An Analysis of Telehealth in the Outpatient Management of Atrial Fibrillation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adaption of a telehealth care model. We studied the impact of telehealth on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) by electrophysiology providers in a large, multisite clinic. Clinical outcomes, quality metrics, and indicators of clinical activity for patients with AF during the 10-week period of March 22, 2020 to May 30, 2020 were compared with those from the 10-week period of March 24, 2019 to June 1, 2019. There were 1946 unique patient visits for AF (1,040 in 2020 and 906 in 2019). During 120 days after each encounter, there was no difference in hospital admissions (11.7% vs 13.5%, p = 0.25) or emergency department visits (10.4% vs 12.5%, p = 0.15) in 2020 compared with 2019. There was a total of 31 deaths within 120 days, with similar rates in 2020 and 2019 (1.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in quality metrics. The following clinical activities occurred less frequently in 2020 than in 2019: offering escalation of rhythm control (16.3% vs 23.3%, p <0.001), ambulatory monitoring (29.7% vs 51.7%, p <0.001), and electrocardiogram review for patients on antiarrhythmic drug therapy (22.1% vs 90.2%, p <0.001). Discussions about risk factor modification were more frequent in 2020 compared with 2019 (87.9% vs 74.8%, p <0.001). In conclusion, the use of telehealth in the outpatient management of AF was associated with similar clinical outcomes and quality metrics but differences in clinical activity compared with traditional ambulatory encounters. Longer-term outcomes warrant further investigation.

Prospective evaluation of the effect of smartphone electrocardiogram usage on anticoagulant medication compliance.

PURPOSE: Compliance with anticoagulation treatment for atrial fibrillation is highly variable. Smartphone electrocardiograms that allow patients to have greater insight into their arrhythmia burden may improve anticoagulant compliance. METHODS: Patients were enrolled if they had atrial fibrillation with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more, were eligible for anticoagulation and had a smartphone. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a smartphone electrocardiogram (AliveCor Kardia) to record their electrocardiograms 5 times/week or to the control group. All patients received 6 months of anticoagulant (apixaban) dispensed as 1-month pre-loaded pill boxes. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled from July 2017 to August 2019, but 5 patients in the monitor arm and 1 in the control arm withdrew prematurely. The monitor and control groups did not differ in age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score, or comorbidities. Median medication compliance was 99.7%, with nonsignificantly greater compliance in the monitor group (100%) than in the control group (99.7%) (p-value = 0.247). There was also no significant difference between missing any dose and use/nonuse of the smartphone monitor (48.9% vs. 55.1%; p-value = 0.692). Mean monitor compliance was 86.8% ± 14.0% with an average of 4.34 recorded electrocardiograms per week. Monitor group patients with perfect medication compliance had significantly higher monitor compliance than those patients who missed doses (median 95.3% vs 86.7%; p-value = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a study population with higher-than-expected medication compliance, the use of smartphone electrocardiogram did not demonstrate an improvement in medication compliance as compared to usual care. Greater monitor compliance was associated with greater medication compliance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: BOAT-OAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03515083.

Comparison of the Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients Aged <75 Versus Those Aged ≥75 Years (from a Nationwide Cohort Sample).

The mean age in clinical trials of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has been <75 years. We aimed to better understand the safety of LAAO in older patients. National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAO during the years 2016-2018. Patients were grouped by age <75 and ≥75 years. Baseline characteristics; length of stay; cost; hospital mortality; and other adverse events, including hematoma, vascular complications, perforation/tamponade, and stroke/ transient ischemic attack, were compared for the 2 groups. A total of 6,877 patients were identified, of whom 4,160 (60.4%) were aged ≥75 years. Length of stay and hospitalization costs were similar for the 2 groups. There were 10 deaths in patients aged ≥75 years and 1 death in patients aged <75 years (p = 0.059). The incidence of perforation/tamponade was 1.3% in patients aged ≥75 years versus 0.6% for those <75 years (p = 0.008). This difference persisted on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 3.07). The risk of perforation/tamponade was also higher in female patients (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.63 to 4.59). There was a trend toward higher combined procedure-related adverse events (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.15) in patients ≥75 years. There was no difference in the individual components of hematoma, vascular complication, and stroke/transient ischemic attack between both groups. In conclusion, percutaneous LAAO was associated with a higher risk of perforation and tamponade in older patients, particularly women.

Comparative outcomes of vascular access closure methods following atrial fibrillation/flutter catheter ablation: insights from VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry.

PURPOSE: This registry compared the safety and efficacy of vascular closure device Perclose (PC) with figure-of-eight stitch (Fo8) and manual compression (MC) following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation/flutter. METHODS: VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry (VACCAR) is a prospective, observational registry that assessed the time to hemostasis (TTH), time to ambulation (TTA), length of stay (LOS), complications, patient-reported outcomes, and pain medication use. RESULTS: A total of 434 patients (mean age 64.0±11.0 years; 38% female; 94.9% white) were enrolled between October 2017 and May 2019: 156 in MC, 203 in Fo8, and 75 in the PC group. Median TTH was significantly reduced in the PC and Fo8 group at 7 and 9 min respectively vs. the MC group at 20 min (p<0.001). Median TTA was significantly reduced in both the PC and Fo8 group at 2.2 h vs. the MC group at 6.5 h (p<0.001 for both). Median LOS for the PC group was significantly reduced at 27.5 h compared to the MC and Fo8 group at 29 h (p<0.01). A higher proportion of same-day discharges were noted in the PC and Fo8 groups at 14 (18.7%) and 25 (12.3%), respectively, compared to 5 (3.2%) in the MC group (p<0.01 for all). There was no significant difference in complications between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both PC and Fo8 are safe with improved TTH, TTA, LOS, and a higher number of same-day discharges compared to MC.

Outcomes using a single tapered dilator for Micra leadless pacemaker implant.

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of outcomes, device deployment time (DT), and total time (TT) using a single tapered Coons dilator versus sequential serial dilation for implantation of the Micra leadless pacemaker. BACKGROUND: Micra leadless pacemaker placement requires a 23 French Micra introducer sheath (MIS) for percutaneous delivery. We sought to evaluate outcomes with use of a single tapered Coons dilator (CD) versus sequential serial dilatation (SD) method to facilitate insertion of the Micra introducer sheath. METHODS: 35 patients were included in the SD arm and 49 in the CD arm. DT and TT were recorded in minutes and cost in dollars. Analysis was performed using independent t-test between two groups and one-way ANOVA to evaluate inter-operator variability in the CD arm. RESULTS: Both DT and TT were significantly lower for the CD arm (15.1 ± 5.1 vs 23.5 ± 9.3, p < 0.0005 and 29.9 ± 14 vs 39.3 ± 13.5 min, p = 0.000374; respectively). The cost was also significantly lower using a CD versus SD. There was no inter-operator variability in the CD arm between 6 operators (p = 0.177 for DT and p = 0.304 for TT). No complications occurred in the SD arm. There were 3 vascular access site complications in the CD arm, all of which occurred early in the operator's experience. CONCLUSION: Coons dilator is an efficient and cost-effective method for vascular dilatation to facilitate Micra leadless pacemaker insertion. Rate of complications is low and expected to improve with greater experience.

Safety and Clinical Impact of MRI in Patients with Non-MRI-conditional Cardiac Devices.

PURPOSE: To explore the safety and clinical utility of MRI in participants with non-MRI-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices, by establishing the Patient Registry of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Approved DEvices (PROMeNADe). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2015 to June 2019, 532 participants (211 women) with a mean age of 69 years ± 14 (standard deviation) were enrolled prospectively in the PROMeNADe registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03081364) and underwent a total of 608 MRI examinations (61 cardiac MRI examinations). All participants had device interrogations performed before and after each MRI. Pacemaker-dependent patients received asynchronous pacing. Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) had tachycardia therapies disabled during the MRI. An electrophysiology nurse monitored participants for any hemodynamic or rhythm abnormalities. Referring physicians were surveyed regarding the clinical utility of the MRI. Standard descriptive analyses included summary statistics with percentages and means. RESULTS: Cardiac devices included pacemakers (46%), ICDs (30%), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacemakers (4%), and CRT defibrillators (17%), as well as abandoned leads (2%). Pacemaker-dependent patients comprised 27% of all MRI examinations. There were no patient- or device-related complications. Clinical utility surveys of MRI examinations were completed by 150 physicians. According to the survey responses, these MRI examinations changed the suspected diagnosis 25% of the time and changed suspected prognosis in 26% of participants, with planned medical or surgical treatment being changed 42% of the time. CONCLUSION: This registry demonstrates that MRI examinations, including thoracic MRI examinations, can be performed safely in patients who have non-MRI-conditional devices, in pacemaker-dependent patients with ICDs, and in patients with abandoned leads. These MRI examinations can have a substantial impact on patient care, justifying the extensive resources used to perform them.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Peshock in this issue.

Comparison of the Effect of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on All-Cause Hospitalization in Patients With Versus Without Heart Failure (from the Nationwide Readmission Database).

Catheter ablation (CA) is associated with reduced arrhythmia recurrence and improved quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Heart failure (HF) is common in patients with AF and is associated with a high hospitalization burden. The real-world association between CA and rates of subsequent hospitalization in patients with AF and HF has not been well studied. Patients who underwent CA for AF during the middle 4 months of each year 2010 to 2015 were identified using the Nationwide Readmission Database. Patients were grouped according to the HF status and HF patients were stratified to reduced versus preserved ejection fraction (EF) using ICD-9 codes. Rates of all-cause hospitalization 120 days before and after index admission were compared using the McNemar's test, before and after matching for baseline characteristics. A total of 10,966 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1,950 with HF. In the HF group, all-cause hospitalization rates changed from 45.8% before CA to 33.2% after (p <0.001). Corresponding rates for non-HF patients were 23.8% and 19.7% (p< 0.001) with a greater relative reduction in hospitalizations seen in the HF group (27.5% vs 17.2%; p value <0.001). The difference in relative reduction persisted after adjustment by propensity score matching. The relative reduction in hospitalization rates was similar in HF patients with reduced and preserved EF with 25.2% and 28.5%, respectively. In conclusion, CA for AF was followed by a significant reduction in all-cause hospitalization rates. Patients with HF, regardless of EF, showed a greater reduction in admissions.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and survival in advanced heart failure patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) implantation in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction improves survival by reducing mortality secondary to arrhythmic events. Whether advanced HF patients treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) derive similar benefit is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Scopus from inception through November 2018 for studies examining the association between ICD implantation and all-cause mortality in patients with advanced HF and CF-LVADs. Analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity and publication bias were formally assessed, using I2 and funnel plots, respectively. Eight observational studies with a total of 6416 patients (ICD group = 3450, no ICD group = 2966) met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients (84.6%) came from the two largest observational studies. There was no difference in mortality in the ICD and no ICD groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.27, P = 0.79, I2 = 42%), and ICD implantation post-CF-LVAD was not associated with an improvement in mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.48-1.57, P = 0.64, I2 = 0%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the likelihood of transplantation (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93-1.30, P = 0.28, I2 = 26%) or non-mortality adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use was not associated with improved survival in advanced HF patients with CF-LVADs. These findings underscore the need to formally study the efficacy of ICDs in this population in a dedicated randomized controlled study.

Outcomes following cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by pressure waveform monitoring without the routine use of pulmonary venography.

PURPOSE: Pressure waveform analysis has the potential for facilitated assessment of pulmonary vein occlusion during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Data on clinical outcomes using this method are lacking. We sought to validate through clinical outcomes the use of pressure waveform analysis as the primary method of determining pulmonary vein occlusion during cryoballoon ablation. METHODS: A study was performed of 122 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (85% paroxysmal) undergoing cryoballoon ablation from May 2014 through July 2015 at a single institution using pressure waveform analysis as the primary method of assessing pulmonary vein occlusion. RESULTS: Cryoballoon ablation, with additional segmental radiofrequency ablation in 13.7%, resulted in complete pulmonary vein isolation in 100% of patients. The single procedure freedom from recurrence of atrial arrhythmia beyond the initial 3-month post-ablation was 81.2% at a mean follow-up of 237 days. Recurrence of atrial arrhythmia within 3-month post-ablation was 11.1%, and predicted recurrence beyond 3 months. Repeat ablation was performed in 12.0% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to date on this topic and the only study to focus on clinical outcomes, pressure waveform analysis as the primary method of determining pulmonary vein occlusion in cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation resulted in acute and long-term procedural success rates comparable to those reported with use of routine pulmonary venography. Controlled study is needed to confirm these findings and to determine if this technique affects variables such as procedure duration and radiation exposure.

Stability of pacing indices and need for pacing in cardiac transplant patients over 1 year of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: A significant minority of cardiac transplant patients require permanent pacemaker (PPM) implant, primarily for sinus node dysfunction. The stability of pacing indices has not been determined in this unique patient population, and data regarding ongoing need for pacing are limited. METHODS: Pacing indices (sensing, threshold, and impedance) as well as the percentage of time patients required pacing were recorded, from 30 cardiac transplant patients that underwent PPM implant, over 1 year of follow-up. Repeated measure ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to compare pacing indices and the percentage of time patients required pacing in each cardiac chamber (right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV)) and at different time points. RESULTS: There was no difference in sensing among the follow-up time points (p = 0.9). Thresholds at 3 months were significantly higher compared to the day of implant (p = 0.005) and the day after implant (p = 0.03). Impedances at implant were significantly higher compared to day 1 (p < 0.001), 3 months (p < 0.003), and 12 months (p < 0.001) post-implant. The mean percentage of RA pacing was 85 ± 6% the day after implant, 74 ± 6% at 3 months, and 80 ± 6% at 1 year (p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: In cardiac transplant patients, pacing impedances decrease and thresholds trend up in short-term follow-up, but subsequent sensing, threshold, and impedance remain stable at 1 year. This is comparable to the pattern observed among noncardiac transplant PPM recipients. The atrial pacing percentage was stable over 1 year, suggesting continued relative sinus node dysfunction.

Resolution (and Late Recurrence) of WATCHMAN Device-Related Thrombus Following Treatment with Dabigatran.

The WATCHMAN left atrial (LA) appendage closure system is an alternative therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are intolerant to chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin. Infrequently, LA device-related thrombus (DRT) has been suspected. Optimal treatment of DRT is not known, and the efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in this setting has not been previously described. A 69-year-old woman with permanent atrial fibrillation underwent WATCHMAN device placement. A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) performed 45 days following implant revealed a well-seated device. A 1-year follow-up TEE revealed a 1.2 × 0.8 cm sized DRT on the LA aspect of the WATCHMAN device. She was prescribed dabigatran 150 mg po BID for 3 months and she remained on aspirin 325 mg per day. She returned approximately 4 months later (and several weeks after completing her 3-month course of dabigatran) for a repeat TEE, which revealed complete resolution of the DRT. A TEE was performed approximately 8 months later and revealed a new DRT measuring 1 cm in diameter on the LA aspect of the device. This is the first report of successful WATCHMAN DRT treatment with a NOAC, and the first report of late DRT recurrence following treatment to resolution with an anticoagulant. This case report demonstrates that (1) WATCHMAN DRT may form late following implantation, (2) DRT resolution is possible with NOACs, specifically dabigatran, and (3) late recurrence of DRT is possible, even after treatment to initial resolution with systemic anticoagulation.

Effect of pre-procedural interrupted apixaban on heparin anticoagulation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Effective intraprocedural anticoagulation is considered essential to minimize the risk of thromboembolism in catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). The effect of interrupted apixaban on intraprocedural heparin dosing requirements and levels of achieved anticoagulation with heparin has not been well studied. The purpose of the present study was to compare heparin administration and activated clotted times (ACTs) for patients undergoing CA for AF treated with interrupted apixaban before the procedure with patients on uninterrupted warfarin. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing CA for AF treated with interrupted apixaban or uninterrupted warfarin were prospectively enrolled. Heparin administration determined by a standard protocol and normalized to patient weight and procedure duration, as well as rapidity, and degree of anticoagulation with heparin (as measured by mean ACT, peak ACT, time to ACT ≥300 s, and time to ACT ≥350 s) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled (25 apixaban and 23 warfarin). Heparin administered by bolus (51.3 ± 21.5 vs 27.8 ± 9.6 units/kg/h; p < 0.001) and mean heparin drip rate (25.3 ± 3.6 vs 20.7 ± 2.4 units/kg/h; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the apixaban group compared to the warfarin group. Despite greater heparin administration, apixaban patients achieved a significantly lower mean ACT (332.3 ± 17.0 vs 384.5 ± 53.9; p < 0.001) and peak ACT (369.5 ± 22.6 vs 432.3 ± 75.8, p < 0.001) compared to the warfarin group. The time to ACT ≥350 s (66.7 ± 35.8 vs 26.9 ± 34.0; p < 0.001) was significantly longer for apixaban-treated patients. Outcome differences persisted after analysis using linear models and Cox proportional hazard regression with adjustment for propensity scores. CONCLUSIONS: A standard intraprocedural heparin protocol results in delayed and lower levels of anticoagulation as measured by the ACT for interrupted apixaban-treated patients in comparison to those on uninterrupted warfarin during CA of AF.

Azithromycin and Risk of Cardiovascular Death: A Meta-Analytic Review of Observational Studies.

Recent evidence, though conflicting, suggests an association between azithromycin use and cardiovascular death. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of azithromycin on risk of death. Multiple databases were searched. Authors independently screened and extracted the data from studies. Primary outcome of interest was risk of death (cardiovascular and/or noncardiovascular). Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the source of a possible heterogeneity. Random effects model meta-analysis and hazards ratio (HR) were used to pool the data and calculate the overall effect estimate, respectively. Eight hundred twenty-eight citations, identified with 5 cohort studies that involved 2,246,178 episodes of azithromycin use, met our inclusion criteria. Azithromycin use was not associated with higher risk of death from any cause, HR = 0.99 [confidence interval (CI), 0.82-1.19], I = 54%, or cardiovascular cause, HR = 1.15 (CI, 0.66-2.00), I = 64%, but there was a moderate degree of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses have shown no increased risk of death with azithromycin use in younger population with zero degree of heterogeneity, HR = 0.85 (CI, 0.66-1.09), I = 0%. However, current use of azithromycin (within 1-5 days of therapy) was associated with a higher risk of death among older population with mild degree of heterogeneity, HR = 1.64 (CI, 1.23-2.19), I = 4%. In summary, azithromycin use was not associated with higher risk of death particularly in younger population. Nevertheless, older population might be at higher risk of death with current use of azithromycin, and an alternative therapy should probably be considered.