An Update on Stiripentol Mechanisms of Action: A Narrative Review.

Stiripentol (Diacomit®) (STP) is an orally active antiseizure medication (ASM) indicated as adjunctive therapy, for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome (DS), a severe form of childhood epilepsy, in conjunction with clobazam and, in some regions valproic acid. Since the discovery of STP, several mechanisms of action (MoA) have been described that may explain its specific effect on seizures associated with DS. STP is mainly considered as a potentiator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission: (i) via uptake blockade, (ii) inhibition of degradation, but also (iii) as a positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors, especially those containing α3 and δ subunits. Blockade of voltage-gated sodium and T-type calcium channels, which is classically associated with anticonvulsant and neuroprotective properties, has also been demonstrated for STP. Finally, several studies indicate that STP could regulate glucose energy metabolism and inhibit lactate dehydrogenase. STP is also an inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of other ASMs, contributing to boost their anticonvulsant efficacy as add-on therapy. These different MoAs involved in treatment of DS and recent data suggest a potential for STP to treat other neurological or non-neurological diseases.

How have the recent updated epilepsy classifications impacted on diagnosis and treatment?

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsies are a diverse group of disorders which differ regarding prognosis for seizure control and associated comorbidities. Accurate classification is critical to choose the highest yield investigations and best therapeutic options and to provide the most accurate prognoses regarding the expected degree of seizure control, possible remission, and risk of associated comorbidities to patients and their families. This article reviews the recent updates in epilepsy classification to illustrate how accurate classification impacts care for persons with epilepsy. AREAS COVERED: The authors discuss the ILAE 2017 Classification of the Epilepsies along with the modification of the classification for neonatal seizures and epilepsies. They also discuss the ILAE position papers on Epilepsy syndromes in neonates and infants and children of variable age and the Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies. EXPERT OPINION: Accurate epilepsy classification allows selection of the highest yield investigations, choice of optimal therapies, and accurate prognostication of seizures (likelihood of response to antiseizure treatments and likelihood of remission with age), as well as comorbidities (likelihood, type, and severity). As we move into the era of disease modifying therapy, early accurate identification of underlying causes with timely introduction of specific treatments will be crucial to lessen the severity of epilepsy, with improved seizure control and attenuation of associated comorbidities.

Pediatric psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A retrospective observational cohort study at a quaternary center.

BACKGROUND: Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) represent a common functional disorder in the pediatric population. We aimed to characterize pediatric PNES by describing their clinical characteristics, PNES semiologies, and healthcare pathway towards and after diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational chart review of pediatric patients aged 6 to 18 years admitted between December 2020 and December 2021 for spell classification or suspected PNES. Psychogenic non-epileptic seizure diagnosis was made by the capture of a typical event on video electroencephalogram (vEEG). We used descriptive statistics to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: We included 26 patients (18 females, 69.2%) with a mean age (SD) of 13.9 (2.5) years. Pre-morbid neurologic and psychiatric conditions included: epilepsy (23.1%), migraine (46.2%), mild traumatic brain injury (26.9%), anxiety (57.7%), ADHD (34.6%), and depression (30.8%). Six patients (23.1%) had a prior diagnosis of PNES. 14 patients (53.8%) presented with convulsive, and 6 (23.1%) each with non-convulsive and mixed PNES. Patients were seen by a range of providers prior to diagnosis including ED providers (50%), neurologists (53.8%), pediatricians (34.6%), and psychology/psychiatry (11.5%). Emergency department evaluation occurred for 13 patients (50%) on 15 occasions, and six (23.1%) were admitted to the hospital. The median (p25-p75) time from PNES onset to presentation and diagnosis at our institution was 3.5 (1.5-6.2) and 4.1 (3-7) months, respectively. A total of 33 events from the 26 patients were captured on vEEG. The most frequent semiologies in our cohort were rhythmic motor (27.3%) followed by equal frequency (18.2%) of complex motor and dialeptic. Eighteen patients (69.2%) were followed after the PNES diagnosis, for a median (p25-p75) of 17.3 months (6.3-21) with variable outcome. CONCLUSION: Pediatric PNES has female predominance and often presents with comorbid psychosocial stressors and psychiatric conditions. High clinical suspicion and early recognition are crucial to decrease healthcare utilization and establish timely diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical presentation and evaluation of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia: Results of an international expert consensus panel.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine areas of consensus among an international panel of experts for the clinical presentation and diagnosis of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM; formerly known as Jeavons syndrome) to improve a timely diagnosis. METHODS: An international steering committee was convened of physicians and patients/caregivers with expertise in EEM. This committee summarized the current literature and identified an international panel of experts (comprising 25 physicians and five patients/caregivers). This international expert panel participated in a modified Delphi process, including three rounds of surveys to determine areas of consensus for the diagnosis of EEM. RESULTS: There was a strong consensus that EEM is a female predominant generalized epilepsy syndrome with onset between 3 and 12 years of age and that eyelid myoclonia must be present to make the diagnosis. There was a strong consensus that eyelid myoclonia may go unrecognized for years prior to an epilepsy diagnosis. There was consensus that generalized tonic-clonic and absence seizures are typically or occasionally seen in patients. There was a consensus that atonic or focal seizures should lead to the consideration of reclassification or alternate diagnoses. There was a strong consensus that electroencephalography is required, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is not required for diagnosis. There was a strong consensus to perform genetic testing (either epilepsy gene panel or whole exome sequencing) when one or a combination of factors was present: family history of epilepsy, intellectual disability, or drug-resistant epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: This international expert panel identified multiple areas of consensus regarding the presentation and evaluation of EEM. These areas of consensus may be used to inform clinical practice to shorten the time to the appropriate diagnosis.

Management of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia: Results of an international expert consensus panel.

OBJECTIVE: There are limited data about the treatment and management of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM). The objective of this study was to determine areas of consensus among an international panel of experts for the management of EEM (formerly known as Jeavons syndrome). METHODS: An international steering committee was convened of physicians and patients/caregivers with expertise in EEM. This committee summarized the current literature and identified an international panel of experts (comprising 25 physicians and five patients/caregivers). This panel participated in a modified Delphi process, including three rounds of surveys to determine areas of consensus for the treatment, other areas of management, and prognosis for EEM. RESULTS: There was a strong consensus for valproic acid as the first-line treatment, with levetiracetam or lamotrigine as preferable alternatives for women of childbearing age. There was a moderate consensus that ethosuximide and clobazam are also efficacious. There was a strong consensus to avoid sodium channel-blocking medications, except for lamotrigine, as they may worsen seizure control. There was consensus that seizures typically persist into adulthood, with remission occurring in <50% of patients. There was less agreement about other areas of management, including dietary therapy, lens therapy, candidacy for driving, and outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: This international expert panel identified multiple areas of consensus regarding the optimal management of EEM. These areas of consensus may inform clinical practice to improve the management of EEM. In addition, multiple areas with less agreement were identified, which highlight topics for further research.

Drug resistance in epilepsy.

Drug resistance is estimated to affect about a third of individuals with epilepsy, but its prevalence differs in relation to the epilepsy syndrome, the cause of epilepsy, and other factors such as age of seizure onset and presence of associated neurological deficits. Although drug-resistant epilepsy is not synonymous with unresponsiveness to any drug treatment, the probability of achieving seizure freedom on a newly tried medication decreases with increasing number of previously failed treatments. After two appropriately used antiseizure medications have failed to control seizures, individuals should be referred whenever possible to a comprehensive epilepsy centre for diagnostic re-evaluation and targeted management. The feasibility of epilepsy surgery and other treatments, including those targeting the cause of epilepsy, should be considered early after diagnosis. Substantial evidence indicates that a delay in identifying an effective treatment can adversely affect ultimate outcome and carry an increased risk of cognitive disability, other comorbidities, and premature mortality. Research on mechanisms of drug resistance and novel therapeutics is progressing rapidly, and potentially improved treatments, including those targeting disease modification, are on the horizon.

Cenobamate in Generalized Epilepsy and Combined Generalized and Focal Epilepsy.

Background and Objectives: Cenobamate (CNB) is a United States Food and Drug Administration-approved antiseizure medication (ASM) for focal-onset seizures; however, its potential clinical effectiveness as a broad-spectrum ASM is not established. CNB has a proposed dual mechanism of action with preferential blockade of persistent sodium currents and positive allosteric modulation of the γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA-A) receptor. We evaluated the efficacy of CNB in drug refractory patients with genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE) or combined generalized and focal epilepsies (CGFE), including developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Methods: We performed a retrospective review and identified the following: cohort 1 (n = 4) with GGE, of which 2 patients had idiopathic generalized epilepsy, and cohort 2 with CGFE (n = 9), of which 4 patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and 1 had Dravet syndrome. Results: In cohort 1, all 3 patients with frequent generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs) had a greater than 50% reduction in GTCs. In cohort 2, reduction in both generalized and focal-onset seizures was noted. In these groups together, the mean reduction of all seizure types was 58%, and ≥50% responder rate was 70% (SD = ±34.16, median = 50%). No worsening of generalized-onset seizures occurred in either cohort. Seventy-seven percent of patients experienced side effects, warranting a modification of treatment managed by slower titration, dose reduction of CNB, or discontinuing other ASMs. Discussion: In our retrospective case series, CNB seems to be an effective ASM for patients with drug-resistant GGE and CGFE. The ongoing CNB trial assessing effectiveness for primary GTCs will provide more data on generalized-onset seizures. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that CNB in generalized epilepsy and combined generalized and focal epilepsy reduces seizure frequency.

A comprehensive narrative review of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia.

Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM) is a generalized epilepsy syndrome with childhood-onset and 2:1 female predominance that consists of: 1. eyelid myoclonia with or without absence seizures, 2. eye closure induced seizures or EEG paroxysms, 3. clinical or EEG photosensitivity. While eyelid myoclonia is the disease hallmark, other seizure types, including absence seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures, may be present. It is thought to have a genetic etiology, and around one-third of patients may have a positive family history of epilepsy. Recently, specific genetic mutations have been recognized in a minority patients, including in SYNGAP1, NEXMIF, RORB, and CHD2 genes. There are no randomized controlled trials in EEM, and the management literature is largely restricted to small retrospective studies. Broad-spectrum antiseizure medications such as valproate, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and benzodiazepines are typically used. Seizures typically persist into adulthood, and drug-resistant epilepsy is reported in over 50%.

Dravet Syndrome as an Example of Precision Medicine in Epilepsy.

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a drug-resistant, early-onset, developmental and epileptic encephalopathy where there have been many recently approved therapies with many more in development. With the availability of more syndrome specific treatment options coupled with an earlier diagnosis, DS is well-positioned to be an example of how a precise syndromic diagnosis can guide treatment choices and improve overall outcomes and also allow for the development of potential disease modifying therapies to address more than just seizures. In this review we summarize the current state of DS approved therapies and those that are in various stages of development.

Stiripentol for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome in patients 6 months and older and taking clobazam.

INTRODUCTION: Stiripentol (STP) is a structurally unique molecule with anticonvulsant and neuroprotective properties in animal and human studies. STP enhances gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic neurotransmission and inhibits multiple hepatic isoenzymes (i.e. cytochrome P450 system) involved in the metabolism of other antiseizure medications (ASMs) potentiating their anticonvulsant effects and has proven to be a promising therapy in Dravet Syndrome (DS). AREAS COVERED: The authors review randomized clinical trials and observational studies showing STP efficacy, safety, and tolerability when used as adjunctive therapy with VPA and clobazam in patients with DS. Moreover, they include recent evidence of its use in patients<2 years of age. EXPERT OPINION: Evidence on STP demonstrates clinically meaningful efficacy in both short and long term in patients with DS. In addition to reducing convulsive seizure frequency, STP also markedly reduces the number of status epilepticus episodes and associated medical complications which are more common in younger children. STP adverse effects are generally not severe and often resolve following STP dose reduction or adjustments of concomitant ASMs. STP is approved by the FDA for children aged 6 months and older with DS who are also taking clobazam, making it the only DS-specific ASM for children under age 1 year.

Temporal Encephalocele: A Treatable Etiology of Drug-Resistant Pediatric Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Temporal lobe encephaloceles (TEs) are a rare cause of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (DR-TLE), with head trauma and obesity identified as risk factors in adults. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics of childhood-onset DR-TLE due to TE. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective review of childhood-onset DR-TLE with radiographic TE identified between 2008 and 2020. The epilepsy history, brain imaging features, and surgical outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Eleven children with DR-TLE due to TE were included (median age at epilepsy onset was 11 years, interquartile range 8.5 to 13.5 years). Median latency between epilepsy diagnosis and TE detection was 3 years (range of 0 to 13 years). None had history of head trauma. Body mass index greater than 85 percentile for age and sex was seen in 36% of the children. No patient had bilateral TE identified. TEs were diagnosed based on epilepsy surgery conference re-review of imaging in 36% of cases. All herniations were contained defects without osseous dehiscence. Regional fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) hypometabolism ipsilateral to the encephalocele was seen in all children who had FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) of the brain. Of the children who had surgery, 70% were seizure free or had nondisabling seizures at last follow-up (mean follow-up 52 months). CONCLUSIONS: TE is a surgically remediable etiology of DR-TLE in childhood. TEs are often overlooked at pediatric epilepsy diagnosis, calling for the need to increase awareness of this entity. FDG-PET temporal hypometabolism in children with presumed nonlesional DR-TLE should be carefully examined for occult TEs.

Autism Spectrum Disorder and Epilepsy.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), was first described in 1943 as a disorder consisting of a triad of qualitative impairments of social interaction, communication and restricted repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities. The relationship between ASD and epilepsy is well documented. Patients with ASD have an increased risk of epilepsy, while those with epilepsy have a higher risk of ASD, as compared with the general population. Diagnosing epilepsy in those with ASD can be challenging. For example, stereotyped behaviors could be mistaken as ASD stereotypies, when in fact, they may be due to seizures. Fortunately, in recent years, we have gained a better understanding of the best antiseizure medications (ASMs) to use in this vulnerable population. However, more studies are needed to understand how best to screen for ASD in epilepsy, what the various ASD phenotypes are in people with epilepsy, especially those due to de novo genes/mutations, as well as factors influencing the fluctuating nature of ASD symptoms (eg, seizure type, frequency, syndromes, ASMs)..

Role of Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings in Early Recognition and Diagnosis of Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Type 2 Disease.

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2) disease is a very rare neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorder. Progression is rapid and irreversible, making early diagnosis crucial for timely treatment. A group of pediatric neurologists and neuroradiologists with expertise in CLN2 convened to discuss early electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in CLN2 diagnosis. Of 18 CLN2 cases, 16 (88.9%) had background slowing and 16 (88.9%) had epileptiform discharges on initial EEG. Seven of 17 (41.2%) patients who received intermittent low-frequency photic stimulation had a photoparoxysmal response. Initial MRIs showed subtle cerebellar (n = 14, 77.8%) or cerebral (n = 9, 50.0%) atrophy, white matter abnormalities (n = 11, 61.1%), and basal ganglia T2 hypointensity (n = 6, 33.3%), which became more apparent on follow-up MRI. The recognition of even subtle cerebellar atrophy and white matter signal changes in children aged 2-5 years who present with language delay, new-onset seizures, and an EEG with epileptiform discharges and background slowing should prompt investigation for CLN2. Because these early signs are not unique to CLN2, genetic testing is essential early in the diagnostic journey.

Considerations for determining the efficacy of new antiseizure medications in children age 1 month to younger than 2 years.

OBJECTIVES: Drug treatment for children with epilepsy should, ideally, be governed by evidence from adequate and well-controlled clinical studies. However, these studies are difficult to conduct, and so direct evidence supporting the informed use of specific drugs is often lacking. The Research Roundtable for Epilepsy (RRE) met in 2020 to align on an approach to therapy development for focal seizures in children age 1 month <2 years of age. METHODS: The RRE reviewed the regulatory landscape, epidemiology, seizure semiology, antiseizure medicine pharmacology, and safety issues applicable to this population. RESULTS: After reviewing evidence, the conclusion was that pediatric efficacy trials would be impracticable to conduct but a waiver of the regulatory requirement to conduct any study would lead to an absence of information to guide dosing in a critical population. Review of available data and discussion of RRE attendees led to the conclusion that the requirements for extrapolation of efficacy from older children down to infants from age 1 month to <2 years old appeared to be met. After the RRE, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved brivaracetam for use in children with focal epilepsy above the age of 1 month in August 2021 and lacosamide in October 2021, both based on the principle of extrapolation from data in older children. SIGNIFICANCE: These recommendations should result in more rapid accessibility of antiseizure medications for infants.

Methodology for classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes with list of syndromes: Report of the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions.

Epilepsy syndromes have been recognized for >50 years, as distinct electroclinical phenotypes with therapeutic and prognostic implications. Nonetheless, no formally accepted International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of epilepsy syndromes has existed. The ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions was established to reach consensus regarding which entities fulfilled criteria for an epilepsy syndrome and to provide definitions for each syndrome. We defined an epilepsy syndrome as "a characteristic cluster of clinical and electroencephalographic features, often supported by specific etiological findings (structural, genetic, metabolic, immune, and infectious)." The diagnosis of a syndrome in an individual with epilepsy frequently carries prognostic and treatment implications. Syndromes often have age-dependent presentations and a range of specific comorbidities. This paper describes the guiding principles and process for syndrome identification in both children and adults, and the template of clinical data included for each syndrome. We divided syndromes into typical age at onset, and further characterized them based on seizure and epilepsy types and association with developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy or progressive neurological deterioration. Definitions for each specific syndrome are contained within the corresponding position papers.

ILAE definition of the Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy Syndromes: Position statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions.

In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of Epilepsies described the "genetic generalized epilepsies" (GGEs), which contained the "idiopathic generalized epilepsies" (IGEs). The goal of this paper is to delineate the four syndromes comprising the IGEs, namely childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, and epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone. We provide updated diagnostic criteria for these IGE syndromes determined by the expert consensus opinion of the ILAE's Task Force on Nosology and Definitions (2017-2021) and international external experts outside our Task Force. We incorporate current knowledge from recent advances in genetic, imaging, and electroencephalographic studies, together with current terminology and classification of seizures and epilepsies. Patients that do not fulfill criteria for one of these syndromes, but that have one, or a combination, of the following generalized seizure types: absence, myoclonic, tonic-clonic and myoclonic-tonic-clonic seizures, with 2.5-5.5 Hz generalized spike-wave should be classified as having GGE. Recognizing these four IGE syndromes as a special grouping among the GGEs is helpful, as they carry prognostic and therapeutic implications.

International League Against Epilepsy classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes with onset in childhood: Position paper by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions.

The 2017 International League Against Epilepsy classification has defined a three-tier system with epilepsy syndrome identification at the third level. Although a syndrome cannot be determined in all children with epilepsy, identification of a specific syndrome provides guidance on management and prognosis. In this paper, we describe the childhood onset epilepsy syndromes, most of which have both mandatory seizure type(s) and interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) features. Based on the 2017 Classification of Seizures and Epilepsies, some syndrome names have been updated using terms directly describing the seizure semiology. Epilepsy syndromes beginning in childhood have been divided into three categories: (1) self-limited focal epilepsies, comprising four syndromes: self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, self-limited epilepsy with autonomic seizures, childhood occipital visual epilepsy, and photosensitive occipital lobe epilepsy; (2) generalized epilepsies, comprising three syndromes: childhood absence epilepsy, epilepsy with myoclonic absence, and epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia; and (3) developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathies, comprising five syndromes: epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy with spike-and-wave activation in sleep, hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia-epilepsy syndrome, and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome. We define each, highlighting the mandatory seizure(s), EEG features, phenotypic variations, and findings from key investigations.

International League Against Epilepsy classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes with onset at a variable age: position statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions.

The goal of this paper is to provide updated diagnostic criteria for the epilepsy syndromes that have a variable age of onset, based on expert consensus of the International League Against Epilepsy Nosology and Definitions Taskforce (2017-2021). We use language consistent with current accepted epilepsy and seizure classifications and incorporate knowledge from advances in genetics, electroencephalography, and imaging. Our aim in delineating the epilepsy syndromes that present at a variable age is to aid diagnosis and to guide investigations for etiology and treatments for these patients.

International consensus on diagnosis and management of Dravet syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to gain consensus from experienced physicians and caregivers regarding optimal diagnosis and management of Dravet syndrome (DS), in the context of recently approved, DS-specific therapies and emerging disease-modifying treatments. METHODS: A core working group was convened consisting of six physicians with recognized expertise in DS and two representatives of the Dravet Syndrome Foundation. This core group summarized the current literature (focused on clinical presentation, comorbidities, maintenance and rescue therapies, and evolving disease-modifying therapies) and nominated the 31-member expert panel (ensuring international representation), which participated in two rounds of a Delphi process to gain consensus on diagnosis and management of DS. RESULTS: There was strong consensus that infants 2-15 months old, presenting with either a first prolonged hemiclonic seizure or first convulsive status epilepticus with fever or following vaccination, in the absence of another cause, should undergo genetic testing for DS. Panelists agreed on evolution of specific comorbidities with time, but less agreement was achieved on optimal management. There was also agreement on appropriate first- to third-line maintenance therapies, which included the newly approved agents. Whereas there was agreement for recommendation of disease-modifying therapies, if they are proven safe and efficacious for seizures and/or reduction of comorbidities, there was less consensus for when these should be started, with caregivers being more conservative than physicians. SIGNIFICANCE: This International DS Consensus, informed by both experienced global caregiver and physician voices, provides a strong overview of the impact of DS, therapeutic goals and optimal management strategies incorporating the recent therapeutic advances in DS, and evolving disease-modifying therapies.