Early intramedullary nailing of bilateral femur fractures: who might benefit most?

INTRODUCTION: Identifying which patients can receive immediate intramedullary nailing (IMN) after bilateral femoral shaft fracture may improve health-related quality of life outcomes and decrease healthcare costs. This retrospective study evaluated the perioperative factors that guided emergency department transfer of patients to the operating room (OR) where IMN or temporizing external fixation (TEF) was performed, to the intensive care unit (ICU), or to the orthopedic ward. The hypothesis was that patients referred initially to the OR or to the ICU had more serious co-morbidities, complications, or orthopedic polytrauma, increasing the likelihood that they would benefit from "damage control orthopedics" and TEF use. METHODS: A Level I Trauma Center database (2010-2020) review identified the records of 23 patients that met study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most sustained their injury in a motor vehicle accident (87%) and were not wearing a seatbelt. RESULTS: Patients transferred to the operating room had a greater body mass index and shorter times between admission and surgery. Those transferred to the OR or ICU had higher injury severity scores (ISS), higher arterial blood O2 partial pressure (paO2) values on the first post-surgical day, and had more red blood cell unit (RBCU) transfusions during hospitalization. Patients transferred to the ICU more often underwent TEF and had shorter initial surgical procedure duration. Those with pneumothorax, rib fractures, or with other orthopedic comorbidities were more often transferred to the OR or ICU and those with acute complications requiring exploratory laparotomy were transferred to the OR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher BMI, ISS, greater RBCU transfusion needs, with pneumothorax, rib fractures, or acute complications requiring exploratory laparotomy were more likely to be initially transferred to the OR or ICU. Patients transferred to the orthopedic ward represented a more heterogenous group with greater possibility for benefitting from earlier definitive IMN.

Improved Resource Utilization Using WALANT Hand Surgery in Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Cost, efficiency, patient preference, and safety have driven utilization of wide awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) in hand surgery. This is not well documented in adolescents. We hypothesize that the use of WALANT with adolescents reduced time spent in the operating room (OR) and in the hospital when compared with patients who underwent surgery with traditional anesthesia (TA). METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of patients aged 10 to 17 who underwent surgery at a regional hospital system including the level 1 pediatric trauma hospital. Operative notes were assessed for use of WALANT. We excluded those operations not traditionally amenable to WALANT. Using a propensity matched cohort, hospital time, OR time, and perioperative complications were recorded and compared to evaluate efficiency and perioperative safety. RESULTS: There were 28 cases in the WALANT group and 28 cases in the TA group after excluding cases not amenable to WALANT, and cases were propensity matched. Although the operative time (incision to closure) was similar, for WALANT patients, the in-room to procedure time (15 vs 22 minutes), procedure end to out-room time (5 vs 10 minutes), total room time (52.81 vs 63.68), and length of hospital stay (222 vs 342 minutes) were shorter than patients in the TA group. CONCLUSION: Our case series demonstrates time-savings both in the OR and in the hospital overall. Avoiding TA when WALANT is feasible may result in significant savings to hospital systems, patients, and payers while also freeing up anesthesia staff and perioperative nurses.

Patient Preference for Medical Information in the Emergency Department: Post-Test Survey of a Random Allocation Intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Health literacy can create barriers for ED staff attempting to communicate important information to patients. Video discharge instructions may address some of these barriers by improving patients' comprehension of medical information and addressing health literacy challenges. METHODS: One hundred ninety-six patients diagnosed with either hypertension, asthma, congestive heart failure, or diabetes were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 interventions: watching video medical information followed by reviewing written discharge instructions or written instructions first, followed by video education. After the interventions, patients from both groups completed surveys assessing their preferences for receiving medical information. RESULTS: We found that 44% (n = 86/196) of ED patients preferred receiving medical information in video format, whereas 18% (n = 35/196) favored the written format, and 38% (n = 75/196) of the sample preferred receiving both formats. Fifty-five percent of men (n = 38/69) preferred the video format, whereas 42% (n = 51/122) of women indicated a preference for both video and written formats. Learning something new from the video was associated with patient preference for receiving medical instructions, (χ2 [1] = 9.39, P = 0.01) and the desire to watch medical videos or read information at home via the Internet (χ2 [1] = 18.46, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The majority of ED patients in this study preferred medical information in video or video plus written formats, compared with written-only format.