Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
4.
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) ; 42(6): 836-44; quiz 845-6, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12482006

RESUMO

A worthy goal of HIPAA is to protect the privacy of patient health information. Final regulations for achieving this goal have been issued, and all covered entities, including all pharmacies that transmit health information electronically, must comply with these regulations by April 14, 2003. Pharmacists are strongly advised to begin educating themselves about the HIPAA privacy regulations and taking steps toward implementation as soon as possible. Because of the complexity of the privacy rule and the lingering ambiguities about how to implement the regulations, pharmacies also are encouraged to obtain expert guidance and stay up-to-date with the regulations and implementation recommendations posted by OCR.


Assuntos
Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Farmácias/legislação & jurisprudência , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/legislação & jurisprudência , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação Farmacêutica , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
6.
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) ; 42(3): 439-48, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12030631

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the controversies and review the evidence about computer-aided prospective drug utilization review (PDUR) systems. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search of the literature. STUDY SELECTION: Published studies of the effectiveness of computer-aided prescription screening. DATA SYNTHESIS: One randomized, controlled trial and four nonrandomized studies constitute the evidence base. The five studies are inconclusive with respect to whether computer-aided prescription screening causes health care providers to take action, either because of a no difference finding or because there was no comparison group. In the one randomized, controlled trial, a substantial number of actions were taken by the control group whose members did not receive alerts. No study evaluated the total effect of screening by in-store and payer (online) systems. Specific research recommendations are made to increase the evidence base. CONCLUSION: Limited and inconclusive evidence about whether these systems are effective and what system features are optimal may explain the wide variation among systems in terms of what problems are screened and may also explain clinicians' uncertainty about their value. A comprehensive national research agenda for reducing medical errors should include research on the effectiveness of computer-aided PDUR.


Assuntos
Sistemas Computacionais , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Administração Farmacêutica/instrumentação , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14635828

RESUMO

Extemporaneous compounding of medications has been an integral component of the practice of pharmacy and medicine since the practices began. A staple of early medical and pharmacy practice, even today many patients benefit from compounding at some point in their care. Unfortunately, the regulation of the practice has not been so consistent. With a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, compounding regulation is again uncertain. This commentary reviews compounding practice, the history of compounding regulation, and discusses the current regulatory status of the practice.


Assuntos
Composição de Medicamentos , Legislação de Medicamentos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA