Fortified Snack Preferences among Patients with Cancer.

Fortified snacks can increase nutrient intake among patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to identify snack foods preferred as potential vehicles for fortification and how experienced symptoms influence preferences.A study-specific survey among 150 patients identified snack foods for fortification, influence of symptom presence, desired nutrients and characteristics of a fortified snack, and perception of oral nutritional supplements.Patients had mainly breast, gastrointestinal, lung, and colorectal tumors. Soup, yogurt, cheese, fruit juice, egg products, and protein bars were identified as suitable fortified snacks by >60% of subjects. Desired characteristics for snacks included nutritious, flavorful, convenient, ready to eat, easy to chew, and easy to swallow. Vitamins, minerals, and protein were the nutrients of interest. Three clusters of symptoms were identified that predicted patients' desired characteristics of fortified snacks and satisfaction with food-related life. Patients in High and Moderate symptom clusters were more likely to have reduced food intake and higher consumption of oral nutritional supplements.Preferences for fortified snacks and their characteristics are influenced by symptom presence. The results of this study provide insight to guide the development of fortified snacks for patients with cancer.

Patient-reported taste change assessment questionnaires used in the oncology setting: A narrative review.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported questionnaires to assess taste changes (TC) among patients with cancer and the common domains or aspects assessed by those questionnaires are identified in this narrative review. Taste changes are a prevalent symptom experienced by patients with cancer that impact food choice and enjoyment, reduce food intake, and diminish quality of life. Appropriate assessment is essential to detect and manage this symptom. METHOD: A systematic search of relevant databases between 1999 and 2018 yielded 1959 articles; 38 articles were included in the review. RESULTS: Seventeen questionnaires designed specifically to assess patient-reported taste changes among patients with cancer are described in the review. Seven domains were identified among the questionnaires; the most frequently assessed domain was the description of the taste change in 14 questionnaires). Timeframe, scoring, number of items and domains, and item phrasing varied greatly among questionnaires and the approach to domain and item evaluation was inconsistent. Comprehensive questionnaires (n = 7) assessed five or more domains to characterize the taste change experience. The majority of questionnaires have been cited only once or twice. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported taste change assessment in oncology has been achieved by a large number of diverse questionnaires; no standard tool or approach is used. Development of a question bank of validated or standardized taste change modules or items may strengthen the consistency and applicability of research in this area.

Characterization of chemosensory alterations in advanced cancer reveals specific chemosensory phenotypes impacting dietary intake and quality of life.

CONTEXT: Taste and smell (chemosensory) alterations are common and distressing among advanced cancer patients, but their specific nature is poorly described and seldom linked to dietary intake. Details of altered chemosensory perception may help to explain food intake behaviors. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to characterize chemosensory alterations and their relationship with dietary intake and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Adult advanced cancer patients (n=192) completed a chemosensory self-assessment questionnaire to characterize changes in their sense of smell and four basic tastes (sweet, sour, salty, and bitter) since the onset of cancer, three-day food record, and QOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients experienced either no alteration in any basic tastes and sense of smell sensations (26% of patients) or one of three altered chemosensory phenotypes: 1) stronger sensations overall (42%), 2) weaker sensations overall (18%), or 3) mixed (some sensations stronger and others weaker, 14%). For individual sensations (sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and smell), stronger sensation was twice more prevalent than weaker sensation (P=0.035). Patients reporting chemosensory alteration consumed 20%-25% fewer calories per day (P=0.0018), experienced greater weight loss (P=0.0036), and had poorer QOL scores (P=0.0176) compared with patients with no alterations, but results did not vary by chemosensory phenotype. Chemosensory alterations were not related to tumor type (P=0.884), gender (P=0.286), or nausea (P=0.278). CONCLUSION: Chemosensory alterations predict dietary intake and QOL; the identification of chemosensory phenotypes provides a rationale to adjust the properties of foods and dietary recommendations in function of the specific nature of these changes.