Occlusal contact changes in patients treated with clear aligners: A retrospective evaluation using digital dental models.

INTRODUCTION: This study used digital intraoral scans to evaluate how clear aligner treatment affects occlusal contacts and to determine the influence of sex and age on contact changes. Results were compared with contact changes that occur during fixed appliance therapy. METHODS: Patients included in this study were treated in a University setting and private practice. Inclusion criteria were a Class I malocclusion treated nonextraction with clear aligners and the presence of pretreatment and posttreatment digital intraoral scans. Scans were imported into specialized software, and occlusal contacts were analyzed. The effects of age and sex on contact changes during clear aligner treatment were determined. Changes in occlusal contacts were compared with changes that occur during nonextraction treatment of patients with a Class I relationship using fixed edgewise appliances. RESULTS: A total of 45 clear aligner patients fit the eligibility criteria. Clear aligner treatment reduced the percentage of tight, near, and approximating contacts, whereas the percentage of open and no contacts increased. These changes in occlusal contacts were greater for the older age group studied. Genderinfluenced occlusal contact changes in the anterior dentition only where the decrease in near contacts and increase in open contacts were greater for males. These results for patients treated with clear aligners were similar to those for patients treated with fixed appliances; both treatment modalities reduced close occlusal contacts at the time active treatment was completed. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that when clear aligners or fixed appliances are used to treat a Class I malocclusion, the resulting occlusion immediately after debonding is not as "tight" as it was at pretreatment.

Association between crowding estimation and extraction recommendations in orthodontics.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about how precisely orthodontists in the United States (US) assess crowding or at what range of crowding they recommend extraction. This study aimed to assess the relationship between estimated crowding in patients with a Class I relationship and extraction recommendation by orthodontists in the US. The secondary aims were to evaluate the accuracy and precision of clinician estimations and determine if clinician background traits play a role in extraction decision-making. METHODS: An electronic survey was prepared using 4 patients with a Class I relationship with anterior crowding selected from a University Orthodontics Clinic and was sent to approximately 10,400 subjects through Facebook and the American Association of Orthodontists Partners in Research program. RESULTS: From the 297 responses received, most clinicians recommended extraction once crowding reached 9-10 mm in either the maxilla or the mandible. The data from 2 patients suggest this decision was more strongly correlated with mandibular crowding. Clinician estimations varied widely but, on average, were precise within approximately 2 mm of objective measurements. There was a tendency to overestimate crowding, especially by Northeastern practitioners. Clinicians who reported routinely measuring crowding or who reported that they recommended extractions to >10% of their patients were 1.2-2.0 and 1.4-1.6 times more likely, respectively, to recommend extraction in the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Crowding estimation was highly subjective and varied widely among clinicians. Most clinicians recommended extraction once maxillary or mandibular crowding approximated 9-10 mm. Some clinician demographics were correlated with the precision and accuracy of estimations and the likelihood of extraction in the patients.