Potential synergistic effects of cranial radiotherapy and atezolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of individual patient data from seven prospective trials.

Background: The impact of cranial radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) of patients with brain metastasis (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors remains unclear. We aimed to examine the effect of previous cranial RT on the efficacy and neurological toxicity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. Methods: Patient-level data from seven prospective trials involving atezolizumab for the treatment of NSCLC [BIRCH (NCT02031458), FIR (NCT01846416), IMpower130 (NCT02367781), IMpower131 (NCT02367794), IMpower150 (NCT02366143), OAK (NCT02008227), and POPLAR (NCT01903993)] were pooled. Patients with baseline BM were divided into two subgroups based on previous cranial RT before initiation of treatment: patients with previously irradiated BM (iBM) and patients with non-irradiated BMs (niBM). Results: The per-protocol population consisted of 4,714 patients, including 3,176 in the atezolizumab group and 1,538 in the comparator chemotherapy group. In the atezolizumab group, OS was better in patients with BM (n=308) compared to patients without BM (n=2,868) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.98; P=0.028]. Among patients with BM, patients with iBM (n=280) had a numerically longer OS (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.41-1.07; P=0.090) than those with niBM (n=28). Intriguingly, OS was longer in patients with iBM than those without BM before (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70-0.99; P=0.043) and after (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.32-0.49; P<0.0001) propensity score matching, while OS was similar between patients with niBM and those without BM. The survival advantage of patients with iBM over those without BM was not observed in the chemotherapy group. Atezolizumab-related serious neurological adverse events occurred in 16 (0.6%) patients without BM, none in those with niBM, and 2 (0.7%) patients with iBM. Conclusions: These data suggest potential synergistic effects of cranial RT and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in NSCLC patients, which warrants further validation.

Organ Preservation and Survival by Clinical Response Grade in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the OPRA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Assessing clinical tumor response following completion of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is paramount to select patients for watch-and-wait treatment. Objective: To assess organ preservation (OP) and oncologic outcomes according to clinical tumor response grade. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma trial, a phase 2, nonblinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Randomization occurred between April 2014 and March 2020. Eligible participants included patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma. Data analysis occurred from March 2022 to July 2023. Intervention: Patients were randomized to induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed 8 (±4) weeks after TNT by digital rectal examination and endoscopy and categorized by clinical tumor response grade. A 3-tier grading schema that stratifies clinical tumor response into clinical complete response (CCR), near complete response (NCR), and incomplete clinical response (ICR) was devised to maximize patient eligibility for OP. Main Outcomes and Measures: OP and survival rates by clinical tumor response grade were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: There were 304 eligible patients, including 125 patients with a CCR (median [IQR] age, 60.6 [50.4-68.0] years; 76 male [60.8%]), 114 with an NCR (median [IQR] age, 57.6 [49.1-67.9] years; 80 male [70.2%]), and 65 with an ICR (median [IQR] age, 55.5 [47.7-64.2] years; 41 male [63.1%]) based on endoscopic imaging. Age, sex, tumor distance from the anal verge, pathological tumor classification, and clinical nodal classification were similar among the clinical tumor response grades. Median (IQR) follow-up for patients with OP was 4.09 (2.99-4.93) years. The 3-year probability of OP was 77% (95% CI, 70%-85%) for patients with a CCR and 40% (95% CI, 32%-51%) for patients with an NCR (P < .001). Clinical tumor response grade was associated with disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, most patients with a CCR after TNT achieved OP, with few developing tumor regrowth. Although the probability of tumor regrowth was higher for patients with an NCR compared with patients with a CCR, a significant proportion of patients achieved OP. These findings suggest the 3-tier grading schema can be used to estimate recurrence and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who receive TNT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02008656.

Durvalumab and PET-Directed Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase Ib/II Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of adding the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant induction FOLFOX followed by positron emission tomography (PET) directed chemoradiation has demonstrated improved survival for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There is clear benefit now for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors both in early and advanced stage disease. Given these results we investigated the safety and efficacy of adding durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma received PET-directed chemoradiation with durvalumab before esophagectomy. Patients who had R0 resections received adjuvant durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks for 6 treatments. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response. RESULTS: We enrolled 36 patients, 33 of whom completed all preoperative treatment and underwent surgery. Preoperative treatment was well tolerated, with no delays to surgery nor new safety signals. Pathologic complete response was identified in 8 [22% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 13.3%)] patients with major pathologic response in 22 [61% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 50%)] patients. Twelve and 24-month overall survival was 92% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed chemoradiotherapy before surgery is safe, with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data.

Safety of stereotactic ablative body radiation for ultracentral stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Recent data suggests that "ultra-central" tumors, generally defined as those abutting the proximal airways, are at particularly high risk for severe complications when treated with stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR). However, this association has not been consistently demonstrated across reports, possibly due to small numbers, varying definitions of "ultra-central", and the lack of prospective data. New evidence suggests that exposure to VEGF-inhibiting agents may potentiate SABR toxicity and may partially explain the disproportionately high incidence of fatal complications in some reports. Efforts are underway to identify dose-volume limits that can predict complications involving central structures such as the proximal airways, heart, esophagus, and great vessels. The optimal dose for ultra-central SABR has not been determined, though there is a trend towards using more highly fractionated regimens. Further research into the safety of SABR for ultra-central tumors is needed, given the lack of other effective local therapy options for this clinical scenario.

Potential for Interfraction Motion to Increase Esophageal Toxicity in Lung SBRT.

PURPOSE: To characterize the effect of the relative motion of esophagus and tumor on radiation doses to the esophagus in patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for central lung tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy in 10 patients with lung tumors within 2.5 cm of the esophagus were reviewed. The esophagus was delineated on each treatment's cone-beam computed tomography scan and compared to its position on the planning scan. Dose-volume histograms were calculated using the original treatment beams to determine the actual dose delivered to the esophagus for each fraction of stereotactic body radiation therapy. RESULTS: Median interfraction right-left shift of the esophagus was 0.9 mm (range, -5.4 to 3.3 mm) toward the left. Median interfraction anteroposterior shift was 0.7 mm (range, -3.7 to 11.5 mm) posteriorly. The median percentage increase in dose to 1 cm3, dose to 3.5 cm3, and dose to 5 cm3 was 1.7%, 5.6%, and 6.6%, respectively. Two cases of significant late esophageal toxicity were observed, with change in esophageal position relative to the planning target volume resulting in significantly higher D5cc values than anticipated. CONCLUSION: Interfraction shifts between the internal target volume and esophagus can lead to unanticipated increases in the volume of esophagus receiving high doses when treating central lung tumors with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Certain practical steps, such as considering deep breath hold for internal target volume reduction, using a planning risk volume for esophagus, and carefully visualizing and considering esophageal position at the time of stereotactic body radiation therapy, can be taken to minimize unanticipated dose increases that could cause unexpected esophageal toxicity.