DIALIZE China: A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Reduce Predialysis Hyperkalemia With Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Chinese Patients.

PURPOSE: The DIALIZE China study (Reduce Incidence of Pre-Dialysis Hyperkalaemia With Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Chinese Subjects) (NCT04217590) evaluated sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) for the management of hyperkalemia in Chinese patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: In the double-blind, Phase IIIb DIALIZE China study, Chinese adults with kidney failure and predialysis hyperkalemia (predialysis serum potassium [sK+] concentration >5.4 mmol/L after the long interdialytic interval [LIDI] and >5.0 mmol/L after ≥1 short interdialytic interval) who were receiving hemodialysis 3 times weekly were randomized to placebo or SZC 5 g once daily on nondialysis days. Doses were titrated towards maintaining normokalemia for 4 weeks (titration period) in 5-g increments up to 15 g. Primary efficacy was the proportion of responders during the 4-week evaluation period following the titration period (ie, those with a predialysis sK+ of 4.0-5.0 mmol/L for at least 3 of 4 hemodialysis visits following the LIDI) who did not require urgent rescue therapy. FINDINGS: Overall, 134 adults (mean [SD] age, 55 [11.3] years) were randomized to SZC or placebo (n = 67 each). There were significantly more responders with SZC (37.3%) versus placebo (10.4%; estimated odds ratio [OR] = 5.10; 95% CI, 1.90-15.12; P < 0.001). The probability of all predialysis sK+ concentrations being 3.5 to 5.5 mmol/L was significantly higher with SZC versus placebo (estimated OR = 6.41; 95% CI, 2.71-15.12; P < 0.001). A greater proportion of patients achieved an sK+ of 3.5 to 5.5 mmol/L on at least 3 of 4 LIDI visits during evaluation with SZC (73.1%) versus placebo (29.9%). Serious adverse events occurred in 9.1% and 11.9% of patients in the SZC and placebo groups, respectively. IMPLICATIONS: SZC treatment for predialysis hyperkalemia is effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04217590.

The trajectory of renal function following mechanical circulatory support and subsequent heart transplantation.

AIM: Patients with advanced heart failure (HF) frequently suffer from renal insufficiency. The impact of durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and subsequent heart transplantation (HTx) on kidney function is not well described. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied patients with advanced HF who received durable MCS as bridge to transplantation (BTT) and underwent subsequent HTx at our centre between 1996 and 2018. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by 51 Cr-EDTA or iohexol clearance during heart failure work-up; 3-6 months after MCS; and 1 year after HTx. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was classified according to KDIGO criteria based on estimated GFR. A total of 88 patients (46 ± 15 years, 84% male) were included, 63% with non-ischaemic heart disease. The median duration of MCS-treatment was 172 (IQR 116-311) days, and 81 subjects were alive 1 year after HTx. Measured GFR increased from 54 ± 19 during HF work-up to 60 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2 after MCS (P < 0.001) and displayed a slight but nonsignificant decrease to 57 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m2 1 year after HTx (P = 0.38). The trajectory of measured GFR did not differ between pulsatile and continuous flow (CF) pumps. Among patients 35-49 years and those who were treated in the most recent era (2012-2018), measured GFR increased following MCS implantation and subsequent HTx. Estimated GFR displayed a similar course as did measured GFR. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced heart failure, measured GFR improved after MCS with no difference between pulsatile and CF-pumps. The total study group showed no further increase in GFR following HTx, but in certain subgroups, including patients aged 35-54 years and those treated during the latest era (2012-2018), renal function appeared to improve after transplant.

The risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, a registry based study.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the intestinal tract and is associated with decreased bone mineral density. IBD patients are at higher risk of osteopenia, osteoporosis and fracture compared to non-IBD patients. The impact of IBD on the performance of orthopedic implants has not been well studied. We hypothesized that a history of IBD at the time of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) would increase the risk of subsequent failure as assessed by revision surgery. A retrospective implant survival analysis was completed using the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry and the Sweden National Patient Register. A total of 150,073 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis within an 18-year period were included in the study. THA patients with (n = 2,604) and without (n = 147,469) a history of IBD at the time of THA were compared with primary revision as the main endpoint and adjusted using sex, age category and comorbidity (Elixhauser scores) as covariates. We found that patients with a history of IBD had a relatively higher risk of revision surgery for septic causes while the non-IBD patients had a relatively higher risk of revision for aseptic causes (p = 0.004). Our findings suggest there may be an association between gut health and THA performance.

Reduced risk of clinically important deteriorations by ICS in COPD is eosinophil dependent: a pooled post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clinically Important Deterioration (CID) is a novel composite measure to assess treatment effect in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined the performance and utility of CID in assessing the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of four budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) studies comprised 3576 symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients with a history of exacerbation. Analysis of time to first CID event (exacerbation, deterioration in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] or worsening St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] score) was completed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with ≥1 CID in the four studies ranged between 63 and 77% and 69-84% with BUD/FORM and FORM, respectively, with an average 25% reduced risk of CID with BUD/FORM. All components contributed to the CID event rate. Experiencing a CID during the first 3 months was associated with poorer outcomes (lung function, quality of life, symptoms and reliever use) and increased risk of later CID events. The effect of BUD/FORM versus FORM in reducing CID risk was positively associated with the blood eosinophil count. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that BUD/FORM offers protective effects for CID events compared with FORM alone, with the magnitude of the effect dependent on patients' eosinophil levels. CID may be an important tool for evaluation of treatment effect in a complex, multifaceted, and progressive disease like COPD, and a valuable tool to allow for shorter and smaller future outcome predictive trials in early drug development.

Corticosteroid tapering with benralizumab treatment for eosinophilic asthma: PONENTE Trial.

Benralizumab is an interleukin-5 receptor α-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody approved in several countries for the add-on maintenance treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma aged 12 years and older. In the 28-week Phase III ZONDA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02075255), benralizumab produced a median 75% reduction from baseline in oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage (versus 25% for placebo) while maintaining asthma control for patients with OCS-dependent severe asthma. This manuscript presents the detailed protocol for the Phase IIIb PONENTE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03557307), a study that will build on the findings from ZONDA. As the largest steroid-sparing study undertaken in severe asthma, PONENTE has a faster steroid tapering schedule for prednisone dosages ≥7.5 mg·day-1 than previous studies, and it includes an evaluation of adrenal insufficiency and an algorithm to taper OCS dosage when prednisone dosage is ≤5 mg·day-1. It also has a longer maintenance phase to assess asthma control for up to 6 months after completion of OCS tapering. The two primary endpoints are whether patients achieve 100% reduction in daily OCS use and whether patients achieve 100% reduction in daily OCS or achieve OCS dosage ≤5 mg·day-1, if adrenal insufficiency prevented further reduction, both sustained over ≥4 weeks without worsening of asthma. Safety and change from baseline in health-related quality of life will also be assessed. PONENTE should provide valuable guidance for clinicians on tapering OCS dosage, including the management of adrenal insufficiency, following benralizumab initiation for the treatment of patients who are OCS-dependent with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.

Application of structured statistical analyses to identify a biomarker predictive of enhanced tralokinumab efficacy in phase III clinical trials for severe, uncontrolled asthma.

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab is an anti-interleukin (IL)-13 monoclonal antibody investigated for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma in two Phase III clinical trials, STRATOS 1 and 2. The STRATOS 1 biomarker analysis plan was developed to identify biomarker(s) indicative of IL-13 activation likely to predict tralokinumab efficacy and define a population in which there was an enhanced treatment effect; this defined population was then tested in STRATOS 2. METHODS: The biomarkers considered were blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), serum dipeptidyl peptidase-4, serum periostin and total serum immunoglobulin E. Tralokinumab efficacy was measured as the reduction in annualised asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) compared with placebo (primary endpoint measure of STRATOS 1 and 2). The biomarker analysis plan included negative binomial and generalised additive models, and the Subgroup Identification based on Differential Effect Search (SIDES) algorithm, supported by robustness and sensitivity checks. Effects on the key secondary endpoints of STRATOS 1 and 2, which included changes from baseline in standard measures of asthma outcomes, were also investigated. Prior to the STRATOS 1 read-out, numerous simulations of the methodology were performed with hypothetical data. RESULTS: FeNO and periostin were identified as the only biomarkers potentially predictive of treatment effect, with cut-offs chosen by the SIDES algorithm of > 32.3 ppb and > 27.4 ng/ml, respectively. The FeNO > 32.3 ppb subgroup was associated with greater AAER reductions and improvements in key secondary endpoints compared with the periostin > 27.4 ng/ml subgroup. Upon further evaluation of AAER reductions at different FeNO cut-offs, ≥37 ppb was chosen as the best cut-off for predicting tralokinumab efficacy. DISCUSSION: A rigorous statistical approach incorporating multiple methods was used to investigate the predictive properties of five potential biomarkers and to identify a participant subgroup that demonstrated an enhanced tralokinumab treatment effect. Using STRATOS 1 data, our analyses identified FeNO at a cut-off of ≥37 ppb as the best assessed biomarker for predicting enhanced treatment effect to be tested in STRATOS 2. Our findings were inconclusive, which reflects the complexity of subgroup identification in the severe asthma population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: STRATOS 1 and 2 are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02161757 registered on June 12, 2014, and NCT02194699 registered on July 18, 2014).

Tralokinumab for severe, uncontrolled asthma (STRATOS 1 and STRATOS 2): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab is an anti-interleukin-13 human monoclonal antibody developed for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma. These clinical trials aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in this population. METHODS: STRATOS 1 and STRATOS 2 were randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials that enrolled participants aged 12-75 years with severe asthma that was inadequately controlled despite use of inhaled corticosteroids (≥500 µg per day fluticasone or equivalent) and a long-acting ß2 agonist (but not oral corticosteroids). STRATOS 1 was done at 246 sites in 14 countries, and STRATOS 2 was done at 242 sites in 13 countries. In STRATOS 1, participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive tralokinumab 300 mg or matching placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. In STRATOS 2, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tralokinumab 300 mg or matching placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. STRATOS 1 attempted to identify a biomarker-positive population with enhanced tralokinumab benefit, which was then tested in STRATOS 2. The primary endpoint was the annualised asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) reduction at week 52 in the all-comers population for STRATOS 1 and in the biomarker-positive population for STRATOS 2. All efficacy analyses for both trials were done on the full analysis set by an intention-to-treat approach. The safety analysis set comprised any participant who received the investigational drug and was categorised by treatment received. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02161757 (STRATOS 1) and NCT02194699 (STRATOS 2), and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2013-005614-35 (STRATOS 1) and EudraCT 2013-005615-27 (STRATOS 2). FINDINGS: STRATOS 1 was done between June 13, 2014, and Feb 28, 2017. 1207 participants were randomly assigned and 1202 treated as follows: tralokinumab every 2 weeks (n=398), tralokinumab every 4 weeks (n=404), or placebo (n=400). STRATOS 2 was done between Oct 30, 2014, and Sept 21, 2017. 856 participants were randomly assigned and 849 treated as follows: tralokinumab every 2 weeks (n=427) and placebo every 2 weeks (n=422). In the STRATOS 1 all-comers population, tralokinumab every 2 weeks did not significantly reduce AAER compared with placebo (7·0% reduction [95% CI -20·8 to 28·4]; rate ratio 0·93 [95% CI 0·72 to 1·21]; p=0·59). Baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) 37 ppb or greater was identified as the preferred biomarker in STRATOS 1; in FENO-high participants, tralokinumab every 2 weeks (n=97) reduced AAER by 44·0% (95% CI 6·0 to 66·0; rate ratio 0·56 [95% CI 0·34 to 0·94]; p=0·028) compared with placebo (n=102). In the STRATOS 2 FENO-high population, tralokinumab every 2 weeks (n=108) did not significantly improve AAER (15·8% reduction [95% CI -33·7 to 47·0]; rate ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·53 to 1·34]; p=0·47) compared with placebo (n=121). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous tralokinumab trials. INTERPRETATION: Tralokinumab reduced AAER in participants with severe asthma with baseline FENO 37 ppb or higher in STRATOS 1, but not in STRATOS 2. These inconsistent effects on AAER do not support a key role for interleukin 13 in severe asthma exacerbations. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

A nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor agonist inhibits allergen-induced late asthmatic responses.

RATIONALE: Effective antiinflammatory therapies are needed for the treatment of asthma, but preferably without the systemic adverse effects of glucocorticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of an inhaled nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor agonist, AZD5423, on allergen-induced responses. METHODS: Twenty subjects with mild allergic asthma were randomized to receive 7 days of treatment with nebulized AZD5423 (75 or 300 µg) once daily, budesonide 200 µg twice daily via Turbuhaler, or placebo in a double-blind, four-period, crossover design study. Allergen challenge was performed on Day 6. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: FEV1 was measured repeatedly for 7 hours after allergen challenge for early and late asthmatic responses. Sputum inflammatory cells was measured before and at 7 and 24 hours after allergen challenge, and methacholine airway responsiveness was measured before and 24 hours after allergen challenge. AZD5423 significantly attenuated the fall in FEV1 during the late asthmatic response (both doses led to an 8.7% fall) versus placebo (14% fall) (P < 0.05) with no effect of budesonide (12.5% fall) versus placebo (P > 0.05). There was no effect on the fall in FEV1 during early asthmatic response. AZD5423 300 and 75 µg significantly attenuated allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia by 63 and 61% at 7 hours, respectively, and by 46 and 34% at 24 hours after allergen challenge, respectively, versus placebo (all P < 0.05). Budesonide did not reduce allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia versus placebo. AZD5423 at 300 µg significantly attenuated allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness at 24 hours after allergen challenge versus placebo (P < 0.05). Both doses of AZD5423 were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-day treatment with inhalation of the nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor agonist AZD5423 effectively reduced allergen-induced responses in subjects with mild allergic asthma. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01225549).

Safety and tolerability of an immediate-release formulation of theoral direct thrombin inhibitor AZD0837 in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AZD0837 is an investigational oral anticoagulant which is converted to the active form, AR-H067637, a selective direct thrombin inhibitor. The present study, a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, dose-guiding study, assessed the safety and tolerability of an immediate-release formulation of AZD0837 compared with dose-adjusted warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Two hundred fifty AF patients with at least one additional risk factor for stroke were randomised to receive either immediate-release AZD0837 (150mg twice daily [bid] or 350mg bid, blinded treatment) or dose-adjusted warfarin (international normalised ratio 2.0-3.0, open treatment) for three months. The safety and tolerability of 150mg bid AZD0837 appeared to be as good as that of warfarin. Total bleeding events were six with 150mg bid AZD0837, 15 with 350mg bid AZD0837 and eight with warfarin. Alanine aminotransferase elevations (>3xupper limit of normal) were infrequent, without apparent differences between treatment groups. A numerically higher incidence of serious adverse events was observed with 350mg bid AZD0837 compared with 150mg bid, with six of 13 being cardiac related, all with different diagnoses. An increase in mean serum creatinine of approximately 10% was observed in both AZD0837 groups, which returned to baseline after completion of therapy. There were no strokes, transient ischaemic attacks or cerebral haemorrhages with any of the treatments. In conclusion, the safety and tolerability of 150mg bid immediate-release AZD0837 appeared to be as good as that of dose-adjusted warfarin. However, larger studies will be needed to define the safety profile of AZD0837.

Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism or bleeding in relation to thrombophilic risk factors in patients receiving ximelagatran or placebo for long-term secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism.

The impact of prothrombotic abnormalities on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding in patients receiving long-term anticoagulation remains unclear. This analysis evaluated the influence of potential prothrombotic risk factors (antithrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene G20210A mutation, cardiolipin antibodies, number of risk factors) on the risk of recurrent VTE or bleeding during treatment with oral ximelagatran (24 mg twice daily) or placebo for 18 months [THRombin Inhibitor in Venous thromboEmbolism (THRIVE) III trial]. Of the 1223 patients in the intention-to-treat population, prothrombotic state was analysed in 559 patients receiving ximelagatran and 540 patients receiving placebo. It is possible that patients at a high risk of recurrent VTE were poorly represented in this analysis because of selection bias. Prothrombotic risk factors were reported in 41% of patients (8% had > or = 2 factors). No significant interactions were found between ximelagatran treatment and potential prothrombotic risk factors for the risk of recurrent VTE or bleeding by Cox proportionate hazard modelling. There was no clear evidence for a higher risk of recurrent VTE or bleeding across subgroups according to the potential prothrombotic factors analysed in this study.

A statin in the treatment of heart failure? Controlled rosuvastatin multinational study in heart failure (CORONA): study design and baseline characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Previous prospective outcome studies of statins have not provided any guidance on benefit-risk in patients with heart failure. AIM: The primary objective is to determine whether rosuvastatin (10 mg) reduces the combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (time to first event). The first secondary endpoint is all-cause mortality. METHODS: CORONA is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Briefly, men and women, aged > or =60 years with chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure of ischemic aetiology and ejection fraction < or =0.40 (NYHA class III and IV) or < or =0.35 (NYHA class II) were eligible if they were not using or in need of cholesterol lowering drugs. RESULTS: Mean age was 73 years (n=5016; 24% women), with 37% in NYHA II and 62% in NYHA III, ejection fraction 0.31, total cholesterol 5.2 mmol/L. Sixty percent have a history of myocardial infarction, 63% hypertension, and 30% diabetes. Patients are well treated for heart failure with 90% on loop or thiazide diuretics, 42% aldosterone antagonists, 91% ACE inhibitor or AT-I blocker, 75% beta-blockers, and 32% digitalis. CONCLUSION: CORONA is important for three main reasons: (1) A positive result is very important because of the high risk of the population studied, the increasing prevalence of elderly patients with chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure in our society, and the health economic issues involved. (2) If negative, new mechanistic questions about heart failure have to be raised. (3) If neutral we can avoid unnecessary polypharmacy.