Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Psychiatry ; 25(5): 918-938, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30862937

RESUMO

The biological fingerprint of environmental adversity may be key to understanding health and disease, as it encompasses the damage induced as well as the compensatory reactions of the organism. Metabolic and hormonal changes may be an informative but incomplete window into the underlying biology. We endeavored to identify objective blood gene expression biomarkers for psychological stress, a subjective sensation with biological roots. To quantify the stress perception at a particular moment in time, we used a simple visual analog scale for life stress in psychiatric patients, a high-risk group. Then, using a stepwise discovery, prioritization, validation, and testing in independent cohort design, we were successful in identifying gene expression biomarkers that were predictive of high-stress states and of future psychiatric hospitalizations related to stress, more so when personalized by gender and diagnosis. One of the top biomarkers that survived discovery, prioritization, validation, and testing was FKBP5, a well-known gene involved in stress response, which serves as a de facto reassuring positive control. We also compared our biomarker findings with telomere length (TL), another well-established biological marker of psychological stress and show that newly identified predictive biomarkers such as NUB1, APOL3, MAD1L1, or NKTR are comparable or better state or trait predictors of stress than TL or FKBP5. Over half of the top predictive biomarkers for stress also had prior evidence of involvement in suicide, and the majority of them had evidence in other psychiatric disorders, providing a molecular underpinning for the effects of stress in those disorders. Some of the biomarkers are targets of existing drugs, of potential utility in patient stratification, and pharmacogenomics approaches. Based on our studies and analyses, the biomarkers with the best overall convergent functional evidence (CFE) for involvement in stress were FKBP5, DDX6, B2M, LAIR1, RTN4, and NUB1. Moreover, the biomarker gene expression signatures yielded leads for possible new drug candidates and natural compounds upon bioinformatics drug repurposing analyses, such as calcium folinate and betulin. Our work may lead to improved diagnosis and treatment for stress disorders such as PTSD, that result in decreased quality of life and adverse outcomes, including addictions, violence, and suicide.


Assuntos
Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/sangue , RNA Helicases DEAD-box/sangue , Proteínas Nogo/sangue , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/sangue , Receptores Imunológicos/sangue , Estresse Psicológico/sangue , Proteínas de Ligação a Tacrolimo/sangue , Microglobulina beta-2/sangue , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/sangue , Transtornos Mentais/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Medicina de Precisão , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Homeostase do Telômero
2.
Mol Psychiatry ; 24(4): 501-522, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755720

RESUMO

We endeavored to identify objective blood biomarkers for pain, a subjective sensation with a biological basis, using a stepwise discovery, prioritization, validation, and testing in independent cohorts design. We studied psychiatric patients, a high risk group for co-morbid pain disorders and increased perception of pain. For discovery, we used a powerful within-subject longitudinal design. We were successful in identifying blood gene expression biomarkers that were predictive of pain state, and of future emergency department (ED) visits for pain, more so when personalized by gender and diagnosis. MFAP3, which had no prior evidence in the literature for involvement in pain, had the most robust empirical evidence from our discovery and validation steps, and was a strong predictor for pain in the independent cohorts, particularly in females and males with PTSD. Other biomarkers with best overall convergent functional evidence for involvement in pain were GNG7, CNTN1, LY9, CCDC144B, and GBP1. Some of the individual biomarkers identified are targets of existing drugs. Moreover, the biomarker gene expression signatures were used for bioinformatic drug repurposing analyses, yielding leads for possible new drug candidates such as SC-560 (an NSAID), and amoxapine (an antidepressant), as well as natural compounds such as pyridoxine (vitamin B6), cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), and apigenin (a plant flavonoid). Our work may help mitigate the diagnostic and treatment dilemmas that have contributed to the current opioid epidemic.


Assuntos
Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/genética , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/sangue , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Proteínas Contráteis/genética , Proteínas Contráteis/metabolismo , Reposicionamento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Expressão Gênica/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Genômica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transcriptoma/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA