RESUMO
The 3rd-7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer had 3 categories for positive lymph nodes (pN1-3) in upper urinary tract carcinomas. The 8th edition removed pN3, defining pN1 as one lymph node with a tumor deposit ≤2 cm and pN2 as a node with a tumor deposit >2 cm or metastases in multiple nodes. The aim of this study was to assess if the current pN categories impact survival in renal pelvic and ureteral carcinomas. Nephroureterectomies performed at our institution for primary upper urinary tract carcinomas between 2010 and 2019 were reviewed. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 73.3% of cases (151/206, median = 9 nodes). Eighty-one (53.6%) patients were deceased at the last review (pN0, 53 [44.5%]; pN1-2, 28 [87.5%]). There was no difference in overall or recurrence-free survival between pN1 and pN2 with 5-year overall survival (95% confidence interval) of pN0, 60.7% (52.0-70.8%); pN1, 15.4% (4.3-35.2%); and pN2, 21.1% (8.8-40.3%). The metastatic deposit size threshold of 2 cm, the number of positive lymph nodes, as well as extranodal extension did not correlate with overall or recurrence-free survival. As such, pN1 and pN2 were grouped together with a 5-year overall survival of 18.8% (9.12-28.6%). The current stratification of upper urinary tract carcinomas into pN1 and pN2 does not provide prognostic information, and both yield a stage IV classification, regardless of pT or pM category. Therefore, we recommend further simplification of pN classification into one category for regional lymph node metastasis, irrespective of the lymph node deposit size or number of positive lymph nodes.
Assuntos
Carcinoma , Sistema Urinário , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Extensão Extranodal/patologia , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Prognóstico , Carcinoma/patologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Linfonodos/patologia , Sistema Urinário/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Excisão de Linfonodo , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
According to the American Joint Cancer Committee, pT3 renal pelvic carcinoma is defined as tumor invading the renal parenchyma and/or peripelvic fat and is the largest pT category, with notable survival heterogeneity. Anatomical landmarks within the renal pelvis can be difficult to discern. Using glomeruli as a boundary to differentiate renal medulla invasion from renal cortex invasion, this study aimed to compare patient survival of pT3 renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma on the basis of the extent of renal parenchyma invasion and, thereafter, determine whether redefining pT2 and pT3 improves pT correlation with survival. Cases with primary renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma were identified through a review of pathology reports from nephroureterectomies completed at our institution from 2010 to 2019 (n = 145). Tumors were stratified by pT, pN, lymphovascular invasion, and invasion of the renal medulla versus invasion of the renal cortex and/or peripelvic fat. Overall survival between groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival models and Cox regression multivariate analysis. pT2 and pT3 tumors had similar 5-year overall survival, with multivariate analysis demonstrating an overlap between hazard ratios (HRs) for pT2 (HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 0.70-6.95) and pT3 (HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.63-6.09). pT3 tumors with peripelvic fat and/or renal cortex invasion had a 3.25-fold worse prognosis than pT3 tumors with renal medulla invasion alone. Furthermore, pT2 and pT3 tumors with only renal medulla invasion had similar overall survival, whereas pT3 tumors with peripelvic fat and/or renal cortex invasion had a worse prognosis (P = .00036). Reclassifying pT3 tumors with only renal medulla invasion as pT2 yielded greater separation between survival curves and HR. Thus, we recommend redefining pT2 renal pelvic carcinoma to include renal medulla invasion and restricting pT3 to peripelvic fat and/or renal cortex invasion to improve the prognostic accuracy of pT classification.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias Renais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are benign, locally aggressive neoplasms that typically affect patients during their first two decades of life. Curettage with or without bone grafting or adjuvants is the current standard treatment; however, other surgical and medical treatments, such as sclerotherapy, have been reported. Treatment options for cervical spine ABCs are more limited because the proximity of ABCs to critical structures leads to greater risk of spontaneous or treatment-related adverse events, including death. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively review all children and young adults with cervical spine ABCs treated with doxycycline sclerotherapy at one referral center to assess its viability as a standalone treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical notes and imaging of 16 patients treated with doxycycline sclerotherapy for pathologically proven cervical spine ABCs at our institution between May 2008 and March 2021. All patients underwent image-guided percutaneous doxycycline sclerotherapy to ablate the ABC and stimulate bone formation. We assessed clinical outcomes through chart review and described post-treatment imaging outcomes using modified Neer scoring. RESULTS: Of the 16 total children and young adults treated, 2 were lost to follow-up, leaving 14 patients with a median age of 14.5 years. Twelve of these 14 patients were successfully treated with doxycycline sclerotherapy for a success rate of 86%. One patient experienced one treatment-related complication (Society of Interventional Radiology [SIR] adverse event classification D), before ultimately being successfully treated. Doxycycline treatment failed in two patients, who then underwent surgical management. Post-treatment imaging of successfully treated cases had a mean modified Neer score of 1.3, whereas post-treatment imaging in failed cases had a mean score of 3.5. CONCLUSION: Doxycycline sclerotherapy is a viable standalone treatment for cervical spine ABCs because it is safe and effective while avoiding the morbidity associated with open surgical treatments.
Assuntos
Cistos Ósseos Aneurismáticos , Doxiciclina , Adolescente , Cistos Ósseos Aneurismáticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Cistos Ósseos Aneurismáticos/terapia , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a benign, locally aggressive tumor that is often challenging to treat. When complete resection is not possible, curettage with or without adjuvants is the most common treatment. The high frequency of local recurrence and risk of injury to adjacent structures can limit this surgical approach, especially with skull and spine lesions. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report 2 cases of axial skeleton GCTs, 1 in the skull of a 58-year-old woman in whom operative management failed, who experienced local recurrence, and 1 in the cervical spine of an 8-year-old girl that grew extracompartmentally to surround her brachial plexus. Both patients were referred to us because of the surgically challenging nature of their tumors. After completion of the same percutaneous doxycycline sclerotherapy protocol previously described for aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs), both patients were considered cured and were able to return to normal activities without loss of pretreatment function. After 4 and 10 years of follow-up, respectively, there has been no tumor recurrence in either patient. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully treated 2 patients with very challenging axial skeleton GCTs using a percutaneous doxycycline sclerotherapy protocol previously shown to have success with ABCs. We believe that this minimally invasive procedure should be considered a potential alternative treatment for GCTs, especially axial skeleton lesions, which may not be easily approached with standard surgical techniques.