Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ethics Int Aff ; 35(4): 543-562, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34937990

RESUMO

COVID-19 vaccines are likely to be scarce for years to come. Many countries, from India to the U.K., have demonstrated vaccine nationalism. What are the ethical limits to this vaccine nationalism? Neither extreme nationalism nor extreme cosmopolitanism is ethically justifiable. Instead, we propose the fair priority for residents (FPR) framework, in which governments can retain COVID-19 vaccine doses for their residents only to the extent that they are needed to maintain a noncrisis level of mortality while they are implementing reasonable public health interventions. Practically, a noncrisis level of mortality is that experienced during a bad influenza season, which society considers an acceptable background risk. Governments take action to limit mortality from influenza, but there is no emergency that includes severe lockdowns. This "flu-risk standard" is a nonarbitrary and generally accepted heuristic. Mortality above the flu-risk standard justifies greater governmental interventions, including retaining vaccines for a country's own citizens over global need. The precise level of vaccination needed to meet the flu-risk standard will depend upon empirical factors related to the pandemic. This links the ethical principles to the scientific data emerging from the emergency. Thus, the FPR framework recognizes that governments should prioritize procuring vaccines for their country when doing so is necessary to reduce mortality to noncrisis flu-like levels. But after that, a government is obligated to do its part to share vaccines to reduce risks of mortality for people in other countries. We consider and reject objections to the FPR framework based on a country: (1) having developed a vaccine, (2) raising taxes to pay for vaccine research and purchase, (3) wanting to eliminate economic and social burdens, and (4) being ineffective in combating COVID-19 through public health interventions.

4.
Nat Struct Mol Biol ; 25(5): 372-383, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29686279

RESUMO

Iron metabolism is critical for sustaining life and maintaining human health. Here, we find that iron homeostasis is linked to facultative heterochromatin assembly and regulation of gene expression during adaptive genome control. We show that the fission yeast Clr4/Suv39h histone methyltransferase is part of a rheostat-like mechanism in which transcriptional upregulation of mRNAs in response to environmental change provides feedback to prevent their uncontrolled expression through heterochromatin assembly. Interestingly, proper iron homeostasis is required, as iron depletion or downregulation of iron transporters causes defects in heterochromatin assembly and unrestrained upregulation of gene expression. Remarkably, an unbiased genetic screen revealed that restoration of iron homeostasis is sufficient to re-establish facultative heterochromatin and proper gene control genome-wide. These results establish a role for iron homeostasis in facultative heterochromatin assembly and reveal a dynamic mechanism for reprogramming the genome in response to environmental changes.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo , Regulação Fúngica da Expressão Gênica/genética , Heterocromatina/metabolismo , Metiltransferases/metabolismo , RNA Fúngico/metabolismo , Proteínas de Schizosaccharomyces pombe/metabolismo , Schizosaccharomyces/metabolismo , Proteínas de Transporte/metabolismo , Montagem e Desmontagem da Cromatina/genética , Temperatura Baixa , Histona-Lisina N-Metiltransferase , Ferro/metabolismo , RNA Fúngico/genética , Schizosaccharomyces/genética , Transcrição Gênica/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA