NOS2 polymorphisms in prediction of benefit from first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Macrophages play a crucial role in the interaction between tumor and immune system, and iNOS is known as a surrogate marker of M1 macrophages activation. The goal of the study was to investigate the role of iNOS polymorphisms as prognostic marker in mCRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Functional significant polymorphisms in the promoter of INOS gene were analyzed by PCR-based and direct DNA sequencing in 4 cohorts of patients receiving bevacizumab based first-line chemotherapy: two evaluation cohorts (TRIBE ARM A and ARM B) and two validation cohorts (FIRE 3 arm A and MOMA). The relation of the SNPs with PFS and OS was evaluated through Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Subgroup analyses according to RAS status were preplanned. RESULTS: In the exploratory cohort 1 (TRIBE A), patients with CCTTT any>13repeats (N = 57) showed improved median PFS compared with patients carrying the ≤13/≤13 repeats variant (N = 152) (HR, 0.64; 95%CI 0.44-0.92, p = 0.010). Similar results were shown adopting the >26repeats/≤26 repeats (HR, 0.56; 95%CI 0.36-0.87, p = 0.005). In RAS mutant, patient with any>13 repeats (N = 24) had improved PFS results compared with those carrying the ≤13/≤13 repeats variant (N = 81) (HR, 0.51; 95%CI 0.30-0.87, p = 30.009). Similar results were found adopting the >26 repeats/≤26 repeats cut off: (HR, 0.52; 95%CI 0.27-0.98, p = 0.035). These data were partially confirmed in the exploratory cohort 2 (TRIBE B): a better median PFS was observed in patients with >26 repeats vs ≤26 repeats (N = 205) patients. However, these data were not confirmed in the two validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: We failed to replicate the exploratory findings in both validation sets. The CCTTT polymorphic region of the INOS gene does not predict outcome in mCRC receiving bevacizumab based first line chemotherapy. Further investigations are needed to reveal mechanisms between tumor, immune system and chemotherapy response.

Predictive value of TLR7 polymorphism for cetuximab-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The TLR7 and TLR9 signalings are implicated in the regulation of the immune system through type-I interferon induction. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the immunomodulatory and antitumor effects of TLR7 and TLR9 agonists in combination with cetuximab. We tested the hypothesis that genetic variations in TLR7 and TLR9 and their downstream molecules IRF5 and IRF7 were associated with outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving cetuximab-based chemotherapy. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TLR7, TLR9, IRF5 and IRF7 were tested for the association with RR, PFS, and OS in KRAS-wild type mCRC patients. Patients treated with FOLFIRI + cetuximab or FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the FIRE-3 trial served as a discovery set (FIRE3-Cet, n = 244) or a control set (FIRE3-Bev, n = 246), respectively. Patients treated with FOLFOX or SOX + cetuximab in the JACCRO-CC05/06 trial served as a validation set (JACCRO, n = 76). Genomic DNA isolated from tumor tissue samples was analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. In the discovery cohort, patients with the TLR7 rs3853839 G/G variant showed a trend toward longer PFS than those with any C variants (median 10.0 vs. 11.8 months, HR 1.39, p = 0.092). This preliminary association was confirmed in the validation cohort, and those with the G/G genotype showed a PFS benefit compared with others (univariate: 9.1 vs. 11.6 months, HR 2.04, p = 0.005, multivariate: HR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.14-3.55, p = 0.015). This association was not observed in the control cohort. Our findings suggest that TLR7 rs3853839 predicts the outcome of cetuximab-based chemotherapy in mCRC patients.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the IGF-IRS pathway are associated with outcome in mCRC patients enrolled in the FIRE-3 trial.

The Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/IGF-receptor pathway with its scaffolding proteins Insulin Receptor Substrate (IRS)1 and IRS2 are crucial regulators of metabolism and progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The goal of the study was the identification of predictive and prognostic markers among IRS1, IRS2, IGF1 and IGF-1R SNPs in mCRC patients enrolled in the FIRE-3 trial. Four SNPs of IRS (IRS1 rs1801278, rs1801123; IRS2 rs1805097, rs2289046) and four SNPs of IGF1-IGFR1 (rs6214, rs6220, rs2946834, rs2016347) were analyzed by PCR/direct-sequencing in the FIRE-3 trial. The relation of SNPs with PFS and OS was evaluated through Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test in the overall population and in subgroup according to RAS status and treatment arm. In the overall population IRS1 rs1801123 C/- carriers (N= 105) achieved significantly worse OS compared to T/T (N = 464) in univariate (HR = 1.32 [95%CI 1.03-1.70], p = 0.029) and in multivariable. Similar results were observed among RAS wild type. Patients with IGF1 rs2946834 T/- variant (N= 280) achieved improved PFS compared to C/C (N = 257) in univariate (HR = 0.77 [95%CI 0.64-0.92], p = 0.004) and in multivariable. In the RAS wild-type subgroup IGF1 rs2946834 T/- carriers showed better PFS and OS compared to C/C (univariate HR for PFS = 0.65 [95%CI 0.51-0.81], p < 0.001; multivariable HR for PFS = 0.63 [95%CI 0.50-0.81], p < 0.001). IRS1 rs1801123 SNP was identified as a new prognostic marker for mCRC. IGF1 rs2946834 was confirmed as prognostic factor in the overall population and in RAS wild type patients. Our findings underline the importance of IGF downstream signaling pathway in RAS wild-type mCRC patient.

Clinical Significance of TLR1 I602S Polymorphism for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in TLR1, TLR2, TLR6, and TAK1 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We genotyped 9 SNPs of TLR1, TLR2, TLR6, and TAK1 in mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI (combination therapy of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid) plus bevacizumab, using a discovery cohort (TRIBE trial, n = 228) and a validation cohort (FIRE-3 trial, n = 297), and analyzed for the association with response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). There was a significant association of TLR1 rs5743618 (T1805G) with the clinical outcome. In the TRIBE cohort, a homozygous wild-type genotype (T/T) associated with a significantly lower RR compared with variant T/G and G/G genotypes (43% vs. 62%, P = 0.025), and this observation was validated in the FIRE-3 cohort (46% vs. 65%, P = 0.021). In addition, those patients with the T/T genotype had significantly worse PFS (median, 8.2 vs. 10.5 months; HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.28, P = 0.014) and OS (median: 19.9 vs. 27.9 months; HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.14-2.35, P = 0.007), compared with those with other genotypes in the TRIBE cohort. These differences remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Our data suggest that TLR1 rs5743618 could serve as a predictor of clinical response to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(7); 1740-5. ©2016 AACR.