PET Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

Heart transplantation is an effective and life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage heart disease. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a frequent complication after heart transplantation and a leading cause of graft failure and death. The diffuse involvement of the coronary macro- and microvasculature in CAV poses significant challenges for noninvasive imaging surveillance techniques that depend on regional differences in myocardial perfusion or contractility to detect abnormalities. Recent imaging and transplantation guidelines recommend cardiac PET for CAV evaluation. Current evidence demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy of PET myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve quantification for CAV as well as utility for post-transplant patient risk stratification. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine optimal PET measures and to define thresholds for diagnostic and prognostic assessment of CAV.

The Future of Cardiac Molecular Imaging.

Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) serves numerous applications in clinical cardiology and research. Similar to other medical imaging technologies, this area has undergone and continues to experience rapid changes resulting from technological and medical advances. These have immediate impacts on diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient care, as well as supplying innovative tools for fundamental and translational research. A broad shift toward hybrid PET systems and incorporation of advanced computational tools has been accompanied by mechanism-specific, targeted radiopharmaceuticals that seek to address long-standing limitations in cardiac imaging. While this review addresses some of the still-emerging clinical uses of established radiopharmaceuticals, it too highlights newer imaging probes, applications, and imaging techniques and instrumentation on the horizon. We highlight molecular imaging advances in inflammatory and infiltrative myocardial conditions, heart metabolism, vascular and valvular diseases, neurohormonal dysregulation, and transformational technical advances such as the rise of artificial intelligence and theranostic approaches to cardiovascular disease.

The Current Role of Viability Imaging to Guide Revascularization and Therapy Decisions in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Left Ventricular Function.

This review describes the current evidence and controversies for viability imaging to direct revascularization decisions and the impact on patient outcomes. Balancing procedural risks and possible benefit from revascularization is a key question in patients with heart failure of ischemic origin (IHF). Different stages of ischemia induce adaptive changes in myocardial metabolism and function. Viable but dysfunctional myocardium has the potential to recover after restoring blood flow. Modern imaging techniques demonstrate different aspects of viable myocardium; perfusion (single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT], positron emission tomography [PET], cardiovascular magnetic resonance [CMR]), cell metabolism (PET), cell membrane integrity and mitochondrial function (201Tl and 99mTc-based SPECT), contractile reserve (stress echocardiography, CMR) and scar (CMR). Observational studies suggest that patients with IHF and significant viable myocardium may benefit from revascularization compared with medical treatment alone but that in patients without significant viability, revascularization appears to offer no survival benefit or could even worsen the outcome. This was not supported by 2 randomized trials (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure [STICH] and PET and Recovery Following Revascularization [PARR] -2) although post-hoc analyses suggest that benefit can be achieved if decisions had been strictly based on viability imaging recommendations. Based on current evidence, viability testing should not be the routine for all patients with IHF considered for revascularization but rather integrated with clinical data to guide decisions on revascularization of high-risk patients with comorbidities.