Clinical relevance and treatment outcomes of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after obstetric and gynecologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVF) are consequences from obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Treatment approach from either abdominal or vaginal route have its own pros and cons. The study aims to present the anatomical, clinical and lower urinary tract symptom outcomes of women with VVF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case series conducted patients with VVF. Data regarding pre-operative evaluation, surgical treatment, and post-operative follow-ups were collected. Surgical approach depended on the cause, type, number, size, location, and time of onset of the fistula. Post-operatively, foley catheter was maintained for at least 1 week with cystoscopy performed prior to removal. Follow-up evaluation included cystoscopy, bladder diary, UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires and multi-channel urodynamic study. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients that were evaluated, 1 had spontaneous closure, 8 were repaired vaginally and 6 abdominally. Patients repaired vaginally were significantly noted to have a mean age of 50.3 ± 7.1 years with VVFs located adjacent the supra-trigone area having a mean distance of 1.7 ± 0.5 cm from the ureteric orifice. Its operative time and hospital stay were significantly shorter. In contrast, abdominally repaired patients had mean age of 38.0 ± 8.2 years and VVFs with mean distance of 0.4 ± 0.4 cm from the ureteric orifice. Post-operatively, 2 cases (14.2%, 2/14) of VVF recurrence and de novo urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) (25%, 2/8) were noted after vaginal repair and 3 cases (50%, 3/6) of concurrent ureteric injury and overactive bladder after abdominal repair. CONCLUSION: Treatment outcomes for vaginal and abdominal repair yielded good results. Though the vaginal route had higher incidence of recurrence and de novo USI, its less invasiveness, faster recovery period, and no association with post-op overactive bladder made it more preferable than the abdominal approach.

Clinical Relevance and Treatment Selection of Ureteral Injury After Cesarean Section.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this case series was to report the clinical relevance and management outcomes of ureteral injuries acquired secondary to cesarean section. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series from January 2007 to September 2014. Description of the patients' characteristics, diagnostic tools for investigation, management, and postoperative follow-up was conducted on postcesarean section patients who developed symptoms of urine leakage after cesarean section and necessitated secondary surgery for ureteral injury. Descriptive statistics was used for demographics and operative data. RESULTS: A total of 5619 cases were managed by cesarean section during the study period. Six (0.107%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1069%-0.1071%) patients had ureteral injury related to the cesarean section. Of 6 cases, 3 (0.053%; 95% CI, 0.0529%-0.0531%) had ureterouterine fistula. Three cases were managed by ureteroneocystostomy, 1 by ureteroneocystostomy with Boari flap, 1 by transureteroureterostomy, and the other one by ureteral stenting via ureterocystoscopy. Three patients had immediate operation because of an acute abdomen and 3 patients had delayed operation. The left ureter was the most common site of ureteral injury (5/6). The postoperative course was uneventful for all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous urinary leakage and acute abdominal distention associated with fluid accumulation after emergency cesarean section should be considered as "red flag" symptoms of ureteral injury and ureterouterine fistulae complications. Delayed management for ureteral repair may not be associated with bad outcomes for management of ureterouterine fistula. Delayed management was associated with less blood loss, less operating time, and acceptable outcome among patients with ureterouterine fistulae when the renal function is not compromised.