Basophils control T cell priming through soluble mediators rather than antigen presentation.

Basophils play an important role in the development of type 2 immunity and have been linked to protective immunity against parasites but also inflammatory responses in allergic diseases. While typically classified as degranulating effector cells, different modes of cellular activation have been identified, which together with the observation that different populations of basophils exist in the context of disease suggest a multifunctional role. In this review we aim to highlight the role of basophils play in antigen presentation of type 2 immunity and focus on the contribution basophils play in the context of antigen presentation and T cell priming. We will discuss evidence suggesting that basophils perform a direct role in antigen presentation and relate it to findings that indicate cellular cooperation with professional antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells. We will also highlight tissue-specific differences in basophil phenotypes that might lead to distinct roles in cellular cooperation and how these distinct interactions might influence immunological and clinical outcomes of disease. This review thus aims to consolidate the seemingly conflicting literature on the involvement of basophils in antigen presentation and tries to find a resolution to the discussion whether basophils influence antigen presentation through direct or indirect mechanisms.

Psychotherapists' perspective on the treatment of patients with somatic symptom disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend psychotherapy in addition to primary care for patients with moderate to severe somatic symptom disorders. While general practitioners' experiences have been well studied, psychotherapists' experiences with this patient group and the explanatory models psychotherapists use in psychotherapy are unknown. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted between April and July 2018 with 20 German licensed outpatient psychotherapists with either a medical or a psychological background, using the label "somatoform disorders". Interviews were analyzed applying thematic analysis. RESULTS: Psychotherapists experienced management of affected patients as challenging and partly frustrating, mainly due to the difficult diagnostic process and the "somatic fixation" of some patients. Diagnostic labelling was considered a delicate issue, with some psychotherapists using the term "somatoform", while others preferred either "functional" or vague descriptions like "psychosomatic". The explanatory process was deemed essential for treatment, as was the adaptation of explanations to both a patient's biography and language. As main explanatory factors, psychotherapists referred to generic vulnerability factors, previous somatic illness and health care system influences. CONCLUSIONS: Explanatory models used in psychotherapy are patient-centred, processual and constitute a major component of the psychotherapeutic process. However, this process might be impeded if patients are confronted with different diagnostic labels and explanatory models during their pathways through care.

How RB1CC1/FIP200 claws its way to autophagic engulfment of SQSTM1/p62-ubiquitin condensates.

Macroautophagy/autophagy mediates the degradation of ubiquitinated aggregated proteins within lysosomes in a process known as aggrephagy. The cargo receptor SQSTM1/p62 condenses aggregated proteins into larger structures and links them to the nascent autophagosomal membrane (phagophore). How the condensation reaction and autophagosome formation are coupled is unclear. We recently discovered that a region of SQSTM1 containing its LIR motif directly interacts with RB1CC1/FIP200, a protein acting at early stages of autophagosome formation. Determination of the structure of the C-terminal region of RB1CC1 revealed a claw-shaped domain. Using a structure-function approach, we show that the interaction of SQSTM1 with the RB1CC1 claw domain is crucial for the productive recruitment of the autophagy machinery to ubiquitin-positive condensates and their subsequent degradation by autophagy. We also found that concentrated Atg8-family proteins on the phagophore displace RB1CC1 from SQSTM1, suggesting an intrinsic directionality in the process of autophagosome formation. Ultimately, our study reveals how the interplay of SQSTM1 and RB1CC1 couples cargo condensation to autophagosome formation.

FIP200 Claw Domain Binding to p62 Promotes Autophagosome Formation at Ubiquitin Condensates.

The autophagy cargo receptor p62 facilitates the condensation of misfolded, ubiquitin-positive proteins and their degradation by autophagy, but the molecular mechanism of p62 signaling to the core autophagy machinery is unclear. Here, we show that disordered residues 326-380 of p62 directly interact with the C-terminal region (CTR) of FIP200. Crystal structure determination shows that the FIP200 CTR contains a dimeric globular domain that we designated the "Claw" for its shape. The interaction of p62 with FIP200 is mediated by a positively charged pocket in the Claw, enhanced by p62 phosphorylation, mutually exclusive with the binding of p62 to LC3B, and it promotes degradation of ubiquitinated cargo by autophagy. Furthermore, the recruitment of the FIP200 CTR slows the phase separation of ubiquitinated proteins by p62 in a reconstituted system. Our data provide the molecular basis for a crosstalk between cargo condensation and autophagosome formation.

Regulation of the human Suv3 helicase on DNA by inorganic cofactors.

Mitochondria are essential organelles and consequently proper expression and maintenance of the mitochondrial genome are indispensable for proper cell function. The mitochondrial Suv3 (SUPV3L1) helicase is known to have a central role in mitochondrial RNA metabolism and to be essential for maintenance of mitochondrial DNA stability. Here we have performed biochemical investigations to determine the potential regulation of the human Suv3 (hSuv3) helicase function by inorganic cofactors. We find that hSuv3 helicase and ATPase activity in vitro is strictly dependent on the presence of specific divalent cations. Interestingly, we show that divalent cations and nucleotide concentration have a direct effect on helicase substrate stability. Also, hSuv3 helicase is able to utilize several different nucleotide cofactors including both NTPs and dNTPs. Intriguingly, the potency of the individual nucleotide as energy source for hSuv3 unwinding differed depending on the included divalent cation and nucleotide concentration. At low concentrations, all four NTPs could support helicase activity with varying effectiveness depending on the included divalent cation. However, at higher nucleotide concentrations, only ATP was able to elicit the helicase activity of hSuv3. Consequently, we speculate that the capacity of hSuv3 DNA unwinding activity might be sensitive to the local availability of specific inorganic cofactors.