Exploring the Correlation and Protective Role of Diabetes Mellitus in Aortic Aneurysm Disease.

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is recognised as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease, as the abnormal metabolic state increases the risk for atherosclerosis, occlusive arterial disease and vascular dysfunction. There have been reports of potential association across the literature that illustrates a link between diabetes mellitus and aortic aneurysm, with the former having a protective role on the development of the latter. Methods: A thorough literature search was performed through electronic databases, to provide a comprehensive review of the study's reporting on the association of diabetes mellitus and aortic aneurysm, discussing the mechanisms that have been reported; furthemore, we reviewed the reports of the impact of oral hypoglycameic agents on aortic aneurysms. Results: Various proposed mechanisms are involved in this protective process including endothelial dysfunction, chronic hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. The evidence suggests a negative association between these disease process, with prevelance of diabetes mellitus resulting in lower rates of aortic aneurysm, via its protective mechanistic action. The increase in advanced glycation end products, increased arterial stiffness and vascular remodelling seen in diabetes, was found to have a profound impact on aneurysm development, its slow progression and lower rupture rate in these individuals. This review has also highlighted the role of oral hypoglycaemic agents having a protective effect against AA disease. Conclusion: A decrease in development, progression and mortality from aortic aneurysms as well as reduced rates of dissection, have been observed in those with diabetes. This review has provided a comprehensive insight on the effect of diabetes and its physiological processes, and elements of its con-committant treatment, having a protective role against these aortic diseases.

When is extra-anatomical bypass for the left subclavian artery required to prevent ischaemia after thoracic endovascular stent grafting?

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an accepted treatment for thoracic aortic disease. However, the principal complications relate to coverage of the thoracic aortic wall and deliberate occlusion of aortic branches over a potentially long segment. Complications include risk of stroke, spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) and arterial insufficiency to the left arm (left arm ischaemia (LAI)). This study specifically scrutinised the development of SCI and LAI after TEVAR for interventions for thoracic aortic disease from 1999 to 2020. In particular, those who underwent extra-anatomical bypass (both immediate and late) were compared to the length of thoracic aortic coverage by the stent graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients underwent TEVAR. The presenting symptoms, pathology, procedural and follow-up data were collected prospectively with particular evidence of stroke, SCI and LAI both immediate onset and after 48 h of graft placement. RESULTS: Fifty underwent TEVAR for an aneurysm (thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm), 22 for dissection, 19 for acute transection and 7 for intramural haematoma/pseudoaneurysm of the thoracic aorta. Twenty-nine (30%) required a debranching procedure to increase the proximal landing zone (1 aorto-carotid subclavian bypass, 10 carotid/carotid subclavian bypass and 18 carotid/subclavian bypass). Ten patients (10%) died within 30 days of TEVAR. Twenty-four grafts covered the left subclavian artery origin without a carotid/subclavian bypass. Five required a delayed carotid/subclavian bypass for LAI (4) and SCI (1). Six developed immediate signs of SCI after TEVAR and these 11 (group i) had a mean (SD) length of coverage of the thoracic aorta of 30.2 (10.6) cm compared to 21.5 (11.2) cm (group g) in those who had no LAI or SCI post TEVAR, p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, delayed carotid/subclavian bypass may be required for chronic arm ischaemia and less so for SCI. The length of coverage of thoracic aorta during TEVAR is a factor in the development of delayed SCI and LAI occurrence. Carotid subclavian bypass is required for certain patients undergoing TEVAR (particularly if greater than 20 cm of thoracic aorta is covered).

Anatomical Considerations and Open Surgery to Treat Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, the open approach to the abdominal aorta has been transperitoneal (TP). In comparison, a retroperitoneal (RP) incision exposes the lateral wall of the suprarenal aorta for clamp application and midline structures such as the duodenum and pancreas are not encountered. Proximal clamp position for open repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JR-AAA) is suprarenal, supra-superior mesenteric, or supraceliac. While RP and TP approaches have previously been compared for physiological reasons, there are currently no randomized controlled trials comparing these methods from an anatomical perspective. AIMS: The primary aim is to examine the evidence for adopting an RP approach for JR-AAA and compare it with TP approach from an anatomical perspective. The secondary aim is to assess optimum proximal clamp position and its effect on renal function and mortality for the 2 approaches. METHODS/DESIGN: Literature was reviewed searching databases Medline and Embase for studies on clamp positioning in JR-AAA repair using a TP or RP approach, up to December 2017. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear evidence for the optimum cross-clamp position for open repair of JR-AAAs. More proximal clamps provide adequate operative space with the possible downside of increased afterload leading to visceral and renal ischemia. Clamps placed inferior to the superior mesenteric artery allow continued bowel and hepatic perfusion with the potential to cause trauma to the adjacent aortic branches during application. As far as the optimum approach is concerned, many series show a strong trend for RP as a more proximal clamp is required. Significant numbers develop renal failure after JR-AAA repair, with most recovering fully irrespective of the clamp position.