Disseminated tuberculosis in a child during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case report and literature review.

Background: Disseminated tuberculosis is an uncommon but devastating form of tuberculosis, possibly developing with the immune response of patients. COVID-19 infection may produce an immunosuppressive effect with possible implications for tuberculosis dissemination. Case presentation: A 17-year-old female patient with a history of tuberculous pleurisy presented to the hospital with a high fever and life-threatening dyspnea after contracting a COVID-19 infection. Her condition deteriorated rapidly with grand mal epilepsy and acute gastrointestinal bleeding with a grossly depressed CD4 T-cell count, which was indicative of her profoundly immunosuppressed state. After identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis in her cerebrospinal fluid and a subcutaneous abscess in her left lower back, she was diagnosed with disseminated tuberculosis involving both lungs, the central nervous system, the terminal ileum, the liver, bilateral adnexal tissue, and subcutaneous soft tissue in accordance with the chest and abdominal CT. Empirical treatment was initiated with dexamethasone (5 mg/day) and an anti-tuberculosis regimen of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, amikacin, and meropenem, which was replaced with faropenem after she left the hospital. The therapeutic effect was considered satisfied in the second month of follow-up. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case report of disseminated tuberculosis after COVID-19 infection. Tuberculosis may disseminate and progress during the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring more significant studies to provide better diagnosis and treatment options for the co-infection.

Selecting an appropriate all-oral short-course regimen for patients with multidrug-resistant or pre-extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis in China: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Long, ineffective, and toxic regimens hinder the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and pre-extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cohort study to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of three 9-month, all-oral, 5-drug regimens. Regimen A (bedaquiline [Bdq]+linezolid [Lzd]+moxifloxacin [Mfx]+cycloserine [Cs]+pyrazinamide [Pza]) and Regimen B (Lzd+Mfx+Cs+clofazimine [Cfz]+Pza) were used to treat MDR-TB patients (Groups A and B, respectively, assigned according to the patient's treatment preference), while Regimen C (Bdq+Lzd+Cs+Cfz+Pza) was used to treat pre-XDR-TB patients (Group C). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of an unfavorable outcome within 12 months of treatment completion, regardless of regimen. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (34 in Group A, 46 in Group B, and 24 in Group C), with a median age of 35.5 (29.0-54.0) years, were included in the analysis population. At 12 months after treatment completion, five patients were deemed non-assessable. Of the remaining 99 participants, seven (7.1%) had an unfavorable outcome (including two deaths from any cause, four with treatment failure, and one loss to follow-up) and 92 (92.9%) had a favorable outcome. Culture conversion was achieved in 82.5% (80/97) of participants at month 2 and in 97.9% (94/97) of participants at month 6. Adverse events (AEs) resulting in drug adjustment occurred in 69.2% (72/104) of participants, mainly due to Lzd and Pza use. A QT interval prolongation of ≥ 500 ms occurred in 5.8% (6/104) of participants. CONCLUSION: The primary outcome of the three tailored, 9-month, all-oral, 5-drug regimens was satisfactory in the vast majority of MDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB patients, with manageable and reversible AEs.

Rapid Detection of Extensive Drug Resistance by Xpert MTB/XDR Optimizes Therapeutic Decision-Making in Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients.

The Xpert MTB/XDR assay met the critical need for etiologic diagnosis of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance in previous studies. However, its benefits in tailoring the treatment regimen and improving the outcome for patients with rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) require further investigation. In this study, the Xpert MTB/XDR assay was used to determine the resistance profile of second-line drugs for RR-TB patients in two registered multicenter clinical trials, TB-TRUST (NCT03867136) and TB-TRUST-plus (NCT04717908), with the aim of testing the efficacy of all-oral shorter regimens in RR-TB patients in China. Patients would receive the fluoroquinolone-based all-oral shorter regimen, the injectable-containing regimen, or the bedaquiline-based regimen depending on fluoroquinolone susceptibility by using Xpert MTB/XDR. Among the 497 patients performed with Xpert MTB/XDR, 128 (25.8%) had infections resistant to fluoroquinolones and/or second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs). A total of 371 participants were recruited for the trials, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on all corresponding culture-positive baseline strains. Taking the WGS results as the standard, the accuracy of the Xpert MTB/XDR assay in terms of resistance detection was 95.2% to 99.0% for all drugs. A total of 33 cases had inconsistent results, 9 of which were due to resistance heterogeneity. Most of the patients (241/281, 85.8%) had sputum culture conversion at 2 months. In conclusion, the Xpert MTB/XDR assay has the potential to serve as a quick reflex test in patients with RR-TB, as detected via Xpert MTB/RIF, to provide a reliable drug susceptibility profile of the infecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain and to initiate optimized treatment promptly.

Insignificant difference in culture conversion between bedaquiline-containing and bedaquiline-free all-oral short regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients have been suffering long, ineffective, and toxic treatment until short-course injectable-free regimens emerged. However, the new WHO-recommended regimens might be less feasible in the real-world setting. Here, we evaluated two optimized all-oral short-course regimens in China. METHODS: From April 2019 to August 2020, we conducted a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial and consecutively included 103 MDR-TB patients diagnosed with pulmonary MDR-TB in Shenzhen, China. A 4-5 drug regimen of 9-12 months was tailored to the strain's resistance patterns, patients' affordability, and tolerance to drugs. This was an interim analysis, focusing on the early treatment period. RESULTS: 53.4% (55/103) of patients were prescribed linezolid, fluoroquinolone (FQ), clofazimine, cycloserine, and pyrazinamide, followed by a regimen in which clofazimine was replaced by bedaquiline (35/103, 34.0%). The culture conversion rate was 83.1% and 94.4% at two and four months, respectively, with no significant difference between bedaquiline-free and bedaquiline-containing cases and between FQ-susceptible and FQ-resistant cases. Among 41 patients who completed treatment, 40 (97.6%) patients had a favorable outcome and no relapse was observed. Peripheral neuropathy and arthralgia/myalgia were the most frequent AEs (56.3%, 58/103). 18 AEs caused permanent discontinuation of drugs, mostly due to pyrazinamide and linezolid. CONCLUSION: Optimized all-oral short-course regimens showed satisfactory efficacy and safety in early treatment stage. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

Refining MDR-TB treatment regimens for ultra short therapy (TB-TRUST): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are unsatisfied to treat, pressing more effective and innovative treatment regimens. New efficient regimens for MDR-TB have obtained high treatment success rates. However, those regimens without drug susceptibility testing (DST) are also likely to contribute to the emergence of resistance. Precision treatments guided by DST might optimize the patients' treatment outcome individually and minimize resistance amplification. METHODS: TB-TRUST is a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial of non-inferiority comparing the treatment success rate between the World Health Organization (WHO) shorter regimen and the refined ultra-short regimen for fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs susceptible rifampicin-resistant TB. The control arm uses the WHO injectable-containing shorter regimen for 36-44 weeks depending on time of sputum smear conversion. The investigational arm uses a refined ultra-short regimen guided by molecular DST to pyrazinamide via whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to optimize the treatment of pyrazinamide-susceptible patients with levofloxacin, linezolid, cycloserine and pyrazinamide for 24-32 weeks and pyrazinamide-resistant with levofloxacin, linezolid, cycloserine and clofazimine for 36-44 weeks. The primary outcome is the treatment success rate without relapse at 84 weeks after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes include the time of sputum culture conversion and occurrence of adverse events. Assuming α = 0.025 level of significance (one-sided test), a power of 80%, a < 10% difference in treatment success rate between control arm and investigational (80% vs. 82%), and a 5% lost follow-up rate, the number of participants per arm to show non-inferiority was calculated as 177(354 in total). DISCUSSION: Rapid molecular testing distinguishes patients who are eligible for shorter regimen with fluoroquinolone and the WGS-guided results shorten the treatment to 6 months for pyrazinamide susceptible patients. It's foreseeable that not only novel developed medicines, but also traditional powerful medicines with the susceptibility confirmed by DST are the key factors to ensure the effect of anti-MDR-TB drugs. As a DST-guided precision treatment, TB-TRUST are expected to optimize therapy outcome in more patients who cannot afford the expensive new medicines and minimize and even avoid resistance amplification with the rational use of anti-TB drugs. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03867136 . Registered on March 7, 2019.

Patient pathway analysis of tuberculosis diagnostic delay: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in China.

OBJECTIVES: Delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is an important but under-appreciated problem. Our study aimed to analyse the patient pathway and possible risk factors of long diagnostic delay (LDD). METHODS: We enrolled 400 new bacteriologically diagnosed patients with pulmonary TB from 20 hospitals across China. LDD was defined as an interval between the initial care visit and the confirmation of diagnosis exceeding 14 days. Its potential risk factors were investigated by multivariate logistic regression and multilevel logistic regression. Hospitals in China were classified by increasing size, from level 0 to level 3. TB laboratory equipment in hospitals was also evaluated. RESULTS: The median diagnostic delay was 20 days (IQR: 7-72 days), and 229 of 400 patients (57.3%, 95%CI 52.4-62.1) had LDD; 15% of participants were diagnosed at the initial care visit. Compared to level 0 facilities, choosing level 2 (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.12-0.62, p 0.002) and level 3 facilities (OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.14-0.84, p 0.019) for the initial care visit was independently associated with shorter LDD. Equipping with smear, culture, and Xpert at initial care visit simultaneously also helped to avoid LDD (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.09-0.82, p 0.020). The multilevel logistic regression yielded similar results. Availability of smear, culture, and Xpert was lower in level 0-1 facilities than in level 2-3 facilities (p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients failed to be diagnosed at the initial care visit. Patients who went to low-level facilities initially had a higher risk of LDD. Improvement of TB laboratory equipment, especially at low-level facilities, is urgently needed.