Clinical Practice Survey of Repeat Endoscopy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease in North America.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic remission has become a standard treatment target in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is unclear how widely this practice has been adopted amongst pediatric gastroenterology providers. This study determines the frequency of repeat endoscopy in pediatric IBD and evaluates for predictive baseline characteristics of providers. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional survey, which was distributed via 3 national email listservs to pediatric gastroenterology providers. We obtained baseline characteristics of respondents and assessed motivations and barriers for the practice of repeat endoscopy compared with none. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-eight unique respondents completed the online survey. Response rate was 11% (238 of 2300 possible participants). The majority practice in an academic setting (77%) and reported participation in ImproveCareNow (63%). Overall, 65% of respondents perform repeat endoscopy to assess for endoscopic remission in pediatric IBD as part of routine clinical practice. Fifty-six percent reported repeat endoscopy as individuals in the absence of a departmental protocol. "Symptoms are not sufficient to follow IBD patients" was reported by 82% of those who repeat endoscopy; conversely, "I perform endoscopy based on clinical, biomarker, and/or imaging trends" was reported by 81% of those who do not repeat endoscopy. The establishment of a pediatric-specific guideline was most commonly reported to change current practice, based on rank-order scoring. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of representative providers repeat endoscopy to assess for endoscopic remission in pediatric IBD. Fewer years in practice favored repeating endoscopy. The need for North American pediatric guidelines with pediatric-specific evidence to support the long-term benefits of endoscopic remission are highlighted in this study.

Premedication Use Before Infliximab Administration: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Premedications are commonly given to patients with inflammatory bowel disease before intravenous infliximab administration. We aimed to (1) describe practice variability; and (2) determine clinician rationale for premedicating patients with inflammatory bowel disease before infliximab administration. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional electronic survey after comprehensive literature review to assess practice variability and clinician rationale for premedication use before infliximab. An optional postsurvey quiz assessed clinicians' understanding of the available literature. The survey was distributed through members-only NASPGHAN and Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) listservs and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) web-based discussion boards. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-nine unique respondents with a 93.3% survey completion rate comprised 331 (87%) and 45 (12%) pediatric and adult gastroenterologists. Among numerous options for premedications, acetaminophen (66%) and diphenhydramine (64%) were most often given before each infliximab infusion. Only 20% did not routinely use premedications. There was heterogeneity of premedication use between gastroenterologists within the same clinical practice. Of 328 (87%) respondents who completed the knowledge assessment quiz, only 18% identified the association of diphenhydramine use with increased reaction. CONCLUSIONS: There is high interpractice and intrapractice variability for premedication use before infliximab administration. Clinician rationale for premedicating patients seems to be driven by individual preference or group practice habit. Improved knowledge of the evidence may assist in decreasing overuse of premedications, particularly diphenhydramine.

The effect of ezetimibe on peripheral arterial atherosclerosis depends upon statin use at baseline.

BACKGROUND: Both statins and ezetimibe lower LDL-C, but ezetimibe's effect on atherosclerosis is controversial. We hypothesized that lowering LDL-C cholesterol by adding ezetimibe to statin therapy would regress atherosclerosis measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: Atherosclerotic plaque volume was measured in the proximal 15-20 cm of the SFA in 67 PAD patients (age 63 ± 10, ABI 0.69 ± 0.14) at baseline and annually × 2. Statin-naïve patients (n=34) were randomized to simvastatin 40 mg (S, n=16) or simvastatin 40 mg+ezetimibe 10mg (S+E, n=18). Patients already on statins but with LDL-C >80 mg/dl had open-label ezetimibe 10mg added (E, n=33). Repeated measures models estimated changes in plaque parameters over time and between-group differences. RESULTS: LDL-C was lower at year 1 in S+E (67 ± 7 mg/dl) than S (91 ± 8 mg/dl, p<0.05), but similar at year 2 (68 ± 10 mg/dl vs. 83 ± 11 mg/dl, respectively). Plaque volume did not change from baseline to year 2 in either S+E (11.5 ± 1.4-10.5 ± 1.3 cm(3), p=NS) or S (11.0 ± 1.5-10.5 ± 1.4 cm(3), p=NS). In E, plaque progressed from baseline to year 2 (10.0 ± 0.8-10.8 ± 0.9, p<0.01) despite a 22% decrease in LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: Statin initiation with or without ezetimibe in statin-naïve patients halts progression of peripheral atherosclerosis. When ezetimibe is added to patients previously on statins, peripheral atherosclerosis progressed. Thus, ezetimibe's effect on peripheral atherosclerosis may depend upon relative timing of statin therapy.

Intraspecific polymorphism to interspecific divergence: genetics of pigmentation in Drosophila.

Genetic changes contributing to phenotypic differences within or between species have been identified for a handful of traits, but the relationship between alleles underlying intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific divergence is largely unknown. We found that noncoding changes in the tan gene, as well as changes linked to the ebony gene, contribute to pigmentation divergence between closely related Drosophila species. Moreover, we found that alleles linked to tan and ebony fixed in one Drosophila species also contribute to variation within another species, and that multiple genotypes underlie similar phenotypes even within the same population. These alleles appear to predate speciation, which suggests that standing genetic variation present in the common ancestor gave rise to both intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific divergence.