RESUMO
Introduction Limited guidance exists for primary and urgent care ultrasound applications. This study sought to identify the most useful applications for providers in these clinical settings, to create and implement a structured interdisciplinary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) curriculum, and to assess the effectiveness of the course. Methods This prospective cohort study took place at an urban academic medical center. After a needs-based assessment of ultrasound applications in primary and urgent care, the Emergency Medicine ultrasound faculty and fellows were paired with a primary or urgent care provider (N = 6). The pairings met for scanning sessions in the emergency department to practice image acquisition, documentation, and incorporation of ultrasound into the workflow. Participants were given POCUS pre-work to review before each session. The final bedside session included a formal Objective Standard Clinical Examination (OSCE) to assess learner proficiency to be cleared for independent imaging. The program was assessed using pre- and post-training surveys. Results The survey results demonstrated that renal, gallbladder, and soft tissue scans were the most interesting and useful to primary and urgent care providers after completion of the training course. Conclusion The course was effective, and efficient, simple, high-yield POCUS applications should be included in future programs and organizational guidelines for primary and urgent care POCUS education.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT: About 60% of family physician practices employ PAs and/or NPs but gaps exist in the knowledge of the clinical effects on physician-PA and physician-NP teams. This review summarizes and comments on the significance of a recent report from the American Board of Family Medicine that compares the scope of practice of family physicians for family physicians practicing with either a PA, NP, or both.
Assuntos
Profissionais de Enfermagem , Assistentes Médicos , Eficiência , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Humanos , Médicos de Família , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Telemedicina , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Serviços de Diagnóstico/organização & administração , Serviços de Diagnóstico/tendências , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/normasRESUMO
Hospitals and health systems suffer an over-reliance on elective surgeries to remain profitable. As a result, systems report record losses, while demand for emergency room, hospital, and intensive care beds have surged. Studies have admitted that many surgeries are unnecessary, and physician leaders admit that profit plays a role in driving such needless cost and risk. Most diseases are better managed with medications and lifestyle changes. But it pays more to replace a knee than to prevent that replacement. We must bring surgical and medical value closer in-line. Communities of color are suffering disproportionately from coronavirus. The social determinants of health that lead to higher concentrations of hypertension and diabetes can be mitigated by investment in primary care. Such investment has been proven to decrease cost and increase quality of life. However, the United States spends 50% less on primary care, than other developed countries. While showing promise, telehealth is not a panacea. It relies on continued reimbursement parity, and there remains a digital divide. Any meaningful fix will draw the ire from those who profit from such a profligate system. If we want to improve quality, access and equity, while avoiding unnecessary hospitalizations, risky surgeries, and runaway costs, we must invest in primary care.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/etnologia , Pneumonia Viral/etnologia , Medicina Preventiva , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , COVID-19 , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pandemias , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Acupuncture has been increasingly used as an integrative or complementary therapy for pain. It is well-tolerated with little risk of serious adverse effects. Traditional acupuncture and nontraditional techniques, such as electroacupuncture and dry needling, often result in reported pain improvement. Multiple factors may contribute to variability in acupuncture's therapeutic effects, including needling technique, number of needles used, duration of needle retention, acupuncture point specificity, number of treatments, and numerous subjective (psychological) factors. Controlled trials have been published on pain syndromes, such as acupuncture for acute and chronic low back pain, knee osteoarthritis, headache, myofascial pain, neck pain, and fibromyalgia. For some conditions, enough data are available for systematic evaluations or meta-analyses. Acupuncture may provide modest benefits in the treatment of chronic low back pain, tension headache and chronic headache, migraine headache prophylaxis, and myofascial pain. Although patients receiving acupuncture for acute low back pain and knee osteoarthritis report less pain, the improvement with true (verum) acupuncture over sham acupuncture is not clinically significant for these conditions. These two conditions illustrate a recurring pattern in acupuncture trials, in which the additional improvement that can be attributed to verum over sham acupuncture, even when statistically significant, is of less clinical significance. This pattern supports the notion that acupuncture treatment has a notable placebo response, or meaning response, that may be responsible for much of its demonstrated benefits. For certain patients, especially those who are unresponsive or intolerant to standard therapies, acupuncture is a reasonable treatment option.
Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura , Dor Aguda/terapia , Dor Crônica/terapia , HumanosRESUMO
CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old male presented to the ED with a 2-day history of fever (Temperature-Maximum 39°C), nonbloody productive cough, and worsening right-sided pleuritic chest pain. The patient denied shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, sinus symptoms, and abdominal pain. His medical history included type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin, 11.1), hyperlipidemia, and depression. He smoked marijuana but denied tobacco or illicit drug use. He reported no recent travels. He reported a 1-week history of left molar pain that began after he siphoned stagnant water with a straw from a refrigerator drip pan. He lived in Ohio all of his life. He denied any sick contacts. His medications include Lantus insulin at night, metformin, glimepiride, pravastatin, and Remeron.
Assuntos
Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos/microbiologia , Sphingomonas/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Dor no Peito , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ecocardiografia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiplos/tratamento farmacológico , PleurisiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Millions of Americans fail to receive proper preventative care and/or have poorly managed chronic conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine if local student volunteers could be utilized to assess hypertension in an underserved community. The two primary objectives included first determining if student volunteers could be effectively trained to perform blood pressure screening and if they could then successfully provide such screening door-to-door in a targeted community. RESULTS: Volunteers were recruited from local universities, trained and skill tested in basic medical techniques and simulated door-to-door interactions. Of 43 initial students, 37 successfully completed written and competency exams. During the two-weekend community engagement, 220 individuals answered door knocks and 80 agreed to screening. Of those without a previous diagnosis of hypertension, 70.9% had an abnormal reading as did 87% of those who had been previously diagnosed with hypertension. This methodology was implemented at minimal cost and was perceived as a benefit by both students and community members. CONCLUSIONS: The study scope did not allow longer-term follow up for those with abnormal readings, but did serve as a reminder for those diagnosed with hypertension to monitor their status and as an indication for those undiagnosed that they may need to seek further care. Our findings are important because they show that undergraduate students are a viable source of volunteers for performing medically-related community outreach.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Modelos Educacionais , Estudantes de Ciências da Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Illinois/epidemiologia , Masculino , Papel (figurativo) , Voluntários , Recursos Humanos , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Acidentes por Quedas , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Ocupações em Saúde/educação , Visita Domiciliar , Polimedicação , Idoso , Educação Profissionalizante , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Medição de Risco , Estudantes de Ciências da SaúdeRESUMO
The use of multiple medications, in persons 65 years and older, has been linked to increased risk for cognitive impairment, falls, hip fractures, hospitalizations, adverse drug reactions, and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine if trained undergraduate students, in conjunction with pharmacists, could provide in-home medication reviews and demonstrate benefit to the health and welfare of a senior population affiliated with a primary care facility. Students received training in the completion of an in-home medication inventory, assessing a home for fall risk, and performing blood pressures. Once trained and proven proficient students performed the assessments in homes of Decatur Family Medicine Residency patients 65 years and older. Collected medication inventories were reviewed by a hospital pharmacist for fall risk medications, major drug interactions, or duplicate therapy. Changes to patient management were made by the primary care provider as needed. In all, 75 students visited 118 patients in Fall 2010. Findings from the medication review include: 102 (86%) patients were prescribed at least one fall risk medication; 43% were prescribed 3 or more; 14% had the potential for a major drug interaction; and 7% were prescribed duplicate therapies. Fifty-seven patients had a subsequent change made to their clinical medication list. The results demonstrate that an in-home outreach can be successfully performed by student volunteers and provide data of high clinical relevance and use. This application of the patient-centered medical home can readily and directly improve patient safety.