RESUMO
We report a case of successful endoscopic stone management in a patient with ectopic ureteric insertion. The patient had a complete duplex collecting system, with the upper moiety ureter inserting ectopically into his prostatic urethra, and an obstructing ureteric stone in the distal portion of the ectopic ureter. This made both characterisation of the patient's anatomy and initial emergency stone management challenging.The case offers several learning points for clinicians who may encounter similar situations. By describing the challenges of managing this patient's presentation, we highlight considerations in imaging interpretation and operative approach that may help the reader manage a similar presentation to their practice. Additionally, we remind the urologist to consider the implications of an ectopic duplex ureter on future procedures, such as transurethral resection of the prostate or radical prostatectomy.
Assuntos
Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Ureter , Cálculos Ureterais , Obstrução Ureteral , Masculino , Humanos , Ureter/diagnóstico por imagem , Ureter/cirurgia , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Uretra/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Cálculos Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgiaRESUMO
This is a case report on a patient with an unusual presentation and clinical course of priapism. It further discusses treatment options with reflection on current literatures and guidelines. 48 year old patient presented with a history of more than 50 episodes of priapism, each lasting for five minutes. Patient had history of brain tumor that was resected and had since been in remission. On examination and further biochemistry assessment revealed conflicting clinical findings, making it difficult to ascertain the type of priapism in this case. The patient, however, recovered from the acute attacks of priapism after 24 hours of conservative management and no obvious cause had been identified on post-discharge follow-up. Priapism, despite being rare, is a medical emergency. This case report reflected upon the limitations of treatment guidelines and the lack of level one evidence to support treatment decisions.