Retrograde intramedullary nailing for humeral midshaft fractures : a retrospective cohort study.

This study evaluates the patient-reported functional outcome, clinical functional outcome and frequency of complications of simple oblique and transverse humeral midshaft fractures treated with a retrograde expert humeral nail. A retrospective cohort study of humeral midshaft fractures (AO 12-A2, 12-A3) treated with retrograde nailing between January 2010 and February 2018 in a level II trauma center was performed. Patients' perception of functional outcome was measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Thirteen patients with a median age of 20-years were treated with a retrograde nail. The median DASH score, administered 29 months (IQR 74) after surgery, was 7.9 (IQR 15.9). There were no perioperative frac- tures and the frequency of complications was 8%, being one nonunion. Retrograde nailing for humeral midshaft fractures is a safe technique, with excellent patient reported and clinical functional outcome. No iatrogenic peri- operative fractures occurred and the frequency of complications was low. We recommend the retrograde technique, if surgical fixation of humeral midshaft fractures is needed, especially in younger patients for who rotator cuff associated injuries will have a major impact on quality of life.

Surgical treatment of acute and chronic AC joint dislocations: Five-year experience with conventional and modified LARS fixation by a single surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Different surgical fixation methods are available for the treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. The aim of this study was to present the results of five years of experience with the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) fixation technique by a single surgeon. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients treated for an AC joint dislocation with LARS fixation by the same surgeon between 2012 and 2016 (n = 20) were eligible for inclusion. All these dislocations were unstable injuries, Rockwood type-III or higher, requiring acute or chronic repair. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, return to work, complications, and implant removal. RESULTS: 17 patients (85%) were available for final follow-up. The median follow-up was 23 months (IQR; 17─34). The median QuickDASH score was 7 (IQR; 2-18), the median SSV was 90 (IQR; 80-90), and the median NRS pain score was 2 (IQR; 1-3). Patients returned to work after a median of 8 weeks (IQR; 6-12). There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores between acute and chronic repair, or between the conventional and modified LARS fixation groups. There were two major complications requiring revision surgery, one ruptured LARS ligament and one case of deep wound infection. Implant removal was performed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: The LARS ligament fixation technique seems to be effective for the treatment of AC joint dislocations, resulting in good short- and mid-term patient-reported functional outcome. LARS fixation might also be an acceptable treatment option for active patients with symptomatic chronic AC dislocations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study, Treatment Study.

Nonunion of the Capitate due to Delayed Diagnosis of an Isolated Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: A 14-year-old girl was diagnosed with nonunion of an isolated capitate fracture 5 months after she first presented to the emergency department. The fracture of the capitate was treated by cancellous proximal bone graft and screw fixation. This current case provides details of the surgical fixation method and long-term functional outcome after nonunion of an isolated capitate fracture after a follow-up of 18 months following fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Persisting localized tenderness over the capitate should be an indication to perform an additional computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. Nonunion of isolated capitate fractures can be treated by means of open reduction and internal fixation, with autologous bone grafting.

Excellent functional recovery after Kirschner-wire extension blocking technique for displaced closed bony mallet finger injuries; results of 36 cases.

Bony mallet finger injuries comprise 30% of all mallet injuries. Operative treatment of bony mallet fingers injuries still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to describe the k-wire extension blocking technique and the functional results using the PRWHE questionnaire. A single center retrospective observational cohort of 36 patients was defined between January 2010 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria for this study were acute fractures with 1) persistent displacement of more than 3 mm in extension splint, 2) palmar subluxation of the distal phalanx or 3) fracture fragments consisting of more than one third of the joint surface. According to the PRWHE questionnaire, excellent results were observed with a mean follow up period of 32 months of all patients. Two patients developed a clinically relevant superficial wound infection and one patient developed a nail deformity. In conclusion, the k-wire extension blocking technique is safe and results in excellent mid-term functional outcome.

Lateral subtalar dislocation: Case report and review of the literature.

A case of complicated lateral subtalar dislocation is presented and the literature concerning this injury is reviewed. Subtalar joint dislocations are rare and often the result of a high-energy trauma. Complications include avascular necrosis of the talus, infection, posttraumatic osteoarthritis requiring arthrodesis and chronic subtalar instability. Negative prognostic factors include lateral and complicated dislocations, total talar extrusions, and associated fractures. A literature search was performed to identify studies describing outcome after lateral subtalar joint dislocation. Eight studies including fifty patients could be included, thirty out of 50 patients suffered a complicated injury. Mean follow-up was fifty-five months. Ankle function was reported as good in all patients with closed lateral subtalar dislocation. Thirteen out of thirty patients with complicated lateral subtalar joint dislocation developed a complication. Avascular necrosis was present in nine patients with complicated injury. Four patients with complicated lateral subtalar dislocation suffered deep infection requiring treatment with antibiotics. In case of uncomplicated lateral subtalar joint dislocation, excellent functional outcome after closed reduction and immobilization can be expected. In case of complicated lateral subtalar joint dislocation immediate reduction, wound debridement and if necessary (external) stabilisation are critical. Up to fifty percent of patients suffering complicated injury are at risk of developing complications such as avascular talar necrosis and infection.

HUMeral shaft fractures: measuring recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the humeral shaft are associated with a profound temporary (and in the elderly sometimes even permanent) impairment of independence and quality of life. These fractures can be treated operatively or non-operatively, but the optimal tailored treatment is an unresolved problem. As no high-quality comparative randomized or observational studies are available, a recent Cochrane review concluded there is no evidence of sufficient scientific quality available to inform the decision to operate or not. Since randomized controlled trials for this injury have shown feasibility issues, this study is designed to provide the best achievable evidence to answer this unresolved problem. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate functional recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment in adult patients who sustained a humeral shaft fracture. Secondary aims include the effect of treatment on pain, complications, generic health-related quality of life, time to resumption of activities of daily living and work, and cost-effectiveness. The main hypothesis is that operative treatment will result in faster recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: The design of the study will be a multicenter prospective observational study of 400 patients who have sustained a humeral shaft fracture, AO type 12A or 12B. Treatment decision (i.e., operative or non-operative) will be left to the discretion of the treating surgeon. Critical elements of treatment will be registered and outcome will be monitored at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Secondary outcome measures are the Constant score, pain level at both sides, range of motion of the elbow and shoulder joint at both sides, radiographic healing, rate of complications and (secondary) interventions, health-related quality of life (Short-Form 36 and EuroQol-5D), time to resumption of ADL/work, and cost-effectiveness. Data will be analyzed using univariate and multivariable analyses (including mixed effects regression analysis). The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective. DISCUSSION: Successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of operative versus non-operative treatment of patients with a humeral shaft fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR3617).

A hinged external fixator for complex elbow dislocations: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Elbow dislocations can be classified as simple or complex. Simple dislocations are characterized by the absence of fractures, while complex dislocations are associated with fractures of the radial head, olecranon, or coronoid process. The majority of patients with these complex dislocations are treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or arthroplasty in case of a non-reconstructable radial head fracture. If the elbow joint remains unstable after fracture fixation, a hinged elbow fixator can be applied. The fixator provides stability to the elbow joint, and allows for early mobilization. The latter may be important for preventing stiffness of the joint. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of early mobilization with a hinged external elbow fixator on clinical outcome in patients with complex elbow dislocations with residual instability following fracture fixation. METHODS/DESIGN: The design of the study will be a multicenter prospective cohort study of 30 patients who have sustained a complex elbow dislocation and are treated with a hinged elbow fixator following fracture fixation because of residual instability. Early active motion exercises within the limits of pain will be started immediately after surgery under supervision of a physical therapist. Outcome will be evaluated at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months. The primary outcome is the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. The secondary outcome measures are the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, Oxford Elbow Score, pain level at both sides, range of motion of the elbow joint at both sides, radiographic healing of the fractures and formation of periarticular ossifications, rate of secondary interventions and complications, and health-related quality of life (Short-Form 36). DISCUSSION: The outcome of this study will yield quantitative data on the functional outcome in patients with a complex elbow dislocation and who are treated with ORIF and additional stabilization with a hinged elbow fixator. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR1996).

Increased tumor growth after high pressure pneumoperitoneum with helium and air.

BACKGROUND: Tumor growth appears proportional to the pressure of carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopic surgery. Air and helium are alternative insufflation gases. The objective of this study is to assess tumor growth after air and helium insufflation at different pressures. METHOD: Ninety-six WAG rats were allocated to either air or helium. In both arms, rats were randomly exposed to a one hour gasless procedure, or to 4 mm Hg, 10 mm Hg, or 16 mm Hg insufflation. At the start of the procedure, 500,000 CC531 tumor cells were injected intraperitoneally. After three weeks, intraperitoneal tumor growth was assessed. RESULTS: Higher insufflation pressures were associated with greater tumor growth. No difference of tumor growth between air and helium insufflation was found. CONCLUSION: In this experimental model, insufflation pressure appeared to have a greater impact on tumor growth than the type of gas. Further studies are necessary but it seems prudent to recommend employment of lower insufflation pressures in laparoscopic oncologic surgery.

Irrigation of port sites: prevention of port site metastases?

INTRODUCTION: Port site metastases can occur when free viable tumor cells implant at trocar wounds. Irrigation of port sites with cytotoxic agents has been suggested to prevent port site metastases. The objective of this study is to assess whether tumor growth at port sites can be reduced by irrigation of these port sites. METHODS: WAG rats were insufflated with CO(2) for 20 minutes and 5 x 10(5) CC531 tumor cells were injected intraperitoneally. Port sites were irrigated after completion of the pneumoperitoneum with povidone-iodine, a mixture of taurolidine and heparin, or sodium chloride. Controls did not undergo any irrigation of port sites. In experiment 1, all 16 rats had all 4 irrigation modalities. In experiment 2, four groups of 20 rats had one type of irrigation on two trocar wounds. Tumor growth was evaluated 4 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: No difference in tumor growth at trocar wounds was found between any type of irrigation and controls in both experiments. CONCLUSION: In this experimental model, no beneficial or adverse effects of irrigation of port sites could be shown.