Implementation of patient priorities-aligned care in a home-based primary care program.

BACKGROUND: Older adults may be limited in their ability to access care that meets their health goals owing to disease burden, financial instability, and psychosocial barriers. A home-based primary care (HBPC) program established in 2020 within a large family medicine practice uses the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach to identify and address patients' health priorities. When incorporated as part of the HBPC model of care, the PPC approach has the potential to enhance person-centered care for older adults in a way that best supports their health goals. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to summarize common recommendations for alignment of care with patients' health outcome goals after implementation of the PPC approach in an HBPC population. METHODS: This retrospective study was exempt from review by an institutional review board. After enrollment in the HBPC program, patients participated in a PPC priorities identification conversation to identify their health outcome goals and care preferences. Through chart review, 2 researchers independently categorized these goals based on the set of values they most reflect: connecting, managing health, enjoying life, and functioning. Aspects of care in place before enrollment in HBPC were considered to determine any adjustments that needed to be made to align care with patients' identified priorities. RESULTS: The most common value associated with patients' most desired health outcome goal was functioning (n = 33, 66%). For secondary and tertiary health outcome goals, the most common value identified was managing health (secondary, n = 28, 56%; tertiary, n = 22, 44%). Common recommendations made to align care with patients' identified priorities included stopping potentially harmful medications, starting medications for untreated conditions, starting physical or occupational therapy, and adjusting medications. CONCLUSION: Through the PPC approach, patients' values were identified and care was assessed to aid in attainment of individualized health outcome goals and tailor care to What Matters most.

Survey of pharmacy students to assess attitudes toward a career in older adult care.

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, the older adult population is growing faster than the geriatrics-trained healthcare workforce. The primary objective of this study was to determine the top factors that increase or decrease pharmacy student interest in seeking a career in geriatrics. METHODS: A 23-item survey was disseminated to 611 first- through fourth-year pharmacy students. Participants were recruited from two public schools of pharmacy in the United States from February through September 2022. Surveys were administered during class or distributed via email and websites for required courses. Participation was voluntary, and responses were anonymous. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, Fisher's exact test, and analysis of variance were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 210 responses were received. Respondents were evenly split between somewhat or extremely interested and somewhat or extremely disinterested in geriatrics. Among those interested, the top factors driving interest were past positive experiences with older adults, interest in deprescribing, and perceived need for geriatrics-trained providers. Among those not interested, the top three factors discouraging interest were emotional impact of death and end-of-life care, disinterest in geriatric syndromes, and perception of inadequate exposure to geriatrics within the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: In order to ensure an adequately trained geriatrics workforce for the aging population, it is crucial to intensify efforts to encourage health profession students to pursue careers in geriatric care. Creating opportunities to increase interest and addressing factors that discourage interest may augment the pipeline of pharmacy students wishing to seek a career specializing in older adult care.

Addressing Healthcare Utilization and Costs for Older Adults with Limited Mobility Through a Multidisciplinary Home-Based Primary Care Program.

INTRODUCTION: Home-based primary care (HBPC) has shown promise in the management of multiple chronic conditions for patients who are homebound or who have limited mobility. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate an HBPC program that integrates the services of clinical pharmacists and community aging services providers in a community-based setting. METHODS: Mountain Area Health Education Center's (MAHEC) HBPC program brought together an interdisciplinary team including medical providers, pharmacists, and community aging services providers to conduct home visits with older adults (age 50+). A single-arm, prepost analysis was conducted to determine differences from the year before program enrollment to the year postenrollment. We examined the frequency of health care visits, high-cost health care utilization (emergency department [ED] utilization and hospitalizations), and health care costs. Descriptive statistics characterized the study population and outcomes. Fisher's Exact Tests were used to determine if there was a significant difference between years. RESULTS: There were 130 home visits with 62 patients enrolled in the program. The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) was completed for 32 (51.6%) patients. There were 13 (21.0%) and 12 (19.4%) individuals who had at least 1 ED visit and hospitalization, respectively, pre-enrollment as compared with 8 (12.9%) and 9 (14.5%) individuals postenrollment (p-value = 0.05, p-value = 0.06). During the postenrollment year, patient enrollees had an average per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost of $1567.96 as compared with $3053.21 in the year prior. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist and community agency services-integrated HBPC was implemented in the community setting. There was a decrease in high-cost health care utilization and total health care expenditures for patients as compared with the previous year.

Pharmacist Identification of Older Patients' Priorities in a Home-Based Primary Care Program.

Background Patient Priorities Care (PPC) aims to identify and integrate patient goals and preferences into health care decision-making to provide more personalized care for multimorbid older individuals. Home-based primary care (HBPC) is a model of care delivery that supports aging in place. HBPC-integrated pharmacists can identify patient priorities and communicate with the team to ensure care is aligned with what matters most. Objectives Evaluate patients' perceptions of having priorities identification conversations with the pharmacist; identify the value domains represented by patients' health outcome goals. Setting HBPC program at a large family medicine practice where pharmacists are core members of the interdisciplinary team. Intervention Pharmacists led priorities identification conversations for patients newly enrolled in HBPC. Care preferences and health outcome goals were documented in the medical record and communicated during HBPC team meetings. Design This was a prospective, observational study of HBPC enrollees. After the priorities identification conversation, a three-question survey was administered to identify patients' perceptions of the conversation and interaction with the pharmacist. Health outcome goals and care preference statements were reviewed to determine with which value domain(s) they most aligned. Descriptive statistics were used for results analysis. Results Pharmacists led conversations with 30 participants. Average overall satisfaction with the conversation was 4.6 on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = least, 5 = most satisfied). Ninety-three percent of patients felt it was appropriate to have a pharmacist lead these conversations. Ninety-seven percent believed it was important/very important to discuss their values and goals with their health care team. The predominant value domains represented were Managing Health (43%) and Functioning (40%). Conclusion Patients were mostly satisfied with having PPC conversations and felt it was appropriate for a pharmacist to lead these conversations. Managing health conditions and preserving function were the most frequent value domains associated with patients' goals and care preferences.

Pharmacy student attitudes towards a career in older adult care.

INTRODUCTION: The United States (US) health care workforce is significantly unprepared to meet the needs of the growing older adult population. The primary purpose of this study is to examine the reasons that current pharmacy students are interested or not interested in pursuing a career or postgraduate training in geriatrics and to evaluate factors that influence this choice. METHODS: This is a qualitative study utilizing focus groups of pharmacy students from the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum of one public school of pharmacy in the US. Student pharmacists were invited to participate in the focus groups, and focused interviews were conducted by two postgraduate year two geriatric residents. Each discussion was audio recorded and subsequently transcribed, extracting key factors through open thematic coding. RESULTS: Focus group participants (n = 8) most commonly identified job security, relationship value add, and past positive experiences with older adults as encouraging factors promoting interest, and inadequate geriatric exposure, emotional impact of death and dying, and heightened professional liability as discouraging factors deterring interest in a career in geriatrics. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing early exposure to geriatric patients and pharmacists, emphasizing common geriatric considerations in the PharmD curriculum, and increasing specialized older adult and end of life content could encourage more student pharmacists to seek careers in geriatrics.

The Social Bridging Project: Intergenerational Phone-Based Connections With Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Millions of Americans aged 65+ are socially isolated and millions more report feeling lonely. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults were compounded by stay-at-home orders and other COVID-19 prevention measures. Although many Americans experienced no difficulties transitioning to the use of electronic devices as their primary means of communication and connection, some older adults were not similarly able to espouse this shift. Our aim was to reduce the impact of social isolation on older adults, increase their comfort in expressing feelings of loneliness, and assist them in acquiring technology skills and accessing telehealth and community supports. Participants received wellness calls for conversation, resource access and technology-based support. Most participants reported decreased loneliness and increased connectedness after the calls; half reported increased ease in expressing their feelings. Programs that provide phone-based support for older adults may reduce loneliness and increase social connectedness.

The current state of geriatric pharmacy education in the United States - A cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns exist that the current health care workforce is underprepared to meet the needs of the aging American population. This study evaluated the current emphasis on geriatrics in doctor of pharmacy curricula. METHODS: A 61-item web-based survey was distributed to associate deans with oversight of pharmacy curricula at all United States (US) schools and colleges of pharmacy (S/COP). Information collected included school demographics, employment of geriatrics faculty, geriatric education (required, elective, and experiential courses), co-curricular geriatric experiences, postgraduate residency training in geriatrics, student interest in geriatrics, and perception of preparedness of the profession to care for older adults. RESULTS: Of responding S/COP, 35% required a course in geriatrics while 63% offered a geriatrics elective. An advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) in geriatrics was required by 14%, and 79% offered an elective APPE. Insufficient curricular emphasis on geriatrics was noted by 44% of responding schools, and 33% lacked confidence that the profession of pharmacy is adequately prepared to care for the aging population. CONCLUSIONS: According to the survey respondents, most pharmacy schools do not have a required didactic course or APPE in geriatrics. Additional emphasis on foundational principles of medication management for older adults in pharmacy curricula is warranted to meet the health care needs of the rapidly aging US population.

Evaluation of the need for a fracture liaison service in a patient-centered medical home.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the need for a fracture liaison service (FLS) based on postfracture care in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). METHODS: Patients in a PCMH who presented to a local 763-bed community teaching hospital with fragility fracture of the hip, spine, or forearm between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014, were identified using ICD-9 codes. A retrospective chart review of inpatient and outpatient medical records 2 years before the fracture and 1 year afterward was conducted. The primary outcome was dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan utilization or pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis 6 months after fracture. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two patients were identified, and 75 patients were included in the analysis. The median age of the cohort was 84 years, and 70.7% of patients were white women. Fragility fractures included hip fracture (42.7%), vertebral fracture (40.0%), and forearm fracture (17.3%). Six months after fracture, 30.7% of patients were prescribed prescription therapy for osteoporosis, and 6.7% had received a DXA scan. Although nearly all patients had a follow-up visit in the PCMH during the year after fracture, only 8.3% were seen in an established osteoporosis clinic. Twenty-three percent of patients were deceased at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: More patients in this PCMH received a DXA scan or pharmacotherapy, or both, for osteoporosis 6 months after fragility fracture than observed nationally. However, approximately 70% of patients were undertreated. Incorporating principles of an FLS into an existing osteoporosis clinic is warranted.

Physician perceptions of integrating advanced practice pharmacists into practice.

OBJECTIVES: Barriers have prevented full integration of advanced practice pharmacists (APPs) into collaborative practice in some areas despite evidence describing their value. APPs in North Carolina can be recognized as Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners (CPPs) under a collaborative practice agreement and provide comprehensive medication management under physician supervision. This study describes the perceptions of physicians regarding the barriers and benefits of integrating CPPs into interprofessional teams and compares physician and CPP perceptions. METHODS: This prospective descriptive study surveyed CPP supervising physicians in North Carolina. The questionnaire consisted of 17 multiple-choice and free-response questions. Questions included demographics, perceived benefits and challenges of incorporating CPPs into health care teams, and services provided by CPPs. Findings were compared with previously published data that assessed CPP perceptions about the same topics to gain insight into common perspectives of team members. RESULTS: Fifty-six physicians (23.1%) responded, identifying enhanced clinical outcomes (87.5%), access to drug knowledge (58.9%), and creation of a multidisciplinary model for learners (57.1%) as the top benefits of working with CPPs. Primary barriers included limited reimbursement (60.7%) and billing difficulties (51.8%). More CPPs acknowledged provider acceptance as a barrier (25.9% vs. 3.6%; P = 0.001). Twelve physicians (21.4%) and no CPPs identified space as a barrier. CONCLUSION: Physicians identified enhanced clinical outcomes, access to drug knowledge, and creation of a multidisciplinary model for learners as the top benefits of incorporating CPPs into teams, and billing difficulties and limited reimbursement were the primary barriers. These findings were similar to the perceptions of CPPs, with exceptions being that physicians were more concerned about space limitations and CPPs noted that provider acceptance may be difficult. These findings may provide guidance to providers desiring to establish collaborative practice.

Improved Utilization of Preventive Services Among Patients Following Team-Based Annual Wellness Visits.

BACKGROUND The Annual Wellness Visit was designed to enhance preventive services utilization among Medicare beneficiaries; Annual Wellness Visits are underutilized with sparse documented effectiveness. Patients of 3 community-based and 2 retirement community outpatient clinics in western North Carolina had team-based Annual Wellness Visits over a 20-month program, with the goal of improving the uptake and delivery of the Annual Wellness Visit. A clinical pharmacist saw high-complexity patients (≥5 medications) and a licensed practical nurse saw low-complexity patients. We examined the effectiveness of team-based Annual Wellness Visits on patients' use of preventive services.METHOD We conducted a retrospective chart review on a random sample of 500 patients for 12 months post-Annual Wellness Visit. Change over time in use of preventive services was assessed using McNemar's test. Adjusted relative risks of use within 6 months were calculated using generalized linear models with the Poisson loglinear function.RESULTS Overall, utilization of Annual Wellness Visit increased from 14% at baseline to 44% after the 20-month program. The percentage of patients up-to-date with all recommended services increased from 17.4% at the Annual Wellness Visit to 42% within 6 months. Age-appropriate preventive screens and vaccines demonstrated the most improvement (55.8% to 75.4% and 36% to 52.2%, respectively). Community-based patients were less likely to obtain recommended services (RR = 0.618; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.442-0.865), while patients with supplemental insurance (RR = 1.484; 95% CI, 1.023-2.153), patients seen in subsequent Annual Wellness Visits (RR = 1.405; 95% CI, 1.062-1.858), and patients who were men (RR = 1.422; 95% CI, 1.053-2.041) were more likely to obtain recommended services.LIMITATIONS Generalization is limited by the pre-/post design of one organizational model.CONCLUSION Team-based Annual Wellness Visits with a clinical pharmacist or an LPN, who were supervised by physicians, were associated with significantly improved utilization of preventive services. Use will likely continue to improve as more patients access team-based Annual Wellness Visits yearly.

Provision of annual wellness visits with comprehensive medication management by a clinical pharmacist practitioner.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness and financial benefit of pharmacist-led annual wellness visits (AWVs) in conjunction with comprehensive medication management (CMM) for older, high-risk patients were examined. METHODS: Eligible patients were 65 years of age or older with three or more chronic medical conditions, taking five or more long-term prescription or nonprescription medications and receiving primary care in a retirement community clinic. The intervention involved two components, an AWV and CMM. The AWV included all Medicare-required components. All participants saw a clinical pharmacist practitioner for an AWV with CMM and additional CMM visits at three and six months. Outcomes included completion of required AWV components, prevalence of medication-related problems (MRPs), classic return on investment, patient satisfaction, and change in rate of hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 60 eligible patients contacted, 53 (88%) agreed to participate. Patients' mean ± S.D. age was 82.1 ± 5.5 years, and patients used a median of 12 medications (range, 5-27) at baseline. The pharmacist identified at least 1 MRP in 90.6% of patients at the AWV; all patients had at least 1 MRP identified over six months. A total of 278 MRPs were identified: suboptimal drug (32.7%), insufficient therapeutic monitoring (25.2%), undertreatment of chronic condition (16.9%), and suboptimal dose, frequency, or administration (15.8%). Revenue generated by the pharmacist exceeded costs by 38.1%. The rate of hospitalizations did not significantly change after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists played a beneficial role in the provision of both AWVs and CMM, facilitating the completion of wellness visits and identifying and addressing MRPs in an older, high-risk population.

Interprofessional care for patients with osteoporosis in a continuing care retirement community.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of care provided to patients with osteoporosis in a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) after implementation of an interprofessional osteoporosis clinic (OPC). Specifically, quality measures were evaluated, including dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and prescription treatment of osteoporosis and low bone mass in an ambulatory independent living community. SETTING: Large family medicine teaching practice that provides primary care for residents in one main practice, 5 rural satellite practices, and 2 CCRCs. An interprofessional OPC was developed at the main practice in 2005. Patients at all of the organization's sites could be referred to the main practice for osteoporosis management. A needs assessment conducted at one of the CCRCs in 2011 revealed that rates of screening and treatment were suboptimal for its residents despite availability of an off-site OPC. PRACTICE INNOVATION: In 2012, a new interprofessional OPC including a physician, medical assistant, and pharmacist was replicated on-site at the CCRC so that residents had access to this service within their medical home. EVALUATION: Quality measures were evaluated after implementation of the team-based OPC on-site at a CCRC and included: 1) DXA screening; 2) calcium and vitamin D supplementation; and 3) prescription treatment of osteoporosis and low bone mass. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were seen in the new OPC from January 2012 to August 2013. Ninety-three percent had appropriate DXA testing after OPC implementation. Patients accepted pharmacist recommendations regarding calcium and vitamin D supplementation 90% and 86% of the time, respectively. All but 4 patients received appropriate treatment for osteoporosis or low bone mass. CONCLUSION: Providing a team-based OPC on site in a CCRC improved quality measures for screening and treatment of osteoporosis and low bone mass.