The impact of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) on patients and their family members: results from an international burden of illness survey.

BACKGROUND: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare, genetic disorder of heterotopic ossification within soft, connective tissues resulting in limited joint function and severe disability. We present results from an international burden of illness survey (NCT04665323) assessing physical, quality of life (QoL), and economic impacts of FOP on patients and family members. METHODS: Patient associations in 15 countries invited their members to participate; individuals with FOP and their family members were eligible. The survey was available online, in 11 languages, from 18 January-30 April 2021. Participants responded to assessments measuring joint function, QoL, healthcare service and living adaptation utilization, out-of-pocket costs, employment, and travel. RESULTS: The survey received 463 responses (patients, n = 219; family members, n = 244). For patients, decreased joint function was associated with reduced QoL and greater reliance on living adaptations. Nearly half of primary caregivers experienced a mild to moderate impact on their health/psychological wellbeing. Most primary caregivers and patients (≥18 years) reported that FOP impacted their career decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this survey will improve understanding of the impact of FOP on patients and family members, which is important for identifying unmet needs, optimizing care, and improving support for the FOP community.

Economic and clinical burden of comorbidities among patients with acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is a rare, pituitary hormonal disorder that requires improved awareness worldwide. The objective of this analysis was to quantify the clinical and economic burden of comorbidities for patients with acromegaly and examine the influence of biochemical control on these outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Markov cohort decision analytic model consisting of two states, including alive (with and without comorbidity) and dead. METHODS: A cohort of patients with acromegaly who had achieved biochemical control, a cohort of patients with acromegaly who had not achieved biochemical control, and a cohort of individuals from the general US population were tracked over a lifetime time horizon. The model tracked the proportion of the alive population that had each comorbidity based on age, sex, presence of acromegaly, and biochemical control status. The proportion of patients with each acromegaly-associated comorbidity were assigned comorbidity-associated costs, disutilities, and increased risk of mortality. RESULTS: Compared with the general population, controlled acromegaly resulted in $192,000 additional comorbidity-related costs, 0.7 fewer years of life, 2.9 fewer quality-adjusted life years, and 1.1 more comorbidities across the remaining lifespan. Compared with the general population, uncontrolled acromegaly resulted in $285,000 additional comorbidity-related costs, 0.9 fewer years of life, 4.2 fewer quality-adjusted life years, and 1.6 more comorbidities across the remaining lifespan. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving biochemical control is associated with improvements in cost, quality of life, and mortality, albeit not to the level of the general population. A multimodal treatment strategy including biochemical control and management of comorbidities is necessary to improve patient outcomes.

Health Benefit Costs and Absenteeism Among Employed Patients With Acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Limited data are available on these patients' utilization and costs of health care. This study assessed the impact of acromegaly on employees' health benefit (direct and indirect) costs and absenteeism. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of drug and medical claims and employer data (from January 2010 to April 2019) of patients with an acromegaly diagnosis and matched controls from a U.S. employee database. Patient claims were tracked for 12 months postdiagnosis (or matched) date. Outcomes were analyzed using separate 2-part regression models, controlling for clinical, demographic, and job-related variables. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with acromegaly and 940 controls were identified. Cohorts were similar in most demographic and job-related variables. Patients with acromegaly had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index score and higher incidence of claims for several comorbidities. Acromegaly drugs represented 16.3% of the acromegaly cohort's total costs. Total health benefit costs were $54 821 higher (P < .05) for patients compared with controls, with direct costs representing 79.8% of the difference. Total indirect costs were higher for patients with acromegaly, with short-term and long-term disability comprising most of the difference between the acromegaly and control groups. Patients with acromegaly had significantly more short-term disability days than controls, but total sick days were similar for the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The presence of acromegaly was associated with increased direct and indirect employee health benefit costs and increased work absenteeism.

Burden of acromegaly in the United States: increased health services utilization, location of care, and costs of care.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the utilization and healthcare costs among patients with acromegaly. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of acromegaly on healthcare utilization and costs by locations of care (LoC). METHODS: Patients with acromegaly and controls were identified from an analysis of drug and medical claims filed from January 2010 to April 2019 from a US employer database. Each patient with acromegaly was matched with 20 random controls (without acromegaly) selected from the database. Claims were tracked for 12 months postdiagnosis (or matched date for controls). Outcomes by LoC, including costs, services, and likelihood of use, were compared using two-stage regression models or logistic regression models, controlling for demographic and job-related variables, and Charlson comorbidity index scores. RESULTS: Claims from 60 patients with acromegaly and 1,200 controls were analyzed. Compared with the control group, patients with acromegaly had significantly higher likelihoods of receiving care in a physician's office [odds ratio > 1,000], inpatient [OR = 8.010], outpatient [OR = 12.656], laboratory [OR = 3.681], and 'other' locations [OR = 4.033] (all p < .001), except in an emergency department (ED). Significantly more services were performed at each LoC for those with acromegaly (p < .01) but not in an ED. Total costs were more than 5-fold higher for the acromegaly cohort compared with controls (p < .05). Costs by LoC were consistently higher (p < .001) for patients with acromegaly vs. controls, with mean annual cost differences greatest in outpatient hospital/clinic ($9,611 vs $1,355), inpatient ($8,646 vs $739), physicians' office ($4,762 vs $1,301), other ($2,001 vs $367), and laboratory ($508 vs $66). ED-related treatment costs were not significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with matched controls, patients with acromegaly were more likely to utilize healthcare services in nearly all LoCs and accrue higher expenditures at each LoC, with the exception of ED services.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Using the FULFIL Trial: A Spanish Perspective.

Purpose: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) vs twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) in patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at risk of exacerbations, from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. Patients and Methods: The validated GALAXY-COPD model was used to simulate disease progression and predict healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over a 3-year time horizon for a Spanish population. Patient characteristics from published literature were supplemented by data from FULFIL (NCT02345161), which compared FF/UMEC/VI vs BUD/FOR in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations. Treatment effects, extrapolated to 3 years, were based on Week 24 results in the FULFIL intent-to-treat population, including change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score, and exacerbation rates. Treatment, exacerbations, and COPD management costs (2019€) were informed by Spanish public sources and published literature. A 3% discount rate for costs and benefits was applied. One-way sensitivity and scenario analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), were performed. Results: FF/UMEC/VI treatment led to fewer moderate and severe exacerbations (2.126 and 0.306, respectively) vs BUD/FOR (2.608 and 0.515, respectively), with a mean incremental cost of €69 and gain of 0.107 QALYs, which resulted in an ICER of €642 per QALY gained. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER was most sensitive to treatment effect variations in exacerbations and healthcare resource utilization/event costs. Overall, 95% of 1000 PSA simulations resulted in an ICER less than €11,000 per QALY gained for FF/UMEC/VI vs BUD/FOR, confirming robustness of the results. The probability of FF/UMEC/VI being cost-effective vs BUD/FOR was 100% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 per QALY gained. Conclusion: At the accepted Spanish ICER threshold of €30,000, FF/UMEC/VI represents a cost-effective treatment option vs BUD/FOR in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations.

A State Transition Model for Health Outcomes Associated with Vorapaxar Treatment as an Add-on to Standard Care Antiplatelet Therapy in the Prevention of Thrombotic Events for Patients with a Recent Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: The TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial showed the addition of vorapaxar to standard care (SC) antiplatelet therapy reduced the combined risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke, while exhibiting an increase in moderate, but not other bleeding events. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the long-term health benefits and risks of vorapaxar as an add-on to SC treatment (lifetime aspirin and up to 12 months of clopidogrel) for patients with a prior MI and without a history of cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: In the state transition model we developed, the patients transition between states due to recurrent MI, stroke, or death, and are at risk of non-fatal bleeding. Risk equations were developed from individual patient-level data from the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial to predict long-term cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Additional sources informed inputs for case fatality, bleeding rates on SC, risk of non-CV death, and utilities. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, fewer CV events and more bleeding events occurred in the vorapaxar (VOR) + SC arm, relative to the SC-only arm. These results were ultimately accompanied by an increase in life expectancy and health benefits associated with add-on vorapaxar treatment, as the VOR + SC arm yielded an average of 8.27 discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with an average of 7.96 discounted QALYs in the SC-only arm. CONCLUSION: This model framework leveraged novel risk equations to make long-term projections of CV events in a population at high risk of recurrence. Model results suggest vorapaxar is most effective as add-on therapy to SC antiplatelet treatment when initiated upon hospital discharge post-MI.