Nuclear Beta-Catenin Expression in Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia (Atypical Hyperplasia) Does Not Predict Carcinoma on Subsequent Hysterectomy.

Beta-catenin (BC) mutations are associated with a high risk of recurrence in otherwise low-grade, early-stage uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Recent literature suggests nuclear BC expression by immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for BC mutations. The significance of BC expression in endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN/atypical hyperplasia) and its relationship to altered differentiation patterns in EIN has yet to be fully explored. Cases meeting current diagnostic criteria for EIN based on H&E examination were obtained from 2 institutions (years 1999-2014). Patterns of altered differentiation (eg, tubal, squamous morular metaplasia, mucinous, secretory) were noted. Representative blocks were stained for BC, and expression patterns recorded. Follow-up and demographic data was obtained from the electronic medical record. Ninety-six cases were included (84 biopsies, 12 hysterectomies). BC nuclear expression was identified in 41 cases (42.7%), with 33 of 41 demonstrating foci of nonmorular BC staining. BC staining in any component of EIN was not significantly associated with the presence of carcinoma on subsequent hysterectomy (P=0.79). When restricting to nonmorular BC, the results were the same (P=0.56). Cases with tubal differentiation were significantly less likely to demonstrate nonmorular BC than cases with no specific pattern of differentiation (P<0.01). EIN frequently demonstrates BC nuclear positivity, especially in cases without tubal differentiation. BC nuclear expression in EIN does not appear to be associated with an increased likelihood of carcinoma on subsequent hysterectomy. Our results do not support routine use of BC immunohistochemistry as a prognostic biomarker in cases of EIN.

Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.

PURPOSE: This study investigated how genome sequencing results affect health behaviors, affect, and communication. METHODS: We report on 29 participants who received a sequence result in the ClinSeq study, a cohort of well-educated, postreproductive volunteers. A mixed-methods design was used to explore respondents' use, communication, and perceived utility of results. RESULTS: Most participants (72%) shared their result with at least one health-care provider, and 31% reported subsequent changes in the health care they received. Participants scored high on the Positive Experiences subscale and low on the Distress subscale of a modified version of the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment. The majority (93%) shared their result with at least one family member. Participants described deriving personal utility from their results. CONCLUSION: This article is the first to describe research participants' reactions to actionable sequencing results. Our findings suggest clinical and personal benefit from receiving sequencing results, both of which may contribute to improved health for the recipients. Given the participants' largely positive or neutral affective responses and disclosure of their results to physicians and relatives, health-care providers should redirect concern from the potential for distress and attend to motivating patients to follow their medical recommendations.Genet Med 18 6, 577-583.

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the implications of sequencing information and stated preferences for return of results among research participants. METHODS: Six focus groups were held with 39 ClinSeq participants. The groups included participants who had received results, those who had not, those affected with cardiovascular disease, and healthy adults. Audio recordings of the sessions were transcribed and coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS: All participants expressed interest in receiving results that are medically actionable, nonactionable, carrier, and less so variants that cannot be interpreted. Most participants preferred to receive results in person, although several endorsed use of Internet-based resources that they could return to. Participants identified benefits for health management along with satisfying curiosity, making scientific contributions, and partnering in research. Value was seen in gaining control over health risks. Concerns were distress and/or fear that may result. Some participants were opposed to or ambivalent about learning certain types of results, particularly those having to do with diseases that were incurable or that might have implications for the health of their children. CONCLUSION: There was relative enthusiasm about the value of learning sequencing information, yet it was tempered by concern about negative feeling responses and aversion to learning about incurable conditions.