Intrarenal Pressure Measured Using a Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Pressure Sensing Capabilities: A Study of the Effects of Ureteral Access Sheath, Irrigation, and Working Channel Accessories.

Introduction: Intrarenal pressure is emerging as an important monitoring parameter during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). We measure how intraoperative conditions affect intrarenal pressure using a novel pressure sensing ureteroscope. Methods: The LithoVue Elite (LVE) single-use digital flexible ureteroscope (Boston Scientific) is the first commercial ureteroscope that senses pressure at its tip. LVE was used in a porcine model to measure intrarenal pressure with and without a ureteral access sheath (UAS) with various sizes and placement locations, irrigation methods, and working channel accessories. LVE pressure accuracy was measured in a bench model. This abstract shows the least-square means from multiway analysis of variances used for analysis. Results: Intrarenal pressures were the highest without a UAS (64 mm Hg), followed by the 11/13 UAS (51 mm Hg) and the 12/14 and 13/15, which were not statistically different (39-40 mm Hg). The pressures were highest with UASs placed at the ureteropelvic junction (61 mm Hg), and lowest if placed in the renal pelvis (24 mm Hg). Irrigation methods showed the highest pressures with syringe (57 mm Hg), while irrigation bags (pressurized at 150-300 mm Hg) produced 43 to 46 mm Hg and 25 mm Hg when applied with 80 cm of gravity. Placing a 200 µm laser fiber reduced pressures from 44 to 41 mm Hg. Finally, the bench model showed that LVE was 96% accurate up to 300 mm Hg. Conclusion: Intrarenal pressure significantly varied based on UAS sizes, placement, and irrigation methods. Accordingly, fURS with LVE is poised to be an invaluable tool for clinical decision-making and future studies of intrarenal pressure.

Long-term follow-up on dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy: a prospective multicenter trial from the EDGE Research Consortium.

In 2018, the Endourology Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) published a prospective trial comparing dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy. One hundred fifty-nine patients were included in the original analysis, which found no difference in stone-free rate at 3 months. We report the intermediate and long-term outcomes of patients included in the original trial. Two analyses were performed. At 1-year, a retrospective chart review was performed, and data collected on stone episodes, Emergency Department (ED) visits, hospital admissions and surgical interventions. To obtain long-term outcomes, the four sites with the largest initial accrual were included in a second phase of data collection with updated analyses. The patients from those sites were contacted, re-consented, and data were collected on stone surgical interventions, stone episodes, stone recurrences on imaging, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital admissions for stone-related care since their original procedure. One-year follow-up data were collected in 111 of the original 159 (69.8%) patients from the nine sites. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of painful episodes, ED visits, hospital admissions, or surgical interventions. 94 patients from four sites were included in the long-term analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in surgical interventions, painful stone episodes, stone recurrence on imaging, ED visits or hospitalizations for stone-related events between the two groups. Long-term outcomes of dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy indicate that there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two surgical modalities.