RESUMO
Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is an emerging sexually transmitted infection, which appears to be a cause of urethritis and cervicitis and has been associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), epididymitis, proctitis, infertility, complications during pregnancy, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Three Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved tests are available. Testing should be focused to avoid inappropriate antibiotic use. The Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines recommend testing for persistent male urethritis, cervicitis, and proctitis and state that testing should be considered in cases of PID. Testing is also recommended for sexual contacts of patients with MG. Testing is not recommended in asymptomatic patients, including pregnant patients, who do not have a history of MG exposure. Although resistance-guided therapy is recommended, there are currently no FDA approved tests for MG macrolide resistance, and tests are not widely available in the United States. The CDC recommends 2-step treatment with doxycycline followed by azithromycin or moxifloxacin. Moxifloxacin is recommended if resistance testing is unavailable or testing demonstrates macrolide resistance..
Assuntos
Infecções por Mycoplasma , Mycoplasma genitalium , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica , Proctite , Uretrite , Cervicite Uterina , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/tratamento farmacológico , Uretrite/complicações , Moxifloxacina/uso terapêutico , Cervicite Uterina/complicações , Cervicite Uterina/tratamento farmacológico , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/complicações , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/diagnóstico , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/complicações , Proctite/complicações , Proctite/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the 2022 mpox outbreak, most cases were associated with sexual contact, and many people with mpox sought care from sexual health clinics and programs. The National Network of STD Clinical Prevention Training Centers, in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, conducted a survey of US sexual health clinics and programs to assess knowledge, practices, and experiences around mpox to inform a future public health response. METHODS: Between August 31 and September 13, 2022, the National Network of STD Clinical Prevention Training Centers facilitated a web-based survey. Descriptive statistics were generated in R. RESULTS: Among 168 responses by clinicians (n = 131, 78%) and program staff (n = 37, 22%), more than half (51%) reported at least somewhat significant mpox-related clinical disruptions including burdensome paperwork requirements for mpox testing (40%) and tecovirimat use (88%). Long clinic visits (51%) added additional burden, and the median mpox-related visit lasted 1 hour. Few clinicians felt comfortable with advanced pain management, and clinicians felt most uninformed about preexposure (19%) and postexposure (24%) prophylaxis. Of 89 respondents involved in vaccination, 61% reported using equity strategies; however, accounts of these strategies revealed a focus on guideline or risk factor-based screenings instead of equity activities. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the substantial impact of the 2022 mpox outbreak on sexual health care in the United States. Critical gaps and barriers were identified that may inform additional mpox training and technical assistance, including challenges with testing, diagnosis, and management as well as a disconnect between programs' stated goal of equity and operationalization of strategies to achieve equity.
Assuntos
Mpox , Saúde Sexual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Assistência Ambulatorial , Instituições de Assistência AmbulatorialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increasing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is a critical part of ending the HIV epidemic. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many PrEP services transitioned to a telehealth model (telePrEP). This report evaluates the effect of COVID-19 and the addition of telePrEP on delivery of PrEP services at the Denver Sexual Health Clinic (DSHC), a regional sexual health clinic in Denver, CO. METHODS: Before COVID-19, DSHC PrEP services were offered exclusively in-clinic. In response to the pandemic, after March 15, 2020, most PrEP initiation and follow-up visits were converted to telePrEP. A retrospective analysis of DSHC PrEP visits compared pre-COVID-19 (September 1, 2019 to March 15, 2020) to post-COVID-19 (March 16, 2020 to September 30, 2020) visit volume, demographics, and outcomes. RESULTS: The DSHC completed 689 PrEP visits pre-COVID-19 and maintained 96.8% (n = 667) of this volume post-COVID-19. There were no differences in client demographics between pre-COVID-19 (n = 341) and post-COVID-19 PrEP start visits (n = 283) or between post-COVID-19 in-clinic (n = 140) vs telePrEP start visits (n = 143). There were no differences in 3- to 4-month retention rates pre-COVID-19 (n = 17/43) and post-COVID-19 (n = 21/43) ( P = 0.52) or between in-clinic (n = 12/21) and telePrEP clients (n = 9/22) in the post-COVID-19 window ( P = 0.37). Also, there were no significant differences in lab completion rates between in-clinic (n = 140/140) and telePrEP clients (n = 138/143) ( P = 0.06) and prescription fill rates between in-clinic (n = 115/136) and telePrEP clients (n = 116/135) in the post-COVID-19 window ( P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of TelePrEP enabled the DSHC to sustain PrEP services during the COVID-19 pandemic without significant differences in demographics, engagement, or retention in PrEP services.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Saúde Sexual , Telemedicina , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is on the CDC Watch List of Antimicrobial Resistance Threats, yet there is no systematic surveillance to monitor change. METHODS: We initiated surveillance in sexual health clinics in 6 cities, selecting a quota sample of urogenital specimens tested for gonorrhea and/or chlamydia. We abstracted patient data from medical records and detected MG and macrolide-resistance mutations (MRMs) by nucleic acid amplification testing. We used Poisson regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs, adjusting for sampling criteria (site, birth sex, symptom status). RESULTS: From October-December 2020 we tested 1743 urogenital specimens: 57.0% from males, 46.1% from non-Hispanic Black persons, and 43.8% from symptomatic patients. MG prevalence was 16.6% (95% CI: 14.9-18.5%; site-specific range: 9.9-23.5%) and higher in St Louis (aPR: 1.9; 1.27-2.85), Greensboro (aPR: 1.8; 1.18-2.79), and Denver (aPR: 1.7; 1.12-2.44) than Seattle. Prevalence was highest in persons <18 years (30.4%) and declined 3% per each additional year of age (aPR: .97; .955-.982). MG was detected in 26.8%, 21.1%, 11.8%, and 15.4% of urethritis, vaginitis, cervicitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), respectively. It was present in 9% of asymptomatic males and 15.4% of asymptomatic females, and associated with male urethritis (aPR: 1.7; 1.22-2.50) and chlamydia (aPR: 1.7; 1.13-2.53). MRM prevalence was 59.1% (95% CI: 53.1-64.8%; site-specific range: 51.3-70.6%). MRMs were associated with vaginitis (aPR: 1.8; 1.14-2.85), cervicitis (aPR: 3.5; 1.69-7.30), and PID cervicitis (aPR: 1.8; 1.09-3.08). CONCLUSIONS: MG infection is common in persons at high risk of sexually transmitted infections; testing symptomatic patients would facilitate appropriate therapy. Macrolide resistance is high and azithromycin should not be used without resistance testing.
Assuntos
Infecções por Mycoplasma , Mycoplasma genitalium , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica , Saúde Sexual , Uretrite , Cervicite Uterina , Vaginite , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Uretrite/tratamento farmacológico , Mycoplasma genitalium/genética , Cervicite Uterina/tratamento farmacológico , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Vaginite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , PrevalênciaRESUMO
As of March 31, 2023, more than 30,000 monkeypox (mpox) cases had been reported in the United States in an outbreak that has disproportionately affected gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender persons (1). JYNNEOS vaccine (Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine, Bavarian Nordic) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for the prevention of smallpox and mpox via subcutaneous injection as a 2-dose series (0.5 mL per dose, administered 4 weeks apart) (2). To expand vaccine access, an Emergency Use Authorization was issued by FDA on August 9, 2022, for dose-sparing intradermal injection of JYNNEOS as a 2-dose series (0.1 mL per dose, administered 4 weeks apart) (3). Vaccination was available to persons with known or presumed exposure to a person with mpox (postexposure prophylaxis [PEP]), as well as persons at increased risk for mpox or who might benefit from vaccination (preexposure mpox prophylaxis [PrEP]) (4). Because information on JYNNEOS vaccine effectiveness (VE) is limited, a matched case-control study was conducted in 12 U.S. jurisdictions, including nine Emerging Infections Program sites and three Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity sites,§ to evaluate VE against mpox among MSM and transgender adults aged 18-49 years. During August 19, 2022-March 31, 2023, a total of 309 case-patients were matched to 608 control patients. Adjusted VE was 75.2% (95% CI = 61.2% to 84.2%) for partial vaccination (1 dose) and 85.9% (95% CI = 73.8% to 92.4%) for full vaccination (2 doses). Adjusted VE for full vaccination by subcutaneous, intradermal, and heterologous routes of administration was 88.9% (95% CI = 56.0% to 97.2%), 80.3% (95% CI = 22.9% to 95.0%), and 86.9% (95% CI = 69.1% to 94.5%), respectively. Adjusted VE for full vaccination among immunocompromised participants was 70.2% (95% CI = -37.9% to 93.6%) and among immunocompetent participants was 87.8% (95% CI = 57.5% to 96.5%). JYNNEOS is effective at reducing the risk for mpox. Because duration of protection of 1 versus 2 doses remains unknown, persons at increased risk for mpox exposure should receive the 2-dose series as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP),¶ regardless of administration route or immunocompromise status.
Assuntos
Mpox , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Vacina Antivariólica , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Estudos de Casos e ControlesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Innovative approaches such as online, at-home programs may address important barriers to sexually transmitted infection (STI) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening in the United States. This study evaluated the first year of an online, at-home program offering HIV and triple-site (urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal) gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydia (CT) testing in Colorado. METHODS: Test Yourself Colorado (TYC) is an online, at-home program that provides free mailed HIV tests and/or GC/CT tests to Colorado adults. Program use and outcomes between 1 June 2021 and 31 May 2022 were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1790 unique clients utilized TYC. Of 1709 clients who ordered HIV tests, 508 (29.7%) were men who have sex with men (MSM), and 41.3% (210/508) of these clients reported having never been tested for HIV before or were not tested in the prior year. Hispanic clients had lower STI test return rates (37.1%; 134/361) compared with non-Hispanic clients (45.9%; 518/1128) (P = .003). Positive STI tests were identified in 9.6% (68/708) of clients. Positive STI tests were more common in MSM clients (15.7%; 34/216) compared with all other sexual orientations (6.9%; 34/492) (P < .001). STI treatment was confirmed in 80.9% (55/68) of clients. CONCLUSIONS: The TYC online, home testing portal is a scalable tool that reaches clients at risk of STIs and HIV and navigates those with positive STI tests to treatment. HIV/STI home testing programs need to further assess and address utilization and outcomes for disparities by race and ethnicity to assure programs equitably benefit all at-risk communities.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Homossexualidade Masculina , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , HIV , Programas de Rastreamento , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Denver COVID-19 Joint Task Force is a multisector community partnership which formed to coordinate Denver's pandemic response in people experiencing homelessness (PEH). OBJECTIVES: Describe how interdisciplinary community partners collaborated to develop, implement, and pilot severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing and isolation protocols in congregate shelters, and discuss lessons learned and subsequently applied. METHODS: In March through May 2020, community partners collaborated to design, implement and conduct pilot testing paired with isolation in a subset of PEH at a congregate shelter to assess feasibility and inform protocol development.Results and Lessons Learned: We performed SARS-CoV-2 testing in 52 PEH with 14 (27%) testing positive or inconclusive. Thirteen (93%) positive or inconclusive participants were transferred to isolation hotels with 9 of 13 (69%) transferred within 72 hours of testing. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings informed development of coronavirus disease 2019 surveillance testing and isolation protocols for PEH and highlight the value of community partnerships in nimbly responding to the pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19 , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Women who attend sexual health clinics are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) are very effective contraceptive methods, but the provision of LARC in such clinics is not well described in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women who presented to Denver Sexual Health Clinic for any reason and received family planning services between April 1, 2016, and October 31, 2018. We assessed demographic and clinical factors associated with contraceptive method received and conducted a subanalysis of those with intrauterine device (IUD) insertions on the same-day versus delayed insertion. Among those who received an IUD, we assessed rates of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) 30 days after insertion. RESULTS: Of the 5064 women who received family planning services in our clinic, 1167 (23%) were using a LARC method at the time of their visit. Of the 3897 who were not using a LARC, fewer women, 12.6%, chose LARC (IUD and progestin implant), compared with 33.3% who chose new short-acting reversible contraceptives. Further analysis of the 270 IUD initiators revealed 202 (74.8%) received the IUD on the same day, whereas 68 (25.2%) had delayed IUD insertion. There were 9 incident cases of gonorrhea or chlamydia in those who received same-day IUD and 1 incident case among those who had delayed IUD insertion. There were no cases of PID at 30 days after insertion in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings support IUD provision in a sexual health clinic on the day of initial visit without increased risk of PID.
Assuntos
Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica , Saúde Sexual , Anticoncepção , Anticoncepcionais , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The National Network of Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinical Prevention Training Centers (NNPTC) trains clinical providers to diagnose and treat sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the demographics of clinical providers and to correlate the number of training episodes with STI rates at the county level. METHODS: Registration data were collected between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2020, in a custom Learning Management System from clinical providers taking NNPTC training. Using the 2018 STI surveillance data, counties were divided into quartiles based on reportable STI case rates and the number of county-level training events was compared per quartile. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (Armonk, NY) and SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1 (Cary, NC). RESULTS: From 2015 to 2020, the NNPTC trained 21,327 individuals, predominantly in the nursing professions and working in a public health environment. In multivariate analysis, the number of training events was significantly associated with higher STI rates at the county level (P < 0.0001) and the state where a prevention training center is located (P < 0001). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis suggests that NNPTC trainings are reaching the clinical providers working in geographic areas with higher STI rates.
Assuntos
Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reinfection and partner transmission are common with Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). We assessed treatment and follow-up laboratory testing for GC and CT and evaluated associations with patient- and system-level factors. METHODS: The analysis included positive GC and/or CT nucleic acid amplification test results from patients aged 14 to 24 years at a federally qualified health center system site in Denver, CO, from January 2018 to December 2019. Outcomes assessed include treatment within 14 days, HIV/syphilis testing within 6 months, and repeat GC and CT testing within 2 to 6 months. Bivariate and multivariable regression modeling assessed associated factors. RESULTS: Among 27,168 GC/CT nucleic acid amplification tests performed, 1.8% (484) were positive for GC and 7.8% (2125) were positive for CT. Within the assessed time frames, 87% (2275) of patients were treated, 54.1% (1411) had HIV testing, 50.1% (1306) had syphilis testing, and 39.9% (1040) had GC and CT retesting. Older patients were more likely to receive treatment (adjusted odds ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.27; P = 0.05) than younger patients, whereas males were less likely to receive GC and CT retesting (adjusted odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.33; P < 0.001) than females. Patients treated on the day of testing were less likely to receive follow-up laboratory tests than those treated 2 to 14 days after. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients received antibiotic treatment, only about half received HIV/syphilis testing and less than half received GC and CT retesting. It is critical to find innovative strategies to improve treatment and follow-up management of these infections to decrease complications, reduce transmission, and combat the rising rates of sexually transmitted infections.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Sífilis , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/tratamento farmacológico , Sífilis/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that people experiencing homelessness (PEH) face in congregate shelters versus unsheltered encampments is critical for an effective pandemic response. METHODS: We analyzed factors associated with current and past severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among PEH in day and overnight shelters and encampments in Denver, Colorado, during June 2-July 28, 2020, and constructed multivariable logistic regression models to examine risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and seropositivity with age, race/ethnicity, testing location, testing month, and symptom status as predictor variables. RESULTS: A total of 823 participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and 276 individuals were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. A greater percentage of PEH at overnight shelters tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA (8.6% vs 2.5%, Pâ <â .01) and antibodies (21.5% vs 8.7%, Pâ =â .03) compared with encampments. In regression models, testing at an overnight shelter compared with testing at encampments (odds ratio [OR]â =â 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-9.02) had increased odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA result. Age >60 years compared with age <40 years (ORâ =â 5.92; 95% CI: 1.83-20.3), Hispanic ethnicity (ORâ =â 3.43; 95% CI: 1.36-8.95), and non-Hispanic Black race compared with non-Hispanic White race (ORâ =â 3.07; 95% CI: 1.16-8.26), and testing at an overnight shelter compared to testing at encampments (ORâ =â 2.45; 95% CI: 1.04-6.17) had increased odds of a positive antibody result. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the need for continuing assessment of mitigation strategies in shelters, increasing access to individual rooms and linkage to housing options for PEH, and supporting people to remain in encampments when these options are not available.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Colorado/epidemiologia , Habitação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cisgender women have been underrepresented in antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea (ARGC) surveillance systems. Three of 8 project sites (City of Milwaukee [MIL], Guilford County [GRB], Denver County [DEN]), funded under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG), focused efforts to better include cisgender women in ARGC surveillance. METHODS: MIL, GRB, and DEN partnered with diverse health care settings and developed gonorrhea culture criteria to facilitate urogenital specimen collection in cisgender women and men. Regional laboratories within the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network performed agar dilution antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of gonococcal isolates. Data from 2018 and 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: In SURRG, 90.5% (11,464 of 12,667) of the cisgender women from whom urogenital culture specimens were collected were from MIL, GRB, and DEN. Of women in SURRG whose gonococcal isolates underwent AST, 70% were from these 3 sites. In these 3 sites, a substantial proportion of cisgender women with positive urogenital cultures and AST were from health care settings other than sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics (non-STD clinics; MIL, 56.0%; GRB, 80.4%; and DEN, 23.5%). Isolates with AST were obtained from 5.1%, 10.2%, and 2.4% of all diagnosed gonorrhea cases among cisgender women in MIL, GRB, and DEN, respectively, and were more often susceptible to all antibiotics than those from cisgender men from each of these sites. CONCLUSIONS: With focused efforts and partnerships with non-STD clinics, 3 SURRG sites were able to include robust ARGC surveillance from cisgender women. These findings may guide further efforts to improve gender equity in ARGC surveillance.
Assuntos
Gonorreia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Vigilância de Evento SentinelaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2016, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG) in multiple jurisdictions to enhance antibiotic resistant gonorrhea rapid detection and response infrastructure and evaluate the impact of key strategies. METHODS: Eight jurisdictions were funded to establish or enhance local gonococcal culture specimen collection in sexually transmitted disease and community clinics, conduct rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in local laboratories, modify systems for enhanced data collection and rapid communication of results, and initiate enhanced partner services among patients with gonorrhea demonstrating elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftriaxone, cefixime or azithromycin. RESULTS: Grantees incorporated genital, pharyngeal, and rectal gonococcal culture collection from all genders at participating clinics. During 2018 to 2019, grantees collected 58,441 culture specimens from 46,822 patients and performed AST on 10,814 isolates (representing 6.8% [3412] and 8.9% [4883] of local reported cases in 2018 and 2019, respectively). Of isolates that underwent AST, 11% demonstrated elevated azithromycin MICs; fewer than 0.5% demonstrated elevated ceftriaxone or cefixime MICs. Among patients whose infections demonstrated elevated MICs, 81.7% were interviewed for partner elicitation; however, limited new cases were identified among partners and contacts. CONCLUSIONS: As a public health model to build capacity to slow the spread of emerging resistance, SURRG successfully expanded culture collection, implemented rapid AST, and implemented an enhanced partner services investigation approach in participating jurisdictions. Findings from SURRG may enhance preparedness efforts and inform a longer-term, comprehensive, and evidence-based public health response to emerging gonococcal resistance. Continued development of innovative approaches to address emerging resistance is needed.
Assuntos
Gonorreia , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Ceftriaxona/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and primary/secondary syphilis rates in 2018 were significantly higher in counties located in states without Medicaid expansion compared with those with Medicaid expansion. For sexually transmitted infections combined, 59.9% of counties without Medicaid expansion were in the highest 2 sexually transmitted infection rate quartiles compared with 42.2% of counties with Medicaid expansion (P < 0.0001).
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Sífilis , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Medicaid , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal specimens (NPS) are commonly used for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing but can be uncomfortable for patients. Self-collected saliva specimens (SS) or anterior nasal specimens (ANS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection are less invasive, but the sensitivity of these specimen types has not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS: During September-November 2020, 730 adults undergoing SARS-CoV-2 testing at community testing events and homeless shelters in Denver provided self-collected SS and ANS before NPS collection and answered a short survey about symptoms and specimen preference. Specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by means of real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR); viral culture was performed on a subset of specimens positive by rRT-PCR. The sensitivity of SS and ANS for SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR was measured against that of NPS. Subgroup analyses included test outcomes by symptom status and culture results. RESULTS: Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR appeared higher for SS than for ANS (85% vs 80%) and higher among symptomatic participants than among those without symptoms (94% vs 29% for SS; 87% vs 50% for ANS). Among participants with culture-positive SARS-CoV-2 by any specimen type, the sensitivities of SS and ANS by rRT-PCR were 94% and 100%, respectively. SS and ANS were equally preferred by participants; most would undergo NPS collection again despite this method's being the least preferred. CONCLUSIONS: SS were slightly more sensitive than ANS for SARS-CoV-2 detection with rRT-PCR. With both SS and ANS, SARS-CoV-2 was reliably detected among participants with symptoms. Self-collected SS and ANS offer practical advantages, are preferred by patients, and might be most useful for testing people with coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Teste para COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Saliva , Manejo de EspécimesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted disease clinical training for working professionals requires substantial time and resources. Understanding the predictors of change in worksite practices and barriers to change will allow educators, learners, and clinical leadership to aid in ensuring learned practices are implemented and barriers are addressed. METHODS: Data for this analysis come from the first standardized national evaluation of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded clinical prevention training network, including precourse registration and responses to immediate postcourse (1-3 days) and 90-day postcourse evaluations from 187 courses. Univariate statistics describe the trainees and their workplace. Bivariate statistics describe their intention to change and actual change stratified by functional role and employment setting. Logistic regression identified predictors of self-reported changes in practice. RESULTS: The strongest predictors for practice change included an intention to change and attendance at a training lasting 4 hours or more. Functional role was a weaker predictor of change in practice; employment setting did not predict change. More than half of the trainees (65.9%; n = 912) stated their intention to make a change in their practice immediately after training. At 90 days after a course, 62.4% (n = 863) reported making a practice change. Trainees that took courses lasting 4 hours or more reported making a change more often (70%) compared with trainees from shorter courses (53%). We also report on trainees' barriers to practice change. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that longer trainings may result in more practice change than shorter trainings, recruitment of trainees should focus on those more likely to make a change in their practice, and future trainings should focus on organizational capacity building and assessing change at the organizational level.
Assuntos
Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Strategies to increase pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake are needed. We hypothesized that same-day PrEP initiation in a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic would be acceptable, feasible, and safe, and that individuals would engage in ongoing PrEP care. METHOD: Individuals aged ≥ 18 years were evaluated for PrEP. Exclusion criteria were HIV, history of renal dysfunction or chronic hepatitis B infection, pregnancy, indications for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, or positive screen for acute HIV symptoms. One hundred individuals received a free 30-day PrEP starter pack and met with a patient navigator to establish ongoing care. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare individuals who did and did not attend at least 1 PrEP follow-up appointment within 180 days of enrollment. Client satisfaction surveys were given 3 months after enrollment. RESULTS: The majority (78%) of participants completed at least 1 PrEP follow-up appointment, and 57% attended at least 2 follow-up appointments. After adjusting for race and ethnicity, age, health insurance status, and annual income, only income was associated with follow-up appointment attendance. Each additional $10,000 increase in income was associated with a 1.7-fold increase in the odds of attending a PrEP follow-up appointment (95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.66, P = .02). The majority (54%) of individuals completed the satisfaction survey and all respondents liked the option of same-day PrEP initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests STD clinic-based, same-day PrEP initiation is acceptable, feasible, safe, and links a high proportion of individuals into ongoing PrEP care. Additional resources may be needed to support low-income individuals' retention in care.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid syphilis tests (RST) may shorten time to syphilis diagnosis and treatment while enhancing access to testing in outreach settings. There are limited data on the performance of RST in outreach settings in the US. METHODS: We offered RST (Syphilis Health Check) at 6 outreach sites to men who reported having sex with men and no prior history of syphilis. Clients accepting RST were also tested with laboratory-based rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and reflex Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay when RPR or RST were positive. Clients with positive RST were immediately referred to a sexually transmitted infection clinic. Those declining RST were screened with RPR and reflex TPPA only. The validity of the RST-based algorithm was compared with the RPR-based algorithm among participants receiving both. Time to treatment for those accepting RST was compared with those declining RST and to a historical control group screened in outreach settings with RPR and reflex TPPA before the availability of RST. RESULTS: Rapid syphilis test was accepted by 690 (64%) of 1081 eligible clients. Compared with RPR-based algorithm, RST sensitivity was 90%; specificity, 98.5%; positive predictive value, 47.4%; and negative predictive value, 98.5. The single false-negative case by RST was determined to be a late latent case by RPR/TPPA. Median time to treatment was 1 day (range, 0-6 days) for 9 of 690 accepting RST, compared to 9 days (range, 7-13 days) for 3 of 391 declining RST, and 9 days (range, 6-21 days) for 25 of 1229 historical controls (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with an RPR-based algorithm, RST identified all early syphilis cases. Although RST had high specificity and negative predictive value, the low positive predictive value resulted in additional assessments in a sexually transmitted infection clinic for some patients. However, RST use in outreach settings significantly decreased time to treatment for new syphilis cases.
Assuntos
Homossexualidade Masculina , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Sorodiagnóstico da Sífilis/métodos , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Tempo para o Tratamento , Treponema pallidum/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Reaginas/sangue , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sífilis/microbiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
An online consultation tool, the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinical Consultation Network is a new resource for sexually transmitted disease clinicians and clinic managers. An initial evaluation shows that most requests (29%) were from medical doctors, followed by nurse practitioners (22%). Syphilis queries comprised 39% of consults followed by gonorrhea (12%) and chlamydia (11%).
Assuntos
Informática Médica , Sistemas On-Line/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Chlamydia/prevenção & controle , Gonorreia/prevenção & controle , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Sífilis/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Trichomonas vaginalis infection is a common cause of vaginal irritation in women and is the most common nonviral sexually transmitted disease in the world. It has been associated with serious sequelae, the most notable of which are prematurity, low birth weight, and increases in human immunodeficiency virus transmission. We review advances in diagnosis and treatment and the current controversies regarding management.