RESUMO
BACKGROUND: With regard to acute stroke, patients with unknown time from stroke onset are not eligible for thrombolysis. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI relative signal intensity (rSI) biomarkers have been introduced to predict eligibility for thrombolysis, but have shown heterogeneous results in the past. In the present work, we investigated whether the inclusion of easily obtainable clinical-radiological parameters would improve the prediction of the thrombolysis time window by rSIs and compared their performance to the visual DWI-FLAIR mismatch. METHODS: In a retrospective study, patients from 2 centers with proven stroke with onset <12 h were included. The DWI lesion was segmented and overlaid on ADC and FLAIR images. rSI mean and SD, were calculated as follows: (mean ROI value/mean value of the unaffected hemisphere). Additionally, the visual DWI-FLAIR mismatch was evaluated. Prediction of the thrombolysis time window was evaluated by the area-under-the-curve (AUC) derived from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Factors such as the association of age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, MRI field strength, lesion size, vessel occlusion and Wahlund-Score with rSI were investigated and the models were adjusted and stratified accordingly. RESULTS: In 82 patients, the unadjusted rSI measures DWI-mean and -SD showed the highest AUCs (AUC 0.86-0.87). Adjustment for clinical-radiological covariates significantly improved the performance of FLAIR-mean (0.91) and DWI-SD (0.91). The best prediction results based on the AUC were found for the final stratified and adjusted models of DWI-SD (0.94) and FLAIR-mean (0.96) and a multivariable DWI-FLAIR model (0.95). The adjusted visual DWI-FLAIR mismatch did not perform in a significantly worse manner (0.89). ADC-rSIs showed fair performance in all models. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative DWI and FLAIR MRI biomarkers as well as the visual DWI-FLAIR mismatch provide excellent prediction of eligibility for thrombolysis in acute stroke, when easily obtainable clinical-radiological parameters are included in the prediction models.
Assuntos
Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Terapia Trombolítica , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Circulação Cerebrovascular , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is an MRI technique to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF) without the need of exogenous contrast agents and is thus a promising alternative to the clinical standard dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion imaging. Latest international guidelines encourage its application in the clinical setting. However, susceptibility-induced image distortions impair ASL with fast readout modules (eg Echo Planar Imaging, EPI; gradient and spin echo, GRASE). In the present study, we investigated the benefit of a distortion correction for ASL compared to DSC. METHODS: A pulsed ASL (PASL) sequence combined with a 3D-GRASE readout at multiple inflow times (multi-TI) was used and was corrected for susceptibility distortions using a FMRIB Software Library (FSL) implemented tool TOPUP. We performed qualitative (three expert raters) and quantitative (volume of interest [VOI]-based) comparisons of ASL and DSC imaging in 13 patients with chronic steno-occlusive disease. RESULTS: In the qualitative analysis, distortion correction of the images led to a strong increase in diagnostic precision of ASL compared to DSC in the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) perfusion territory, where the susceptibility artifact was most pronounced (specificity 8% vs. 75%). In the quantitative analysis, the correlation between ASL and DSC values increased for all perfusion territories with the best improvement for the ACA territory (for anterior, middle and posterior cerebral artery: ACA: rho -0.22 vs. 0.71; MCA: rho 0.58 vs. 0.76; PCA: rho 0.58 vs. 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that susceptibility distortion correction strongly improves the comparability of multi-TI ASL 3D-GRASE to DSC in steno-occlusive disease. We suggest it to be implemented in ASL postprocessing routines.