Confidence of UK Ophthalmology Registrars in Managing Posterior Capsular Rupture: Results from a National Trainee Survey.

INTRODUCTION: To establish the level of confidence amongst UK ophthalmology specialist registrars (residents) in managing posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery. METHODS: An online nine-item questionnaire was distributed to all registrars, recruited nationwide via regional representatives. Data collected included stage of training, number of completed cataract operations, cumulative PCR rate, number of PCRs independently managed, understanding of vitrectomy settings and fluidic parameters and access to simulation. Respondents self-evaluated their confidence in managing PCR with vitreous loss. RESULTS: Complete responses were obtained from 248 registrars (35% response rate). Mean number of phacoemulsification procedures performed was 386. For senior registrars (OST 6-7), 35 out of 70 (50%) felt confident to manage PCR independently and 55 out of 70 (78.6%) were either quite confident or very confident at deciding when to implant an intraocular lens during PCR management. Lower confidence levels were noted for junior trainees (OST 1-2). Over 65% of survey respondents had access to relevant simulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results represent the largest UK survey analysing the confidence of PCR management amongst registrars. Confidence improves with duration of training and increased exposure to management of PCR. However, 50% of senior registrars still lacked confidence to independently manage PCR and vitreous loss. A specific competency-based framework, potentially using a simulator or simulating a PCR event, incorporated into the curriculum may be desirable.

Fingerprick Autologous Blood in the Treatment of Severe Dry Eyes and Ocular Surface Disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of autologous blood eye drops in patients diagnosed with severe ocular surface disease and dry eye who were unresponsive to conventional therapy and who would otherwise be considered for autologous serum eye drops. METHODS: A total of 38 eyes of 19 patients (15 women and 4 men) with ocular surface disease and severe dry eye refractory to conventional treatment were treated with fingerprick autologous blood 4 times daily for 6 months. Follow-up visits occurred at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals. At each visit, visual acuity, Oxford Grading Scheme score, tear film break-up time, Schirmer test, and ocular surface disease index were measured. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the ocular surface staining score at all time gates. The mean score at presentation was 2.13, and this improved to 1.50 at 1 month (P < 0.001), 1.29 at 3 months (P < 0.01), and 1.42 at 6 months (P < 0.01). There was an improvement in tear film break-up time from 4.75 seconds at baseline to 6.79 seconds at 3 months (P < 0.01) and 7.0 seconds at 6 months (P < 0.001). An improvement in the Schirmer test was only found at 6 months with an improvement from 3.67 mm to 13.33 mm (P < 0.05). There was no statistical change in visual acuity at any time gate or ocular surface disease index score, although 83% of patients reported an improvement in their symptoms at 6 months. There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Fingerprick autologous blood is an effective, readily accessible, and safe therapy for the treatment of recalcitrant cases of severe ocular surface disease and dry eye unresponsive to conventional therapy.

The differences between patient and optometrist experiences of contact lens hygiene education from the perspective of a Scottish university teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Contact lens related keratitis is a frequent presentation to acute ophthalmology services. Patients often do not recall being counselled regarding the safe use of contact lenses therefore fail to comply with guidance. This study aimed to identify the content and format of advice given to patients with contact lens keratitis concerning appropriate hygiene practices, determine their compliance with this and finally characterise optometrist practices regarding contact lens advice provided to patients. METHODS: All adult patients presenting with contact lens related keratitis to the acute ophthalmology clinic were asked to complete a survey. Information was collected on lens type, format of advice received and compliance. Community optometrists were asked to complete an electronic survey on their contact lens review practices and routine patient education. RESULTS: All patients surveyed recalled counselling on initiation of contact lenses; however 12% (6/50) were given no advice on return visits. This advice was in written format for 20% (10/50) of patients on initiation increasing to 32% (16/50) on renewal. Many patients slept (22%), showered (44%) or swam (36%) in lenses. 92% cleaned their contact lenses appropriately, but cases were washed infrequently (19% of cases cleaned < monthly) or with tap water (27%). All optometrists surveyed claimed to provide advice to patients in either written or verbal format for new and returning contact lens users. 49% (16/33) of optometrists gave written advice to patients on initial contact lens fitting, but only 1/33 continued with written advice for repeat customers. CONCLUSION: This study identified that although most patients were informed of appropriate hygiene requirements, compliance was poor. Optometrists regularly provide verbal advice but do not routinely offer written support and there is a mismatch between patient recollection and self-reported optometrist practice. It is suggested that patient education needs greater emphasis and both verbal and written information should be regularly provided on initial review and follow up assessments.

Learning styles and the prospective ophthalmologist.

PURPOSE: Understanding the learning styles of individual trainees may enable trainers to tailor an educational program and optimise learning. Surgical trainees have previously been shown to demonstrate a tendency towards particular learning styles. We seek to clarify the relationship between learning style and learned surgical performance using a simulator, prior to surgical training. METHODS: The Kolb Learning Style Inventory was administered to a group of thirty junior doctors. Participants were then asked to perform a series of tasks using the EyeSi virtual reality cataract surgery simulator (VR Magic, Mannheim, Germany). All completed a standard introductory programme to eliminate learning curve. They then undertook four attempts of level 4 forceps module binocularly. Total score, odometer movement (mm), corneal area injured (mm(2)), lens area injured (mm(2)) and total time taken (seconds) recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 31.6 years. No significant correlation was found between any learning style and any variable on the EyeSi cataract surgery simulator. CONCLUSION: There is a predominant learning style amongst surgical residents. There is however no demonstrable learning style that results in a better (or worse) performance on the EyeSi surgery simulator and hence in learning and performing cataract surgery.

Safety of nondominant-hand ophthalmic surgery.

PURPOSE: To establish the safety of nondominant-hand simulated intraocular surgery. SETTING: Horizon Suite Simulation Centre, South Devon Foundation NHS Trust, Devon, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Physicians with no previous ophthalmic surgical experience completed an introductory program on the EyeSi ophthalmic surgical simulator to eliminate the learning curve. They then completed the validated level-4 forceps module 4 times with their dominant hand and then 4 times with their nondominant hand. Simulator total score, odometer movement, corneal injury, lens injury, and total time were recorded. Acuity (Snellen near) and stereoacuity (Frisby) were also recorded. RESULTS: All 30 physicians showed good acuity (6/6 and N6 or better) and stereopsis (mean 35 seconds of arc). The total score was lower (mean 60.8 versus 65.6; P=.019), operating times were longer (mean 71.6 versus 70.0; P=.026), and lens injury was greater (mean 0.93 versus 0.79, P=.021) when operating with the nondominant hand than with operating with the dominant hand. Those with higher scores with the dominant hand had higher scores with their nondominant hand. CONCLUSIONS: Simulated nondominant-hand ophthalmic surgery resulted in less efficient, less safe, and slower surgery. This observation was more marked in those with less skill with their dominant hand. This has practical implications for trainee and trainer if 1 surgeon is left handed and 1 right handed. It also suggests that a higher degree of competence with the dominant hand is required before performing nondominant-hand surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Can virtual reality simulation help to determine the importance of stereopsis in intraocular surgery?

AIM: To establish the effect of acute loss of stereopsis on simulated intraocular surgical performance. METHODS: This study was performed using the EYESi ophthalmic surgical simulator. Thirty junior doctors with no previous ophthalmic surgical experience were enrolled and distance visual acuity (Snellen), near visual acuity and stereoacuity (Frisby) were recorded. All participants completed a standard introductory programme on the forceps module to eliminate the learning curve. They then undertook four attempts of level 4 forceps module binocularly and another four monocularly to simulate an acute loss of stereopsis. Total score, odometer movement, corneal area injured, lens area injured and total time taken were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 31 years (SD±9). None had amblyopia, with all demonstrating distance visual acuity of 6/6 or better and N6 for near. Mean stereopsis was 35 s of arc (SD±18). Average total score decreased from 60 while operating binocularly to 47 monocularly (p<0.05). Average corneal area injured increased from 0.95 mm(2) to 2.30 mm(2) (p<0.05), average lens area injured increased from 1.76 mm(2) to 3.53 mm(2) (p<0.05) and average time taken increased from 69.6 s to 77.4 s (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The importance of stereopsis for intraocular surgery is difficult to establish in a live theatre setting without compromising patient safety. Virtual reality simulators provide a safe alternative. This study demonstrates a statistically significant decrease in simulated intraocular surgical performance with acute loss of stereopsis in potential ophthalmic training applicants. Caution is recommend in using these results to advocate stereopsis testing as a screening tool in interviews because some participants performed well despite an absence of stereopsis.