Patient Characteristics, Procedural Details, and Outcomes of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Real-World Practice: Insights from Nationwide Thai PCI Registry.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice and outcomes vary substantially in different parts of the world. The contemporary data of PCI in Asia are limited and only available from developed Asian countries. Objectives: To explore the pattern of practice and results of PCI procedures in Thailand as well as a temporal change of PCI practice over time compared with the registry from other countries. Methods: Thai PCI Registry is a prospective nationwide registry that was an initiative of the Cardiac Intervention Association of Thailand (CIAT). All cardiac catheterization laboratories in Thailand were invited to participate during 2018-2019, and consecutive PCI patients were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. Patient baseline characteristics, procedural details, equipment and medication use, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Results: Among the 39 hospitals participated, there were 22,741 patients included in this registry. Their mean age (standard deviation) was 64.2 (11.7) years and about 70% were males. The most common presentation was acute coronary syndrome (57%) with a high proportion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (28%). Nearly two-thirds of patients had multivessel disease and significant left main stenosis was reported in 11%. The transradial approach was used in 44.2%. The procedural success rate was very high (95.2%) despite the high complexity of the lesions (56.9% type C lesion). The incidence of procedural complications was 5.3% and in-hospital mortality was 2.8%. Conclusion: Thai PCI Registry provides further insights into the current practice and outcomes of PCI in Southeast Asia. The success rate was very high, and the complications were very low despite the high complexity of the treated lesions.

The correlation between aortic stiffness and left ventricular mass index in hypertensive patients: a cardiac MRI study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In hypertensive patients, increased left ventricular (LV) mass and impaired aortic stiffness are independent predictors for cardiovascular events. There were some prior studies which established the correlation between left ventricular hypertrophy and aortic stiffness; nevertheless, there are limited data in hypertensive patients. Furthermore, few studies applied cardiac MRI which is a promising technique for LV mass assessment. The authors sought to assess the correlation of LV mass and impaired aortic stiffness, as measured by cardiac MRI. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 113 hypertensive patients (mean age 68.9 +/- 10.3 years, female 51.3%) who underwent cardiac MRI study were enrolled. Left ventricular mass was obtained by summation of multiple slice technique and then calculated into the left ventricular mass index. Aortic stiffness was measured as aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) by distance divided by time delay between mid-ascending and mid-descending aorta. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to determine the correlation of aortic stiffness and left ventricular mass index. RESULTS: Mean left ventricular mass index was 53.39 +/- 18.32 g/m2, mean PWV was 11.72 +/- 5.11 m/s. No correlation was found between PWV and LV mass index (r = 0.085, p-value = 0.37). However aortic stiffness had significant correlation with age (r = 0.469, p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was no significant correlation between LV mass index and aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients. This may be explained by the relatively less severe left ventricular hypertrophy in our patients.