standard deviation) in the posterior direction for all eleven glenoids was 24 degrees for the native glenoids, 14 degrees for the denuded glenoids, 25 degrees for the glenoids reamed to a radius of 25 mm, and 33 degrees for the glenoids reamed to a radius of 22.5 mm. The values for the glenoids reamed to 25 mm (25 degrees ) were similar to those of a polyethylene glenoid of the same radius of curvature. For glenoids reamed to 22.5 mm, the average difference between the actual balance stability angle and that predicted from the glenoid geometry was 3.4 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: The glenoid contribution to shoulder stability was decreased by the removal of cartilage and labrum and was restored by spherical reaming to a level similar to resurfacing the glenoid with a polyethylene component.

Glenohumeral arthritis and its management.

Glenohumeral arthritis has many different etiologies, including osteo-arthritis, secondary degenerative joint disease, rheumatoid arthritis,avascular necrosis, cuff tear arthropathy, and capsulorrhaphy arthropathy. Each of these diagnoses may have different underlying pathoanatomy and pathomechanics. The treating physician must recognize how these characteristics impair shoulder function so that the prescribed course of treatment addresses the root causes of shoulder dysfunction. The patient's age. level of physical activity, and comorbidities should be taken into account, and the intended management should be weighed against how these factors may interfere with treatment efficacy over the long-term. The goal of treatment is to restore comfort, motion, strength, and stability to the shoulder in a safe and reliable manner. Conservative treatments should aim to optimize shoulder flexibility, maintain muscle function, and reduce inflammation. Activity modification is crucial but often unreasonable to the active patient. Temporary surgical approaches include arthroscopic debridement and synovectomy. These approaches may be appropriate for a younger patient with some remaining joint space and a functional rotator cuff. Definitive surgical treatment typically involves either a proximal humerus replace mentor a total shoulder replacement. The decision to resurface the glenoid should be based on the patient's age, diagnosis, available bone stock, and physical demands. The surgeon must be familiar with the options provided by the given implant system so that the proper balance of motion and stability can be restored with a close approximation of the native anatomy. Inexperienced hands, good-to-excellent results can be achieved in greater than 90% of properly selected patients. Glenoid component failure is one of the most common complications of shoulder arthroplasty, highlighting the need to select carefully patients in whom glenoid resurfacing is warranted.